User talk:BhikhariInformer

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, BhikhariInformer! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 07:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Maliner were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manan Bhardwaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Maliner (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BhikhariInformer! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Maliner (talk) 17:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manush (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Byomkesh O Durgo Rahasya. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because It is an unreleased film and does not satisfy the notability rules for unreleased films.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Robert McClenon (talk) 08:15, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Byomkesh O Durgo Rahasya. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:33, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Biye Bibhrat instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has information that is not in the article and should be added to the article. Please compare and combine the draft and the article. You may ask for advice about comparing and combining a draft and an article at the Teahouse.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Biye Bibhrat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:20, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 5th Filmfare Awards Bangla into Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:34, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will do that for my next edits if I copy information. And I will provide attribution to my old edits in which I remember to have copied little formats cause I didn't knew them properly. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 07:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shibpur (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SVF. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ARandomName123 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is too soon. Wait until the movie has released, and it has received a few reviews before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raktabeej and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 15:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

All references are first-party, eithier from the newspapers owned by the Times Group or the awards website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 19:23, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I briefly browsed the sources and they appear to be press releases and advertorials. --Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 06:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 06:39, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OlifanofmrTennant was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OLIfanofmrtennant 03:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akshithmanya was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manan Bhardwaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akshithmanya ^talk 00:54, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raktabeej and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:37, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raktabeej, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– DreamRimmer (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: Thank you.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:16, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BhikhariInformer. Thank you for your work on Raktabeej. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please do not copy and paste entire review paragraphs. Instead, provide a brief summary in your own words.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

– DreamRimmer (talk) 16:03, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamRimmer: Okay I will keep that in mind from my next edits.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Close but not quite enough independent significant coverage. Some of the sources are interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manan Bhardwaj and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 05:34, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manush: Child of Destiny, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pradhan (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Toadette ^{(Happy holiday!)} 08:59, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Manan Bhardwaj. Thanks! ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:36, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Manan Bhardwaj, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:32, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heyy@BhikhariInformer your recent edit at Salaar: Part 1 – Ceasefire is reverted by someone. Assuming as your edit as Good faith, I want to tell you that we at ICTF don't consider production house figure or any primary source that cites Production house Figures as reliable as they are highly manipulated and especially south one which are infamous for that, a recent example we have of Kabzaa. We uses Independent box office trackers mainly like Bollywood Hungama , Box Office India, or Pinkvilla. I hope you understood. Thanks Tousif ❯❯❯ Talk 13:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information. I will keep it in mind while doing any further box office updates. BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Daniel Quinlan. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pradhan (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 04:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Quinlan:

I updated the latest numbers of 3 week collection but by mistake I attached the citation stating the box office till 2 weeks. I have attached citation from the same site which is currently cited in the article. Although not considered reliable according to Wikipedia, it provides almost accurate box office numbers for many Bengali films and is considered as a source of box office collection in Bengali industry. I hope that citation would be okay.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pradhan (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 08:10, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BhikhariInformer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:6th Filmfare Awards Bangla, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bengali films of 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rahul Banerjee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected it. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:43, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BhikhariInformer. Thank you for your work on 6th Filmfare Awards Bangla. Kencf0618, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kencf0618}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

kencf0618 (talk) 11:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kencf0618:

Thanks

BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:33, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will keep that in mind for any further edits.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please use edit summaries when you are adding or changing content. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:57, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please refer to WP:ICTFSOURCES promptly. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:32, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 06:21, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Love jihad conspiracy theory. — Newslinger talk 09:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Newslinger:

Thanks for informing me that the concept of contentious topics. I didn't knew about them earlier.

BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:32, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 09:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Newslinger talk 09:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Newslinger:

Over the last few months, I have edited a number of articles regarding living or deceased people: mostly actors, actresses, film makers, music composers and singers. So, could you tell me the name of the particular biographical articles, editing for which caused my to receive this message.

Becoz I would like to know which type of edits were wrong in the biographical articles. Then I would refrain myself in the future from such edits.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 15:04, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BhikhariInformer, the above messages are standard notices issued to editors who demonstrate interest in contentious topics. Many editors participating in contentious topics receive a notice for each topic area. As stated in the notice text, receiving these types of messages "does not imply that there are any issues with your editing". I included the notice about the "living or recently deceased people" contentious topic only because you have been editing biographies of living people, as you mention.

These contentious topic notices are not to be confused with warnings such as the one I posted in #May 2024; warnings are issued in response to edits that fall short of meeting a policy or guideline in some way. Per the verifiability policy, "All material in Wikipedia mainspace, including everything in articles, lists, and captions, must be verifiable. All quotations, and any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material." Additionally, "A source 'directly supports' a given piece of material if the information is present explicitly in the source so that using this source to support the material is not a violation of Wikipedia:No original research."

Within contentious topics, articles tend to be scrutinized more closely to ensure that they are compliant with policies and guidelines, including the verifiability policy. Please make sure your edits are adequately supported by cited reliable sources before submitting them, especially when the article subject is controversial. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 21:43, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I got it.

Thanks

BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:55, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a practice agreed and followed by editors to keep either 5 films or not to have BO section at all for Malayalam films list pages, as keeping more films led to more fights and reverts and we did not want Wiki to become a fanfight page like FB. Better discuss first and then revert than the other way around.
Anish Viswa 03:50, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Now I get the point. Would keep in mind while editing Malayalam film lists.

Thanks BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:21, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, please don't add obviously unreliable sources to articles as you did at 6th_Filmfare_Awards_Bangla. Indiablooms and Desiblitz are not reliable. Sohom (talk) 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sohom Datta:

Okay.

But

Just a question. Desiblitz I understand. But Indiablooms is a website which I have noticed, they write neutral news on upcoming Bengali movies. Nothing like fan pages. Also they cover promotional events. So can you inform me why is it stll unreliable.

Thanks

BhikhariInformer (talk) 10:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abir Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:24, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified it. BhikhariInformer (talk) 05:09, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. You edits to Kalki 2898 AD were unconstructive. Sacnilk source or any news media (Hindustan Times and Indian Express) publishing claims made by the film's makers and its production company are unreliable. Source needs to be secondary independent. RangersRus (talk) 17:40, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, you did it again. Please be careful next time. There are edit notices everywhere regarding WP:FRUIT. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are multiple users who still don't believe 84 million is 700 crore approximately they are changing the box office collection back to 600 please ensure that does not happen 2409:40F3:1014:8A43:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:17, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kaliachak Chapter 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified😊😁 BhikhariInformer (talk) 12:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chiranjeet Chakraborty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Partha Chatterjee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed BhikhariInformer (talk) 03:43, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BhikhariInformer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bohurupi (2024) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Bohurupi (2024) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of highest-grossing Indian Bengali films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dunki.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:57, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please be advised that discussion about changing the title of the Adam's Bridge article are prohibited by a moratorium. Please see Talk:Adam's Bridge and the FAQ on that page. You are hardly the first person and won't be the last to propose changing the title, but the current title is in accordance with Wikipedia policy. 331dot (talk) 10:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, please add the reception section in the article Shastri (2024 film), as you did in Tekka (film). Izno Paglu (talk) 15:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done BhikhariInformer (talk) 02:05, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:King (rapper). Thanks! Tavantius (talk) 18:53, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

King (rapper), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 19:25, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abir Chatterjee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Statesman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed BhikhariInformer (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Tota Roy Chowdhury wiki page award section and reference section has been merged pls check and do the needful. MDas2024 (talk) 16:37, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Resolved the issue.

But next time onwards in any future edits, if you are not sure regarding any edit, please do practice in your

sandbox before publishing it. BhikhariInformer (talk) 17:08, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks MDas2024 (talk) 17:16, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Subhasree Ganguly picture.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhool Bhulaiyaa 3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified. BhikhariInformer (talk) 01:53, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]