user talk:mx3
Thanks
[edit]for reverting the vandalism on O-Zone. It was on my watchlist, but I'd never looked in the history, so I thought it was just a really short article. I'd been planning to expand it, but now I realize I don't have to. -- Soap Talk/Contributions 00:57, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, no problem. I just looked at the article for the first time in a few months and was shocked that the article went through so many edits without all of its normal sections. I'm sure many users would still appreciate any expansions to the article however ;). Eugeniu Bmsg 01:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Re: Ayu in Paris
[edit]Yeah, it's too bad there aren't more (free) non-concert photos of Ayu on the web. If only she would visit my city ... Ink Runner (talk) 00:52, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
Tokio
[edit]You said "Please read that section more carefully." However, WikiProject Albums#Formatting says:
- Songs and singles are placed in "quotation marks", album titles are italicized...
I think that it explains about albums.--ACSE (talk) 06:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
- You're completely right. I'm just stupid today; I thought the double apostrophes you added were quotation marks when I compared the revisions side by side. :P Eugeniu B +1 17:24, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Tokio albums
[edit]Hi.
Well, i`m not sure what do you mean by "fairly obvious" but i only did it because that`s what the project guidelines says an article must have, without it they are just stubs. That`s it. Zidane tribal (talk) 01:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
- The intention of the project is that anyone can appreciate the article, even if you are not familiar with the band, in this particular case the members have been the same for 15 years, but some bands change line-up every album. Zidane tribal (talk) 05:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
December 2009
[edit]Repeated action counts of removal of content they do not like can be considered vandalism, and your warning was done in complete bad faith as you could have just left a message on my talk like I have done. MS (Talk|Contributions) 20:55, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- I did leave a message on your talk page—warning you not to warn users not actually vandalizing pages. A warning is a message. How was my edit done in bad faith? By the way, remember your initial edits to Sunrise/Sunset (Love Is All)? Without making a AfD at all, you repeatedly blanked the page, although multiple users didn't agree with doing so. I didn't believe the article violated WP:NSONGS then and I don't think it did now either. Like I said earlier, discuss controversial edits on talk pages. And please don't delete my comments on your talk page, otherwise Template:Uw-tpv1 will end up accompanying that warning. Eugeniu B +1 21:11, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- A warning is a warning. A user friendly warning such as a minor message like above is considered a message. About the "Sunrise/Sunset" article I did not "blank" the page. I redirected the page, which was acceptable per WP:NSONGS, which it failed at the time. A AFD usually results in the deletion of a page hence the title Articles for deletion. I did not want the page deleted because in time it might become notable. There is a difference between deletion a article and redirecting it. Sure multiple editors disagreed with it, fans like that often do. Do not threaten me with warnings. Read WP:TPOC, I can remove your comment if I chose. And if you paid attention to the note on my talk it states I am watching your talk so I would reply to you on your talk. MS (Talk|Contributions) 21:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- How intriguing. Please, tell me where in this Wikipedia is a user friendly warning such as a minor message like above is considered a message, while a message using a template is not a message. I would love to know, since I've never heard of such an absurd claim. What part of WP:TPOC lets a user delete a message? The only one I can think of is #4, which deals with removing personal attacks and incivility. Please refresh yourself on those terms by visiting wiktionary:personal attack and wiktionary:incivility respectively. Eugeniu B +1 22:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- On your own user talk page, you may remove others' comments, although archiving is generally preferred. Its there on WP:TPOC. So please refresh yourself on the TPOC. Calling me a Talk page stalker is a personal attack if you did not know, which I'm pretty sure you did. Anyone knows that a warning is a warning. It does not take a guideline or a policy to tell you that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MS (talk • contribs) 22:41, 15 December 2009
- Is it still a personal attack if the author admits that it was a joke and was meant to be humorous? When did I actually call you a talk page stalker anyway. (If you were wondering, I watch your page too.) But you still didn't answer my biggest question, how was my warning on your talk page considered bad faith? I just didn't want to craft out a warning that already and conveniently exists as a template. Of course that didn't work, since it caused this long conversation. Eugeniu B +1 00:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
- On your own user talk page, you may remove others' comments, although archiving is generally preferred. Its there on WP:TPOC. So please refresh yourself on the TPOC. Calling me a Talk page stalker is a personal attack if you did not know, which I'm pretty sure you did. Anyone knows that a warning is a warning. It does not take a guideline or a policy to tell you that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MS (talk • contribs) 22:41, 15 December 2009
- How intriguing. Please, tell me where in this Wikipedia is a user friendly warning such as a minor message like above is considered a message, while a message using a template is not a message. I would love to know, since I've never heard of such an absurd claim. What part of WP:TPOC lets a user delete a message? The only one I can think of is #4, which deals with removing personal attacks and incivility. Please refresh yourself on those terms by visiting wiktionary:personal attack and wiktionary:incivility respectively. Eugeniu B +1 22:28, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
- A warning is a warning. A user friendly warning such as a minor message like above is considered a message. About the "Sunrise/Sunset" article I did not "blank" the page. I redirected the page, which was acceptable per WP:NSONGS, which it failed at the time. A AFD usually results in the deletion of a page hence the title Articles for deletion. I did not want the page deleted because in time it might become notable. There is a difference between deletion a article and redirecting it. Sure multiple editors disagreed with it, fans like that often do. Do not threaten me with warnings. Read WP:TPOC, I can remove your comment if I chose. And if you paid attention to the note on my talk it states I am watching your talk so I would reply to you on your talk. MS (Talk|Contributions) 21:38, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:35, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Recent edit to Live Prayer
[edit]Hello,
I reverted your recent edit to Live Prayer. While it is true that the large font size did not appear in the original, this is not the issue as this large font size appears throughout the entire quote. The statement "emphasis in original" is denoting the fact that the original source had the statement "FOR THAT REASON, HE WILL NOT BE RE-ELECTED" in all caps, whereas the rest of the text used normal capitalization. Your edit was reverted as you removed the statement "emphasis in original" for no valid reason as it was added per WP:MOS.
--Webley455 (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- That's very lovely that you think that way, but couldn't you have not reverted my other edits to the quote, such as the insanely large font size? Oh well, it's been removed now anyway. Eugeniu B +1 03:47, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
External link to social site in Olivia Lufkin
[edit]At most, one external link to a commercial topic is usually allowed. The exceptions are rare, and they are definitely not blogs that give readers personal commentary on how difficult it is to shop for shoes. An external link should add something significant and encyclopedic to topic, and in this case, it appears to add nothing. It's just a social site. Take a look at FA articles for major rock stars. Notice: no blogs as external links. Thanks, Piano non troppo (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
Magibon
[edit]Hi I come in good faith, a comment by you as been replied on its respective talk page. ciao Mrdonut2142 (talk) 14:24, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Recochoku
[edit]Well,the RIAJ Top Digital Songs chart does pass, which is the exact same thing as the Recochoku charts. The RIAJ Top Digital Songs is literally just the Recochoku charts posted on their website lol. It says at the top, (「着うたフル(R)」), which is the chart made by Recochoku. If you notice, RIAJ has stopped publishing this chart. That is because Recochoku now publishes the cahrt itself.
I'm not trying to start a war or anything. Maybe we could work towards getting Recochoku recognized (since right now, essentially part of Recochoku --the part that the RIAJ had published-- is recognized while the part that the RIAJ did not publish is not.) Impracticable (talk)
- Ok, I understand. The first thing I would do to get Recochoku recognized is to update the information on RIAJ Digital Track Chart, and perhaps move it to a different name if that seems appropriate. Then I think since it's basically the same chart, you can make the name change to Recochoku (or whatever the weekly chart is called) on Wikipedia:Record charts yourself, then note the change on Wikipedia talk:Record charts.
- The problem I see for Ayumi Hamasaki discography specifically is that there's no space for the digital chart info for Together When... and placing it under the Oricon chart info would be inappropriate. The best idea I think we can do if we want to keep the digital chart info for Together When... is removing the whole single from that table and making a new table for it in a section called "Japan-released digital singles" or something like that. Sorafune +1 05:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- In regards to there being no room for Rechochoku/RIAJ charts, i'm thinking maybe we should change the format of her singles charts. Instead of having the daily peaks, monthly and weekly peaks (which can just be put into the main article) we leave the weekly Oricon peaks, keep the Billboard AIRPLAY peaks (because their Hot 100 is a little silly to begin with.) and use Recochoku for digital. Also, or sales, maybe we should emrge Full Song (Chaku Uta Full) with physical sales (considering digital sales have taken over physical sales, it's a little silly to not include them)
I'm thinking maybe a format like this.
Japanese-released singles
[edit]Year | Title | Charts/Sales | Certifications | Album | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Sales | Digital Sales | Airplay | Physical Sales | Digital Sales | Ringtones | Full Song | Physical | |||
2009 | "Sunrise ~Love Is All~" | 1 | 1 | 15 | 110,169+ | 750,000+ | 2x Platinum | Platinum | Gold | 11th Studio Album |
"Sunset ~Love Is All~" | 11 | – | – | – | – | |||||
"You Were..." | 1 | 3 | 43 | 114,725+ | – | – | – | Gold | ||
"Ballad" | 36 | – | – | – | – | |||||
2010 | "Microphone" | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
"Don't Look Back" | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
"Sexy Little Things" | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
Opinions?
PS, just for the record, I've been the one who's done all the major format revisions of this specific table for the last year or so. (I added certifications, the Billboard section, etc). I feel like a change of this caliber will make it easier to read and simpler, but also more accurate. Instead of showing a billion sales charts (no really, 5 is way too many) and 3 billboard charts (one of which is a sales chart and one is a hybrid sales & airplay) why not have 3 charts that show the three different formats? correct?
My issues: Songs chart seperately on digital charts when they chart together on physical charts. So, that's the reason for that split up. But which song does the physical sales go to? both?
- Sorry for not getting back to you sooner. Personally I much rather prefer having the daily/weekly/monthly/yearly ranks all in there because they're very convenient in comparing the popularity of her singles all at once. I'm also very unsure about having different songs of a single split up, since this is a chart specifically about her singles, not her songs, and splitting them up could imply separate releases. I still think having a main singles table and a second digital-release table would solve this, as well as indication of physical sales for the singles. Sorafune +1 05:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Pandora
[edit]Please don't change the meaning of a sentence and call it a "Reword."
You took the true, referenced fact that on Feb 8th the final case molds were approved, and "reworded" it into an assertion that mass production had begun, and that units had begun to ship in "early February". Both are false.
In fact, no final units have gone to customers because none have been made yet.
"Mass Production" is a little vague, but no manufacturing of interest has "started" recently. The electronics were mass produced months ago, the joystick nubs over a year ago, and the mass production of the plastics will begin either late February or early March.
(You may have been confused by forum posts by the developers who recently excitedly posted that they had received their pre-production prototype units.) APL (talk) 04:46, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
- No, I was following this source, although I did forget to cite it. Engadget is usually reliable, but it looks like I read the article before they included the "update" correcting their mistake. Sorafune +1 05:38, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Radu
[edit]Hi! You reverted my changes about the song Mix Dojdi in the article of Radu Sirbu. Well, it's not released so obviously it does not belong in the discography section. Here is the song, and the lyrics, so we have a source. I'm not going to add the information again if you not agree. / Alexey KzKrann (talk) 19:21, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Institute for Policy Studies
[edit]As per your comment on my talkpage, I was not aware of the Wikipedia guideline on etquiette, but now that I am I will refrain from personally attacking Anonymous. However, what I won't be refraining from is my commitment to keep the criticism that I wrote about IPS on the Wiki-article which Anonymous is trying to delete. Since you have anti-vandalism and anti-Wikipedia edit blocking powers, I ask that you mediate this dispute and speedily resolve this issue in a fair and judicious manner. Fellytone (talk) 03:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphan dates
[edit]Thanks for letting me know. Rich Farmbrough, 00:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC).
Namie
[edit]It's okay xD On a page like that I can totally understand, plus it was from so much further back with edits in the middle that it gets kind of difficult to separate it all out across versions.
To be honest, the main hint (to me, at least) was the fact it said "1995" under the "1998" section. But no, it's fine xD ~Chelsea (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
Tokio/One Ok Rock
[edit]You seem to be the person to come to about Tokio/One Ok Rock stuff. I'm trying to make 2010 in Japanese music as awesome as possible - you wouldn't be able to create articles for the Tokio/One Ok Rock related stuff, would you? There's just "Advance/Mata Asa ga Kuru," "Kanzen Kankaku Dreamer," and Niche Syndrome at the moment, but I'm sure there's more that'll come up! --Prosperosity (talk) 04:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, I'll do that as soon as I have information. Sorafune +1 00:11, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yay, thanks a bunch! --Prosperosity (talk) 06:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
Sergei Kourdakov
[edit]Sorry, Mr (Miss?) Sorafune, but it was not just a funeral procession in an Orthodox church (which would not be allowed at any rate!). It was an Orthodox *funeral service* (at a ROCOR church at that!) which ARE NOT prayed for non-Orthodox. This is prima facie evidence that Sergei became Orthodox sometime between his finding God and his murder. Orthohawk (talk) 02:39, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
How about this for proof: a note on Fr. Sergius at http://www.theophanydesigns.com/rcs/sources.html
SHUKIN * Father Sergius (t1978) A priest who recently died in Canada. When he was a young man he traveled to Optina Monastery to get advice from Elder Nektary concerning how he should live a Christian life in an antichrjstian society. Having concocted elaborate plans in his mind as to how to start secret catacomb lay brotherhoods, he approached the Elder and asked him what he should do. Elder Nektary replied calmly, “Step by step.” Father Sergius left humbled, yet he followed the Elder’s advice, and after suffering for many years, he was ordained reader by Patriarch Tikhon himself and eventually became a priest, later emigrating to the West. He has provided a fascinating description of the life of the Catacomb Church (in which he describes himself in the third person as “Paul”). He kept abreast of information Concerning Orthodoxy in the Soviet Union (see Pp. 162-79), and personally interviewed Sergei Kourdakov at which time he discovered that he was an Orthodox Christian (see “The Orthodox Word”, no. 59, Nov.-Dec. 1974). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orthohawk (talk • contribs) 02:58, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
"good examples" of sections that have only one link
[edit]There are plenty out there. Just to name a few: Coldplay (awards section), this is a good article. Taylor Swift ( Awards and nominations section), another good example. Clari 2010 (talk) 01:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Internet celebrity
[edit]See here, for some thoughts about supporting additional fields in {{infobox person}}. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:47, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Bakiyev
[edit]He was Acting President from 25 March 2005 to 15 August 2005, at which point he got full presidential power until he resigned on 15 April 2010 (in reality, until 7 April 2010 but that's a different story). Therequiembellishere (talk) 20:42, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Bullshit?
[edit]You deliberately altered a sourced fact based on your own belief regarding a release date. Fact, you are wrong...release date is June 7th, and you had no place changing it without a source to back up your own bullshit change. Warning was perfectly valid...you've been around long enough to know the guidelines. magnius (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, so you've left another note here. I just got done writing a message on your talk page. Oh yes, bee-ess. Sorafune +1 00:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Divx logo
[edit]Since when has that been a factor into whether or not an image can be used for fair use in an article? It's an artifact from the screenshot being taken, not a factor into whether or not the image can be used for Wikipedia's encyclopedic purposes.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Superfly
[edit]Please try to use more than two references. Here's a whole selection of articles on Superfly.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:42, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Also you mixed up Hello Hello's tracklist with Ai wo Komete Hanataba wo.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
In addition, quotation marks around songs are not bolded, please use the Japanese title of the song in the lead, and take note of Category:Superfly albums, Category:Superfly songs, and Template:Superfly.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 06:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, alright, alright, I'll keep all of that in mind. What do you mean by "quotation marks around songs are not bolded" though? I don't know what you're talking about. mx3 (Sorafune) 話 07:01, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
- Don't use '''"song"'''. Use "'''song'''".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Ikimono-gakari
[edit]The band uses this name in all media that feature their name in the English language. Not "Ikimono Gakari". On the English Wikipedia, the official name of non-English subjects takes precedence over the "common name" unless a consensus is determined otherwise.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 19:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
- What part of the band's website uses "ikimono-gakari"? Logicartery claims their website uses "ikimonogakari" but I haven't found either version on their official website, only いきものがかり. On English language websites, all I've really seen is "Ikimono Gakari". Also you don't have to point out every edit I make that you don't like as you have above. Just make the changes and I'll notice them, since I add almost every page I edit to my watchlist. mx3 (Sorafune) 話 23:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Shinee
[edit]Hi! If you remember, you edited the Shinee article with me. I need your help again. Shinee is releasing its second full-length album soon and it seems a whole load of unregistered users (or DA fans!) have started to edit the GA status article a lot. They have even disturbed the general layout without discussion (all musician biographies on wikipedia are required to follow a general layout that can't be changed). Since, they don't even know about the rules and standards of wikipedia it is impossible to hold them back. We rather edit other articles than keep reverting their mindless fandom. But I think it had now become important that we make a separate Shinee discography article. Fans have added even the track listings. This had really messed up the page, but I dont want the GA status to go away since we worked so hard on it :'( . Shinee has now two albums and three EPs (thats even more than Girls' Generation who have only two albums and two EPs, and debuted one and a half year before Shinee). What is your opinion about a separate discography article? Will you help again? Reply please, I have watchlisted your page. Farjad0322 (talk) 09:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- This is alarming indeed; I'm seeing MOS violations all over the place! First, I want to point out that discography sections and articles should in all but the rarest of cases never have tracklists in them. The tracklists should only appear in the album/single articles themselves. Now I have to admit that I still wouldn't support a separate discography article because the size of the Shinee article is still quite small, as is the discography. When splitting off discographies, it's important to also note how large the discographies are in terms of how much information there is for every release. Girls' Generation discography has much more information on their singles, as well as information on their music videos. In any case, the GG discography has information about 59 releases, while the Shinee discography section has only 12. If the Shinee discography had more information on their singles, a music videos section (which actually probably isn't needed), and more releases in general, then it would be a different case. For now, I'll help out with removing all of the fancruft and restoring original and more decent content. エムエックスさん 話 05:19, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Usurpation request
[edit]I confirm that I would like to usurp de:User:Mx3 and ca:User:Mx3. エムエックスさん 話 15:11, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
KISS principle
[edit]Before table-ising any more articles [1], I would ask that you take a moment and think about whether placing the content in table form is really value add to the project. See Wikipedia:TABLE#When_tables_may_not_be_appropriate and consider the trouble that new (and experienced!) editors have with the wiki table markup. Active Banana (talk) 17:51, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- I suppose you're right to some extent; I changed the singles back to a bulleted list. But with just about everything on Wikipedia, the first thing we should be thinking about is the readers, not editors. Tables are things editors just have to learn. If you can't edit a table like one on 4minute, then you'll probably have plenty of trouble with ones like on Queens of the Stone Age discography. エムエックスさん 話 18:18, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: What a Girl Wants (4minute song)
[edit]Hello Mx3. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of What a Girl Wants (4minute song), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 requires that the artist does not have an article and that there are no claims of importance/significance regarding the musical recording itself. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 19:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Although it is true that the song charted at #3 on the Gaon downloads chart, the chart is based on the best selling songs of each week, meaning various album tracks are eligible to chart. An example on this week's chart would be Taeyang's "I Need a Girl". It's at number five this week, but its position is based from downloads of that song from the album, which is why if you scroll down you can find "Just a Feeling" at #79 and "You're My" at #87 - both of which are also album tracks from Solar. Hope that helped! :) ~ Hayilim (talk) 21:38, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hm, that's very strange. In that case, since the song was released only in Hit Your Heart, do you think it would be better to merge HuH (song) into Hit Your Heart? Unless it does get released separately in the future, it's very unlikely that the article will be expanded, and the information that it does have, like music video, performances, chart info, etc, can easily be included in Hit Your Heart. Either way, all of the information in the article for HuH should be included in the album along with similar information for other songs in the album anyway. エムエックスさん 話 22:13, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
- Great suggestion, I will start on that now. Would redirecting HuH (song) to Hit Your Heart be okay? I don't know how to merge. :P Hayilim (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, merging just means transferring the content and making a redirect anyway. :) エムエックスさん 話 14:29, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
- Great suggestion, I will start on that now. Would redirecting HuH (song) to Hit Your Heart be okay? I don't know how to merge. :P Hayilim (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:O-Zone_at_Cerbul_de_Aur_in_2005.jpg
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/32px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:O-Zone_at_Cerbul_de_Aur_in_2005.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 12:57, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
dead links
[edit]Hi, I know you meant well, but please don't delete dead links and replace with a cite-needed template, as you did here. From WP:DEADLINK, "Except for URLs in the External links section that have not been used to support any article content, do not delete a URL solely because the URL does not work any longer. Recovery and repair options and tools are available." The citation of a dead link, especially one with an accessdate, indicates that the statement that it supports has had support, and was checked by an editor. It also provides to later editors a suggestion of where the support had been found, which is helpful in case the link is gone due to a website reorganization or move. The preferred handling is to use the {{dead link}} template. WP:DEADLINK is nice how-to guide on marking and (even better) fixing broken links. Thanks for your work. TJRC (talk) 18:31, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
[edit]- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
[edit]- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
[edit]
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi! Please participate in the discussion for criteria of listing at Talk:List of Korean musicians. Thanks! Farjad0322 (talk) 18:11, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
[edit]- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
[edit]- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
[edit]- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
[edit]- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
[edit]- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
Orphaned non-free image File:Rock 'n' Roll Circus - Ayumi Hamasaki CD+DVD.jpg
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Rock 'n' Roll Circus - Ayumi Hamasaki CD+DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 October 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced
- In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
- WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
- Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
[edit]- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
The Signpost: 8 November 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity
- WikiProject report: WikiProject California
- Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science
- Election report: The countdown begins
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
[edit]- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
[edit]- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
[edit]- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
[edit]- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
[edit]- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
[edit]- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
[edit]- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
[edit]- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
[edit]- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
[edit]- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
[edit]- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
[edit]- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 July 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Picture of the Year 2010; data challenge; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Star-Spangled WikiProject
- Featured content: Two newly promoted portals
- Arbitration report: Arb resigns while mailing list leaks continue; Motion re: admin
The Signpost: 11 July 2011
[edit]- From the editor: Stepping down
- Higher education summit: Wikipedia in Higher Education Summit recap
- In the news: Britannica and Wikipedia compared; Putin award criticized; possible journalistic sockpuppeting
- WikiProject report: Listening to WikiProject Albums
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tree shaping case comes to a close
- Technology report: WMF works on its release strategy; secure server problems
The Signpost: 18 July 2011
[edit]- In the news: Fine art; surreptitious sanitation; the politics of kyriarchic marginalization; brief news
- WikiProject report: Earn $$$ free pharm4cy WORK FROM HOME replica watches ViAgRa!!!
- Featured content: Historic last launch of the Space Shuttle Endeavour; Teddy Roosevelt's threat to behead official; 18th-century London sex manual
- Arbitration report: Motion passed to amend 2008 case: topic ban and reminder
- Technology report: Code Review backlog almost zero; What is: Subversion?; brief news