User talk:Academic Challenger

Archives

1. Archive 1
2. Archive 2
3. Archive 3
4. Archive 4
5. archive 5
6. Archive 6
7. Archive 7
8. Archive 8
9. Archive 9
10. Archive 10

Hi. I created this account so many years ago. now I want to change the name of my profile from "Cheposo" to Risantana how can I make a change of name of my account or profile? help please. I hope you can help me with this.

--Cheposo (talk) 13:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you edited the Hilaire Belloc page with the addition of a quote from the poem "The Catholic Sun" on 15 Dec 2008. I have not been able to find a source for that widely quoted poem. It's not in the Duckworth 1970 H. Belloc: Complete Verse and I wondered if you did have a firm attribution for "The Catholic Sun." Thanks. JohnGHissong (talk) 09:13, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Academic Challenger, I found out that you are one of the English Wikipedia Administratos and I've decided to write to you about one irritant user, it's User:Dag13. Please visit his page and review it, I'm really interesting if it is forbidden or not to behave like him. I don't know maybe I also violated some rules, but maybe. If you found out, tell me about them I'll be pleased, I am not well in English Wikipedia rules, but I think what he does it's excessive and trespass. Thank you. --g. balaxaZeႫ 19:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Has been dealt with by another admin. Thanks. --Roxy the dog (resonate) 10:15, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, seeing as you are an active English Wikipedia Administrator, I was wondering if there was anyway you could share with me the contents of a deleted Wikipedia page since only admins & a few others have that ability. Please let me know if this would be possible! Thanks. --LSUkingfish (talk) 09:02, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Academic Challenger. You probably don't remember me; it has been awhile. I've been updating my userspace and I still see the notice you left from when you protected it for me many years ago. I was swinging by and was pleasantly surprised to see some recent editing activity. Does this mean you're back? Mkdw^talk 06:35, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am a Ph.D. student and I am doing research on Wikipedia Vandalism and vandalism in general. Is there a way to access the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Slashdot_trolls. It shows that you have deleted the page. Also, is there a way to get all the wikipedia users who are considered to be vandals? Is there a list anywhere? Thanks Srijan (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Srijankedia) 24 Feb 2014.

I created a account on Wikiquote and brought it over here on accident. It is called Dedicator20. It was done on complete accident and I assure you that I did not intend to create a sock puppet. I am telling you this because I do not want this matter to be guessed or otherwise assumed by any persons, so I am coming right out and admitting the mistake. Informant16 — Preceding undated comment added 18:09, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Academic Challenger. I've just restored your talk page after vandalism by this user and have reported that single-purpose account. Hope you're okay with my intervention. Cheers! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Academic Challenger! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Academic_Challenger,

I am new to Wikipedia (I just created an account today.) I will be going over the rules to write the article properly etc... and will be redacting the page you deleted. You deleted the page on grounds of Copyright infringement. However, I own the Copyright. I'll be back to read over how to write my first article and go from there. Thanks for your help.

Best,

StarLordGuardian

How are you Academic_Challenger? I hope all is well. Thank you for all that you do to keep this community in good standing. Basically, I am puzzled on some other articles that weren't deleted. I actually had a recent article being removed due to issue with promotion and such but I have also seen others who are doing the same but they're still visible and active. I am just wondering if there is some kind of a point system or level of the account registered or something like that to possibly avail the same kind of privilege? I know this is really not a good place to promote or something but I don't think anyone will just post an article here in Wikipedia that is not helpful. I am sure the contents suggested/submitted are, in one way or another, beneficial if not to everyone but at least, I'm sure, 30 people out of the 100 will find it significant. Lastly, I hope it is possible to bring back the page I created that was just removed. :) If it's not, I would be very careful next time and hopefully my article will be approved. This is it for now. Thanks again and take care. --SaryaS90 (talk) 10:16, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fatoumata Kaba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable UN staff member

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:04, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect English teacher. Since you had some involvement with the English teacher redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 06:38, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Academic Challenger. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Academic Challenger.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Academic Challenger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

Hello, Academic Challenger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Presidential candidate. Since you had some involvement with the Presidential candidate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:44, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

....sorry to drop in here, but actually I do not understand why you protected the article; we had two instances of vandalism today, and no edits at all to the article since July 5th before that. Don't get me wrong, but I really see no case for protection...unless there is something I do not see? Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 19:47, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both that article and Badi Dooooor Se Aaye Hai have been the targets of a rather devout fan who fervently believes the show will continue. This has been going on for quite a few months. When they first started, I did some basic research (I'm not from India and not familiar with the show) and was able to find several mentions that the show was not restarting, no plans to restart and some obstacles existed. The IP bounces across multiple wide ranges, so a range-block isn't a possibility. Normally I just revert and am done with it, but when the IP edits more frequently, semi-protection is much easier on me and often stops them for a decent amount of time. I'll respect your decision on this, but will request again in a few days if they persist. Ravensfire (talk) 20:31, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say pending-changes protection should actually do the trick. Persistent the disruption might be....but yes, in olden times I would have said "just watchlist and revert", and not protected. I still like the fact that Wikipedia is the "Encyclopedia that everyone can edit"; if not, we could just semi-protect all the pages (which is actually a perennial proposal), and be done with it. In this case, it seems a bit like shooting with cannon on sparrows. Anyway, it just caught my eye because I had just denied another RFP-request by User:Ravensfire. I will not insist on any change, though. Cheers everyone. Lectonar (talk) 07:07, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there how are you? you may have to take a look at the editing history of Georgepodros, several users have been busy reverting his edits, thank you. Redman19 (talk) 14:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The user seems to be inactive, I will keep you updated when necessary, kind regards. Redman19 (talk) 09:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 18:24, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Academic Challenger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chronic flatulence. Since you had some involvement with the Chronic flatulence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Academic Challenger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Academic Challenger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you closing AFD discussions as delete before the 7-day voting period is up? WP:CLOSEAFD says A deletion discussion should normally be allowed to run for seven full days (168 hours)., and you don't appear to be invoking WP:SNOW in a close rationale. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mea culpa - I should have explicitly invoked WP:SNOW in my close rationale. You're correct that this was my reasoning as the AfDs I closed had a strong consensus in one direction. Thanks for the reminder about WP:CLOSEAFD. Happy editing, Academic Challenger (talk) 23:40, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Academic Challenger,

May I know why Fawzal Number has been delete without giving me chance and time to defend it? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Fawzal_number

Please enlighten me on which part it is not following the guideline? All of the reason given for deletion was not convincing. The work has been peer-reviewed by the professionals namely: (1) Three academic reviewers from the IEEE community. They have a strict rule in publication yet has a high impact factor. (2) Three reviewers from Applied Thermal Engineering coming from the various background. (3) The work has been defended in front of experts in flow physics and electrical machine design. Additionally, this work was supervised by four academicians and one industry expert. The four academician has and expertise in: electrical machine, computational fluid dynamic and vehicle dynamic while the industry expert is the founder of YASA topology.

If you look at other dimensionless numbers, you can apply the same comment given by people who vote for my deletion (i.e: reliable source coverage to demonstrate notability User:PohranicniStraze, Insufficient uptake in the literature User:Elmidae, Not enough coverage User:Kraose) 1) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake_number 2) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chandrasekhar_number I am not saying that these two dimensionless numbers are not valid, but my point is, I wish you could have some justice and allow for the room of discussion before making a judgement.

I am waiting for your reply. Thank you. Fawzala (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Night of Silence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable song.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:19, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Night of Silence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night of Silence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete this article, more detail below. <ref>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Amity-enmity_complex</ref>[[User:Udihgi|Udihgi]] ([[User talk:Udihgi|talk]]) 02:16, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:17, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! Nine-thousand plus pages?! Incredible. Kudos! Here's the quote from your User Page Awards sub section: "The Editor's Barnstar For removing 9000+ unencyclopedically unworthy pages from Wikipedia and helping to keep the encyclopedia in a healthy state - As a new admin, I can certainly attest to the unappetizing nature of this hard work (clearing CSD). Regards, Blnguyen" .. Chuckle .. I almost pasted in a screenshot crop of this quote to the Facebook messenger group chat we have going with @DrMel: but well.. You're a member of wiki blind, so.. that wouldn't be such a great idea :) smiley icon.. *wink wink* .. Hugs from your new pal, Peter, aka Vid2vid (talk) 21:17, 28 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Your words are truly appreciated Vid2vid! Academic Challenger (talk) 00:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pennylvania. Since you had some involvement with the Pennylvania redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:02, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mike Siegel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not appear to be a notable individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:56, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Siegel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Siegel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:13, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In my opinion, the status of the unrecognized Republic of Artsakh article is incorrect. If the state does not recognize it, the country to which it belongs must also be written in its status. For example, unrecognized Abkhazia, South Ossetia, and Transnistria are not like Arsakh in the article. Arsakh's status was written by three non-UN member states. Sorry, is this important? Does it matter? However, they are unrecognized separatist organizations. Even four countries have recognized the independence of those separatist organizations. But Arsakh was not recognized by any state. Excuse me, why isn't the Republic of Artsakh article the same as the 3 unrecognized states article? Don't you think this is a double standard? Sword313 (talk) 00:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just hello @Academic Challenger: - oh man, not a fan at ALLLLLLL of userID's with a space in them, having come from a Unix/Linux background but oh well. Oh my god, these two Wood Ducks I think, on your user page, are gorgeous. I wish you could see them. Are you partially sighted? Hugs and happy holidays Skylar to you and Yours. --From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 00:31, 17 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Aha, the ducks are either Wood Ducks, Ruddy Ducks, or Common Merganser. I google images'ed (verb) it lol. Sending my best my Friend. Look forward to meeting you once the COVID-19 vaccine is in full swing, maybe summer 2021! --From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 00:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC).[reply]

	It’s a maze of twisty passages all around here. Sometimes, it’s hard to feel appreciated, and you deserve some love! This Heart-shaped Labyrinth is to say Thank YOU for all your hard work. I appreciate you being here - I really do - and so do these peeps!
	You can also share some wikiKind wikiLove by adding {{subst:Heart Labyrinth}} to any talk page with your own message.

with love always, DrMel (talk) 01:49, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ps - I’m sending you one of these in the mail! DrMel (talk) 07:04, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Draft:Skylar Covich has been created. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 02:43, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Academic Challenger, Thank you for your message and your concern about Marcus Sheridan. I left the following response on my own "talk" page, but I'm not sure if I was supposed to leave it on your page as well, so I'm taking the liberty of doing so. I was not compensated directly or indirectly to create this page. Instead, I am trying to become an active contributor here, and I am starting with people and organizations I know best. Please let me know what I can do to set things right. Thanks so much. Uxh76 (talk) 21:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am here to give you a heads up on an potential threat, on the article for Omar Mateen there was a pending revision by the IP address 38.142.176.26 stating this: "(OPENLY DEGRADING AN AMERICAN CITIZEN OF MUSLIM FAITH BY STATING HOMESEXUAL TENDENCIES AND ACTS, COMPLETELY UNTRUE AND PATHETIC. CHANGE THIS IMMEDIATELY OR I WILL ATTACK WIKI AND DELETE ALL FILES.)". I am sure that this threat by the user is empty but I thought that I should go ahead and alert an admin either way just incase. Discount Horde (talk) 14:48, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whoa, what? And hello, you have a Wikipedia login, you can edit the article yourself. Would you like pointers how to do so? -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 18:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Corzine, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 06:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-socialist and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 14#Anti-socialist until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello hello there Skylar - long time no talk - just saw a Facebook messenger pop-up that you were active right now; how is your new position or job going? We miss you on the Facebook Messenger / S.D. or San Diego or so-Cal wiki messenger instant message group. Hope all is well with you. I think we're going to try to start up having a once-monthly / slash / every month, 40 or 42 minutes Zoom online video chat to catch up about all things related to Wikipedia or wikimedia or wiki in general, and I would love for you to be a part of those; we're probably going to have it on a Saturday or a Sunday at some point - would you like to be invited if I hear about it? Again hope all is great with you. -From Peter {a.k.a. Vid2vid (talk | contribs)} 18:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An anonymous user using an IP address changed Libya's Chairman of the Presidential Council to "Rawad Derbal", and I have no proof and barely have any existence of the Rawad Derbal guy. Please warn or block him. Thanks. Icantthinkofanamexd (talk) 09:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jorge Briz Abularach has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Arlen Specter has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 01:31, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ted Schwinden, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 09:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kiro Gligorov, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that under the rule of the first Macedonian president, Kiro Gligorov (pictured), the Republic of Macedonia was the only state that seceded from Yugoslavia peacefully? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kiro Gligorov. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kiro Gligorov), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect American actress has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 11 § American actress until a consensus is reached. BD2412 T 00:27, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allan von Schenkel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allan von Schenkel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tacyarg (talk) 09:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Einosuke Akiya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unknown person, useless page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Stevo Crvenkovski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 18:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:21, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

I'm participating in an Unreferenced articles November 2024 drive and came across Salim Ben Ali which you created in 2006. I couldn't find any sources from a Google search, Proquest, newspaper archives and was about to put a notability tag on it since the position seems minor when I dug a little further and saw that similar pages for List of prime ministers of the Comoros have been created, none of which appears to have a WP:RS. There may be something in French sources but I wouldn't be able to find those easily. Do you have better sourcing for these politicians? I've participated in WP:AFD discussions and this one would be an edge case from my experience but you have more than I do and I'd be curious about your thoughts on this matter and what you think could be done to improve sourcing for these Comoros politician articles. Nnev66 (talk) 15:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]