User talk:Khiladi King

Welcome, Khiladi King!

Hello, Khiladi King, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. If you need interactive assistance please visit The Help desk. You may want to begin by reading these pages: Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page How to write a great article Simplified Manual of Style Your first article I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions. Again, welcome! Sincerely, - SUN EYE 1 17:39, 24 February 2022 (UTC)  [reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Khiladi King/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Khiladi King/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khiladi King! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Bhala Thandanana, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Not yet passes WP:NFF. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhala Thandanana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhala Thandanana until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Sammathame, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Not yet passes WP:NFF. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 08:07, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khiladi King. I'm Ab207. I appreciate your work in expanding reception section. Unfortunately, I reverted this edit to Bangarraju due to the following reasons:

1. "The film received mixed reviews from critics praising the performances of Nagarjuna and Chaitanya, music but criticizing the story and first half." This addition must be independently sourced which directly support the information. We cannot make summary ourselves by just reading reviews as it amounts to synthesis which is not allowed per Wikipedia's policy.
2. Arrange reviews by reviewer sentiment, generally going from positive reviews to negative ones. New Indian Express gave the most positive review, so its given first. There's no need to move Times of India ahead. You can read WP:RECEPTION on how to write this section.
3. Sites like Telugu360 are not considered as reliable source. Generally speaking, websites should have a linked article, else they may be not worthy of inclusion.

Hope these inputs would help your edits in a positive manner. Cheers -- Ab207 (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Bangarraju. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions.
As explained earlier, critical summary must be separately sourced. Diffs: [1], [2], [3], [4] Ab207 (talk) 16:30, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again, re this edit, the citation is just one of the reviews, not a summary of critical reception. For example, Shyam Singha Roy's critical summary is supported by this source which explicitly says "Shyam Singha Roy received mixed reviews with critics praising the performances but criticising the screenplay." We need something similar for Bangarraju also, if you want to add a summary. -- Ab207 (talk) 13:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Valimai. - SUN EYE 1 17:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bheemla Nayak, you may be blocked from editing. SP013 (talk) 04:06, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Valimai, you may be blocked from editing. Theoder2055 (talk) 19:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for disruptive editing. Communication is required. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 09:08, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bhala Thandanana poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:24, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Radhe Shyam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Refrain from adding premises to films that have not been released yet SP013 (talk) 00:38, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Radhe Shyam, you may be blocked from editing. As a heads up, refrain from using BO figures by Manobala as his figures are deemed unreliable SP013 (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khiladi King,

Thank you for creating Stand Up Rahul.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section giving details of reviews of the film in reliable sources when available.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 02:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mishan Impossible has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable future film, appears to fail WP:NFF, should be deleted or moved to draft until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SP013 (talk) 20:58, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Swaroop RSJ, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thefinaldestiny (talk) 04:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhala Thandanana, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sakshi. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Radhe shyam is is shot simultaneously in Telugu and Hindi languages. Please see Radhe Shyam article. Sush150 (talk) 05:46, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khiladi King. Re this edit, I want to let you know that it is "The Times of India", not "The Times Of India." Prepositions like "of" should not be capitalized unless it's the first or last word. See title case for more information. Thanks -- Ab207 (talk) 09:14, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khiladi King

Thank you for creating Mishan Impossible.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:58, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pushpa 2: The Rule, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pushpa 2: The Rule until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sadha Nannu Nadipe.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 14:31, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sadha Nannu Nadipe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased film. This film does not explain why it is notable. More sources are needed/please wait till film releases for notability decisions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sadha Nannu Nadipe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sakshi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Panda619 (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khiladi King. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Khiladi King/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shamshera. The omitted data and info was relevant and backed by authentic references while your edits had no justification. Your edits are suspected to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Please note that repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you for understanding. Ankitsalsa14 (talk) 09:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shamshera. Ankitsalsa14 (talk) 20:02, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Despite two warnings earlier, you have been repeatedly vandalising Wikipedia with unsourced information and removing authentic content without explanation. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shamshera. Ankitsalsa14 (talk) 21:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The sources provided there are already present in the reception section. The word 'poor' used is not relevant to be used in wikipedia. Khiladi King (talk) 06:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Khiladi King/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:09, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raksha Bandhan (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The wikipedia page for India Herald is about a defunct British Indian newspaper and is not related to the current website, so please do not wikilink it. DareshMohan (talk) 20:56, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that on the page Dobaara you removed a well cited statement and simply replaced it with words without backing them up with sources. Before doing so, you must achieve consensus. Aisheee (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Khiladi King. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Swaroop RSJ, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not link India Herald in Thank You (2022 film). Already told you three times. The reason is that the link is to some British defunct newspaper. Why are you linking them? DareshMohan (talk) 16:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think DareshMohan is right. Using that source is a different issue but it should not be linked incorrectly. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Khiladi King: Bollywoodlife is WP:NOTRS; you may see WP:ICTFSOURCES for a list of acceptable sources. The edits which you made on Captain (2022 film) got reverted. If you see the discussion on Talk:Vikram (2022 film) you will come to know. Theoder2055 (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 18:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Neurofreak (talk) 19:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khiladi king, can you tell me the process for self-block. As I don't feel I am anymore comfortable or eligible to make edits here, I want to permanentely block my user ID and other related Id's (if created in future, whenever felt so). Thus, in future this don't allow me to edit any possible way, even though I wish. Jayanthkumar123 (talk) 18:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Brother i want ur help pls update the List of highest-grossing Indian films. There is one correction after 43rd place the 44th rank is missing ...pls update it and afterwards all the rank ...hence one more film will be added at 50th rank ,ie, Housefull 4... Pls help 🙏🙏 Harharshit (talk) 07:51, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In this latest September 22 article it is reported that Vikram has grossed over Rs. 500 crores globally please update it

https://www.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/tamil-cinema/kamal-haasan-s-vikram-finishes-theatrical-run-as-highest-grossing-film-ever-in-tamil-nadu-registers-record-footfall-101663821451673.html Cinephilekrr (talk) 03:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only one article has published ₹500 crore gross. Already the English version of asianet news published the value ₹432.50 crore. Khiladi King (talk) 17:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most expensive Indian films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dilwale.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello khiladi king can you protect the page of List of highest-grossing Indian Bengali films because in this article also people do wrong g edits so could you protect this article please Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 14:57, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hello khiladi king please change poniyinselvan1 from 18th place to 15th highest grossing indian films from list of highest grossing indian films it grossed more than 500 crores therefore it should be in 15th place..please DO CHANGE IT. நிரோஜன் சக்திவேல் (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Khiladi King: the article Ori Devuda has not been improved with maximum number of citations so I have redirected it to Draft:Ori Devuda. If you want it to move it back to Ori Devuda again then you need to somehow try to improve the article with maximum number of citations even though I understand the film releases. Theoder2055 (talk) 112:08, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Prince (2022 film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not remove OTT Play source again and again. As per WP:ICTFSOURCES they didn’t mention OTT Play as an unreliable source. Theoder2055 (talk) 16:10, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please not remove Behindwoods source in Sardar (2022 film) as Behindwoods is a reliable source. Behindwoods is not listed at ICTF; Print media by default qualifies as RS per WP:NFSOURCES

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most expensive Indian films, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thank God.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you please write some edit summaries for your edits? That would greatly help others looking at the history! See Help:Edit summary — DaxServer (t · m · c) 16:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Another reminder — DaxServer (t · m · c) 15:51, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another reminder!!! — DaxServer (t · m · c) 10:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drishyam 2 (2022 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Business Today.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Khiladi Kong I have a request that in list of films in India domestic collections could you add years like 2021,2020,2019 and rest please. Sumancranebuddy21q00 (talk) 07:13, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the wiki page of highest grossing Indian films, the peak rank for Vikram is wrongly entered as 21. Only 2 films released later than Vikram grossed higher, brahmastra and ponniyin selvan. So, since the current rank is 22 for Vikram, it's peak rank should be 20. Please correct this error. Thanks. Cinephilekrr (talk) 13:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please add some reviews for Tara Vs Bilal and Double XL film articles. Thank you. Sush150 (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pls add it in the list of highest-grossing Indian films.... someone removed it... Harharshit (talk) 08:33, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]