User talk:Chiolite

Has this user made a silly mistake? Click on the trout to notify him!

You have inserted redirects for all articles on the individual books in this series on the basis that they are not notable according to the standards of Wikipedia. I think you are probably quite correct BUT there are lots of links to these articles and they all loop back to the series article. You should have updated these links as well, or else leave well alone. Either do a proper job or don't do it at all! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgk168421 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Not a very active user, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ghana Interbank Payment and Settlement Systems, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: See the page history, this was a valid stub until recently. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. – Joe (talk) 09:38, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NEXIST as you are supposed to carry out a thorough search for sources not just comment on the existing state of the article. I suggest you slow down your nominations and check them all as per WP:BEFORE. Also, have you been editing as an ip while using this account? regards Atlantic306 (talk) 17:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I don't always bother to log in when editing. Not a very active user (talk) 04:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the articles I have been nominating for deletion have been mostly about fictional creatures which don't seem to be mentioned any suitable sources, just some fan wikis and primary sources. @Atlantic306: Have you found any suitable sources discussing the topics of the articles I've been nominating for deletion? Not a very active user (talk) 04:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi, it is advised to log in when you are editing unless you use a fixed ip address and declare it on your user page, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for informing me. I try to avoid editing anonymously in the future. Not a very active user (talk) 14:33, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not every single article needs to be tagged for popular culture in the deletion sorting list. If you look through the archives articles tagged for that usually have "popular culture" in their names. Its for articles about popular culture, not just things that are part of popular culture since that would be almost everything. Dream Focus 14:14, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the speed of your nominations for AFD and redirecting indicates you are not following WP:BEFORE which is disruptive. You are also hounding an experienced admin @BOZ:by nominating a large number of his articles without giving him time to do a thorough source-search in response, Atlantic306 (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll slow down my nominations. However, I haven't this far found any secondary sources discussing the fictional creatures I have been nominating for deletion. The only mentions I have found have been in primary sources and fan wikis.

Also, I don't nominate pages for deletion because they are created by a specific user. I nominate them for deletion because they don't meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. If the articles I nominated for deletion were created by someone else, (and a few of them in fact were) I would still have nominated them for deletion. Not a very active user (talk) 09:22, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic306, I appreciate the concern, truly, but the AFD party has been quite successful lately and is not going to stop or even slow down on my account. Since they have eliminated all of my merge targets, that has effectively throttled most of my AFD participation, so I essentially have surrendered to the rampant deletionism at this point. Sorry to disappoint, but imagine my disappointment. User:Hobit essentially retired yesterday over this point, which I find far more disappointing. BOZ (talk) 14:52, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Penis (disambiguation)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Doug Mehus T·C 19:26, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you redirected a whole batch of books on 5 September, declaring them as not satisfying NBOOK. Each of them included an image of the book cover, uploaded to Wikipedia under fair use, and likely to be removed when no longer in use in an article. If these had stayed redirected, those images could have been deleted. If you are concerned about the notability of a book, please tag it with a template to indicate your concern rather than deciding to sweep away the combined work of other editors without warning. I have restored the articles I noticed (looking at Lindsey Davis's page I was astonished to see that the Falco books were all redirects, as I knew they had previously had articles). While redirecting an article is easily reversible up to a point, the effort involved in finding and uploading fair use book cover images is an argument for taking time over removing the content of articles like these. I think it's likely that reviews in serious publications could be found for all LD's books. PamD 15:53, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect The Teflon President has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 July 2 § The Teflon President until a consensus is reached. . Three other redirects are nominated in the same section. A7V2 (talk) 01:16, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE Jgk168421 (talk) 01:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC) See "The Roman Mysteries" on your Talk Page.[reply]