User talk:Aryder779

Archives
May 2008 - March 2009

Greetings! I used to go by the name of Musicaindustrial. Are you still editing Wikipedia? I'm currently working on the Into the Pandemonium. I'll need some help in the near future, I'm planning to turn it into a Good article. Thanks! CalmonTellechea (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, I'm having trouble with the copyright tags of this picture [1] of Wagner Lamounier aka "Antichrist" playing live. I've just listed Sarcófago as a "good article" candidate, and I think this picture is integral to its content... I wouldn't want it erased. Could you help me out on this one? Thanks. Musicaindustrial (talk) 09:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How's the grindcore article doing, by the way? It has been a good article candidate for some time now... Musicaindustrial (talk) 11:34, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Have you seen this? Musicaindustrial (talk) 22:02, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm the reviewer. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 17:22, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can insert more music samples in the grindcore article. Take care that they're from a non-copyrightviolating source as suggested and pick them to illustrate the different styles of grindcore. I'll take care of the REDPENOFDOOM and his rather arrogant behaviour. Wandalstouring (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I said non copyrightviolating sources. Is there something unclear about this? Please do speedily specify for each of your sources why it isn't violating copyright. Wandalstouring (talk) 09:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article looks quite good. I'll take a closer look until Sunday. Wandalstouring (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I created this article just now; thought you might like to know. Cheers. Musicaindustrial (talk) 13:00, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey, were you the one who wrote the perfectly lovely synopsis of chantal akerman's jeanne dielman

Nekoeleven (talk) 17:45, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i've been trying to hunt down the author all morning. it's an absolutely wonderful distillation of the 3+ hour movie - saw it recently and it's still haunting me. cheers though! Nekoeleven (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In case you're interested, I just finished a first draft of the Extreme Noise Terror article. Any help, suggestions etc. always gratefully received! Blackmetalbaz (talk) 13:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old friend, the Sarcófago article is currently being reviewed for GA status by admin  GARDEN . Would you like to give some of your reliable input on this process? Thanks a lot. Musicaindustrial (talk) 16:43, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Having a somewhat minor problem with the Assück page in that SPAs (in this case an IP and a newly created account claiming to be a member of the band) are constantly removing sourced material (genre, obviously... what else?!) from Terrorizer and Maximumrocknroll because they don't like how the journalists have desribed them. Just a heads-up. The page is something of a headache as it is, as they have no website, no decent biographies exist and I'm struggling to find interviews. Terrorizer and Maximumrocknroll obviously consider them important, so I suspect they pass WP:MUSIC. I've added what I can in terms of sources (even if people do keep removing them) but if you spot anything else let me know. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look into that. Musicaindustrial (talk) 08:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've lowered the protection level so that non-new registered users such as yourself can create it. You should, however, find more sources, rather than one article in a solid reliable source and two articles from the same bloggish online zine. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try and have a look at it... the main problem it seems is the lead, which you seem to be doing a good job of sorting. I'd actually be tempted to incorporate some more information about the various grindcore subgenres, either within the "legacy" section or as a separate subsection; there are certainly enough sources now (in fact, I'd say enough to recreate the deathgrind article). I've done a small amount of work on the goregrind and pornogrind articles, which admittedly are not brilliant but I reckon far better than they were, if still only stub level. Please feel free to have a look and make suggestions! Blackmetalbaz (talk) 21:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think that the site I got my list from pulled their member list from the band's myspace. Hope that answers your question. = ∫_t^c 5th Eye 23:32, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The article on German gothic rock band TMT is up for deletion. I've been sparring with an admin who clearly has no understanding of the musical genre, or TMT's notability within it, and would be very grateful if you could assist in the AfD discussion before s/he manages to have the article terminated. Thank you ChiRed (talk) 23:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please disregard the previous comment as it is a violation of WP:CANVASS. Ndenison ^talk 13:22, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This merger discussion is long dormant, but there seem to be three votes in favor of merger. I am in favor, as well. Is there any reason this should not proceed, despite the long time lapse? ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 02:55, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Deathgrind. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deathgrind. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I'm trying to figure out how many active members are still interested in working on WikiProject Industrial. I've added a lot of new articles to our project space, and categorized every article already in the project. Please go to the project's talk page and indicate if you're still interested in working on the project, and feel free to add any other articles you want to the project scope. Hopefully we can get this project moving again! Thanks. Torchiest (talk | contribs) 16:13, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As u r an editor of industrial music-oriented articles, would u mind adding to a discussion about this article's genre? Dan56 (talk) 00:15, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aryder779. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Metal.
Message added 18:15, 17 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please check out Talk:Japanese noise rock, I'd like your feedback before I do anything with this article. Thanks! MrMoustacheMM (talk) 23:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

New York hardcore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Cause for Alarm and The Warriors

Japanese noise rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ruins (band)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Skitsystem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Discharge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Industrial Annual Report 2012

—Torchiest ^talk_edits 02:46, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings... A while back you helped me make the Sarcófago article a good article. I'm currently editing Samael's Worship Him album. You mind giving me a hand? Musicaindustrial (talk) 13:00, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aryder779. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aryder779. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chicano rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page East Los Angeles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:59, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punk jazz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punk jazz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:30, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]