User talk:IloveKVariety

Hi IloveKVariety! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

The article Kim Soya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 21:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You need reliable sources that are cited for such information. That's what makes Wikipedia a useful tool. Reliable sourced information, not truth. Evaders99 (talk) 09:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Justeditingtoday (talk) 05:36, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

You recently posted WP:ANI#Annoying user. I think this may be the same topic you previously posted at WP:ANI#Keep changing the things that are based on evidences? Assuming both issues are the same, a few editors have commented at your first post, and it would probably be better to continue discussion at your first post.

Incidentally, I commented on your second posting - IP editors such as the one you've been having problems with do have talk pages, and it may be worth trying to raise issues directly with them. Often IP editors' change their IP addresses quite frequently (mine changes whenever my router reboots) and it can be difficult to carry on discussions when this happens. As an alternative, you could try creating a new discussion on an article's talk page, and linking to that discussion in your edit summary when you edit the article or revert an IP editor's edit.

Hope this helps, and best of luck with the issues you're encountering. 80.229.60.197 (talk) 09:27, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article ELRIS has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Domdeparis (talk) 16:24, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jungkook (singer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —C.Fred (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most viewed K-pop music videos in 24 hours is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most viewed K-pop music videos in 24 hours until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:23, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, are the "2017 MAMA Mwave Global Fans' Choice" and "Mwave Music Chart Award" the same awards? What about "2017 Favorite KPOP Star", isnt this same as ""2017 MAMA Mwave Global Fans' Choice"? Are there any official announcements about those categories since they are not listed at the official website in voting section? Snowflake91 (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So hey, for the Mwave Music chart award, its actually the 2017 MAMA global fans choice but i am not exactly sure of the 'official name' but if u search 2017 MAMA global fans choice on the internet, it comes out the Mwave Music chart award. And as for the 2017 Favourite KPOP star, its an entirely new catogory (more like a popularity award for artist) while the other one is more like a popularity award for songs (2017 MAMA global fans choice/Mwave Music chart award.) IloveKVariety (talk) 16:19, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IloveKVariety. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IloveKVariety . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 03:20, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IloveKVariety. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you edited the Bonsang for Red Velvet as "Seulgi&Irene" only when in fact they won the bonsang as a group for Psycho. Although fast edits are welcome, be sure to only edit with full accuracy as to avoid any discrepancies especially without a written source. Good day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kntx12 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]