User talk:MegaSmike46

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, MegaSmike46. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Aoi (青い) (talk) 23:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Aoi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hanna-Barbera, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hanna-Barbera, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just popping by to mention that I have nominated an article you have created, List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito, for deletion. If you think the article should be kept, please provide your opinion on the deletion discussion. Thank you. Foxnpichu (talk) 15:13, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have moved your recent creation to the draftspace. It is not yet a fully-formed Wikipedia entry and therefore not suitable for mainspace just yet. Please continue to develop at Draft:The Happos Family and submit when considered suitable. Thank you for helping to expand the encyclopedia. Happy editing. Eagleash (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Happos Family.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Cartoonito. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks I understand now. How’s the draft so far? MegaSmike46 (talk) 17:29, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cartoonito, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Small world. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The history section you added to Cartoonito is completely unsourced. When adding content, you are technically responsible for providing reliable sources to back it up and that articles should not contain original research. Foxnpichu (talk) 12:26, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MegaSmike46! It appears one or more of the pages you created, such as On the Team, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.  —FORMALDUDE^(talk) 04:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It’s a work in progress, I was just filling in the basic information. There’s more to uncover about this obscure show from Noggin. MegaSmike46 (talk) 05:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. If you'd like, I can help you move the page to draftspace so that you can further edit it without risk of deletion. —FORMALDUDE^(talk) 06:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MarioJump83 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Per tags.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:On the Team and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:On the Team, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarioJump83! 09:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MegaSmike46! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarioJump83! 09:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Line Cinema, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please undo what FilmandTVFan28 did to the Ned's Newt Page SuperBonnyYahya (talk) 04:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That would be unnecessary since the article clearly mentioned a German production company co-producing it with Nelvana. This problem was already cleared on the article talk page. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 16:09, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edit to the article Thomas & Friends. The article doesn't mention Cartoonito at all, so there is no basis for adding Category:Cartoonito original programming. Please add a properly sourced section to the article about Cartoonito, before adding the category. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have misunderstood the purpose of that category. It is for " television programs that have regularly aired their first-run episodes on Cartoonito. It does not list programs which first appeared on a different network" (emphasis added). Since programs like Molang and Thomas & Friends first appeared on other networks, they should not be added to that category. Thanks, Laplorfill (talk) 21:52, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Before you decide on reverting Ned's Newt, please read WP:TVLEAD. That IP user who keeps barking you orders failed to read it. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 21:20, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, List of animation studios owned by Comcast NBCUniversal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:06, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dora the Explorer. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 04:27, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm The Grand Delusion. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of programs broadcast by Cartoon Network without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 20:49, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create, maintain or restore hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Continued disruption will be met with being blocked from editing, or other sanctions. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 01:28, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK. No matter how plausible the idea is. I just kept that draft in case. It won’t be submitted until confirmation. MegaSmike46 (talk) 03:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter how "plausible" the idea is—it doesn't exist. Creating an article as if it does exist is creating a hoax. Trivialist (talk) 23:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of programs broadcast by Cartoonito (Latin American TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mighty Mike.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MegaSmike46! Thank you for your contributions. It looks like you've copied or moved text from Alvin and the Chipmunks into another page, and while you are welcome to re-use the content, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. If you've copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thanks! DanCherek (talk) 03:12, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MegaSmike46. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:On the Team, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:01, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (Latin American TV channel) you added a template, but put <nowiki> tags around it so it didnt actually work as a template. Just wanted to let you know in case you want to do anything about that. In the meantime I've redirected the page to the new article. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 02:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At List of programs broadcast by Boomerang (Latin American TV channel). I'm actually have trouble with the redirecting issues. My goal was to separate the Cartoonito and Boomerang articles but I ran into ridiculous issues. Signed, MegaSmike46 (talk), 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi @MegaSmike46:! Feel free to just reply to my comments on this page. I have copied the other message you left for me. If youre looking to create the article but having trouble with the technical aspects of putting it on wikipedia, try creating a draft page. This link will give you more information about draft pages. Once you have created both pages, you can request them to be moved by an experienced Wikipedian using the instructions at this link. That way you can figure out the pages before messing up the technical parts. Signed, I Am Chaos (talk) 04:54, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A&E.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Radio Disney into Disney Channel. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 02:30, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Cartoon Network, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Grand Delusion^{(Send a message)} 03:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jeff Bennett, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:43, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OceanHok was:

It is probably a notable topic, but the bulk of the article is unsourced and written in a very WP:CRUFT-y way.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Alvin and the Chipmunks characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

OceanHok (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

There are already multiple nav templates for DC and WB properties and this would only be used on pages which already have at least one of them. Everything in "Senior management) is a generic link except for films which makes the line somewhat redundant which leaves only three items which would likely already be in the template on the page. Can I suggest making changes to Template:Warner Bros. Discovery, Template:DC Comics and Template:Warner Bros. instead?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Template:DC Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Template:DC Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 12:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay we’ll just have to wait and see as the company restructures. MegaSmike46 (talk) 13:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Warner Bros., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Division.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity, how come WBD's content distribution/ad sales units are part of the Global Streaming & Interactive division? I've read articles about the recent reshuffle carried out by JB Perrette, and I don't see much relating to the home entertainment distribution/TV distribution units... BiggieSMLZ (talk) 16:27, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I felt it might join that division as I thought it'd make more sense. After all Content Distribution (Home Media) could correlate with the streaming division as well. I mean WB Interactive was part of WBHE for a time.

I may revert it, but until further confirmation, I guess WBD's Content Distribution will just remain under Warner Bros. Entertainment. MegaSmike46 (talk) 16:56, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney General Entertainment Content, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Kids.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still much of the content in unsourced. If sources do not exist, the content should be removed. Also, many of the sources used are not reliable (YouTube, blogs, etc.) and there no in-depth coverage. The Reception section contains no reviews from reputable critics (being shown is not critical reception). It seems a show nominated for an Emmy would have critical reviews so I am assuming they exist, thus this is a decline rather than a rejection. Clean it up by removing anything not sourced to a reliable source and anything that cannot sourced (exception is the plot), add in-depth coverage/reviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:20, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so your saying that there needs more to be more reliable sources. MegaSmike46 (talk) 19:10, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's two-fold. Content needs to sourced to reliable sources and much of it is still not. For notability, it needs in-depth coverage and that is why I am recommending reviews from reputable critics (two or three reviews with a couple paragraphs or so critiquing the show). As I have stated above, I also recommend trimming it down (removing all the character and episode details along with the Media section as most of it is unsourced or sourced to unreliable sources such as YouTube anyway). S0091 (talk) 19:24, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you copied or moved text from CNN to History of CNN. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. DanCherek (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll begin with apologizing for causing any corruption or confusion. It will be okay, as this is only the first step of helping the article. I may be sure to restore all citations before taking action.

I plan on rewriting the remaining from c. 2003 onwards. You can help, as a lot of this information requires updates anyway. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:19, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Mush-Mush and the Mushables, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 02:31, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MegaSmike46. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Mush-Mush and the Mushables, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Feel free to redirect to the original article or use WP:G6. Thank you. BangJan1999 23:14, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MegaSmike46, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Draft:Mush Mush And The Mushables, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Feel free to redirect to the original article or use WP:G6. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. BangJan1999 23:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scrooge200 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A lot of the information under the Broadcast section (such as networks the show aired on and its name in other languages) are unsourced. Additionally, I feel like Template:Cite episode would be more suitable for sourcing specific episodes (to show events or character traits), rather than a YouTube link.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mush-Mush & the Mushables, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Scrooge200 (talk) 03:27, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Toasy Cake Fan 100. Your recent edit(s) to the page List of DuckTales (2017 TV series) episodes appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Teamo Supremo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Toasy Cake Fan 100 (talk) 20:48, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't adding any further information. I'm simply checking and reorganizing the categories. It's one of the several cartoons that switch from airing on ABC kids to Toon Disney. MegaSmike46 (talk) 21:13, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be careful when moving templates and adding speedy deletes to redirects. You added a speedy to Template:Live-action theatrical films based on DC Comics but that caused multiple articles that linked to that pages, such as American Splendor (film), to appear in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:00, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry. I made simple typo and just wanted it deleted to avoid confusion of redirects. MegaSmike46 (talk) 18:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. It was a bit confusing. Once all the articles are using the new template the redirects can be deleted. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:12, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason= I understand that it was wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates.}}.  Guerillero (talk) 19:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations.

Decline reason:

That's a start, but please tell us in a new request how you will better engage with the community. There also seems to have been some block evasion from looking at this page's edit history that you do not address. 331dot (talk) 10:07, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations. Instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. Throughout my time on Wikipedia, I've noticed that most of my disruptions stem from my "original research" without a reliable backup. However, my lack of insight has led to many unfinished drafts and issues with others. So I'm stepping back from it. Currently, I'm planning on clearing information with TV networks.

Decline reason:

This doesn't answer the question previously posed to you. Yamla (talk) 11:53, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. So instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. I've realized that many of my disruptions were due to a lack of reliable backup, which led to several unfinished drafts. After many "conflicts," I zoned out by thinking of other things. So I didn't respond for several days offsite. So I won't be making as many drafts or "major edits" to avoid those discussions in the first place. The block evasion likely has something to do with the IP address as I even tried deleting this account at some point. So finally I decided to rectify this matter. I'm sorry.

Decline reason:

You've been evading your block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:52, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that it is wrong to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. So instead of trying to (re-)create articles myself, I will try to bring contributive research with others. I've realized that many of my disruptions were due to a lack of reliable backup, which led to several unfinished drafts. After many "conflicts," I zoned out by thinking of other things. So I didn't respond for several days offsite. So I won't be making as many drafts or "major edits" to avoid those discussions in the first place. Despite my blocked IP address, I continued making lesser edits and became carried away, thinking I could help. The evasion is likely the overall result. So finally, I decided to rectify this matter. I'm sorry. MegaSmike46 (talk) 21:32, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My suggestion is that you best chance of being unblocked is to take the standard offer, and make a fresh unblock request in 6 months time with no logged out edits or edits from other accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 17:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As the template says in boldface, you shouldn't remove declined unblock requests. I restored it, and also fixed your substituted unblock request. You shouldn't subst these templates. Actually, it looks like you're habitually removing every decline. If you do it again, I'll remove your ability to edit this page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand it is wrong, and I'm sorry I couldn't always respond to community concerns. It was to make big decisions without negotiations, even with TV networks & templates. I will help restore articles by bringing citations of lost media. I'm mainly here to clarify things for open sources. I've read the guidelines throughout the months.

Decline reason:

As you agree you can't always respond to community concerns, we'll have to leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 21:21, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear administers, Once again, I apologize for my unintentional disruptions on the website. At the time, I had merely started editing sites a year after making an account. The ongoing events that I'd help out and make Wikipedia a more reliable open source. However, I was not used to working in online community groups, but I wanted to help them. There are articles with few editors, such as TV network programming lists. I'm the one who contributed to those articles (e.g. Disney XD, Boomerang, Nicktoons, Cartoonito, etc.). It's been a while since the incident, and I've made embarrassing mistakes and even violated some terms by using other accounts for fun. I felt no one else would have edited those articles had I not stepped in (e.g. the Disney Junior (block) programming list). I understand watchers have often found my edits disruptive before and the trust may be lost. After seeing more participants, I've learned the need to be a team player regardless. Many users have more experience with this website than me and understand Wikipedia is not a blog. I do not enjoy joining controversies, but I promise to contribute to the community's responsibility/cite concerns. Please give me another chance. MegaSmike46 (talk) 01:27, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In general I am a great believer in giving blocked editors another chance, but unfortunately this time I don't see any possibility of doing so. I couldn't unblock you myself even if I wanted to, because this is a CheckUser block, and I am not a CheckUser. I could contact a CheckUser and suggest an unblock, or just leave the request open on the chance that a CheckUser will come along and lift the block, but I really think either of those would have about as much chance of success as looking out of my window and waiting for a pig to fly past, for several reasons. Firstly, your unblock request doesn't really seem to indicate sufficient understanding of why you were blocked to stand much chance of being accepted; secondly, no CheckUser has seen fit to lift the block yet, although it's been open for a while; thirdly one checkuser (Yamla) has already indicated that he doesn't think you should be unblocked, and the CheckUser who placed the block has not responded in several days since being alerted to this request; fourthly Yamla has stated that you have evaded your block within the last six months. Your best chance is to wait until at least six months since the last time you evaded the block, and then post an unblock request which both shows a clear understanding of the original reasons for the block and also addresses the issue of block-evasion. In order for such an unblock request to have any reasonable chance of success I strongly recommend re-reading the guide to appealing blocks. JBW (talk) 15:24, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not an unblock request. If you wish to make an unblock request, see WP:GAB. You'll need to commit to always responding to community concerns in a convincing way (this will be challenging, as you've explicitly stated you are unable to do so) and address your violations of WP:SOCK. --Yamla (talk) 21:55, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But, I followed those steps. I was supposed to put this on my talk page. MegaSmike46 (talk) 04:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have not followed the instructions in WP:GAB. Your unblock request is malformed. Please reread and more carefully follow the instructions. --Yamla (talk) 16:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What other accounts have you used? JBW (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just SMW456. Only once. MegaSmike46 (talk) 19:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What about logged-out editing? --Yamla (talk) 19:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Several times, it awhile for it the catch on. I managed to finish some work through small edits. Most were cited respectably. MegaSmike46 (talk) 19:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you now understand this was inappropriate? Approximately when did you make your last logged-out edit? --Yamla (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I realized I'd seen as another troll/disrupter rather an experienced worker. Even if I provide evident resources. MegaSmike46 (talk) 20:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JBW:I leave this to you. I don't think MegaSmike46 is a good candidate for unblocking but it isn't my call, I've already declined once. This answer only addressed part of the problem, and didn't even do a good job with that. They have evaded their block within the past six months, by the way, but not in the past four. Reminder, NinjaRobotPirate is the blocking admin. --Yamla (talk) 20:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MegaSmike46 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I wasn't the most experienced Wiki user, so I made multiple decisions without discussing them with editors. I failed to meet their community concerns at the time while I was offline with anxiety and ended up blocked. It's been over a year since that incident, and I've been off this website for months. I won't make major changes without small group discussions (e. g. templates and redirects), but the ever-changing entertainment industry has intrigued me. I'm the one who sorted out these articles (e.g. notably Cartoonito, Boomerang, Jetix, BVS Entertainment). I found the missing programs for Disney Channel and it's templates.

So if you give me another chance, I'll continue to recover lost media about certain topics and join those group discussions.

MegaSmike46 (talk) 06:24, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] 

Decline reason:

You don't say what topics you want to edit. PhilKnight (talk) 17:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Have you edited under any other accounts? Jake Wartenberg (talk) 13:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, not in a very long time (about two years) and I only tested it once. Do you know any administrators like Yamla? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MegaSmike46 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up to @JJMC89: as the most recent admin to take action here, this editor has now removed restored unblock requests for at least the third time. Each time, they have used a different tactic: first by removing the declined unblock requests, then by blanking everything, including the declined unblock requests, then by restoring everything but the declined unblock requests. I figured that this wasn't crucial enough to notify ANI. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 04:57, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I mostly didn’t erase unblock requests because it was so long and frustrating. So I helped @JJMC89 restore this stuff. MegaSmike46 (talk) 16:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You literally have removed the declined unblock requests several times and then yesterday, you restored everything except the unblock requests. Are you aware that this is not allowed under WP:KEEPDECLINEDUNBLOCK? You can remove almost anything you want, but declined unblock requests for active blocks are one of the exceptions because they're part of a community process. Where did you "help" restore these?

All of these are diffs in which you removed declined unblock requests. [1] [2] [3][4][5] and here's one in which you simply removed an admin's answer to an unblock request. [6]. The fact that you're still violating a guideline, after multiple requests to stop doing that going back over a year, will very likely be taken into consideration when an admin evaluates your request. It's also ineffective since you're unable to remove history. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 16:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have continued to remove declined unblock requests, I have removed your ability to edit this page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:08, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]