User talk:Canadian2006

On 13 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ligonier Valley Railroad, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations on your first Did You Know article! --Royalbroil 05:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission has some pretty good dates here. Dincher (talk) 01:17, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, many of the dates are pretty sketchy. When it comes to conflicting dates, I always defer to the local website or local history information. I would think that they have the best info. I too have used the PHMC source as a primary reference. It can be frustrating when it comes to establishing just exactly when a place was settled, especially townships. Sometimes I think that we should just go with the incorporation dates and forget the settlement dates for the townships. I think it is safe to go with the first cabin built on what became a borough or city, especially if that particular place remained ihabited since. I agree. Wiki can be very addicting. I started out with the intention of just working on Lycoming County and now look at what I've done. Best of luck with adding the histories. Have Fun! Dincher (talk) 23:20, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		To Canadian2006 for tirelessly improving articles about the municipalities of Westmoreland County Keep up the good work! Dincher (talk) 02:46, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've been adding pics for the southwestern PA places. Do you have any state park pics? Dincher (talk) 02:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Have a good one. Dincher (talk) 19:42, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

204.171.49.26 was in the wrong namespace. User talk:204.171.49.26 makes it clear that they are a persistent source of vandalism. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for making the link from the Daniel Boone Hotel (Charleston, West Virginia) to the page on its architect, William Lee Stoddart! I only wish I could have taken a better pic of the hotel during my recent trip to Charleston. Best wishes .... --Pubdog (talk) 20:10, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks for contact attempt. I do not see from this page how to e-mail you. Plumalley —Preceding unsigned comment added by Plumalley (talk • contribs) 16:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Canadian2006. I see what you mean; the file should not have been tagged with a {{nsd}} tag. I can, however, still tag it with a {{Di-no permission}} tag. But I believe what you're saying so I won't tag it now. Basically, the file is currently missing Evidence of Permission (See WP:PERMISSIONS). Please follow the instructions available at {{Di-no permission-notice}} and WP:PERMISSIONS and act as if there was a {{Di-no permission}} deletion tag placed on File:Sabra Wheless Ballinger Stoddart.jpg. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions or are in need of assistance. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 05:34, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently uploaded photographs to wikimedia commons in regards to Biggar, Saskatchewan. Would you give permissions to upload them also to the Biggar Encyclopaedia? SriMesh | talk 02:06, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded to the above via email. Canadian2006 (talk) 21:26, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I left a lengthy note under your message on my talk page (I can't remember if you'll get it automatically or if I have to add a talkback or whatknot. Carsonmc (talk) 08:42, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Too, I saw you referenced Robert Craig. Great guy. Had the pleasure to talk with him about a building myself and others are trying to save in Atl. The Industrial Life and Health Insurance Company Bldg. Carsonmc (talk) 09:05, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When I go to Wiki's main page and type Georgian Terrace Hotel in, it doesn't go directly to the page, but then says there's a page named that with a redirect? Do you know why this is the case? Carsonmc (talk) 00:36, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to replicate the problem you describe, but it works fine for me. I can't explain it.Canadian2006 (talk) 04:50, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't typing in the full name... in Atl., we just say the Georgian Terrace and leave off the word hotel.Carsonmc (talk) 06:46, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added architectural detail and history to the page. Let me know if you see something screwy. My eyes are shot, I've been working on this for over five hours - that is the research and writing. I know that the Fox Theatre district photos would be good to have on their own page, but since one doesn't exist, I thought I'd attach them here...let me know what you think. Cheers.Carsonmc (talk) 06:48, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I need to truncate the links at the bottom, but still learning to do that. Will attempt it when next on.Carsonmc (talk) 06:53, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to your email. Carsonmc (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Added new aerial view of hotel and district you might be interested in on page. Shows relation of Ponce next door.Carsonmc (talk) 22:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Doncram mentioned that you were having difficulties with CRGIS. I went and found the links for the nom form and for the inventory sheet. If you would like some in-depth instructions on using the database, let me know as I seem to be one of the few who know how to work it. ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​^{Don't give up the ship} 00:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Canadian2006, I added information to the article Employment equity but you undid it. I disagree with your claim that it broke WP:NPOV, I believe that it actually breaks WP:NPOV with the current version. I am only trying to clarify things, according to the guidelines (Canadian Gov.) white Arabs, white Western Asians (including Israelis) and white Latin Americans are not classified as minority. I believe that the following statements are contradictory and need correction or clarification:

For example, people who are Arabs or Latin Americans may consider themselves to be white, yet the federal government treats Arabs and Latin Americans as members of the visible minority category. This is wrong, if the source confirms it, the source is invalid, it is not agreeing with the main source, the Canadian Government.

However, starting in the Canada 2006 Census, respondents were not classified as visible minorities if they identified themselves as having both a white ancestry (for example, "French") in addition to ancestry in a visible minority group.

I hope we can reach a consensus, and we can improve this article together. After all this is the main principle of this encyclopedia. I hope I can count on your help to assist me in this. Best regards. Paulista01 05:24, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Canadian2006,

First, I would like to thank you for your detailed response. I agree with most things you said, the Canadian government really make things very confusing by adopting these unusual standards, especially since Latin Americans and West Asians are not ethnical groups but are rather related to geographical locations. It is quite strange since in Latin America a few countries have a higher percentage of Caucasians (European Caucasians) than Canada, such as Argentina and Uruguay.

The issue to me is that I find the article a little confusing. I believe that if we give a little bit more explanation and details we may clarify things to the average visitor.

According to the website you sent me, it says, the law:

Legislative Definition - In the 1995 Act, "members of visible minorities" means persons, other than Aboriginal peoples, who are non-Caucasian in race or non-white in colour.

Then it has a section titled Operational definition, this section points to the definitions of the 2006 census. For instance that people that check Arab and Caucasian, or Latin American and Caucasian are not visible minority, since if it did, it would contradict or break the law. Now, imagine the following situation, a person comes here to find if they should check visible minority on their job application, by reading the article one would be even more confused. The article takes a sociological approach to the subject; I believe that most people are interested in the hard facts and what the law actually says. I believe that the best solution here is to quote the government directly. When I first read the article I was very confused, since Wikipedia is one of the major sources of information today, we would help a lot of people if we explained things a little better.

Best regards, Paulista01 (talk) 05:08, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On July 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Webster (architect), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		for the wonderful pics of Westmoreland County. Dincher (talk) 00:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean about some places. Some places just can't be beautified. --Dincher (talk) 02:44, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I wasn't first notice your great photos (the one of the hotel in North East piqued my curiosity). Great job! ​​​​​​​​Niagara ​​^{Don't give up the ship} 00:48, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A picture of my high school just went up. thank you --Guerillero | My Talk 03:40, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep them coming! Thanks. Gerry D (talk) 00:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good eye on the Template:Infobox architectural practice ... I didn't even know of its existence. I think I'd used the Template:Infobox architect just because I saw it used in the article on Archibald and Schofield. Now that I know better, I will edit that article to use the proper infobox. Thanks! --Drm310 (talk) 04:29, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Monessen seal.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Goodman School of Business logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Morals for Old, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Young (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:18, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just saw some of your edits on my Watchlist. I encourage you to use kilometres between communities rather than time. Usage of time is discouraged as there are too many variables that affect travel time between communities at it is not the truest measure. As you continue, please use kilometres instead. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 02:55, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You said you found a site that claimed the Johnston Building was called Midtown Plaza. I need to sign in to the email address I used and check for a response from that site, but the site can't be regarded as reliable if The Charlotte Observer and the Charlotte Business Journal have not only never used the name for the Johnston Building, but at least the Observer has used the name for another building. I told the writer of the article perhaps the mistake that has been on Wikipedia for five years led her to believe the name was used.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 18:24, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The writer apologized for her mistake and corrected her article. I'm still waiting on one of the others you told me about. I thought it was just one but then I went back and checked.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Derry-pennsylvania-borough-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Johnson-Shoyama logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Earls logo 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canadian2006. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Corman Park logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canadian2006. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Canadian2006. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:City of Monessen seal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]