User talk:PJtP

Welcome!

Hello, PJtP, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  BD2412 T 20:01, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, to revert your edit. I know you put in a lot of work. See talk page on article for probable reason for albums going out of date. They probably will be reissued under a new label. I think this was also the case with some of his albums in (1997). He probably changed labels about May 2006 so maybe they will be reissued in May 2007. Only guessing.Agadant 20:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was adding a paragraph to the article explaining and referencing what was probably going on with the albums not knowing you were reverting the edit at the same time. Something sure messed up. and I reverting it back to the previous edit. If you want to discuss this issue before once again reverting my edit please let's do so on my talk page. I have worked long and hard on this to get it to where it can maybe get a GA rating and I feel like your edit is not done in an encyclopedia style as is required. Please answer back on my talk page. Agadant 22:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added information I found on the Van Morrison Unofficial website that seems to indicate that Van is in complete control of his albums and as we know he is so private about everything he does, all we can do is speculate on what's going on. [1]... Agadant 23:13, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Left you a message on my talk page.Agadant 03:24, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Everything is restored as before. I know "my" motivations are maintaining the integrity of the article that I have put a lot of work into, and it has not been an easy task.Agadant 02:11, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You added links between George Russell and Gail Russell pages. Are you sure they are actually related? George Russell's family is Ohio-based (see the Background section) and he attended Wilberforce University in Ohio, whereas Gail Russell is from a Chicago family. I've put a Fact note onto the George Russell page. AllyD (talk) 21:51, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop capitalizing headers in articles, as it's contrary to the manual of style. Thanks - Special-T (talk) 19:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't really a matter for debate - the Wikipedia manual of style states:

• The first letter of the first word, letters in acronyms, and the first letter of proper nouns are capitalized; all other letters are in lower case (Funding of UNESCO projects, not Funding of UNESCO Projects).

- Special-T (talk) 07:31, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear PJtP,

I am not the fellow who reverted your recent edit to Wp's article on 2001: A Space Odyssey. I have mixed feelings about it. On the one hand Google lists "They Shoot Pictures" as a possibly malicious-software website, and it is a little known web-site, at least in the USA.

On the other hand, I looked at it, and I think it is an utterly superb web-page, and was glad to have my attention drawn to it. It seems like a legitimate undertaking, and they seem to have tried to take into account many previous polls (rather than just airing their own opinion) to assemble their list of great films.

Query: Is this site better known in Australia (it's home) than here in America? And do you know of any good reason why Google may have gotten a "false positive" re their listing it as a site that "might harm your computer"?

Personally, I would sort of like to see this reference restored to the WP 2001 page. But one would need a good rationale, as to what makes it a notable site, and some explanation of why Google lists it as a possibly harmful site.

Please feel free to leave a message on my talk page.

--WickerGuy (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Adatewithelvis.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:34, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. That's some interesting info on the singles for The Worst of Jefferson Airplane collection, but it has nothing to do with the album. The only single version used on this compilation was "Martha." Everything else is from the album versions and mixes. Somebody to Love and White Rabbit are in stereo (singles were mono), The Ballad of You & Me & Pooneil's single version was only about 3 minutes, etc. Also, track listing goes above personnel according to WP:ALBUM, and we shouldn't split up the original vinyl track listing even though the CD version did. JoeD80 (talk) 00:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Catfish Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Irbisgreif (talk) 22:54, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to add a template to warn of a lack of references, please select one and add it rather than adding two ({{refimprove}}, {{no footnotes}}).

I reverted you addition of two templates to the head of the English Civil War as the {{citation needed}} templates are more specific and help other editors know what the editor who placed them there thinks does and does not need citations. If there are specific templates then a general template is not needed.

I reverted you edit to the New Model Army because there is already an notice of no sources in the References section which has been there since May 2009. As a general rule putting reference warnings in the References section is IMHO a better place to put them than at the top of an article. --PBS (talk) 10:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello PJtP! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mark James (songwriter) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:46, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elvisamazinggrace.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 20:09, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elvisspeedway.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 01:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of The Bob Dylan Encyclopedia, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Bob Dylan Encyclopedia. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:19, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, no prob... I have that CD also and noticed the error!  :-) - eo (talk) 18:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, PJtP... well, the first five tracks on here are Four Tops, but somehow, and I'm sure accidently on your part, from tacks 6 on up you have Supremes songs listed. I'll let you correct it yourself as you did create this article. Best, --Discographer (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Eddiecochranmemorial.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 02:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Apokoinu construction. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write practically anything you want.

Thank you for uploading File:Faithfullbeforepoison.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

Because you used a fair use rationale with your upload, the recommended copyright tag is {{non-free album cover}}. Please add this to the image and remove the speedy delete template ({{di-no license}}).

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Image Screening Bot (talk) 18:05, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have reverted your edit to The Byrds Untitled album because as per the manual of style at WP:LEAD, "The lead serves both as an introduction to the article and as a summary of the important aspects of the subject of the article. The lead should be able to stand alone as a concise overview of the article. It should define the topic, establish context, explain why the subject is interesting or notable, and summarize the most important points—including any notable controversies."

As such, some repetition of information is inevitable and perfectly acceptable in a properly written Wikipedia article, although ideally the lead should only provide an overview, with more detail appearing later on in the article. I just thought that I should point this out because you'll find that any good Wikipedia article, especially if it's been certified as a Good Article or a Featured Article is going to have this kind of repetition in it. Therefore, removing large sections of text to avoid repetition between the lead and the main body of the article is not in line with the Wikipedia Manual of Style or current GA and FA criteria and should be avoided. Many thanks. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hookerservesyouright.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:09, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the article Perry Como and have placed it on hold until certain criteria are met. You have 10 days to update the article before I review it again. If, at the end of those ten days it has not been sufficiently updated I will decline it. The review can be found at Talk:Perry_Como/GA1. Mr. R00t ^Talk 19:03, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paulbutterfieldbluesbanddebut.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:05, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Billy Davenport has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Eeekster (talk) 01:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Star Trek (film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 16:49, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jerome Arnold has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 22:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, The Shape I'm In (Joe Nichols song). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - The Shape I'm In. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Shape I'm In - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. JohnCD (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. I'm not sure what you were trying to do with that, but you should not move articles by cutting and pasting, because that loses the attribution to all the previous contributors contained in the article history, which we are required by the license terms to maintain. If a title is to be changed, it should be done by using the "move" tab at the top of the screen. But we don't normally put a disambiguation term like (Joe Nichols song) into a title unless it's necessary to distinguish from other similarly titled articles. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:25, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Thebandtimetokill45.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent addition of links to a non-notable blog with generic commercial advertising banners can be interpreted as a violation of the policy on spam:

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page The Third Man, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome!

μηδείς (talk) 05:36, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a discussion about your additions such as [this edit] to the film articles. I'd appreciate it if you came and discussed the issue. Betty Logan (talk) 05:54, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a unanimous consensus to remove the "1000 Greatest film" refs you have added. If you think there is valid reason for adding them please join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film#Notable_or_not, and in the meantime please refrain from adding the references to more articles. Betty Logan (talk) 08:47, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If we have two songs with the exact same title, it's better to have a disambiguation page between the two. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:14, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ILeftMyHeartInSanFranciscoLP.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on Blue Rose (Rosemary Clooney album). Keep it up :) Gareth E Kegg (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elviskingcreole.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 11:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Eddiecochranmemorial.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 06:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, PJtP. I've reverted your edit of the Grateful Dead template, moving Robert Hunter back out of the band member section. As I said in the edit summary, please take a look at Talk:Grateful Dead#Band membership, where there is a centralized discussion of this question. You're invited to join in the debate there. Before doing so, I would request that you also read (but do not update) the archived discussion thread at Talk:Grateful Dead/Archive 1#Where are the other band members?, where there is a more extensive discussion about Robert Hunter. Thanks. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 01:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You've explained your views on this subject, which I appreciate. However, you did so in the archived discussion thread, and most editors won't see what you wrote there. So, I've moved your post, from Talk:Grateful Dead/Archive 1#Where are the other band members? to Talk:Grateful Dead#Band membership. That's where the discussion should continue, and in fact I've replied there. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 07:18, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed and passed the nomination for this article. It was only when checking the artcile history at the end of the review that I noticed taht you only seem to have made one edit to the article. The hard work was done by User:Kohoutek1138. It is customary to inform/consult major contributors before nominating for review. I just thought that I would let you know. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just undid your edits to Quiet Nights (Miles Davis and Gil Evans album) and Quiet Nights (album) as I thought this was a cut/paste move. It does seem you have just started a new article at Quiet Nights (album). You should make your edits directly to the Quiet Nights (Miles Davis and Gil Evans album) page, even if it involves wholesale change. This is so that the article history is clearly preserved. Quiet Nights (album) is an unsuitable title for the page as there are 3 articles on Wikipedia about albums called Quiet Nights. The article title should include the artists name to make it unambiguous. This is described at WP:MOSALBUM. Tassedethe (talk) 22:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see you chose to ignore my comments. I have moved the article back to its full name per WP:MOSALBUM and restored the earlier article history. Tassedethe (talk) 18:00, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have again reverted your edits per WP:BRD. If you feel these articles should have different names then you should start a proper WP:RM request. Tassedethe (talk) 03:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed or reverted some of your edits on articles associated with The Left Banke because it seems that you are largely unfamiliar with the Wikipedia manual of style for album articles. For example, the letter "a" should not be capitalised in song titles and punctuation, such as full stops, should fall out side quotation marks in song titles. Also, we don't use the "#" sign to denote number in music articles either.

In addition, you have added an awful lot of information that is completely unsourced. Pretty much all text on Wikipedia should ideally display inline citations that indicate reliable, third-party sources. I would also recommend that you learn how to use proper citation templates and how to use multiple copies of the same reference by naming them -- thus avoiding repetition in the references list at the foot of an article. As if all that wasn't enough, I see that you've also discarded and deleted perfectly good, reliable citations that were already in place, for no adequately explained reason.

Also, the name of The Left Banke's 1992 compilation is not There's Gonna Be A Storm, it is There's Gonna Be a Storm: The Complete Recordings 1966–1969. Under the guidelines laid out at WP:ALBUM and WP:NAME, this full title should be used in the article name, in much the same way as in the Nuggets: Original Artyfacts from the First Psychedelic Era, 1965–1968 article. As a result of this misnaming, the article will now have to be moved. Incidentally, you could do worse that check out the criteria for notability in music articles, because a good case could be made for this Left Banke compilation not meeting any of the criteria, meaning that the article shouldn't have been created in the first place.

I suggest that if you're going to continue to edit music-related articles on Wikipedia that you take time to familiarise yourself with the guidelines and policy laid out at the music manual of style, WikiProject Albums and Wikipedia:WikiProject Songs, because at the moment, you're just making extra work for those of us who do have a handle on how album articles should be formatted on Wikipedia. --Kohoutek1138 (talk) 21:49, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey PJtP, I'm posting this message on your talk page because I noticed that you've recently created the new article Al Gorgoni--However, I think the article seems to contain a few errors: the references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There is a tutorial on formatting citations at Wikipedia:Referencing. Happy editing! Hope your day is going well and you are having fun.Jipinghe (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

70.24.248.23 (talk) 14:46, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited List of Crown albums in The Penguin Guide to Jazz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Surrealistic Pillow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monophonic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article 2001: A Space Odyssey (film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. ASHU^IND 13:07, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. It would be very helpful and appreciated if you would propose changes to articles about The Beatles' albums on each respective album's talk page. Please be mindful of sourced content and formatting. Thank you. Radiopathy •talk• 00:51, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally, do not edit war when someone reverts an article to its properly sourced and formatted state. Radiopathy •talk• 00:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PJtP, I commented on this here. Gwen Gale (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having thought about the situation a while back with Radiopathy I realize now that perhaps I should have spent more time looking into your improvements. I think what you were doing was indeed improving, and you do not need Radio's permission to do so. I hope you will reconsider, and return to improving those articles as you intended. Sorry I didn't support you then, but you will have my support from now on, as long as you make an effort at the talk pages, and your edits are indeed improvements. ~ GabeMc ^{(talk|contribs)} 23:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A-side and B-side, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ruby Tuesday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Lennonmothersingle.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 18:52, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited California (Wilson Phillips album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young 1974 Reunion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Graham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young 1974 Reunion. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Crosby,_Stills,_Nash_&_Young#Reconciliation. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Crosby,_Stills,_Nash_&_Young#Reconciliation – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Whispering 17:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• I have declined the patroller's Speedy Deletion, and I have moved the page to User:PJtP/Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young 1974 Reunion (draft) where you can continue to develop it with a view to merging it into its parent article. Please note that the content must however be adequately sourced before you incorporate it. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:15, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You recently moved the Dylan and The Basement Tapes links down to the compilations section. I always understood those to be considered studio albums. Do you know of any sources that say definitively one way or the other? The Wookieepedian (talk) 01:43, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Dylan album of 1973, made up of outtakes from the Self Portrait and New Morning album sessions of 1970, was compiled by Columbia Records after Dylan temporarily jumped ship and signed to Asylum Records in late 1973. Dylan had no hand in its production or selection; it was made up of leftovers from earlier sessions; it was not the result of a deliberate effort in the studio on Dylan's part. The Basement Tapes were compiled by Robbie Robertson of The Band eight years after the sessions took place mostly in the Big Pink basement celebrated in the album so named. Again, this was done after the fact, in this case to allow the copyright holders to market material that was appearing continually on bootlegs. See books and articles by Michael Gray, Sid Griffin, Greil Marcus, Clinton Heylin, among other noted Dylan scholars, for more in-depth accounts. PJtP (talk) 02:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was already aware of those things, but for some reason thought that Columbia Records considered those two part of the canon. After doing a google search, I can't see any official reference that would support my assumption. So I see your point. The Wookieepedian (talk) 03:59, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Technically, Pat Garrett & Billy the Kid should also be taken out of studio albums and placed in a new soundtracks section. But it seems silly to create a new section for just one album. And once you do that, although this is the only soundtrack Dylan himself composed, do you place in it I'm Not There and other films consisting of nothing but Dylan music? PJtP (talk) 14:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Study In Frustration, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Honeysuckle Rose and John Kirby (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Die schöne Müllerin because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 20:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Allies (Crosby, Stills & Nash album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Finnigan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

American Dream (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Horns and Joe Vitale

Carry On (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Southern Cross (song) and European

Looking Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Celeste and Michael Finnigan

CSN (box set) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Southern Cross (song)

Greatest Hits (Crosby, Stills & Nash album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Michael Finnigan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see that you have blanked the article with the rationale of deleting the page. However, blanking the page is not tantamount to deleting the article. I've restored the page for now. If you wish to nominate the page under deletion, please use WP:CSD if it meets one of the criterions; WP:PROD if there is a reason and it's likely to be unconstroversial; WP:AFD for discussion and consensus. Please leave any questions or comments on my talk page. Thanks. KJ ^{click here} 22:39, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited It's Too Late to Stop Now, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Troubadour (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you care to review or comment at my FA nomination for Marquee Moon, an article about a rock music album? Information on reviewing an FA nomination's criteria is available at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on They Shoot Pictures, Don't They? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Tchaliburton (talk) 03:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Hollies' Greatest Hits (1973 album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Richards. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Miles of Aisles may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• jonimitchell.com/chronology/complete.cfm Joni Mitchell website Chronology retrieved 13 August 2014]]</ref> She hired an already existing group, the [[jazz fusion]] band L.A. Express, members of which

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joel Bernstein has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Joel Bernstein, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 08:11, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wind on the Water, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stills (album). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American Stars 'n Bars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Briggs. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Me and My Uncle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Fe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:26, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From the current article text:

"... commonly referred to as the Nobel Prize in Economics,[1], and as a "category of the Nobel Prize" by the Nobel Foundation itself[2] which owns the tradename "Nobel Prize"[3] [....] Winners are announced on the same day as other Nobel Prize winners, and receive the award at the same ceremony.[4]"

If even owner of the tradename "Nobel Prize" refers to it as one of its prize categories, perhaps you should take up their own "erroneous" usage with them before making further edits to the article. From the link about intellectual property rights, you'll see that that the Nobel Foundation says it defends their use of the term "Nobel Prize" very strictly, yet they somehow haven't tried to defend themselves against anyone who uses the term "Nobel Prize" to refer to the economics Nobel. It was not some independent prize established by the Bank of Sweden, but a collaboration that involved a donation to the Nobel Foundation. Yakushima (talk) 15:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You were here: WP:NPOV. And you're right back there again. I've treated your latest edit as respectfully as I can -- which unfortunately has me resorting to citing a blog (at least at the blogsite of an RS newspaper, though not edited by them) and a bloggish contrarian "journal" (and even that source equivocates). That it's "erroneous" to call this prize a Nobel Prize in Economics (which the owner of the term "Nobel Prize" itself seems consider one of its prizes) is an opinion. It's up to you to establish any such "error" as a fact. Good luck with that. Yakushima (talk) 16:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've been seeing your edits adding to the section "Most top ten singles from one album". The reason why Ericorbit, and myself, had to shorten the list was because it is too long compared to the other lists in the article, and it has been discussed in the past that the lists should be limited to the top 10 entries (unless there should be a tie, in which case more can be added as long as it's not excessive). When you added the group of those which had 4 from one album, the list was already at 12 entries for those who had 5 or more, and 5 is what completed the top 10, even though there ended up being more than 10. So adding those with 4 is excessive, and I am going to remove it one more time. If you disagree with this removal, bring it up on the article's talk page as to why you feel this list should be given undue weight in the article.

Also, take a look at this edit summary comment from Mmrsofgreen [2]. You need to provide reliable sources for this information you are adding; original research is not permitted via Wikipedia policy. Any information without references is subject to removal from the article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 02:24, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Night at the Village Vanguard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oscar Hammerstein. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Bootleg Series Vol. 12: The Cutting Edge 1965–1966, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celeste. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited In Concert, November 1975, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Thompson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Who Hits 50! (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Real Me. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I liked your contribution at United States Constitution on the Second Amendment. I regret that it was reverted. I think it deserves discussion at Talk there to gain a consensus. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 14:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Elvisgoldrecords2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I'll Sleep When I'm Dead (An Anthology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giant Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your relatively recent comment on TheVirginianHistorian’s Talk page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheVirginiaHistorian#Second_amendment and added a comment to your exchange. I thought you might be interested and perhaps make a rebuttal. I could never see the logic in your position on this issue. Thanks.HistoryBuff14 (talk) 22:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

During my recent edits, I took care to include citations from many different viewpoints, and I don't think your "Unbalanced" tag is appropriate. What exactly do you find unbalanced? Spike-from-NH (talk) 04:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Decade of Steely Dan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jim Hodder and Roger Nichols. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Get Yer Ya-Ya's Out! The Rolling Stones in Concert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Stewart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Buffalo Springfield (album)

added a link pointing to The Troubadour

Buffalo Springfield Again

added a link pointing to Dewey Martin

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Casablanca (film), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I reverted your recent edit to Steely Dan because I cannot find a source that supports your interpretation that the band is defunct. That they have upcoming tour dates under the Steely Dan moniker alone indicates necessarily that they remain active. If I've missed something please let me know. CCS81 (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young 1969-1970 Tours, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ladydaycolumbia19331944.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]