User talk:Evaders99

What makes the page to be considered for deletion? If you're able to verify the information and able to fix it, why can't you help improve the page and instead of deleting the page?

The artist has a page on Spanish, Korean, Indonesian, Mongol(?), Tagalog, and Chinese. What make these pages stay up, and what make this English page to be taken down?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpopfansince09 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]  

(talk page watcher) @Kpopfansince09: an article existing on another language Wikipedia doesn’t automatically mean one should be made on the English Wikipedia. Other language Wikipedias May have completely different guidelines regarding notability and could also be more lenient than the English. All articles must pass notability guidelines, and Jeonghan isn’t notable outside of Seventeen. If you believe he does, then you’re more than welcome to discuss this on the AFD (link can be found on the article) and state your case. Alex (talk) 01:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I created a wikipedia page for a Thai and Korean actor in the past 12~ months, and it's still up and no notification of deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kpopfansince09 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As User:Alexanderlee already stated, English wikipedia has its own policies on WP:Notability - you should contribute your arguments on the AFD on why he meets that stated notability requirements, see WP:MUSICBIO as well. And generally WP:OTHERSTUFF exists is not a defense for deletion discussions. Evaders99 (talk) 06:46, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for placing myself in an edit war with KStar101 but clearly their fandom is getting in the way of evidence. I don't know what else to say them to make my point. I do believe I'm right but I know it's less common for this spelling to be used by fans and blogs. I guess the problem is with the direct character romanization of their names. Is there an admin or moderator we could talk to who is heavily involved in K-pop related articles? RatiziAngelou^contribs 22:30, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen a few admins involved in banning vandals but I don't know of any active contributors. It's not a big enough deal for an admin to get involved. Personally, I'm not going to get too worked up over it. It's wasting energy to fight the fans. Evaders99 (talk) 23:14, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for watching over the page Urville86 (talk) 06:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I thought it was appropriate to change it to Hanryu because that is the correct way to romanize it in English, even though most people seem to pronounce it as "hallyu".

-Wajalama

Hey Evaders99. I'm dropping you a note because you used to (or still do!) patrol new pages. This is just to let you know that we've deployed and developed Page Curation, which augments and supersedes Special:NewPages - there are a lot of interesting new features :). There's some help documentation here if you want to familiarise yourself with the system and start using it. If you find any bugs or have requests for new features, let us know here. Thanks! Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Skill at Thumbnails Barnstar
	Thank you for your assistance in the formating of a copyright free photo of Sunye. Geraldshields11 (talk) 18:09, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	Oops.
	Sorry for editing it, it was just a little bit of fun. Sorry :( Shineejjang (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yang Yo-seob, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MNET (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for looking at the edits of Choi Hyun Hee (talk · contribs). He is a student in my Wikipedia class. Would you be so kind and to leave him a more detailed explanation of why you reverted his edits? I left him a note, but it would be great if he also got a note from another editor. Thanks! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:50, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PLS DONT CHANGE THE CONTRIBUTION I MADE IN PARK MIN YOUNG :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koreanyeoja (talk • contribs) 07:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't vandalize and add unsourced information then. Wikipedia:Verifiability Evaders99 (talk) 00:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Im not vandilizing it im adding informations that i gathered in the internet and thats not unsorced — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koreanyeoja (talk • contribs) 09:06, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Im not vandilizing it im adding informations that i gathered in the internet and thats not unsorced AND I ALREADY MADE AN EXPERIMENT SO PLEASE DONT CHANGE IT — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koreanyeoja (talk • contribs) 09:07, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I temporarily removed the speedy tag because I can't find the source. Please help find it. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:16, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. To be more clear: I think it's a copyvio and doesn't totally duplicate Carpet. There's a chance the spam company wrote it and it can be sourced or bits added to carpet. Unlikely, but no harm in keeping it for a short while. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:22, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I looked for copyvios and didn't find any exact phrasing being copied either. I think it's a spam advertisement as a content fork, but I guess it's okay to leave it as-is until someone finds the copyvio. Evaders99 (talk) 06:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Seungri may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• //star.moneytoday.co.kr/view/star_view.php?type=1&gisano=2007120811191544749 빅뱅, '줄넘기춤'으로 국민댄스 도전 (Big Bang, going for 'Jump Rope dance' as the all-time dance] Retrieved March 10, 2008.</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:29, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Still article is in progress, references will be mentioned soon.-- Rajesh Unuppally 06:49, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	It's not for removing the links, is there any rule to only 2 links? other bands 4 , 5 ,6 ...why 2 for Crayon Pop  ???? Sanderasa (talk) 04:40, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Adding improper external links is a problem - but it's NOT vandalism. Cheers DP 13:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I disgree. On two points -

'when the vandal has created an account with no positive contributions across more than one editing session.' - That's exactly what this user JiyeonLove is doing.

On Link Vandalism - 'Adding or changing internal or external links on a page to disruptive, irrelevant, or inappropriate targets while disguising them with mislabeling.' - Obvious abuse of the external links to mislead users seems to be disruptive vandalism. Evaders99 (talk) 22:47, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Evaders99, thanks for reverting my edit my Taeun. When I last clicked on the linked references, all the sites showed "page unavailable" explaining my reverted edit of user Likeitlikethat1004. I see that the links work fine now.  SmileBlueJay97  talk  20:37, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Hello. You have a new message at SmileBlueJay97's talk page. 

Can you pass this along to somebody willing to work on it (List of South Korean musicians)? ☴ Jaewon [Talk] 19:57, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

regarding the revert to the 11 member edit, there is no official announcement of Kris ceasing to be a member of EXO. Until the lawsuit finishes he has a contract with SM. He will officially cease to be a member of EXO if the court disqualifies his contract or SM announces that they released him. I think we should write that the lawsuit is currently ongoing and for the time being Exo is promoting with 11 members. This is what we have valid sources for. There is no source citing that Kris is no longer considered a member of the band. Teemeah ^{편지 (letter)} 14:30, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well due to many talks about Kris' status on EXO, I have undid my edit but have made it clear that he is an inactive member on the List of Exo members page due to his lawsuit. I did mention for other editors to be bold to revert or change my edits, but instead they went on my talk page and called me out on my edits in making it consistent with the main Exo article that I found with Kris already being listed as a Former Member, at the time. It has been since edited with Kris (inactive) but still a current member on the main page. Hopefully you understand. Tibbydibby (talk) 15:32, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have no qualms about Kris' status actually. I'm just reverting obvious vandalism, unsourced info, typos and general mischief. Apparently I got into a fan war, go figure. Evaders99 (talk) 19:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd like to thank you for all of your help on the Wiki in regards to the K-pop pages, and especially how fast you revert and fix errors. Your attentiveness and quick actions have saved me many a headache, especially on the 2PM pages (Those pages are a pet, watch/edit of mine). If I could give you a virtual kitten, I would, but instead have an ASCII Taecyeon: 0(^_^)0 Mikepellerin (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Personally I was hoping for a ASCII Taeyeon, but I appreciate the gesture! Oh, good luck on those Exo pages, those split up pages seem ripe for fan mischief too. Evaders99 (talk) 05:42, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	What's wrong Jun Ji-hyun all the link is gone? 小玉 (talk) 09:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I typed a MoS for WP Korea and new editors of Korea-related articles at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Biography#Guidelines. In need of feedback. ☴ Jaewon [Talk] 18:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for reverting that edit on Suho, I did not research the artist enough before reverting. Thanks for changing it SantiLak (talk) 02:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WHY WOULD YOU ERASE ONE OF THE GIRLS GENERATION MEMBERS INFORMATION — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raddesst (talk • contribs) 23:22, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm? What edit are you referring to? Evaders99 (talk) 01:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

why are you deleting the information of official fanclub colors and names on the list of kpop groups from 1990s til now?! Do you have any idea how hard it is to find that information correctly on the internet from international seas? Its fine if you add sub units and what not but please do not delete the official color and fandom names! They are a huge part of kpop! — Preceding unsigned comment added by HyunAe Le (talk • contribs)

Because they are trivial, unsourced, and prone to fan wars and edit wars. Also, you didn't even get the table right, as further rows were quite broken. Evaders99 (talk) 08:41, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I know i did it wrong, I was still trying to fix it, i just made changes to 2-3 groups. As much as I am against fanwars, fandom names and color has been around Kpop ever since the beginning and is a very important thing to the culture in Korea. Korean fans dont say they are part of a fandom, they call the fandom a job. And international fans need to understand that.

Sorry about that. I was looking at it the wrong way. - Hoops gza (talk) 02:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, simple unsourced vandalism :) Cheers Evaders99 (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

T-ARA'S Concert in PH? Is it Confirmed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GMinorJJ (talk • contribs) 11:11, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. I'm just dealing with vandalism :) Evaders99 (talk) 01:31, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was clearly an accident but be careful when rolling back on pages that are heavily vandalized like the Got7 page, that you are editing back to a point when the page was in order and not a different point of even worse vandalism. Thanks! :) Peachywink (talk) 05:54, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep that was my mistake, I was looking at the most current diff. Sorry about thatEvaders99 (talk) 06:00, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== Hi Evaders99

Kindly do not revert the changes which I made to Kim Hyun Joong's wiki page. The reason you cited was that there is no reliable source to confirm what was there on the page. In that case you just need to go through the latest news of the kim hyun joong. Soompi & other sources are also there. I am gonna update the page again with the news that Kim Hyun Joong has won the court case & hope this time you will not revert the updates. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.227.178.68 (talk) 08:54, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Evaders99, I saw that you've reverted my good faith edit - stating that "One official site is fine".
Normally, I would agree with you on that. Not in this case, however... Many stars' wikipedia pages
contain links to twitter, instagram and other profiles. (Even Lau's korean Wikipedia page refers to
his instagram page: 헨리_(가수). Probably, because there are no links to his social network sites
on his official website). Best, --Momo17 (talk) 06:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Then those pages are are completely against the policy - we use the English wikipedia policies. No matter what other pages uses.

Wikipedia does not provide a comprehensive web directory to every official website. ... Links that provide consistent information are strongly preferred to social networking and communication services where the content changes rapidly and may not comply with this guideline at any given moment in time. Wikipedia does not exist to facilitate corporate "communication strategies" or other forms of marketing.

In that context, a list of social media sites provides little encyclopedia value and are not necessary. 06:55, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

		The Music Barnstar
		for saving me from the futility of that task. I was so frustrated that I was going to take the entire category off my watchlist and rescue some felines in WikiProject Cats. ツWhether this editor takes another round at the infoboxes, I will always appreciate your intervention. All the best! Fylbecatulous talk 18:17, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to report an AIV if they continue. But I think this user has been IP hopping around. I've seen this same sporatic behavior from IPs in the past, it hasn't stopped. So I think this user really has no idea what he is doing or is willingly ignoring it. Evaders99 (talk) 06:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Evaders99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All the informations that you erase are all true and is not unsource...he shared everything on healing camp, a variety show. And everyone knows of the dragon brothers, that they are all super close IloveKVariety (talk) 08:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help to participate in this move discussion Talk:Jang Wooyoung#Requested move 19 January 2017 and Talk:Park Chanyeol#Requested move 26 January 2017? Perhaps, a couple more opinions can help to decide whether the names should be moved or not. Thanks!--TerryAlex (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User adding unnecessary links which aren't even verified production social media accounts: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Emperor:_Owner_of_the_Mask&diff=784199764&oldid=784007352 190.162.1.52 (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Instagram page happens to be linked from their IMBC page, so probably official. But unnecessary social media when one official site is fine - WP:ELMINOFFICIAL Evaders99 (talk) 03:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove redundant show title added by this user: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Emperor:_Owner_of_the_Mask&diff=784007352&oldid=783859005

The very same title, which is the literal translation of the Korean name, is already in the lead paragraph. It's also in the correct format (hyphen, not colon). This one is just redundant. Thanks! 36.82.24.82 (talk) 12:27, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why if it's something that could be reasonably searched for. Please don't ask me to do edits on your behalf, it is unnecessary. You are free to request this on the Talk page or better, just register an account to get autoconfirmed. Thanks! Evaders99 (talk) 02:37, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I frequently see you contribute to articles listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture and would very much appreciate your input on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Popular culture#Eradication of variety show sections so that a conclusion towards variety show appearances can be made. Thanks. Abdotorg (talk) 18:49, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i would like to know why did you undo my edit on the page Cupid Similardi (talk) 19:40, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Emperor:_Owner_of_the_Mask&action=edit&section=33 2A00:1838:36:6A:0:0:0:9AC8 (talk) 06:05, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! May I ask why you would repeatedly delete the guest appearances of Hyungsik in variety shows? Those guest appearances are milestones in his career as ZE:A and as an individual celebrity. They are also easily confirmed through Youtube and other streaming sites.

We hope you could let them be on his wiki page and not revert the last edit.

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SongParkNamLee (talk • contribs) 07:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, if you have a moment I'd appreciate your input to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Korea/Popular_culture#XXXX_in_South_Korean_Music - firstly of whatever improvements you think could be made to the page, and secondly to try and explain WHY these changes are being made. I've tried explaining, but one user doesn't seem to want to accept this. Thanks, Alexanderlee (talk) 22:04, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Justine.vreno565 (talk) 04:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Evaders99. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please DO NOT edit how many members are in Shinee. It will always be 5. The loss is worse enough without you or anyone basically writing him out like that. Thank you. Shinee54ever (talk) 22:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No one is writing anyone out. You are just being emotional. Wikipedia is built on sourced facts, not emotional irrational responses. Evaders99 (talk) 23:09, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing this is a paid job for you. So I apologize for insulting you. It was my understanding that Wika was open to public edits. But that snap back was a bit out of line. I'm not the only one to notice. I just took the time to ask for your reversal. Shinee54ever (talk) 23:23, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your anger is misdirected - I am only applying Wikipedia policies that apply to make a better page. That is, sourced relevant content - not using Wikipedia as an outlet for commentary and rumors. I've barely touched the Shinee page and I'm not paid. I am only keeping the page consistent as an encyclopedia and not as a memorial/shrine/emotional-fan page. So I don't even know what you want me to reverse since you have no edits of your own. You are free to discuss on the talk page for edits you want to make. I have no stake in the page itself. Evaders99 (talk) 23:31, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I only came to you cuz you're the last to edit. Last I knew anyone could freely edit. It is not letting anyone edit it but example you. I'm not angry at you. I was taken aback as you are the one to speak so harshly when all I asked was what was going on with the page to you as it is locked. I'm not trying to start anything with you but you are being quite rude. Have a Merry Christmas! Shinee54ever (talk) 23:38, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You came to my talk page to yell at me, for something I have no control over. At least as the first sentence as written. Thus my response. :)

Given the amount of back and forth on that page, it is likely semi-protected. Again it is open to anyone, just not every new account... at least until it cools down. You are welcome to make changes, but they will likely be reverted if unsourced and against Wikipedia policies. Hope that helps get everyone off my back :) Evaders99 (talk) 23:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said merry christmas Shinee54ever (talk) 23:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why is korean wikipedia an unreliable source? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.75.13.19 (talk) 21:52, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User-generated content is always considered unreliable. See WP:UGC Evaders99 (talk) 22:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please Edit EXO discography back to what it was and fix sales numbers there?!

XOXO goldn certified and platinum EXODUS platinum certified The war Platinum certified Exact platinum certified

Hello, my name is Dae Young Roh, Customer Service Manager at KCP. LLC, a KOCOWA service provider in Los Angeles. I really appreciate for your kind explanation about your edition to my contributions in Wikipedia. I'm pretty sure you have never heard of us, but KCP. LLC is a venture jointly founded by 3 major Korean broadcasters including KBS, MBS and SBS. That means we are an official license holder of all the content produced by the 3 companies. Also, you mentioned links to streaming services are not allowed in Wikipedia, but I checked Bright(film), a Netflix original, has a link to Netflix, and it seems it's okay to be there. I also read the WP:EL, but I only see restrictions about violation of copyrights. Thus, since we are the license holder of the content, I don't see any violation to the Wikipedia rules. I hope you understood my clarification. If you have any further questions, please let me know. In addition, if you think I still am doing it wrong, please tell me what I did wrong, instead of just taking them out without letting me know in the future. I'll take them out if necessary. You can also contact me directly at our KOCOWA Help Center. Thank you. // Answer to your reply: Thank you so much for spending your time on this. I learned a lot from this experience. You have a wonderful day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dyroh.kcpglob (talk • contribs) 18:57, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You HA R1988 (talk) 00:41, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not involved with that edits going on that page, but it looks like there is a question on providing reliable sources (not Instagram/Twitter). You should discuss on the Talk page and provide reliable sources for your edits. Evaders99 (talk) 00:46, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=SoundCloud_rap&diff=842974163&oldid=842968329

You are right, there is no need. Or there would be no need if newbies would stop adding rubbish entries. LISTPEOPLE doesn't actually require people to have an article, just that they qualify for one. Given the often low-quality input that list has received, I'd rather just remove any entry that doesn't have an article. In other areas it may be possible to be notable without having an article (yet), but if no fanboi has even written a stub yet they're not going to be notable anyway. Alexis Jazz (talk) 23:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

hello can you put my Yugyeom link page on got7 introduction page?

Yugyeompat11 (talk) 18:30, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

I'm Yugyeom fan base from Thailand and ihave already created Yugyeom page in the wiki . Check this keyword คิม ยูคยอม

I have a team who can create English page. i hope you don't ignore me. We need your kind help.

Me: will create Yugyeom page you: just put link Yugyeom_ on got7 introduction page

Yugyeompat11 (talk) 18:47, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply] 

I did nothing to your article. It was redirected by someone else due to [1] AFD - you will need to talk to them. Evaders99 (talk) 19:28, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, their correct name is (G)I-DLE, not (G)I-dle. It is similar to IBM, not Ibm, or IKEA, not Ikea. It is not like Asus or Acer or Apple. Thank you, please stop reverting it. It is very rude to write their name wrong. Source is right here on the labels main homepage http://www.cubeent.co.kr/gidle
Katietran (talk) 13:03, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Hello, just leaving a note that Katietran also left this comment/question at my talk page where I have posted a response. See User_talk:Redalert2fan#(G)I-DLE name. Redalert2fan (talk) 14:27, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Evaders99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I need help communicating with a user. Circle999 keeps on removing information from the reception section for Tempted (TV series), even though there are various sources to support the statement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.115.98.121 (talk) 23:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, my edits were in line with multiple sources that explain the title used for marketing and distribution on the English-speaking markets:

• IMDB ^[1]
• Amazon.com ^[2],
• hancinema.net^[3],
• Viki.com^[4]
• Soompi.com^[5]
• TVtime.com^[6]
• DramaBeans^[7]
• KPopMap^[8] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Klim3k (talk • contribs) 14:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on the talk page here. You are free to propose a move on there. But copying and paste moves are generally not allowed. Evaders99 (talk) 02:49, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was in the process of adding a timeline and I was going to go back and finish it, so it would be easier for fans to understand what members were when — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1298shadow (talk • contribs) 06:53, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Evaders99, I'm replying to your message regarding the recent edit you've undone on "The Emperor: Owner of the Mask". I'm not sure if you've watched the show, but it was absolutely stunning and I honestly don't think it is constructive to describe the show so negatively in its top summary introduction area. I think it is best to just state the ratings objectively, since opinions on movie sites are very subjective (eg HanCinema stating it's "irredembly stupid" etc etc). For the introduction, an objective description is the best. This is after I've watched the show and it was honestly an extrardinary and stunning production. I think your version would only discourage international viewers from watching it in the first place before they place their judgements, which is very bad for the show.

Wikipedia is not censored, just because you disagree with negative tone doesn't mean it should be deleted. Aesthetic judgement based on reliable sources of public views are allowed - WP:AESTHETIC. You are free to add other sources that put it into a more positive light. Evaders99 (talk) 02:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the aftermath on produce x 101. All other produce pages have an aftermath as well so why would you delete x 101’s aftermath. Doing that was a stupid idea and was pointless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bibian48 (talk • contribs) 10:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was unsourced and frankly very trivial. I didn't even do it this time, but I agree with the other editors. Please be civil and discuss the policy issues rather than attacking people. Evaders99 (talk) 02:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, this is Darryl. I will try to update the Play M Entertainment wiki & Templates (E&T Story's Parent Label) if there are any artist joining E&T Story or Play M from their Website. Thanks!Darrylpoh

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you had informed User:Flowsion of his potential COI regarding Koreaboo. He has continued to edit it and, after quite some time, the page still doesn't meet the requirements of WP:WEB. I've proposed it for deletion and wanted to give you a heads up. The Pony Toast 🍞 (Talk) 12:54, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Will keep an eye out and see if comes to AFD. Evaders99 (talk) 07:11, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User Snowflake91 keeps deleting Son Chaeyoung from the Twice page. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:41, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted my edit naming Lay Zhang as a political activist. Under the section Endorsements it already states: In July 2016, Zhang was appointed by the Communist Youth League of China (CYLC) of Changsha as a publicity ambassador, the first celebrity to hold such title.[134] Since then, he has served as the publicity ambassador for three consecutive years.[135] Moreover he has been making videos and sang songs and posted on Weibo about Socialism, One-China-Policy, Chinese Dream, New Era and Communist Youth League in general (all of this might not have been noticed outside of China). He is certainly one of the most prominent young celebrities in China endorsing the Communist Youth League and the Party. I don't understand why this doesn't qualify him as a political activist? Vivianweiland (talk) 09:29, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So he's a paid publicity ambassador. It doesn't make him an activist. What causes has he promoted? What policies is he known for? Does any other source call him an activist outside of the promotion of the CYLC itself? You do need reliable sources that show him actually being part of his notability, not just a celebrity endorser. Evaders99 (talk) 06:06, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep reverting changes on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnie_(singer) ???

She's a pianist and a vocalist, what are you doing?

Where is she notable as a pianist? Evaders99 (talk) 07:01, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

She's literally written 2 songs on piano, and even if she's not known for it, it doesn't take away that fact, she's been practising it since she was 4

An idol who plays piano is not notable as a pianist. Unless her musical career is known as to play concerts and study at conservatories, she isn't a notable pianist. This isn't taking anything away, this is clarifying what is notable about her. Plenty of idols play their own instruments but they aren't notable instrumentalists. Evaders99 (talk) 07:12, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't say "notable for" it says "instruments" and one of her instruments is piano, is there any rule that says you must me notable for it so it can be added?

Yes in fact Template:Infobox_musical_artist#instrument - "Instruments listed in the infobox should be limited to only those that the artist is primarily known for using. The instruments infobox parameter is not intended as a WP:COATRACK for every instrument the subject has ever used." Evaders99 (talk) 07:17, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank you for clarifying, I think they should change the section's name in that case then but if it's the rules, welp

Hi. I came across some kpop articles using The Kraze magazine reviews as sources. For instance, Psycho (Red Velvet song). From what I see, its mostly a fan-blog along the lines of Seoulbeats, HelloKpop, etc., and could be possibly listed at WP:KO/RS#UR. I would really appreciate your thoughts. Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 05:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yea no evidence of journalistic credentials, no difference between researched news and editorials. I would definitely consider it unreliable blog site. Evaders99 (talk) 06:11, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I'm adding it to the list above. Thanks. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 08:27, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Explain to me why you reverted my edit on her family name. It should be "Son", and "Shon". Where did you even get your so-called "facts"? 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:D36:EF90:25EE:2BFA (talk) 06:13, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) well, @2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:D36:EF90:25EE:2BFA:, if you'd have bothered to check the sources in the article before questioning "so-called 'facts'", you would have noticed this source which is placed directly after her name in the Infobox. This source very clearly shows two pictures showing her name in English. Both pictures, a certificate and some kind of student board, clearly show her surname to be Shon. Alex (talk) 06:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not that's a typo, the Hangul 손 translates to Son (ㅅ + ㅗ + ㄴ). Shon would be if the horizontal line had two little lines sticking out from it (ㅅ + ㅛ + ㄴ; also, I don't care what this page says), and even then, everyone calls her Wendy Son anyways. That being said, most of the "Son/손" celebrities here are as spelled as Son. 2600:1700:BAD0:23C0:D36:EF90:25EE:2BFA (talk) 18:14, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whether you care what pages say or not is irrelevant, and what "most" go by is also irrelevant. The source provided directly after her name clearly shows that her name is Shon, not Son. Alex (talk) 18:24, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Evaders99! I'm Ed6767. I noticed you have been using Twinkle and was wondering if you'd like to beta my new tool called RedWarn, specifically designed to improve your editing experience.

RedWarn is currently in use by over 80 other Wikipedians, and feedback so far has been extremely positive. In fact, in a recent survey of RedWarn users, 90% of users said they would recommend RedWarn to another editor. If you're interested, please see the RedWarn tool page for more information on RedWarn's features and instructions on how to install it. Otherwise, feel free to remove this message from your talk page. If you have any further questions, please ping me or leave a message on my talk page. Your feedback is much appreciated! Ed6767 talk! 03:49, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have not only used Google search in article Nancy Jewel McDonie, I have used reliable source along with Google search in it. Please see in citations number 2, all the information about what I have written in the artical Nancy Jewel McDonie is present in this citations. (The name of the citations "7 Things You Probably Did Knowing About Nancy McDonie of Momoland") Abhishek Sanu (talk) 05:51, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is no evidence that giztrendzone.com is a reliable source either. You want actual reliable sources from well-known news outlets and publishers - WP:KO/RS Evaders99 (talk) 06:11, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay! Okay! I got it and thank you for advising me to use this actual reliable sources WP:KO/RS and also thank you for removing all the unreliable sources in the article Nancy Jewel McDonie. Abhishek Sanu (talk)

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for blocking that BlackSwan vandal! Firestar464 (talk) 05:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure it was an admin that did the block. But I'll say I helped revert the vandalism that occured. :) Evaders99 (talk) 07:22, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey sorry about trying to change your edits a couple days ago. I honestly have no idea how Wikipedia works if I’m being honest, so I’m not sure where I’m supposed to go to email users. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that the reason why I wanted to change Blackswan’s wiki page is because the members know about it being merged and Hyeme says she feels disrespected and hurt. When they had an online fanmeet I asked them if they knew about this and Hyeme said she did. She feels as if it’s disrespectful to Rania since she is the only Rania member left and she wants them to have their own page dedicated to their history and wants people to leave it at that. Blackswan will have its own history so she doesn’t really like the two separate groups being tied with each other. I’m not really sure if you are the editor who merged the two separate pages but I just wanted to tell you how the members felt. Thank you. JollyJossie (talk) 17:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh okay thanks for responding back. Does this mean that you have no control over changing the wiki page and can’t separate the two groups into their individual pages? JollyJossie (talk) 19:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should talk to K-popguardian (talk · contribs) who did the merge. Evaders99 (talk) 21:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have tried to update the page for Lee Soo-Man, founder of SM Entertainment several times and the last message I received from you said it was vandalism. It is not vandalism and I'm not sure why you claimed it to be that. I am an employee under SM Entertainment and I was asked by the company to update his page with a new bio and other achievements in his career. All edits/updates I made were provided directly from SM, meaning that is the source of every edit I have tried to make. There is nothing defaming in there as it was written by his company directly. I have posted the edits/updates in the Talk:Lee Soo-Man page and noted the COI. If I am unable to personally add the necessary edits/updates myself then I would like for you or whoever is capable to have everything approved and added immediately, thank you. Smtownusa (talk) 01:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You did not declared your Wikipedia:Conflict of interest until now - nor understood Wikipedia policies on avoiding them. So your edits to attempt such inclusion are vandalism. All your information is unsourced - it doesn't matter if it's from the company as it needs to properly referenced. It is not acceptable information to include a resume here. Wikipedia is not here to advertise or promote for your employer which is all your edits are doing. Evaders99 (talk) 05:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, apologies for before as I was not fully aware of how to properly go about such things as I had never had to edit anything on Wikipedia, but have since learned my way around a bit more. I added some references to the talk page edits for Lee Soo-Man over a week ago and I would like to know if they are approved to use in the official bio update. Please let me know so I can get them added, thank you. --Smtownusa (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is my addition to Ji-soo not constructive? Hong Ji-Soo is Joshua from Seventeen’s Korean name, so it is relevant and none of the information I put afterwards is incorrect. I don’t mean to be rude, but I don’t understand why it needs to be taken down. --Hwang Jeonghyeon 22 (talk) 09:07, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WP:APOENTRIES - list of people is meant for notable people. If they aren't yet notable for their own article, they aren't listed. Evaders99 (talk) 09:10, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Evaders99,
Thanks for your contributions to improving and organizing all articles relating to Korean pop culture. Have a Happy New Year! ~~~~

---

• File:Bg.gif
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Hi! I've been studying lately and notability and noticed that you would be knowledgable so I wanted to ask you directly. For artists with not meeting notability guidelines for music, would it be helpful if the list of their say, produced or written songs of one artist be listed on their page with credits as some do (i.e. lyric writing, composing, arangement)? Will it also be counted to meet the needed "reliable secondary sources" since those credits usually come from their respective countries' copyright associations? Thanks in advance and happy new year! Mheira225 (talk) 03:49, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd look at WP:GNG - notability is not only about sources but "significant coverage" - that means if they are notable as writers and producers, other people would be providing evidence of that. There would be critical reviews of their work and exposure. A list of credits with basic trivial mentions is not really what I'd look at for notability. Evaders99 (talk) 21:18, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just reverted your edit on Kim Min-kyu by pointing out the difference between disambiguation guidelines (MOS:DABRL/MOS:DABMENTION) and set index guidelines (WP:APORL/WP:APOENTRIES). But now that I think twice about my rationale, I'm not so sure. The main reason to include any entry on a dab page is to help WP:DPL patrollers resolve mislinks, but I guess no one refers to this guy by his full name? (E.g. Seventeen (South Korean band)#Hip-hop unit doesn't even mention his full name.) So feel free to revert my reversion if you find my edit summary unconvincing, because at this point I'm only about halfway-convinced by it myself. Happy editing, 61.239.39.90 (talk) 09:21, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whats your problem why are you removing pictures I edited I putted credits P3TUHGON (talk) 08:28, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the copyright holder and thus don't have their permission to upload these images. Wikipedia is very strict on the copyright status on all images. WP:UPIMAGE - Most images you might find on the Internet are copyrighted and not appropriate for uploading to Wikipedia. If you did not create the image, or if you are unable or unwilling to verify its copyright status, do not upload the image. Hope that clarifies it. Evaders99 (talk) 08:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to mee mf P3TUHGON (talk) 08:34, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thats why I putted the exact link of the owner P3TUHGON (talk) 08:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are not the owner. Therefore you can give no license to these images. Evaders99 (talk) 08:35, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sige punyeta ka bye so If I made my own I can put it there? P3TUHGON (talk) 08:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if they are photos owned or created by you - you can put them under Wikipedia giving permission to use under a compatible license. Really you should read the entire Wikipedia image policy before doing this. (And note: if you're going to harass me to respond and sending personal attacks, you're going to get banned plain and simple). Evaders99 (talk) 08:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Evaders99! I see that you're an expert here. Could I ask for a help regarding editing values for already existing pages (I hope it's ok to ask this from you)?

Thanks NZK-music (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - what specifically are you trying to edit? You know the editor can help you preview all changes before you save them. Evaders99 (talk) 20:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User Deanock12 /Add the wrong information on page Under Cover (2021 TV series) in production information, JTBC channel bought drama and work from JTBC and STORY TV and not BBC currently Muatsem90 (talk) 11:06, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting malicious edits on Soojin (singer) page insanely fast, life and death is not a joke to mess around. Please accept my deepest thanks. YehWolf 🐺 09:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, can you please stoping changing his birth year from 1992 to 1993? On his recent YouTube vlog, it‘s confirmed that he was born in 1992 and NOT 1993. Me and other Wonho fans would really appreciate if you change it back to 1992 again. Thank you. Shwnubu (talk) 04:50, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Then provide a reliable source for this please. Evaders99 (talk) 05:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is my source not reliable for you? Shwnubu (talk) 09:48, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At 2:30 min in his last vlog, you can see on the right screen that his birth year is listed as "1992.3.1". What other confirmation do you need? Shwnubu (talk) 09:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You provide a citation to a reliable, independent (preferably secondary) source that can someone can verify this. Evaders99 (talk) 20:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does his company or himself have to come publicly now to verify his correct birth year so that is seen as a reliable source? Other question: Where’s the "reliable source" which confirms he’s a 93 liner? There’s no reference for it. Shwnubu (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was deleted as unreferenced. If you have a published reliable source like a notable news company, rather than primary source like their company, then you'll have a better chance for verification. Evaders99 (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Thanks for answering my questions. Shwnubu (talk) 03:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures that I used at Ferlyn Wong are my own pics, taken by my artistes, so I don't understand how it works and how I should do to publish a new photo. There is option for Own Photo, but have to select those options about license, got me lost. Thanks! JSYY95 (talk) 00:36, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - if you're the copyright holder, you should confirm permission by using the email template to send via OTRS. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Licensing Evaders99 (talk) 18:44, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You threatened to block me from using unsourced info even though I myself am an alum and reliable source as was the yelp review I posted. I won't try again since this is sensitive and it is clear that Wikipedia is censoring at this point.

Sorry, no - your own words are original research. Please understand what a reliable source is before you edit. Evaders99 (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I commented on your nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Choerry. You might consider nominating ViVi (singer) for deletion as well, and you could use the same logic. I think some other members of Loona had their own articles which have gradually been merged back to the group's article, with Choerry and ViVi as the only remaining survivors. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:00, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I removed "not" in the synopsis after adding it some weeks ago (I also initially thought it wasn't logical), because I saw the synopsis on iQIYI and I'm watching the drama, so I don't want to spoiler it, but the edit you reverted is related to the spoilers. Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 14:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I haven't watched the show. If the premise is marked as "the last story of failed idols who need just one 'success' for them not to disband" and then there's some twist to it, then probably needs to be written in a Results section or find some way to make it clear this is a spoiler. I'm not against fixing it, I just don't want people confused like I am when reading it. :) Evaders99 (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, so it's better to readd it once the drama has finished. Bloomingbyungchan (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe premise in the Synopsis should be followed by a more detailed description, something like "Though advertised as a needing a hit to not disband, what actually happened is...". Unless I'm competingly misunderstanding it. Some people don't like spoilers in Wikipedia but if it adds clarity without completing spoiling things, I think its reasonable to add.Evaders99 (talk) 20:40, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please understand that I am writing a comment with the help of a translator because English is not my first language. (but not 100% translator)

The Korean Wikipedia is already talking about Lovelyz document and concluded that maintaining the current state, not saying Lovelyz is in disbandment, of the document.

Woollim Entertainment did not say it's disbanded, but just decided not to renew their contracts and left Woollim Entertainment.

In short, it is in the same state as Girl's Day or Girls' Generation. (Indefinite hiatus)--121.133.40.84 (talk) 12:12, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Find a reliable source that states this and add a citation. 22:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

EXCUSE ME?? See the summary of the User:Paper9oll's edit history([2]) and User talk:Paper9oll#Lovelyz. I'm not doing "disruptive editing" I already gave a reliable source and explanation.--121.133.40.84 (talk) 02:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are annoying about reading the full discussion, at least read this edit summary in Lovelyz.(written by User:Paper9oll)

As per what was officially mentioned by Woollim in their own statement, ignoring the term "disband" which is coined by the news media themselves for their fancy headline despite the official statement in which they included in their reporting not mentioned such. If disagreed, please open discussion in the article talk, to discuss further as this is kind of gray area situation.

--121.133.40.84 (talk) 02:57, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your source does not say anything about it other than what is already restated. Evaders99 (talk) 03:06, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

NO IT'S DIFFRENT. [[User:Paper9oll] AGREED MY EXPLANATION AND ADMIT IT. DID YOU EVER READ MY FULL DISCUSSION BETWEET ME AND User:Paper9oll?

I posted a link to Woollim's statement through the media. Woollim Entertainment almostly doesn't have news themselves via their Official Website. There is a "notice" section([3]), but as you can see, it is rarely used.

Whatever, I posted a link to Woollim's statement through the media. [4] I partially translated (official annocuntment part) by translator.

On the 1st (of November, because news release date was November 1), Woollim Entertainment officially announced, "The exclusive contract between us and Lovelyz members will expire on November 16, 2021," adding, "After a long in-depth discussion and consideration, Lovelyz members Yoo Ji-ae, Seo Ji-soo, Lee Mi-joo, Kei, Jin, Ryu Soo-jung, and Jeong Ye-in decided to prepare for another start."

Among Lovelyz members, Babysoul renewed his contract based on his long-standing trust, he added. "As a helper for Babysoul, who has been with us for a long time, we will spare full support for his new leap forward and active activities."

Woollim said, "As an artist belonging to Woollim Entertainment, I thank the eight members of Lovelyz for shining the company and doing their best over the past seven years, and I sincerely support the new start of the members."

what is the problem? There is no mention about disbandment. As, paper9oll said, the term "disband" is coined by the news media themselves rather than Woollim Entertainment.--121.133.40.84 (talk) 03:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you still in disagreement, see Talk:Lovelyz#To_users_who_undo_this_document_(disbanded_or_not)] --121.133.40.84 (talk) 03:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And I have done so. Feel free to discuss there - no consensus has been reached despite User:Paper9oll's edits. Evaders99 (talk) 03:14, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't believe what i stype there go check on board of director YG Ent in website and don't remove semi protected due vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 성형 수술 (talk • contribs) 02:51, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't believe what i stype there go check on board of director YG Ent in website and don't remove semi protected due vandalism — Preceding unsigned comment added by 성형 수술 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can see you have removed the content on Kyungsoo's acting recognition. The content was supported by both Korea film council's website and newspapers/blog/media articles. I appreciate if you let me know the problems so I can update the content. Thanks Doks2021 (talk) 23:24, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) @Doks2021: Kpopmap is not a reliable source, this was stated in the edit summary when Abdotorg removed it before you re-added it. Alex (talk) 23:41, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And it was largely just a WP:FLUFF piece. Evaders99 (talk) 23:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Someone's changing the artist's page without his official name.

He removed his Korean name and chose a picture that wasn't good. His haircut when he got out of the army is different from him.

Suggested changing his name to

Jinyoung (entertainer, born 1991) 

His name isn't official Jung Jinyoung he is only Jinyoung Since 2011

Because he doesn't use Jung

Even in movies and drama, and new songs his name is only Jinyoung

Jung -Jin-young He never used that name, and why do you make his name so hard with

( - )!  

Please add his name to Jinyoung (entertainer, born 1991) So the fans know the difference by birth. Other names.

Please add this picture He's the most famous and well-known.

https://www3.0zz0.com/2022/02/27/13/518384366.jpg

Thank you

Youaree (talk · contribs) Wikipedia follows standard encyclopedic policies include WP:SURNAME and WP:MONONYM. Using his surname is standard practice when it is known and other sources use it. Wikipedia also has its image use policy which requires all images to be uploaded and licensed correctly. We can't just accept any random image found on the internet. Evaders99 (talk) 00:15, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]