• User talk:Gwern/Archive/1 -(9 September 2006 - 17 November 2006)
• User talk:Gwern/Archive/2 (28 November 2006 - 29 July 2007)
• User talk:Gwern/Archive/3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Modafinil, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Timothy Grant. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Administrative alerts. Since you had some involvement with the Administrative alerts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Peter James (talk) 01:34, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Impossibility thorem. Since you had some involvement with the Impossibility thorem redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Spirit Ethanol (talk) 11:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried to go to the article for pig in a blanket and got redirected to pigs in blankets. This bugs me because a) "pigs in blankets" *sounds* weird, and b) naming guidelines (WP:SINGULAR) say to avoid plurals. I figured I'd check the page history for the redirect to see if the article could be moved over the redirect, but it has more than one history entry. I was going to say "screw it", but after clicking away a username flashed across my line of sight and instead I said, "holy shit, it's Gwern".

I don't have the wherewithal to deal with Wikipedia bullshittery anymore to try and get someone to do a proper move, but I thought that you might if brought to your attention.

Thanks. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Portable Standard Lisp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable variant of lisp

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. H.dryad (talk) 14:31, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I just came across your Norway Talk page Taxes comment at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Taxation_in_Norway#Skatteliste Please see my comment there. Formulairis990 (talk) 15:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

GCTA

added links pointing to Pedigree, Illumina and GWAS

Maven (Scrabble)

added a link pointing to Go

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Genome-wide complex trait analysis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caudate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bill Clinton\. Since you had some involvement with the Bill Clinton\ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Neve–selbert 23:03, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The IQ Controversy, the Media and Public Policy (book), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page GWAS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Text editor support. Since you had some involvement with the Text editor support redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 07:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amanda Knox s. Since you had some involvement with the Amanda Knox s redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SSTflyer 10:54, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A template you created has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Primefac (talk) 01:04, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ummon zenshi. Since you had some involvement with the Ummon zenshi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ummon Zenshi. Since you had some involvement with the Ummon Zenshi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Un Mun. Since you had some involvement with the Un Mun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:04, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Un mun. Since you had some involvement with the Un mun redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wu-Men. Since you had some involvement with the Wu-Men redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yün-men. Since you had some involvement with the Yün-men redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yunmen Wenyan Ummon. Since you had some involvement with the Yunmen Wenyan Ummon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yun Men. Since you had some involvement with the Yun Men redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yun men. Since you had some involvement with the Yun men redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:12, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yun-men. Since you had some involvement with the Yun-men redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 05:15, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sayings of the high one. Since you had some involvement with the Sayings of the high one redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sayings of the high ones. Since you had some involvement with the Sayings of the high ones redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 21:18, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Vg-stub. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Vg-stub redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Magioladitis (talk) 12:44, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arch-linux. Since you had some involvement with the Arch-linux redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Arch-Linux. Since you had some involvement with the Arch-Linux redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 03:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ReiAsuka.png	Congratulations!
	Enjoy! Ethanbas (talk) 07:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Far-horizons-cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ist of shippuden episodes. Since you had some involvement with the Ist of shippuden episodes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect TEngu. Since you had some involvement with the TEngu redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect .Monster (manga).ref. Since you had some involvement with the .Monster (manga).ref redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 23:34, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Im' a rocket man. Since you had some involvement with the Im' a rocket man redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 10:52, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I noticed a copyright issue with an image you apparently uploaded to Commons eleven years ago. I'd need to be a complete lunatic to hold it against you that you made a mistake that long ago, but while I removed most of the non-PD text, there is still some text visible on the opposite side of the page, and was wondering if you would be able to re-scan the image with perhaps a dimmer light or something? Sorry, I know even less about scanning than image editing (and I made the change that I did in MS Paint...). Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 22:55, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I have to click through and stare at it to see any text. I made the scan from a library book I had ILLed at the time, so I do not; but by sheer coincidence in the past few weeks, I have been going back through my articles on gwern.net & WP and buying cited books in order to scan & upload them, and have already ordered a copy of Japanese Court Poetry. --Gwern (contribs) 03:01 1 October 2017 (GMT)

Have you created any more bots that are against Wikipedia Standards? 69.255.82.84 (talk) 18:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dartmouth workshop, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Nash, John McCarthy and Herbert Simon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect History Of Arabc. Since you had some involvement with the History Of Arabc redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 18:16, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Base Delta Zero. Since you had some involvement with the Base Delta Zero redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Base delta zero. Since you had some involvement with the Base delta zero redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 18:35, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Miss Hannah Minx. Since you had some involvement with the Miss Hannah Minx redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Flavors lisp. Since you had some involvement with the Flavors lisp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Absolute-sandman-cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dan Simmons, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 13:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Beldorian Leia Duel TEC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Phantom type. Since you had some involvement with the Phantom type redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Tea2min (talk) 11:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xmonad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xmonad (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. wumbolo ^^^ 12:09, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Happstack is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happstack until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – FenixFeather ^{(talk)(Contribs)} 23:01, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Gwern, thanks for adding those missing testimony docs for this case. When I first added the docs in that collection ~10+ years ago, for some reason they weren't all available through PACER. I haven't had a chance to read through the links you added, but I plan to at some point in the future. jlcoving (talk) 00:09, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the docket timeline is confusing. For some reason, the transcripts were yanked and then new versions posted later, which was confusing because I wasn't sure if I'd gotten all of Skinner's or not... I didn't care enough to download the additional filings to figure out what went on there, as my experience has been that when filings get amended like that, the reason is often boring, and I had spent enough money at that point. (Getting all of them cost $50!) I still wasn't able to get some of the transcripts listed as I got permission-denied errors, which I assume means they were hidden for confidentiality or secrecy or something. If you're interested, you might want to retry PACER. The docket should also be on RECAP now. --Gwern (contribs) 00:46 1 October 2018 (GMT)

Of papers is not allowed. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Superplastic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:54, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Genome-wide complex trait analysis and Genetic correlation are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether they should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Genome-wide complex trait analysis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jytdog (talk) 10:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It would be much easier for everyone to analyze your sourcing if you used the standard citation templates and cited the PMID. There is an easy tool to use, based into the editing window's toolbar (I only learned about it myself a couple of years ago).

The note below provides brief information about the editing community defines "primary" and "secondary" sources per WP:MEDDEF and a concrete explanation on how to format citations from WP:MEDHOW...

Please remember that when adding content about health, please only use high-quality reliable sources as references. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations (There are several kinds of sources that discuss health: here is how the community classifies them and uses them). WP:MEDHOW walks you through editing step by step. A list of resources to help edit health content can be found here. The edit box has a built-in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN.

1. While editing any article or a wikipage, on the top of the edit window you will see a toolbar which says "cite" click on it
2. Then click on "templates",
3. Choose the most appropriate template and fill in the details beside a magnifying glass followed by clicking said button,
4. If the article is available in Pubmed Central, you have to add the pmc parameter manually -- click on "show additional fields" in the template and you will see the "pmc" field. Please add just the number and don't include "PMC".

Please don't take this as pointy. Jytdog (talk) 22:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Arbcom is set to de facto ban him (he cannot resume editing without permission from the Arbitration Committee) and it looks like they will block him indefinitely, and so he can't be sanctioned further for behaviour at that AfD, and thus there's no point to an AE filing, and I'd suggest withdrawing/removing it. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I didn't realize that his talk page edit was in response to that.

I would still like to see an AE resolution, to condemn his behavior and affirm the topic ban, in case he ever comes back, and send a message about trying to redefine 'GMO' even after being specifically told to interpret it 'broadly'. I still have to deal with the consequences of his harassment even if he has been indef banned for other things. --Gwern (contribs) 17:30 4 December 2018 (GMT)

I suggest that the only venue at the current time to raise the concerns you're raising is on the arbitration page. But keep in mind that the issues relate to something totally unrelated to what you are raising. If you decide to participate you may want to be mindful of that. Coretheapple (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hakaba KitarM. Since you had some involvement with the Hakaba KitarM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Raymond1922 (talk) 23:21, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Self ruke. Since you had some involvement with the Self ruke redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Brycehughes (talk) 01:38, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect A crazy ivan. Since you had some involvement with the A crazy ivan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 03:50, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Masschusetts. Since you had some involvement with the Masschusetts redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Langauge acquisition. Since you had some involvement with the Langauge acquisition redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. – Uanfala (talk) 01:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This link has the same name as your user name https://www.gwern.net/docs/biology/2000-iapac-norvir/index.html

What is your connection? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Obviously, I am hosting the archive because of its historical value and interest. What is your problem with this? Did you not look at the reference I provided and have not familiarized yourself with the polymorph incident despite having reverted me twice now? --Gwern (contribs) 02:37 29 November 2019 (GMT)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology.. Since you had some involvement with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Senator2029 “Talk” 05:38, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Big Bird, TX. Since you had some involvement with the Big Bird, TX redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Theanthropos. Since you had some involvement with the Theanthropos redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. OcelotCreeper (talk) 16:16, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know, I flagged polygenic score for expert-subject genetics just now, due to the complexity of the language in the lead, which has remained relatively unchanged since you added this passage back in November 2016.

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Polygenic_score&diff=prev&oldid=749941005

Don't get me wrong, sometimes I am myself more in the mood to fill a gap than to find ideal language. Nevertheless, on a dispassionate footing, I bounce around in this kind of material a lot, and rarely do I encounter a sentence like this one that defeats even my second reading (though I did eventually clue in). If you still recall your own intent, you'd be the best person to unravel this language in the first instance. Part of the problem pertains to "hits" being a common English word, so phrase-binding does not at first proceed as abstractly as it might otherwise do were a jargon lexeme to take its place. — MaxEnt 01:48, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Beofre the Law. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 7#Beofre the Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 16:27, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia policies. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 14#Wikipedia policies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — J947 ^[cont] 02:07, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Intendo Entertainment System. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 15#Intendo Entertainment System until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Computervprogram. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 16#Computervprogram until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 00:20, 16 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sockepuppet. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 11#Sockepuppet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 15:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect DFTT. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 20#DFTT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Not a very active user (talk) 08:15, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Enecyclopedia of the brethren of purity. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 29#Enecyclopedia of the brethren of purity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — MarkH₂₁^talk 09:05, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fuck-you-money. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 10#Fuck-you-money until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:46, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Unown'. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 17#Unown' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 22:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kernel computer science. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 7#Kernel computer science until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:21, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sheep-goat effect. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 31#Sheep-goat effect until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BDD (talk) 17:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use a custom timestamp when you sign. As Wikipedia:Signatures#Guidelines and policies says: Always keep the time/date-stamp: these are used by bots to determine when a discussion is eligible to be archived. Nardog (talk) 08:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Existential threats. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 24#Existential threats until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:26, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect INpolis (city), Marion County, IN. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 31#INpolis (city), Marion County, IN until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 20:06, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your incredible efforts to preserve the Rule of Rose interview. I had no idea the offical site went down and that, even worse, the IA's archived copy of the official site was unusable. I cannot imagine the considerable work that must have gone into preserving it. Kind regards, Grace Clara (talk) 00:35, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastes Paracelsus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 30#Aureolus Theophrastus Bombastes Paracelsus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 09:07, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hikarunix, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hikarunix (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]