User talk:PaxImperia

This user may have left Wikipedia. PaxImperia has not edited Wikipedia since 28 February 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Please remove the template if you return to editing.

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|PaxImperia}} on your talk. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Please add new sections to the bottom of this page, and new messages to the bottoms of their sections. Thanks.

I've left a comment on the talk page. Sorry for the late reply. I hadn't checked Wiki for a while. But I am glad the situation is resolved. And Chanakyathegreat's second account has finally be blocked indef. Good riddance. Nirvana888 (talk) 16:29, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back, good to see you're around again. G.R. Allison (talk) 16:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your military history newsletter – Volume LVIII, December 2010 From the editors • "Military Historian of the Year" • Discussions • The month's new featured and A-class content • Review awards Contest results • A-class medal recipients • bahamut teaches us proper usage of "Jargon and acronyms" To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here. BrownBot (talk) 21:22, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An RfC/U about AlexCovarrubias (talk · contribs) has been filed - I know you have expressed concerns about his conduct at a previous time and encourage you to participate.·Maunus·ƛ· 15:26, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military history Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: EyeSerene discusses "Writing neutrally for Wikipedia"

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Ed talks about real-world collaborations and how you can help

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 22:22, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

re: Operation Odyssey Dawn; quick note: Operation Odyssey Dawn, Opération Harmattan and Operation ELLAMY are three separate operations, unified only after March 31 under Operation Unified Protector. Odyssey Dawn was the US and attached allied forces operation; while Opération Harmattan and Operation ELLAMY were the much more aggressive French respectively British campaigns. noclador (talk) 18:52, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but I realised my mistake when you had pointed it out, I had read the source and intro wrong, sorry for the misunderstanding. Also, I believe Unified Protector is separate to the French and British strike actions and not the combination of all allied operations, such that some British ships had been moved to Unified Pro while some still stayed with Ellamy. But this doesn't matter, thanks for the heads up! G.R. Allison (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no problem :-) as for the French and British strike actions, they are under NATO, but they have much loser rules of engagement than i.e. the Norwegian planes. The only thing I know for sure is not fully under NATO command is the strike aircraft on the Charles de Gaulle, as their role is to help the rebels fight off Gaddafis troops and thus protect Benghazi. noclador (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I would like your opinion on a sentence of policy. This request does not concern Operation Odyssey Dawn and I have decided not to work on that article any more. The sentence that I would like your opinion on is the first sentence of Wikipedia:Verifiability which states,

"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth: whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."

In your own words, what does this sentence mean? Please note that this is not meant to be the start of any kind of debate with you and I am only honestly interested in your opinion. I will look here on your talk page for your response. Thank you. 75.47.149.249 (talk) 10:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Dank helps you see what article writers want from reviewers

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 04:15, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would certainly support such a nomination, however I have nominated it previously on the ground of being a copy-edit. When proof was presented that such was not the case the nomination was taken down. Thus, if I would nominate it a second time, it may be perceived as if I was out to get that article. However if you, or anybody else, would happen to nominate the article for deletion, then you may count on my support :) Swedish pirate (talk) 23:41, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see, well, I've just nominated it based on the SYN and OR, thanks for letting me know. G.R. Allison (talk) 16:09, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I was wondering if you could clarify your revert of my edit on Chinese Century. The edit was made to improve the flow of the sentence, which I assumed was acceptable as it appeared to be a paraphrase of Chua's work. So what about the edit, then, made the original version correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jetjaws (talk • contribs) 02:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, sure. The wording was the only problem, it makes more grammatical sense to say that the "size and resources for them [the diaspora] are unparalleled" rather than using "its". G.R. Allison (talk) 09:33, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, whoops. When I first read the sentence I misconstrued the meaning of diaspora and because of that misunderstood what "them" referred to. Thanks for the help.Jetjaws (talk) 14:34, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No need to thank me, we're all here doing the same job! Good luck with your editing :) G.R. Allison (talk) 15:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I read the MOD articles and there were two waves deployed--Albion sailed first then Ocean. But if that's not so major, I'll leave it there.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 08:41, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with that is though, the task force itself isn't based on first and second waves. The waves situation just happened to be the way the ships joined together this time to form the one task force, it was only a product of the fact the second group of ships were quite far apart from the first group when it sailed. The waves in this case was just the order of arrival. G.R. Allison (talk) 10:47, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on starting the RFTG page; I've strengthened it.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I really do appreciate the help on getting it set up and running properly. Hope to continue working with you! :) G.R. Allison (talk) 15:35, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HMS Ocean is no longer under COUGAR 11/RFTG. It is now under operational control of those dealing with Operation Unified Protector/Operation Ellamy. http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/MilitaryOperations/ApachesGetReadyToHelpProtectLibyanCivilians.htm and http://www.navynews.co.uk/news/1213-ocean-and-her-gunships-dispatched-to-libya.aspx. Thus my edits. Unless you have news that Cmdre J. Kingwell still retains operational control over Ocean.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 15:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The issue here is that Ocean is still a constituent of the RFTG fleet. It being deployed to Libya doesn't change that as the RFTG is a fleet with assigned ships, their location has little bearing. Ocean is no longer involved in Cougar but it is still very much as RFTG ship. G.R. Allison (talk) 16:16, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think what you're meaning is it's no longer part of Cougar 11. RFTG isn't a deployment, it's a grouping of assets. Hope this clears it up. :) G.R. Allison (talk) 16:22, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I diagree with you. It is no longer under the operational command of Cmdre Kingwell, who is in command of the RFTG. Re-verting. I would like someone else to verify. I am NOT referring to location; Ocean is in a new operational command.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 16:25, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ocean is part of the RFTG concept, it is no longer deployed on COUGAR11. G.R. Allison (talk) 16:26, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No Ocean is part of the deployment to Unifited Protector/Ellamy no longer COUGAR11 nor RFTG. Unless you show me a source that says "still part of RFTG". You haven't.I have shown you sources that Ocean is deploying from one deployment to another. You have to proof beyond doubt that it is going to rejoin the RFTG after UP/Ellamy. You haven't.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is like many operations in World War II. Units of the British Army shifted under US Command, but were deployed under the British Army commander. Other dictionaries are better (talk) 16:30, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved this to the article talk page, cheers. G.R. Allison (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Members: Contest results, A-class medal recipients Editorial: Buggie111 discusses neutral point of view

To stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You need a source to back that up. The SSNs are more significant that most of the FRTG ships in terms of firepower. The Type 45s are definitely more significant than the "forever assigned" HMS Ocean. Size does not equate to "relatively significan".Other dictionaries are better (talk) 17:51, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read what I said please, the largest units in the naval service being deployed is significant. A deployment of Archer patrol vessels would not be. HMS Ocean etc are significant assets. That's just common sense, you do not need to be so damn rude. G.R. Allison (talk) 17:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And you need to learn your military strength. Who considered largest ship in terms of size significant? Can you show me another source that says so? I don't see a Type 23, an LPD, RFA and Royal Marine units as significant as the deployment of SSNs or Type 42/Type 45s.Other dictionaries are better (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In this context the meaning refers to the assets deployed which despite being important naval assets, make up a significant chunk of the Royal Navy. A source is not needed to claim that the majority of the Royal Navys amphibious force being deployed along with escorts and an SSN is significant. G.R. Allison (talk) 18:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project News: From the editors – Contest results, A-class medal recipients Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Editorial: Hawkeye's thoughts on the article writing process

To begin or stop receiving this newsletter, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. BrownBot (talk) 23:10, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Finland and Spitfires Op-ed: Fifelfoo and hunting for plagiarism

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 23:35, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Zeebrugee and Afghanistan Op-ed: WereSpielChequers examines RfA

To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Carthage and Australia in Palestine Op-ed: Remembering 9/11

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's featured and A-class Milhist content Book reviews: Nick-D and Ian Rose look at Australian air power Op-ed: Buggie111 ruminates about WikiLife and WikiDeath

Hi Mr GRA, I'm not sure if you knew there was someone suggesting that Turkey be added to Potential Superpowers or not but I just thought I'd tell you I have an old userpage I made a couple of years back for 'Rising Powers' (which I haven't touched in ages, really). Anyway, the discussion kinda made me look back at that old page and think about working on it a bit; you at all okay with looking over it or helping me flesh it out a bit, just to see if it goes anywhere? Comics (talk) 03:35, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm up for that,'Rising Powers' seems like quite a good idea! :) G.R. Allison (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; medal recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D analyzes three books from Osprey Publishing Review essay: Nick-D reviews the new Bundeswehr Military History Museum

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors – MHotY coming; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the Congolese Wars Review essay: Ian Rose goes to El Alamein Op-ed: DCI's call to revitalize WikiProject History

Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Review essay: Kirill Lokshin, the first coordinator Op-ed: Hchc's English Castles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Ian Rose discusses article assessments

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks into two recent Milhist books Op-ed: Hawkeye on Wikipedia collaborating with the AWM

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Subhas Chandra Bose; Hawkeye on corps commanders; Nick-D on American special forces Op-ed: The Land on commemorating World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Chaco War and the Bougainville Campaign Op-ed: Remembering conflict

Hello, I would like your input at the Blue-water navy article. It appears that once again a list of limited blue-water navies has found its way back into the article. As per previous consensus it should be removed. Cheers. Talk^Woe90i 10:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors: Wikimania 2012; special projects note Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the Australian 25th Battalion Interview: Article writers discuss buildings and fortifications Op-ed: Hawkeye7 reports on a weekend workshop

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Nick-D on the legacy of World War II Op-ed: Bomzibar on German military history

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: AustralianRupert on artillery in South Australia, and Nick-D on Venice's empire Op-ed: Nick-D on the "Kokoda: Beyond the Legend" conference

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; milestone for the Fortifications task force; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/News/October 2012/Hawkeye7 on mission command Op-ed: The ed17 on how The Bugle could be improved

Hey MrGRA; if you have the time at all to spare would you be able to contribute to a discussion about Japan at the Potential Superpowers article? Cheers, Comics (talk) 10:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel_66, AustralianRupert, and Nick-D look at ships, soldiers, and railways Op-ed: Nick-D on navigating the FA and A-Class review processes

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Simon Harley on British battleships and Nick-D on the French Resistance Interview: Five editors discuss some less-represented areas of military history Op-ed: Ian Rose looks back on 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: The month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Mongol naval power Op-ed: Crisco 1492 on war films

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at US Army leadership since World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at refugees during the Battle of France Interview: Editors discuss writing articles about the former Yugoslavia Op-ed: Prioryman on German V-weapon sites and the historian's responsibility

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Sturmvogel 66 and Hawkeye7 look at aspects of the Pacific War Op-ed: ErrantX considers the rabbit hole of research

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Dumelow on the French Foreign Legion and Nick-D on New Zealand military history Op-ed: Nick-D on military history tourism

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Works on the RNZAF, World War I in the Baltic, and British battleship construction Op-ed: Anchors Aweigh for the Majestic Titans

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Australia's frontier wars Interview: What Wikimedia chapters can offer military history editors

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the death of Osama bin Laden Op-ed: Sturmvogel_66 presents his secrets of prolific contribution

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Kirill ^[talk] 17:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at the American Civil War

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks Austro-Hungarian battleships of World War I Op-ed: Advice on reviewing Featured and A-Class articles

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at US industry in World War II Op-ed: AustralianRupert offers a soldier's perspective on editing Wikipedia

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Carcharoth and Hawkeye7 look at World War I cemeteries and the British Army in World War II Interview: Less-represented areas of military history – part 2 Op-ed: TomStar81 and Nick-D look back on 2013 and ahead to 2014

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D, Zawed and Hawkeye7 look at recent releases

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Rabaul in World War II and Australia in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on military command and Nick-D on F-111s in combat

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at Britain's War Machine Interview: Article writers discuss German military history

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at The Lost Boys of Anzac Op-ed: Peacemaker67 on Featured Articles involving Yugoslavia in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at life aboard a US aircraft carrier and Hawkeye7 considers the role of food in World War II

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther and Nick-D look at examples of electronic media Op-ed: TomStar81 on the shot heard around the world

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Wrap-up of some recent external reviews Interview: World War I editors Op-ed: TomStar81 on the outbreak of World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 looks at the military history of Austria-Hungary Timeleine: This month in World War I

Greetings from WikiProject Military history! As a member of the project, you are invited to take part in our annual project coordinator election, which will determine our coordinators for the next twelve months. If you wish to cast a vote, please do so on the election page by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 22:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D on Britain in the French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Nick-D looks at Nazi Germany's Eastern Front allies Op-ed: TomStar81 on the origins and legacy of trench warfare Timeline: This month in World War I

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Military history Wikiproject has opened nominations for the Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year. Nominations will be accepted until 13 December at 23:59 GMT, with voting to begin at 0:00 GMT 14 December. The voting will conclude on 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This message was accidentally sent using an incorrect mailing list, therefore this message is being resent using the correct list. As a result, some users may get this message twice; if so please discard. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Nominations for the military historian of the year and military newcomer of the year have now closed, and voting for the candidates has officially opened. All project members are invited to cast there votes for the Military historian and Military newcomer of the year candidates before the elections close at 23:59 December 21st. For the coordinators, TomStar81

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Hawkeye7 on armoured reconnaissance and German scientists, Nick-D on time travelling historians Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the World War I Christmas truce Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book reviews: Jonas Vinther on Hitler and Cliftonian on the Rhodesia Regiment Interview: 2014 Military History Newcomer Award nominees Review essay: Nick-D on the Australian War Memorial Op-ed: TomStar81 on the birth of strategic bombing Timeline: This month in World War I

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; awards and honours; contest results Articles: Last month's new Featured and A-Class content Book review: Nick-D on the British Pacific Fleet Op-ed: TomStar81 looks at the advent of chemical warfare Timeline: This month in World War I