User talk:Dorkinglad

I wondered if anyone could help add the place of death of Louis Lépine. I have tried to find it but so far i've had no luck. Thanks Greg dorkinglad (talk)

Thank you for uploading File:JackieOpel.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dorkinglad, thanks for contributing to the article on Laura Dekker. You added her exact birthday. I could not find a reference for it. Can you please point to a reference for her birthday? Best regards --Neozoon 20:13, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neozoon - I wikified the entry and got the date of birth from the Dutch site. You can also check out her own website dorkinglad (talk)

Hello Dorkinglad, the date of birth is not published on her homepage (I can read dutch). The date of birth on the dutch wikipedia page has been reverted since the date has been put in the article by an IP without reference. I will change it in the article too. --Neozoon 21:32, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Prežihov Voranc.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 01:54, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Drilnoth - I have made the necessary checks and changes to the photogragh I've used. It is over 70 years old. I used a snipping tool for convenience after I had scanned the photograph.I've made the required changes on the file details. Please come back to me if there are any more problemsdorkinglad (talk)

Thank you for uploading File:Prežihov Voranc2.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 02:07, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Drilnoth - I have made the necessary checks and changes to the photogragh I've used.I used a snipping tool for convenience using the wikipedia image (the same0 on the equivalent Slovenian site. This site makes it clear that the picture is in the public domain. Please come back to me if there are any more problems. dorkinglad (talk)

Very good article, congratulations! As for the photo material, the wikipedia follows quite strict copyright rules: if one does not abide them, the photos get deleted. I'm afraid there's not much I can do about it. Cheers, Viator slovenicus (talk) 16:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prežihov Voranc2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dorkinglad! In File:Prežihov Voranc.JPG, the information regarding the author and the license have been removed as they're not the right ones. For the date, you have to give the date/year/decade when the image was made or leave it blank. For the author, you have to give the name of the actual photographer that made the photo (unless the copyright has been transfered to someone else). It was not the literary association per se. When did the photographer die? These are the information that you have to consider in deciding whether the pd-old license is the correct one. I recommend you reading WP:IUP. Thanks and regards, --Eleassar ^{my talk} 07:40, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being a nuisance, but image copyrights are something that we're trying to take seriously in Wikipedia. The template pd-old does not apply for the image, as it must have passed more than 70 years from the author's death for it to be applicable. As Draško Druškovič has died in 2009, the license has been removed. --Eleassar ^{my talk} 11:17, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Prežihov Voranc.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just referred to your article on the above. My aunt, who lived in Horsham for 73 years, was an estate agent and often alluded to it: she was with Henry Smith & Son who, I think, have been swallowed up by one of the chains. Bashereyre (talk) 21:27, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is just one quarry left selling the stone as Horsham stone. Now very expensive I'm afraid but good to know it is still sold. If you walk on the hills around Horsham it doesn't take long to find it. dorkinglad (talk)

I removed the proposed deletion tag you placed on User:Reginald gray/Article sandbox, because 1) prod cannot be used in the user space, and 2) the proper venue for requesting deletion of a user page in someone else's userspace is Miscellany for deletion. User:Reginald gray is still an active editor and he has explicitly stated on his user page that he is a COI editor and the subject of the article Reginald Gray (artist). Perhaps you should contact him regarding his reasons for keeping this userspace page before nominating it at MfD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 18:12, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:ThomasMedwin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:00, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Template:Not moved to Commons. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:01, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you tell me where you found the information about Hamilton's death? My search engine does not seem to unearth anything. Actually, the death details you edited in to the article do really need a cited source. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Derek - i've entered information on your page. The source is I judge impeccable and was posted on the Southern Soul List. I now feel I should have wiated for an official announcement which must be soon dorkinglad (talk)

Hello. Yes, you should really have waited for an official announcement - no real damage done though. Cheers,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 15:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dorkinglad. Please don't change any more Epsom Derby --> Derby Stakes. I can see your point on this, but there was a long discussion on the topic and we "agreed" on Epsom Derby. That's the name used throughout WP. Tigerboy1966 (talk) 22:35, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Not sure if you're signing your comments manually, there, but you're leaving an unclosed <small> tag in the middle of your signature (it needs a </small> at the end to tell the browser to stop rendering text as small), and you're not including the date. If you want to sign with a custom signature, WP:CUSTOMSIG describes how to set one up - you can then use the normal "signature" button (or type --~~~~ manually) to sign and date your comments. --McGeddon (talk) 13:42, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bernard Holden may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (UK)|Southern Railway]] as a ballast train clerk also studying transport law and signalling.<ref name.<ref name="ReferenceA"/>
• of trains bring back soldiers from [[Dunkerque]] in 1940; 865 trains passed through in ten days]].<ref name="ReferenceB"/> During the [[Blitz]] Holden organised for trains to keep running often in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Percy Bysshe Shelley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shoreham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greg. It's a featured article, so edits that may be OK in other articles have to meet higher standards here. The referencing problem with your link was that it didn't actually say what you put, that it is a Scottish and N England name. The RSPB is normally acceptable, but this reply to a question is really on the same level as a blog, ie not normally acceptable in an FA.

I suggest you use the template <ref name = >{{cite web| author = | title= | work= | url= | publisher=| accessdate = }}</ref>. The only mandatory fields are the title, url, publisher and access date. You don't have to do this, but it saves me or other editors a job and avoids your unintentional formatting error which made the rest of the article invisible.

Let me know if you need any help Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:27, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, I've reformatted the ref to be consistent with the other book refs, but I use Lockwood myself, fine as a source for English names. Like i said, it's the fact that it's an FA that creates the problem, FAs can and do get demoted if they drift too much from the standard Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You don't have to use templates, I use them because it's harder to make mistakes and they ensure consistency. As long as the ref looks the same as the others in the article, that's fine. In practice, I normally clean up references myself if they are incomplete or inconsistent in style Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:41, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemian Waxwing is currently at FAC and I'd rather nothing drastic happened to that while it's in the middle of the process. In any case, I've only just finished it, so it shouldn't be too out of date. Or did you mean waxwing? That could definitely do with some work. I don't think there will be many waxwings this winter, Sussex will be lucky to get any this year, there aren't even many in Scotland yet.

If you fancy a joint effort on waxwing or anything else let me know. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:54, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dave Miller (producer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ]<ref>http://www.allmusic.com/artist/dl-miller-mn0001217938</ref> – 24 May 1985, [[London]]) was a [[record producer]] and the founder of many [[budget album]] record companies.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:29, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rising Universe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• question, at least in its present position.<ref>The District Post, October 3 2012, Horsham edition)</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:52, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure where a lot of your information has come from (full name, DOB, other details) but they're not in any of the sources so I've removed them. I'm also not sure why you have re-formatted the infobox, again I have corrected. GiantSnowman 19:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, where are you sourcing the info regarding full name, DOB etc.? Why are you adding incorrect categories e.g. Category:Hastings United F.C. players rather than the correct Category:Hastings United F.C. (1948) players? Why are you incorrectly formatting the infobox, including removal of valid wikilinks? Why are you adding information full of opinion and original research? Why are you blindly reverting my improvements? GiantSnowman 20:22, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, and apologies if my revisions seemed harsh. Between us we have got the article in much better shape - thank you! GiantSnowman 17:28, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but there is no good evidence that they were ever married, or indeed that they ever knew each other. I don't even think we should report that some sites claim falsely that they were married - it would simply add to the confusion. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:13, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:RupertGould.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Miniapolis 20:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Madam The picture Of Gould has been available on Wikipedia for six years and I have little recollection of uploading it. The source is verifiable though as it came from a now defunct magazine called 'Book Collector'. It's from 1996. Gould died sixty eight years ago . In truth it's not a very good photograph and the background colour clearly bothers some people. There are quite a few other photographs of Gould on links so if you feel happier I have no opinion about deletion.Dorkinglad (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 14:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)Dorkinglad (talk) 14:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, six years is a long time; image stuff is complicated, and I'm still learning. The 70-year mark refers to the date of death of the copyright holder (probably the photographer in this case), not the subject. I don't know the copyright status of those other photos and this one is already uploaded, so I changed the licensing to fair use and added a rationale; however, I can't remove the FFD tag until the discussion is closed and can't close my own discussion :-). All this started when I saw the bot-tagged {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} and realized that it wasn't a free file. All the best, Miniapolis 17:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Another Springwatch viewer, I presume?!?--:SGCommand (Talk to Me  · contribs  · 21:07, 9 June 2016 (UTC))[reply]

In relation to this subject:

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.

Please note that I have merged the histories so everything is fixed for now. Thanks! anemoneprojectors 12:43, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 05:51, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dorkinglad. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for message. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I assume that you refer to this anonymous edit. There are at least three problems with that edit.

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the claimed facts. Mistle thrush is a featured article and therefore all substantive additions must be referenced
• Other than a shared name, there was no explanation of why the album, however notable, is relevant to a bird article. Hardy's poem was included because it describes the bird's song, but it has long been the case that additions on the basis of just a name are not enough. Florence Nightingale is notable, but she isn't mentioned in the nightingale article
• and is still available in 2017 appears to be a sales pitch.

I don't think it's operating a personal fiefdom to revert an ISP editor who, like so many anonymous contributors, has no clue about how we operate, cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:45, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:RupertGould.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dorkinglad. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable source for Felice Taylor's birth name? I'm sure you're right but haven't found a source for it. And, if it's true, she died last year. I'd love to add all this to the article, but we need some confirmation. Ghmyrtle (talk) 13:18, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, There is a mention from her daughter on You Tube as to the fact she had passed but I realise that that is hearsay. I actually looked up her name on the Social Security records that are available on-line. Florain Weaver (her final married name) came up with a relative called Charlotte Lanee Taylor at the same address in LA. This corresponded with the name on the You Tube video. Ms Taylor gave her mother's passing as 6/12/2017 - assume that is 12th June. I double check using the name Florain Taylor and came up with Florain Corella Taylor and again Charlotte Lanee listed.

I confirmed that Johnny Taylor (not The JT) was her manager back in the day (and co-wrote her single on Kent) from the article in Soul Survivor magazine. She had also recorded first for Groovy label in 1966 (picked up by Cadet) as Florain Taylor. This being a very unusual Christian nomenclature I was able to find her under her various guises in Beaumont nr LA. She was also Brown and Andrews at one time.

You can also look up the BMI writing credits for song writers (as I'm sure you are aware). Her Kent single 'I can feel your love' was written by Jerry Flanagan & Johnny Taylor. Jerry Flanagan wrote The Sweets sides on Valiant label. The Sweets were Felice (Florain), her sisters Darlene (lead) & Norma. It's on You Tube and another brother Charles Flanagan has made an entry stating that they were his sisters and Jerry ws his brother. Unless Charles and Jerry were half brothers with different names it makes Felice's birth name Florain Corella Flanagan. However I did find one Social security record where the birth dates tallied for Florain Corella Taylor Taylor so it could be that a her first marriage was to someone with the same surname. I do hope you are following this. Anyway I didn't choose to put that in the article but referred to you as the originator of the article). I didn't think I had a definitive answer apart from her name being Florain (not Florian) so I highlighted to yourself.

I knew that the spelling for Florain had been transcribed incorrectly but as you know changing such errors takes time to gather evidence. Incidentally The Sweets cut a second 45 on Soul Town called 'Something about my baby' released in the late 60s but possibly earlier.Keep up the good work Dorkinglad (talk) 17:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you point me in the right direction for "the article in Soul Survivor magazine"? I haven't seen it - is it online? It's all coming together - but I think we still need a crucial source to bring the threads together. I have a subscription to Ancestry.com - it shows me that Florine [sic] Corella Flanagan was born on 29 January 1944 [sic] in Contra Costa County, California. As Florain C Flanagan, she married Johnny B Taylor on 10 September 1960 in Los Angeles - they divorced in 1977. She married Brian Weaver on 16 August 1985. I don't have a date for her marriage to Walter Lee Andrews. Here she is. And here. But is that enough confirmation for the article? I don't think we're quite there yet. What we need is a written source that clearly says that Florain/Florine Flanagan Taylor performed as Felice Taylor. Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha! Ghmyrtle (talk) 22:31, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed you Gotcha' me! It seems you've splendidly reaffirmed the research I did this week. The Soul Survivor magazine article published in Autumn 1985 doesn't mention the Groovy / Cadet single but likely the journalist/article writer didn't have that information. I've asked the Soul Source site if anyone can confirm that Florain /Felice Taylor are one & the same.The Cadet 45 is on the internet at You Tube and aurally the singer sounds the same as the Felice Taylor releases. The flip side to Felice's 'I Can Feel Love Comin' is called 'Captured By Your Love' on President UK. It's written by Johnny Taylor and Jerry Flanagan (husband 7 brother of Florine/Florain). Would you say that was enough to show the link? Interesting that my early hunch that she was older than stated was true. This happens often in the 60s. She was only 16 when she married Taylor. I found two children from the marriage on the internet including Charlotte.Dorkinglad (talk) 22:51, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Caroline de Crespigny.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

An interesting and well-written article.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sir. I don't have time to research subjects and it is gratifying when I receive encouragement. Dorkinglad (talk) 23:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dorkinglad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dorkinglad. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I've downloaded the latest issue of "All About Horsham" with the cited article. My concern is that the free magazine clearly does not meet wikipedia's criteria for a "reliable source" see Wikipedia:Reliable sources. The author, Robina Arbuthnott may be a keen local historian, but she isn't a well established professional historian.

Sometimes, such articles can give a hint as to where to look for more information in a solid source. For example, Arbuthnott wrote: "he grew and named several orchids with the name Godmanii, winning many awards from the RHS and the Orchid Society."

I looked for records of Godman winning awards. The Orchid Society here was founded in 1951 but the RHS had an Orchid Committee long before that.

Godman is often mentioned in the Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society. Scans are available on the Biodiversitiy Heritage Library site. This is only a selection - his name often appears:

• Vol 7 (1885-1886) On Committee of the Primula Conference https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/44346597
• Vol 23 (1899-1900) Bronze Banksian Medal https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/45667571
• Vol 27 (1902-1903) gr. [grower?] Mr Moody https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/45661339
• Vol 33 (1907-1908) gr. Mr Moody https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/45651211
• Vol 38 (1912-1913)
  • p. 779 Other Exhibits F. DuCane Godman Esq Odontoglossum Godmanii https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46421483
  • p.914 First Class Certificate https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46421618
  • p.976 Silver Flora Medal (gr. Mr. G. Giles) https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/46421680
• Vol 41 (1915-1916) Other Exhibits Tecophilaea Cyanocrocus https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/45701704

Godman won awards for different plant varieties - not just orchids - and had two different head gardeners. I confess that I don't know how to cite the above. Perhaps 3 pages from Volume 38 when he was very active.

• Anonymous (1912–1913). "Prizes". Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society. 38: 779, 914, 976.

This isn't really satisfactory as "Prizes" isn't the title and I receive a error message if I omit it. The RHS announced his death but I didn't find a summary of his contributions. - Aa77zz (talk) 17:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to reply. I can not compete (not that was the intention) with your resources on this subject. It is appreciated. You are clearly a scholarly contributor. I thought Robina Arbuthnott's article to be of interest. However the only part I chose to add was on the plant collection as most of the rest does not contain scholarly references. There is an obituary published by RHS for Godman. It is on-line at https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.1920.0020 It gives a flavour as to the character of Godman and might be of interest. A man with the wealth to indulge his many passions. A fascinating man.

I have enjoyed this correspondence. Dorkinglad (talk) 17:41, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There are inconsistencies between the new infobox and the article text - and with other information. What are your sources? I know it's not "reliable", but this source seems to suggest that her first name was Tina (of course, that could be a nickname), and - more importantly - that she was still alive around 2016/17. Her birthplace also differs between the text and infobox. I'm searching through the 1940 US Census to see if I can find possible candidates but haven't come up with anything yet. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! Marion L. Brittingham, known as Tina Brittingham ... and at least one relative as on the YT page. Progress! Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:54, 24 February 2019 (UTC) PS: Yep... see name under "Copyright". The Marion L Brittingham living in Philadelphia was born on 5 July 1938. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:05, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ghmyrtle, Sorry about my message on your page but I thought I had lost all the edits I started about two hours ago. I put the info box up first and was about to place my finished revisions on the site when I recieved notification I'd been blocked. Well done on finding an exact date of birth. 'In The Basement' was a splendid magazine that reached 75 issues. It was dedicated to interviewing long forgotten R&B / Soul artists. Tina britt was one of them. Dorkinglad (talk) 15:52, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits and the information. I messaged her granddaughter, so if there need to be any corrections as a result we can take them on board. Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:11, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's great to see some detail being added. Dorset100 (talk) 19:07, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I guess (because you have 5000 edits) the move of Etaples art colony [1] to Wikipedia-space was a mistake? I have moved it back. Christian75 (talk) 05:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quite what the editors concerned with that move think you did wrong is beyond me. I never had this trouble when I redirected pages in the past. However, I'm replying to your message on the Mzilikazi page, although I no longer edit under that name. After I originally created the article on the Étaples colony I left to help edit an art encyclopedia on the other side of the world and had only limited online access outside office hours for most of a couple of years. Unable to reply to the negative criticism at the time, I lost heart and never returned to it.

I'd be inclined to tell you to go ahead with sorting the article out but have a few doubts about your knowledge of the subject. Your reasoning on whether there was a real colony in the town suggests massive ignorance. At that period there were colonies all along or just inland from the sea coast from Worpsewede in Germany, across the Netherlands and Belgium and then down to Brittany, of greater or lesser significance. In the case of most, their importance and documentation has been largely a matter of hindsight, but there are major books that cover Étaples and its artists and speak of it as a colony (or rather, a nest of colonies). Two factors rather fog the picture: one is that the significance of many of the North American and Oz/NZ artists, being expats, was not realised until later in their own countries. Their advanced styles relate to what was happening in Paris (only 3 hours away from them by train) and these trends often didn't have a name. The term Post-Impressionist (to which their style relates) was not even coined until 1910 when Roger Fry was casting about for the title of an exhibition he organised in Britain. So if you want to take the subject on, you'll need to have an interest in cultural development across frontiers and an appreciation of the fluidity of artistic styles. It was those phenomena that attracted me to the subject of the article at the start; I rather suspect that it is the way they challenge simplistic color-supplement notions that brought down criticism in the first place! I'll be happy to offer back-seat guidance if you feel equal to the effort. It requires sustained scholarship, not just snipping along the edges. Sweetpool50 (talk) 20:32, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Dorkinglad/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 13:46, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Prežihov Voranc you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 06:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Prežihov Voranc you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Prežihov Voranc for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of No Great Shaker -- No Great Shaker (talk) 08:22, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Dorkinglad:
I've been working on the Epsom article over the past few months and I am thinking about submitting it for WP:GA. I understand that you grew up in the town and I wondered if you'd be willing to take a look at the article and let me know your thoughts as to how I could improve it before nomination? I have set up a new section on the talk page for interested parties to discuss what additional work is required. I will ask a few others to chip in with their feedback and suggestions.
Thanks and best wishes, Mertbiol (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

hello, Sorry it's taken me awhile but personal circumstances have been fraught. An excellent article and I can see no obvious errors. Well done. It's remarkable how Emily Davison's reputation in Epsom has changed in one hundred years. I would add some information on Epsom Public Houses and under notable buildings mention the Amato Inn, one of the oldest pubs in Surrey approaching 350 years. There is a legend attached to the Pub which can be read about in the wiki article Amato (horse). Epsom's racing heritage was more obvious when I was a child with several pubs named after Derby winners (The Ladas and Eclipse, both buildings stand but not as pubs I recall). The naming of the roads of the Longmead Estate built in the 60s and 70s used Derby and Oaks winners. Few people realise this now. The old LSBC railway station Epsom Town still survives hidden behind a parade of shops.--Dorkinglad (talk) 15:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Rosa Mundi (album), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:28, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was the first time I have tried to do an album entry for an under represented artist and it will be the last. I didn't enjoy the writing. I don't want to spend anymore time on it so go ahead and delete. Dorkinglad (talk) 20:59, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rosa Mundi (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Agnès Souret, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think there is a referencing error. The reference is from the birth registry for Bayonne in 1902. I chose the journal template as it seemed the most appropriate. I've added some clarification which I hope meets the required standard. Dorkinglad (talk) 16:16, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have reassessed this as GA. A class requires two impartial reviews. Schierbecker (talk) 06:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks sir Dorkinglad (talk) 15:14, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Emily Stannard (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:09, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the hatnote(s) are the most likely way to move to correct article. I do not object to deletion of Emily Stannard (disambiguation). I can’t see it makes any difference either way. Dorkinglad (talk) 14:46, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]