User talk:Desmond Hobson

Welcome!

Hello, Desmond Hobson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Mahogany

Yes you can use this type of link /info Mahogany

Out of curiosity what is the info you wish to put on the database? Mahogany

Your recent edit to List of Rebel: The Network affiliates was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 10:55, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter. The information was all fictitious anyway, having to do with giving the "affiliates" new "call letters" so that I could use it for personal reasons. The page is now blank, and I am asking for its complete removal.Desmond Hobson 18:32, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Buddy Wayne Barefoot was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 19:40, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tawkerbot,

I am writing you because I understand that you labeled the Buddy Wayne Barefoot page with the "hoax" label. In response, I will make two points:

• The page was not intended to be a hoax. It was for my personal use only, under the permission that Chris Black granted me last month. The idea was to make up the page, print it out, then erase the content to ensure that only entries that meet the standard of verifiability are on Wikipedia. I do not wish to take up valuable hard-drive space on your servers. Unfortunately, Wikipedia pages are not WYSIWYG; they have different fonts when printed out, and also, the links are not visible. Therefore, I must save the page on your server so I can, if only briefly, see the page as it was intended to look. In the case of the BWB page, I hit "save" earlier than planned, and someone saw it as a hoax and put in the label.
• However, I can no longer afford to take any chances with the anti-vandalism system and therefore must vow never to make up these pages again. I must take seriously your efforts to keep Wikipedia the site that it was intended to be. I have also made many legitimate contributions as a Wikipedian and I would like to keep my good name.

Desmond Hobson 16:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Coldplay. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. f(x)=ax²+bx+c 01:03, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't even seen the Coldplay page. How did that message end up in my box?--Desmond Hobson 16:15, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--D-Day ^{What up? Am I cool, or what?} 22:22, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. —Whomp [T] [C] 22:25, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that the edit pages now have a disclaimer against its use for vanity and advertising purposes.

• Exactly when was this added?
• Is this really a widespread problem?
• Has Wikipedia actually sued anyone over these rules?

From a recovering "vandalizer.":)--Desmond Hobson 22:26, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

unblock|apparent administrator confusion

Earlier, I reported that the reason for the block had to do with my use of the sandbox. However, as I have thought some more, I don't think that is what happened.

The reason given was I that had blanked out nihonjoe's user page. Believe me, this never happened. In fact, I had not heard of nihonjoe until the moment I was told I was being blocked. I had expected to give some updates and to put a couple of new pages online today when I received the news.

Some sort of confusion must have happened, and he may well have blocked the wrong page.

Hopefully, nihonjoe, who I understand can be very busy at times, will see only this newest version of the page and not any of the ones I placed earlier. I also hope that he will unblock me in the next few hours, so that I don't have to wait until Saturday afternoon (my time) to resume my editing privileges.

Thank you.

My IP address is 65.116.143.83.

Please solve this problem as quickly as possible. Thank you.--Desmond Hobson 21:18, 23 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that someone has been abusing your IP address. See Special:Contributions/65.116.143.83. Sorry, but I think you might just have to wait this one out. It's not your fault but all it takes is one bad user on an IP... Sasquatch t|c 18:04, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sasquatch, you suspected that something was wrong with my IP address, and after last night, I think you're right.

Early Saturday morning (about 1 am), I was able to edit pages as normal. This was within the 48-hour period that nihonjoe had blocked me for. Earlier, I was blocked while trying to edit from a public library near my home. Therefore, I think the problem has something to do with a lock of some kind placed by that library.

I do know that the library blocks some pages otherwise available; for example, MySpace. Was it the case here? All I know is that the block ended Saturday afternoon.--Desmond Hobson 08:21, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Desmond,

Thank you for making your points on the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gameshow_Marathon_show_summaries page: it has helped me understand what you were trying to do on your user page. I see now that you've edited it slightly by bunning the 'future' template on it. I wonder, however, if I could make a suggestion?

Most user pages are summaries of the user themselves and the opionions they hold, and do not really deal with subjects that should have articles themselves in the main encyclopaedia space. When you wrote that piece of wrestling, I thought that it might be an article that you had put on your user page by mistake. Now that you have told me that it is a 'dream article' I understand.

To avoid others reaching the same conclusion, it might be a good idea to remove the 'future' template and added something that shows instantly that the wrestling article is intimately linked with you. Something along the following, perhaps?

If I ruled the World, we'd have articles like...

As regards your article Gameshow Marathon show summaries, I'm afraid many people will agree that it is not suitable. It is a very long list of information that will be seen as indiscriminate and unencyclopaedic. The length of the article is also at odds with the article's title. Most summaries are maybe four paragraphs long. --die Baumfabrik 14:02, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came here to post something similar, but to suggest using the {{userpage}} template instead. Alternatively, many users who write content in their userspace put it on a subpage such as User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox so that they can work on it and link others to it without cluttering up their main page. (For the record, I don't actually care what you put in your userspace, but I found the juxtaposition of subjects funny.) Opabinia regalis 16:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opabinia and Baumfabrik, your wish has been granted! Click on the link if you're interested. I plan to change the page every few days. In the meantime, I have changed the main user page so that it has factual information.

Desmond, don't worry about changing the race names. We're setting it up so the old race names will redirect to the current name. There's no reason to change them with the pipe link. --D-Day ^{I'm all ears How can I improve?} 22:10, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, D-Day, change it back. But that's lots of hard work down the drain. (sigh)

Then again, there is no link to the name "GM FlexFuel 250" anyway.

The Breakers aren't a youth basketball team, they're a "height challenged" team. Tom Danson 16:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the correction, Tom. I just reprinted what I thought someone else wrote. Either I misinterpreted the entry or the previous editor got it wrong.--Desmond Hobson 03:23, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any announcements on MyTV affiliation? I haven't seen any.--CFIF (talk to me) 18:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I got the information from Chip Kelly's web site, which cited the MNTV affiliates' page. I also did the citation on the affiliates' list page, right before the actual list of stations. I suggest that you read it again.--Desmond Hobson 18:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How reliable is that site though? It's certainly not official. --CFIF (talk to me) 19:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how to answer that one, except to maybe wait a few days. At some point, the station should also make the announcement, unless the deal is totally screwed up, like the CW messed up with KAUT and KUVI.--Desmond Hobson 19:10, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible for you to leave the categories off your sandbox2 articles? Unfortunately the categorization doesn't stay within your userspace, so your sandbox2 is now featuring in a number of real categories. Cheers Yomangani^talk 00:45, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Although I put in the categories on the page in an effort to make it look as realistic as possible, I will abide by your suggestion.--Desmond Hobson 00:51, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • You could do something like this (which would maintain the look and functionality without actually adding the page to the categories):

<div id="catlinks"> <p class='catlinks'> [[Categories]]: [[:Category:Living people|Living people]] | [[:Category:Sharks|Sharks]] | [[:Category:Children|Children]] </p> </div>

Yomangani^talk 01:08, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• • Thanks! Your suggestions worked like a charm!--Desmond Hobson 21:35, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NFLReplay programbox3 210-1-.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Thursdaygames 118x100-1-.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I've nominated Wolfe+585, Senior, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Wolfe+585, Senior satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfe+585, Senior and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wolfe+585, Senior during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- lucasbfr ^talk 18:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings ....

Saw where you created the Fall Series page, which covers PGA Tour events occuring after the FedEx Cup portion of the Tour Schedule. Everything with the page is in order except for its Wikipedia title, which is just "Fall Series".

Feeling that "PGA Tour" needed to be included in the title name, I transferred everything over to this page --- PGA Tour Fall Series, to which the Fall Series page will now re-direct to.

Just wanted to let you know. Feel free to look me up.

Thanx-A-Lot and Enjoy, Frank

Fgf2007 03:38, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't mind the change. - Desmond Hobson 18:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the "Thumbs Up" -- Please feel free to check out my sandbox projects (links on my wiki-user page)
Thanx-A-Lot and Enjoy, Fgf2007 02:42, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thursdaygames 148x100.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 03:03, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have just added Template:Sports television in the United States to Wikipedia as a way for people to see the various sports networks at a glance. However, I have still not gotten it to work exactly as I want it. The network names are supposed to be centered, but all of them are flush to the left right now. If I can, I'll upload the source code so that someone can respond and tell me what I'm doing wrong.

{|- align="center" style="font-size: 100%;" | '''[[Broadcast]] sports divisions: [[ESPN on ABC]] | [[CBS Sports]] | [[Fox Sports (USA)|Fox Sports]] | [[NBC Sports]]<br /> <br /> |- align="center" style="font-size: 100%;" '''National [[cable television|cable]]/[[satellite television|satellite]] networks''': [[ESPN]] | [[ESPN2]] | [[ESPNEWS]] | [[Fox Sports Net]] | [[Versus (TV channel)|Versus]]<br /> <br /> |- align="center" style="font-size: 100%;" '''Specialty networks:''' [[College Sports TV]] | [[ESPNU]] | [[Fox Soccer Channel]] | [[Fuel TV]] | [[Horse Racing TV]] | [[The Golf Channel]] | [[NBA TV]] | [[NFL Network]] | [[SPEED Channel]] | [[The Outdoor Channel]] | [[The Tennis Channel]] | [[TVG]] <br /> <br /> |- align="center" style="font-size: 100%;" '''Occasional broadcasts:''' [[HBO]] | [[Showtime]] | [[Spike TV]] | [[Superstation WGN]] | [[TBS (TV network)|TBS]] | [[Turner Network Television|TNT]] | [[USA Network]] | [[MyNetworkTV]] (as of March 2007) <br /> <br /> |- align="center" style="font-size: 100%;" '''[[Regional sports network]]s:''' [[Fox Sports Net]] | [[4SD]] | [[Cox Sports Television|CST]] | [[Madison Square Garden Network|MSG]] | [[Mid-Atlantic Sports Network|MASN]] | [[New England Sports Network|NESN]] | [[SportsNet New York|SNY]] [[SportsTime Ohio|STO]] | [[YES Network|YES]] <br /> <br /> |- align="center" style="font-size: 100%;" '''Syndicators:''' [[ESPN Plus]] | [[Lincoln Financial Media|LF Sports]] | [[Raycom Sports]] <br /> <br /> |- align="center" style="font-size: 100%;" '''Defunct networks: [[Carolina Sports and Entertainment Television|C-SET]] | [[Empire Sports Network|Empire]] | [[SportsChannel America]] | [[Victory Sports Network|Victory Sports]] <br /> |}

Thank you for your attention.

• Never mind. The edit has been successful. I decided to adapt another template which was simpler to use. - Desmond Hobson 20:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Americas game logo2-1-.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 12:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I give your permission to remove it. I have been to the page and it has been replaced. I also see that the other image has been removed; that was for the same reason. - Desmond Hobson 16:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BrittanyLSpears.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

An editor has nominated The Baseball Channel, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Baseball Channel and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 20:38, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reading and acting on the notices on this page. Best regards, MackSalmon 09:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• You're welcome, Mack! When I read that heading, I feared the worst. Still, this is a problem I have to keep working on, making sure I don't create dummy pages. - Desmond Hobson 20:06, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now, I know absolutely nothing about American football, but are you certain this person is notable? The article doesn't talk about them playing for any team, and the link to Aaron's goes to the wrong place, I think. J Milburn 16:44, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you have blanked it. In future, please do not blank articles that you want deleting. If you are basically the only contributor, please tag them with {{db-author}} and they will be deleted. J Milburn 16:46, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take note of that, thank you. - Desmond Hobson 16:49, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Media coverage of the Virginia Tech massacre, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Media coverage of the Virginia Tech massacre and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:56, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was a prod deletion it can be put back easily. If you can find some other sources or things to show notability. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:08, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BrittanyLSpears.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:08, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I have since added it to User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox. - Desmond Hobson 20:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Correction: it is on the user page. - Desmond Hobson 15:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbrister.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I have since added it to User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox2. - Desmond Hobson 20:56, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bbrister.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:16, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• I believe this message has been sent in error. Please see the previous entry. That is, unless sandbox pages do not count. I want a clarification. - Desmond Hobson 15:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Desmond Hobson. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Bbrister.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BrittanyLSpears.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BRLumpkin.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Desmond Hobson. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:BrittanyLSpears.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Desmond Hobson. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:26, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Desmond Hobson. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:BRLumpkin.JPG) was found at the following location: User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox2. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 07:27, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Steve Beverly, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

• I feel like such a bonehead!:( I have just been reminded that I could have kept the article from deletion by going to the talk page, but now it's too late! I blame myself for this for not responding in a timely matter, but I also blame the server at TVGameShows.net. When the server was changed due to financial issues, some of the information was lost, including a detailed biography that could have helped justify Beverly's inclusion on Wikipedia. Union University does not have such a bio on the web, either. - Desmond Hobson 17:19, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Bonnie Blackstone, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Bonnie Blackstone is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Bonnie Blackstone, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Bonnie Blackstone itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• My mistake, "bot." (It's odd talking to a bot, isn't it?) Anyway, I should have removed the redirect page once the old page was deleted. I still think that there should be a Boni Blackstone page (as well as a Joe Pedicino page) because both appeared on national televised professional wrestling shows briefly in the 1990s. In case you did not know, Pedicino was on syndicated WCW shows and World Class while Blackstone was on World Class/USWA/GWF on ESPN. I know there has been some debate about this in the pro wrestling project as to whether or not they were notable. I say that they were. - Desmond Hobson 17:07, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Bassmasters Classic, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Rjgodoy 04:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Boogers, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tlesher 13:37, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Boogers, you will be blocked from editing. Tlesher 13:39, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• OK, I understand your advice and will take it. However, it is also true that there is a weakness in the anti-vandalism system at Wikipedia. As I wrote in my sandbox about three months ago, pages that are removed or blanked due to vandalism are treated differently on the Wikipedia server. If the article is an original namespace (I hope that's the right term), and there is vandalism, its entire history is removed. But if the vandalism is from a redirect page, the page is then retained in the article history and anyone can click onto it. Although I stumbled onto this weakness by accident, I want to share my experiences in hopes of improving the product and upholding the reputation of Wikipedia content. Honestly, I think that vandalized redirect pages should be treated the same as the original namespace pages - not to be mentioned in page histories. Anything you can do to change this is appreciated. My only other mistake is in doing this over and over and over again. One or two examples to prove my point should have been enough. From my own "archive" on my computer hard drive, I have counted 37 such vandalisms of re-directs, and some pages were re-done four or five times. - Desmond Hobson 13:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oh, and I forgot to do this earlier: To all users of Wikipedia who have been offended by my vandalism, I offer my sincerest apologies. Eventually, despite the weaknesses detailed above, all the responsibility that has brought me to this point is mine. - Desmond Hobson 14:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to place this award on your user page, as a token of appreciation for your contributions. If you're willing to help spread the good cheer to others, please see the project page for the Random Smiley Award at: User:Pedia-I/SmileyAward

Luksuh 04:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain what you are doing with these? e.g. Betty Jean McBricker, Bobo Bates, Little Buddy, Brittany Spears, Brett Bartlett, etc.? Thanks! Ewlyahoocom 07:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Sure. As I have explained several times, it has to do with the fact that a vandalized page based on a redirect stays in the history file, but a vandalism that creates a new namespace is erased and not shown in the history file. This is a huge inconsistency that Wikipedia has to address as soon as possible. For more information, and examples, see my user page.

The most recent redirects were minor edits. One of my characters' hometowns was Reidville, South Carolina, which I misspelled as "Reidsville" earlier. In another case, there was a fake "photo" file which I removed. Finally, on the "Brittany Spears" re-edit, I removed a template that was applied by another user.

Thanks for your interest. Now that the point has been made, I will avoid all such shenanigans in the future. - Desmond Hobson 18:30, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're confused: there's nothing special about redirects, vandal edits stay in the histories of any vandalized page. See also Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Ewlyahoocom 18:47, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ewlyahoocom, I have read and understood the page in question and I also understand the possible consequences of further disruption. I also have a more detailed response to your complaints at Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Click on entry number 14. - Desmond Hobson 12:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. FT2 ^{(Talk | email)} 17:04, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NFLTA_programbox2_125x40-1-.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ Wikihermit 02:14, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bonniemacbird.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated ESPN BottomLine, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ESPN BottomLine. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. brewcrewer (yada, yada) 05:32, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. With that username I expected that baseball fans would assume that I am a Brewers fan; but I'm not. I only chose that name because my first edit was on a Brewers player. (By the way, sorry for nominating your article for afd. Nothing personal.) --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 17:49, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• No problem. In fact, you inspired me. After I saw that you had a Blow (surname) page, I came back and created a similar page, Barefoot (surname). - Desmond Hobson (talk) 19:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why, thank you! --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 19:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've nominated Clash of the Choirs, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created/expanded on December 18, where you can improve it if you see fit. Please see the instructions at the top of that page to see the guidelines on nominations and hooks. Benjiboi 01:35, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 December, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clash of the Choirs, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

~ Riana ⁂ 10:49, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Benjiboi and Riana, thank you. It made my day! Merry Christmas to all of you who celebrate it. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 17:17, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NFLGameday programbox 120x6-1-.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:NFLReplay programbox3 210-1-.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nflscoreboard 163x123-1-.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pointafter 300x125-1-.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:03, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Thursdaygames 118x100-1-.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 02:35, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have no idea why I hate Scott A. Brown either. This may be a result of me using one of the public computers at the Cerritos Public Library in Cerritos, California to edit and forgetting to log out. - Desmond Hobson (talk)

The posting I made on April 19 suggesting new navigation boxes for United States radio stations has been moved to a new page, Category talk:Arbitron market by state navbox templates. That page is a better fit and increases my chances for a response. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gary Miller (sportscaster), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rtphokie (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• This is bizarre. I just checked the page and I don't see the proposed deletion template. I did see the template asking to improve the sourcing. So either the proposed deletion was not intended or the bot was applied incorrectly. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 17:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BrittBarefoot.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• I am disappointed that I did not know that you had generated a request for fair use until just now. If I had seen this message in time, I might have had a chance to save the image. Now, the Britt Barefoot page has no picture. Bummer! - Desmond Hobson (talk) 05:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You seemed a little unsure yourself if Brandy Roderick warranted a separate article or should be a redirect to Brande Roderick - all the links on the Brandy page seem to be dead now and I can't find any ref's to her. Do you have any that confirm her notability? I'm tempted otherwise to turn it back into redirect. Regards Hunting dog (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• That was an accident. I had meant to press the "show preview" button instead of the "save page" button. You know about recovering alcoholics, right? Well, I am a "recovering vandal" and I also am aware of the new software that you now have in place to try to prevent vandalism. That page changed so fast that it looks like the software was used in this case. Believe me, I did not want that page to go on Wikipedia, and again I apologize for hitting the wrong button. You also have my permission to make it a redirect again, as intended. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 05:50, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, cheers for the confirmation. Good luck with the recovery!  :) -Hunting dog (talk) 06:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please add some verifiable sources to Fox Sports Net 2008- to prove your statements' accuracy. Always remember to list your sources. Thanks - TomCat4680 (talk) 09:49, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Desmond Hobson/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 14:06, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Britt Barefoot. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britt Barefoot. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:28, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I sort of expected it. Once Britt left Southern Miss and didn't land in the NFL, I knew that this page's days were numbered. Maybe if Britt and Hollie had, just as an example, been cast on the ABC series Here Come the Newlyweds, there might have been a chance. I wish Britt all the best in his future life. However, I can't believe this page is being eliminated by a bot! I hope that the next time it happens, it comes from a real human being.[sigh] - Desmond Hobson (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was a redirect from KLPN to KTPN that was created. KLPN is the main station so why is the article called KTPN? MeteorMan7228 04:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Don't ask me. I didn't create the page. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 08:35, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you did. Actually, I guess the question is why you called it KTPN rather than KLPN.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where they're hiding all the information on this station.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:56, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, Butte has a newspaper. But it is unsearchable. Or maybe no one wrote an article. This is insane, either way. I hate leaving the DTV article hanging like that.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:59, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, chimp, for that. However, I would have liked it if the last of those two comments were on the KBTZ talk page instead of my user page. It's just a more appropriate place. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 21:36, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I was just using this as a way to let you know I tried.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch — I'd earlier reverted a change to the KAMP disambiguation page because the FCC didn't reflect a change of callsign, but it's (partly) updated on their site now. Just one problem, though. According to the FCC, the new callsign is KAMP, so this article ought to be at KAMP (FM) rather than KAMP-FM. I'm happy to move it, but I didn't want to jump into the middle while you were probably already making various changes related to this. Mlaffs (talk) 20:54, 30 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of unusual personal names. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of unusual personal names (5th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Desmond Hobson! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 8 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 691 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Lee Leonard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Jim Baldridge - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Van Earl Wright - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Jim Durham - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Craig Bolerjack - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Peter McRobbie - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Kevin Kiley (sportscaster) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Barry LeBrock - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Craig Bolerjack has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unreferenced BLP, written as if it were still 2007. We obviously can't take care of this. Cool Hand Luke 15:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

I have nominated Craig Minervini, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Minervini. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. mono 21:15, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Classic Now has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Classic Now – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 15:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Faithful Central Bible Church has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per Wikipedia:Notability_(organizations_and_companies)#Non-commercial_organizations - no secondary sources, tagged as questionable notability since April 2009.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.     Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     12:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Stanzione is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Stanzione until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cind.amuse 07:27, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NFLTA programbox2 125x40-1-.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:27, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thursdaygames 118x100-1-.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:28, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Football League Experience is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Football League Experience until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:35, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 East–West Shrine Game, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Barefoot Ballet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication that this song ever charted or has any other notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wkharrisjr (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that being part of the soundtrack of a long-running soap opera wasn't enough, huh?[LOL]

Anyway, that's the only reason for its notability, but if that's not enough, go ahead and do what you want with it. I've had pages deleted before and I have learned to accept it.[sigh] - Desmond Hobson (talk)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wolfe+585, Senior is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wolfe+585, Senior (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 12:39, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bwbarefoot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 02:13, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Monsters in the Morning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Monsters in the Morning (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Levdr1lp / talk 12:35, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article The MVPs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet any of the criteria for notability listed in WP:BAND

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  ★  Bigr Tex 19:58, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1994 United States broadcast TV realignment may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• former properties include [[Formula One]] races (now on [[NBCSN]]) and the [[Cotton Bowl Classic]] (which will be on [[ESPN]] starting with the game in the 2014 season.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:17, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have just placed on my sandbox page a list of every station that changed affiliation as a direct result of the switches, as well as a list of outlets that were part of the holding companies Fox invested in that Fox chose not to include. The chart itself is a little ragged, but it's a good start toward what I hope will be a finished product acceptable to go into Wikipedia.

Another idea is for a realignment page covering 1994 through 2006. Content would include the affiliation changes for CBS in Jacksonville and NBC in the San Francisco Bay Area, how hundreds of independent stations joined two new networks en masse, and the switch of alliances of Sinclair Broadcast Group from UPN to the WB. - Desmond Hobson (talk) 23:42, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sports Time is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports Time until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:15, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sam's Club may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• with [[Mark Schlabach]], ''The Duck Commander Family''. West Monroe, LA: [[Howard Books]] (owned by [[Simon & Schuster]], 2013, p. 33</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:11, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]