User talk:Tassedethe

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11

Hello, Tassedethe! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Gimme danger (talk) 12:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply] Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

A tag has been placed on Eramudugolla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 14:45, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is this OK? Thx for evaluation. 88.242.58.104 (talk) 10:52, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anastasia Tikhonova (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Carlos Soler (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:17, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect From the River to the Sea (album) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 30 § From the River to the Sea (album) until a consensus is reached. GnocchiFan (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Billy Wayne Davis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 24.183.96.14 (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've noticed you're very active wikignoming. Have you tried the oabot tool? I'd love to hear about your experience doing some edits with it. There are new suggested edits in the queue. Nemo 21:21, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Laura Donnelly (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 09:13, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tassedethe. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greg Moore (American football), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eddie Henderson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Henderson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Laterthanyouthink (talk) 13:00, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Buwelikada requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. NmWTfs85lXusaybq (talk) 05:02, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tassedethe,

I see you use an editing tool to correct redirects after a page move. When you are doing this for the Redirect page, could also do this for the Redirect Talk page as well? For some reason, these talk pages get forgotten and usually are deleted as broken redirects. I don't know why but some of our page movers leave redirects behind for the main article page but not for the talk pages. Thank you for any help you can supply. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:26, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Liz. I think you left me a message about this before and since then I have tried to also correct the talk page redirects as well. Unfortunately I missed this one, thanks for the clean up. Tassedethe (talk) 21:28, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tassedethe, I see you moved the Widower (TV series) to (miniseries). UK programmes are usually much shorter than US programmes, and sometimes can be as short as three episodes a series, and then have no more series, or maybe multiple series of a few episodes. UK dramas are normally classed as TV series, save when it's a joint production and then it's debatable on which format to use.Halbared (talk) 21:15, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly I moved The Widower to The Widower (miniseries). I wouldn't move The Widower (TV series) to The Widower (miniseries), per your concerns. Yes, UK TV series can be much shorter than US ones, but 3 episodes to me is clearly mini. I'm not invested in (miniseries) however... so I can move it again if you feel strongly. Tassedethe (talk) 21:24, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tassedethe, thank you for the response and the correction on the details of the move. I've checked the page again and as a wholly British programme TV series fits with the other British one series dramas on Wiki, save for the ones labelled as serials which was the format a while back. I do feel strongly, keeping the format the same for British dramas seems best for continuity. Could you move it to align it with the rest, please?Halbared (talk) 10:39, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done! Tassedethe (talk) 16:10, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleaned up after your move their significantly, since the redirect you deleted to make way for the move was hiding several other topics (which are now at Chloe Wilson (dog) and Chloe Wilson (disambiguation)). Please make sure to check the history before deleting things in the future, and you may want to reconsider whether the bowler is still the primary topic - he certainly doesn't look like one to me anymore. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:00, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Food Street has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § Food Street until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Skippy1931.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for creating the Carlos Véliz disambiguation page and moving the old page to Carlos Véliz (athlete). Per WP:Naming conventions (sportspeople)#Athletics (track and field), I think it should be at Carlos Véliz (shot putter) instead as that's the new ideal standard. Thanks, --Habst (talk) 20:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link to the new guidelines. Tassedethe (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

move Draft:Asad Ali Palijo Main Article page🙏 Zu-brak (talk) 06:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nick White, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. begocc ^questions? 07:14, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nick White, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. begocc ^questions? 07:21, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hey Everybody is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hey Everybody (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 16:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films) and how Dracula (1931 English-language film) and Dracula (1931 Spanish-language film) list the year. DareshMohan (talk) 18:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The page Robert Hefner has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguated only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ended in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguated zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• was a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that did not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:46, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Barbara Hillary (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:10, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unsure how or why, but your edits are introducing double spacing into categories, which I have fixed at e.g. here and here. GiantSnowman 21:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pasting ' men's ' into the category so that it will always be right whether the cursor is left or right of the existing space. And I had actually assumed extra spaces were being auto-stripped, mainly as the categories show correctly when saved. Is this actually causing problems? Because it's going to be in many more edits than just those two. Tassedethe (talk) 21:07, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, there's no issues with it appearing in the relevant category. I've manually fixed the ones in my watchlist. GiantSnowman 18:20, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OK great. I started again but I'm talking more care this time, no extra spaces. Tassedethe (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I occasionally work in Category:Disambiguation pages in need of cleanup, and your name keeps popping up in the pages' history as the original cleanup marker. What's your method for "finding" the dirty dab pages in the first place? (I usually just want to clean them up but not dig around for them.) – sgeureka ^t•c 08:53, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sgeureka, unfortunately I don't have a way of detecting or finding them. I just do a lot of work with dab pages, especially adding new articles as needed. And that sends me to a lot of random pages. There used to be someone who did create lists of pages that had issues, but they have long since given up. Tassedethe (talk) 20:08, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Chris Sheppard (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. BilledMammal (talk) 07:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, Today I de-orphaned this article by adding a link at List of people from Evanston, Illinois article, Business section. Cheers, JoeNMLC (talk) 23:46, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the hat note? The name is ambiguous; thus a hot note is acceptable 2605:A601:F300:700:0:0:0:1349 (talk) 23:00, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Fisher is now a redirect. The article that was there was moved to Chris Fisher (director) and the hatnote on that article was removed as the article name is now not ambiguous. Tassedethe (talk) 00:10, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about this. Of the three we have, Ronald Tree, socialite and politician is much the best known. And the others' articles do not carry the title Ronald Tree. Ronald Tree (preacher) / Ronald Tree (musician)? Need to think about it a bit more. Was the change discussed? KJP1 (talk) 23:06, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No discussion. Quite happy to restore if you object. Tassedethe (talk) 00:14, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After checking my work I'm also not sure quite why I decided to move the article. So I've restored it and added some hatnote links instead. Thanks for the prompt. Tassedethe (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Frank Wang (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:59, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, I have found a former hoax article on the French Wikipedia where information about it is very scarce. It can be considered lost media. It was about a Chinese scholar named Li M'hâ Ong (or Li Ma-hong) (which was apparently a parody of the phrase "lime á ongles" which means toenail clipper or file) and reportedly existed for over a decade on the French wiki before it was removed in 2015 or 2016. There is almost absolutely zero information still on the internet on what this article was about. It feels like it was quite long, given that multiple French dictionary sites have referenced it as a source for example sentences about "gnarled trees" until recently. The article also had a bunch of supposed quotes from the scholar, apparently, such as: "On nomme d'ordinaire mythologie les récits sacrés des religions auxquelles plus personne ne croit", which in English means "We usually call mythology the sacred stories of religions that no one believes in anymore". One quote, "le clou qui dépasse connaîtra le marteau " (Li M'Hâ Ong)" (The nail that sticks out will know the hammer) has been referenced on the website of TECFA, which is located at Geneva University, as a real quote, and appears to be not the only occurrence where Li M'Hâ Ong is seriously quoted. This article was apparently a very elaborate hoax. Do you know anything about the article or its contents? (Source: https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion:Mythologie, https://fr.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:Projets_p%C3%A9dagogiques/Universit%C3%A9_du_Qu%C3%A9bec_en_Outaouais, both French) 87.122.16.35 (talk) 16:27, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]