User talk:Pelotas

Hello, Pelotas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  hydnjo talk 05:05, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gert steegmans.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

Solved, added tag.-Pelotas 16:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the link to the source for the 2026 China stuff. Having read it, it does not change my opinion of the 2026 article. The FIFA vice-president mentioned is clearly talking in a hypothetical; he will probably not even be in FIFA when the decision is made. Accordingly, I have decided not to remove the PROD notice; if you wish to, that is your right and I will take it to AfD instead. With regards to 2022, I am deciding whether or not to keep it; for the moment, I will not PROD it, but if 2026 gets deleted easily I might nominate it. Batmanand | Talk 17:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to his Team CSC profile, the correct form is Christian Vande Velde. It is the most autoritative source I have found.--Per Abrahamsen 20:21, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I must admit that I have not found the exact correct spelling myself. Three things make me conclude the spelling is probably without the space:

• Most official sites mention his name without a space, as for instance letour.fr
• Google, which automatically searches for errors in queries, always ends up saying: Did you mean: Christian Vandevelde? when I type Vande Velde. This means that Christian Vandevelde is far more used than Christian Vande Velde on the internet.
• Last but not least, Vandevelde comes undoubtedly from Dutch, if he was Dutch or Flemish, the spelling of his name would be Vandevelde or Van De Velde. Both meaning 'From the fields'. Vande Velde is however an unexistent name as Vande is not a word in Dutch and to put the space there is unnatural.

But all in all, I have no watertight proof that one or the other writing is the correct one. --Pelotas^talk 20:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It would be "van de Velde" in Dutch (small caps), I don't see that as an argument that the name is has been Americanized one way or the other. If you quote the name, Google has 60k for "Christian Vande velde" and 100k for "Christian Vandevelde", not exactly decisive. So with regard to the last point, authoritative sources, I'd put his employer at the top of the list of those I have seen. They write his paycheck :-) --Per Abrahamsen 13:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, but also no certainty there, the one 'writing' the paycheck is most of the times not the webmaster and typing errors in foreign names are easily made. For now, I can only say that also the German and Dutch wiki use Vandevelde, not Vande Velde. I'll keep searching for sources. --Pelotas^talk 13:40, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

...for the cupcakes! Never feel like you have angered anyone by disagreeing with the rest of the people on an AfD. And even if someone was mad, who cares? It's an AfD, not a life-or-death situation -- no one will die because 2022 FIFA World Cup will get deleted, despite a few people objecting. I was really suprised to find the cupcakes on my user page, but thanks anyway! Keep up the good work, and continue to speak up for what you believe in. Ian Manka Talk to me! 17:47, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, okido! Enjoy the cupcakes. --Pelotas^talk 12:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pelotas,

good work on belgian football. Keep it up, Julien Tuerlinckx 12:19, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try! --Pelotas^talk 12:50, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just read a bit of the article which seems nice at first sight though if i would have a comment it would be that the article seems to go to deep in the details. Actually I'm not quite sure this topic deserves a full article. Maybe including it into a broader "Bribery in Belgian football" could be an idea. It's been a long time i wanted to write stuff about "what's wrong in Belgian football" (bribery, the weak FA which takes suspicious and weak decisions, the lack of money and modern infrastructures, etc) but right now i think making an article on bribery in belgian football is a good compromise. I'll try to help you on that in the future if you think it's a good idea. Julien Tuerlinckx 22:18, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was originally just thinking of translating (from the Dutch wikipedia) the final paragraph I haven't done yet and that was it. I have not thought of the 'deepness' of the article or the fact if the topic deserves a full article, but maybe you're right. However, I don't really know a lot about other facets of gambling and bribing in belgian soccer. --Pelotas^talk 23:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Dutch literal translation --Cat out 00:44, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No Problem, I'm not sure if it is entirely right though, the translation I made from Dutch back to English is correct, but I'm not sure about the original English to Dutch. "Cool" does not in any way resemble "Tight". --Pelotas^talk 12:01, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On 31 July, 2006, a fact from the article Canadian caper, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Many thanks for the interesting nomination! -- Samir धर्म 00:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hi, no I made an error with the nationality by forgetting to change from French to Belgium. And I was looking at the stage winner thinking it was overall. He was a Belgian cyclist. my other cyclist-stubs should be ok. Sorry for the mistake James Janderson 20:05, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem --Pelotas^talk 20:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I am Oliviu. Can you please tell me how can I "close" my page (User: Oliviu), so that nobody can edit it but me, just like it's yours? Or at least I would like this page (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Oliviu&action=edit) to be replaced by this one (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Oliviu) when someone clicks on it.

Thanks.

Regards Oliviu Hirjan

You can ask for protection of a page but I believe a request for that will probably not be given. Don't worry about other people editing your page, you can always go back through the history to your own version, check out "How to revert a page to an earlier version". Mine is not protected in any way, everyone can edit it.--Pelotas^talk 14:31, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pelotas, Welcome, but how come that you are working on the lux Wiki? -- Myriam

Well, I'm not planning on editing much on the lux wiki but I will probably have to add some links to pages in other languages which is why I created an account. Although I know French, German and Dutch, I dont speak the luxembourgish languagemix so probably I will not be creating and major pages soon. --Pelotas^talk 23:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just welcoming you to the Latin wikipedia, where I am an administrator. Feel free to ask me any questions or problems you might have. Gratus apud nos!--Josh Rocchio 00:49, 4 August 2006 (UTC) or better: la:Usor:Ioshus Rocchio[reply]

Well thanks! I do have some problems, I'll mention them on your talkpage there. --Pelotas^talk 09:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, we have many problems with the vandalism of the America pages and the Peru/Chile pages for some reason. This is why they are protected. But they should only be semi-protected, that is protected to unregistered users, or new users. You should be able to edit it within a day or two. As far as links go, if you see any other wiki, please change the link to Civitates Foederatae Americae, as this is the proper latin name for the US. Anything else?--Ioshus 17:40, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh ok I understand, that makes sence. Thanks for the information. --Pelotas^talk 17:50, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the page is just semi-protected. You can edit it, when you are logged in. --Roland2 15:03, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

ok thanks! --Pelotas^talk 15:08, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1. Second yellow - see {{yel}}.
2. Penalty goal - adding (pen) is standard on most sports websites - the goal is counted as a normal goal, so the icon need not be differnt.
3. Missed penalty - these are not included in most match summaries.

As for the alternating grey layout - iut is only your opinion that it looks crappy now, but it is not set to white - it is set to transparent. We shouldn't hard-code background colours outisde of the stylesheet. ed g2s • talk 12:19, 25 August 2006 (UTC) ed g2s • talk 12:17, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True if you are viewing the article on the Wikipedia website using the default skin. If someone else runs a mirror with a different background - or you customise your skin to use a different background, then there is a big difference between white and transparent. ed g2s • talk 12:52, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I can agree that it is just my opinion, but still between white and transparent is not much difference is there? ;) Thanks for the icons, too bad about the missed penalties. :s --Pelotas^talk 14:37, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted images cannot be used deocratively, see WP:FUC. Team logos need only be used on an article about the club. We try to keep Fair Use to a minimum. ed g2s • talk 13:38, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Because this is the English Wikipedia. ed g2s • talk 10:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, calm down.. I thought you were talking about this edit. The capitalisation of "results" is simply wrong. The hyphen is open to debate but article titles tend not to use them. "(... August 2006)" or "August 2006 ..." are much more common ways of date grouping (see here for examples). ed g2s • talk 12:47, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm from Samogitian Wikipedia. My name is Tadas. If you need help say me o other administrators. (Sorry for me english :) )Tadas12 15:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Pelotas^talk 21:56, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your info. Honestly I do not know for sure if Belgian names always capitalize "Van" or "De". It just appears to me that they are almost always capitalized from the Belgian names I see. I know that it's different from the Dutch, which always use lowercase "van" and "de". As for why I left the comment, this is in response to the previous edits of Stephan Van Der Heyden and Jelle Van Damme. The editors moved the pages from capital to lowercase letters, and left the comments Interjectives should be written without capitals and 'van' in between names needs to be written small, which are certainly incorrect for Belgian names. I guess the editors confused them with Dutch names. As I'm also not 100% correct, I apologize. But it's much more likely that the capitalized "Van" are used in the two names, so I moved them back to its original pages. If there are evidence that the two people use lowercase "van", sure we should move them back. But there aren't, unless we get to see their identity cards, as you suggest. Chanheigeorge 00:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise, at least you care! And indeed it is hard to be sure, one can only hope that the names are correctly spelled in the media and work from there, in this case I can say that I don't really know about Van Der Heyden, but Van Damme is commonly spelled with capital letters as part of Anderlecht and the Red Devils. --Pelotas^talk 09:03, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Program Feature: Barnstar Brigade Here in Wikipedia there are hundreds of wikipedians whose work and efforts go unappreciated. One occasionally comes across editors who have thousands of good edits, but because they may not get around as much as others, their contributions and hard work often go unnoticed. As Esperanzians we can help to make people feel appreciated, be it by some kind words or the awarding of a Barnstar. This is where the Barnstar Brigade comes in. The object of this program is to seek out the people which deserve a Barnstar, and help them feel appreciated. With your help, we can recognize more dedicated editors! What's New? September elections are upon us! Anyone wishing to be a part of the Advisory Council may list themselves as a candidate from 18 September until 24 September, with the voting taking place from 25 September to 30 September. Those who wish to help with the election staff should also list themselves! Appreciation Week, a program currently in development, now has its own subpage! Share your good ideas on how to make it awesome there! The Esperanza front page has been redesigned! Many thanks to all who worked hard on it. Many thanks to MiszaBot, courtesy of Misza13, for delivering the newsletter.

The last AC meeting (full log) The proposals page has been updated, with some proposals being archived. Since the program in development Appretiaion week is getting lots of good ideas, it now has its own subpage. The September 2006 Council elections will open for nominations on 18 September 2006. The voting will run from 25 September 2006 until 30 September 2006. If you wish to be a candidate or a member of the elections staff, please list yourself! The new Esperanza front page design has but put up - many thanks to all who worked on it! TangoTango has written a script for a bot that will list new members of Esperanza, which will help those who welcome new Esperanzains greatly! Signed... Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, Freakofnurture, and Titoxd 04:04, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Although having the newsletter appear on everyone's userpage is desired, this may not be ideal for everyone. If, in the future, you wish to receive a link to the newsletter, rather than the newsletter itself, you may add yourself to Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter/Opt Out List.

Hi Pelotas,

Please don't take my user page seriously. I don't really care about those things that much, but I find it a lot better to argue about silly things like soccer and the metric systems than war or terrorism or abortion or other things that people get really upset about. If it offends you, I'll take it down. But since you're a Simpsons fan: Can you tell me where I got the title: "These things I believe?" -- Mwalcoff 00:08, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nono, leave it, doesn't offend me I just found it quite harsh/bold overall. I totally agree that all in all these are just silly things. About the simpsons thinghy, it's when Homer has the right answer to a radio show question. Is it not the title of a Rory Calhoun (?) album? --Pelotas^talk 00:41, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pelotas. I see you're an ardent supporter of Belgian football and have put a fair bit of work on the league here. Just to say that we are using a different template for Serie A results if you want to have a look at it. The 16 team version is being used for Portugese league.

Here's a blank 18 team version of the template

{{Football (soccer) table results 18 teams| | <!-- 1st squad --> [[Atalanta B.C.|Atalanta]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |      | <!-- 2nd squad --> [[Bologna F.C. 1909|Bologna]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |  | <!-- 3rd squad --> [[Brescia Calcio|Brescia]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 4th squad --> [[A.C. ChievoVerona|Chievo]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 5th squad --> [[ACF Fiorentina|Fiorentina]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 6th squad --> [[Internazionale Milano F.C.|Inter]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 7th squad --> [[Juventus F.C.|Juventus]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 8th squad --> [[S.S. Lazio|Lazio]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 9th squad --> [[U.S. Lecce|Lecce]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 10th squad --> [[A.C. Milan|Milan]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 11th squad --> [[Parma F.C.|Parma]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 12th squad --> [[Perugia Calcio|Perugia]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 13th squad --> [[Piacenza Calcio|Piacenza]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 14th squad --> [[A.S. Roma|Roma]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 15th squad --> [[Torino F.C.|Torino]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 16th squad --> [[Udinese Calcio|Udinese]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 17th squad --> [[S.S.C. Venezia|Venezia]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     | | <!-- 18th squad --> [[Hellas Verona F.C.|Verona]] |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |     |  }}

Just to say aswell, that we have it setup on the Serie A page so that if you click on a result in the table you get taken directly to result on the detailed results page. Handy for picking out one result in particular instead of trawling through pages and pages. Niall123 18:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I've noticed it already, but I believe that the table can be too wide for the people with smaller screens. I would like to see each teamname in the top bar shortened to three letters max. But good work nonetheless, making the results clickable however is a very good idea. I've already copied the idea of a clickable number of goals per team in the standings table. --Pelotas^talk 21:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing that you're using Firefox. If you look at the table using IE, the names of the clubs along the top are shown as vertical. I've had this discussion already with another person. Here's a screen shot as how it looks on my screen using IE. Screen Shot. Hopefully they'll sort out firefox to fix this. Niall123 21:48, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed I am using firefox. Looks nice when it's vertical! --Pelotas^talk 21:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My own beliefs on Kosovo and Albania really have very little to do with what I am doing. I am stub sorting. Because of the Albanian nationality law, any ethnic Albanian from any country can be a citizen of the Republic of Albania. However, it is clear from his birth that he is a Kosovar Albanian. The Albania-bio-stub is for people from the Republic of Albania, not any ethnic Albanian person.--Thomas.macmillan 18:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Albanian bio stub is for Albanian or Albanian Related football, which this clearly is. Since he is an Albanian Citizen, he should be in the "Albanian footballers" catergory too then. --Pelotas^talk 19:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As you have been a major contributor, I was wondering what you think of what I've been doing at List of winners of Unofficial Football World Championships. Kevin McE 12:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks nice, keep going. :) Maybe the date could be set with a green background when a nation captures the title for the first time and red when they last had it? --Pelotas^talk 14:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pelotas. It is very tough to standardize all the Belgian templates, so I have made Jupiler League 2006-07 goalscorers look better. kalaha 13:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For your reading pleasure, the newest Esperanza newsletter (November '06 edition) can be found at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Newsletter. —Natalya, Banes, Celestianpower, EWS23, FireFox, The Halo, Shreshth91 and HighwayCello, 20:33, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 134.58.253.130 lifted/expired. Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  14:09, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I've started a discussion regarding this template you contributed to here.[1] Georgeg 21:08, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	Happy Birthday	from the Birthday Committee
	Wishing Pelotas a very happy birthday on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Don't forget to save us all a piece of cake!

Millancad 08:14, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have a great day, fellow Wikipedian! All the best! File:Jacks personal flag2.png Jackrm (talk) 23:48, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Same here:

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Pelotas, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

• FROM YOUR FRIEND:

 ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cup cake :) It brought some joy to me at a time when I am feeling a bit down. Sorry I didn't notice you'd left me the cupcake until now! Thanks also for putting it in the right place! Thanks alot, and I hope you had a great birthday. -JacќяМ ¿Qué? 14:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jackson_Stewart.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 22:48, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jupiler League.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 23:23, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see you want help with your page, can you tell me what you want doing on my talk page? // Finns 22:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will give it a go for you. // Finns 18:42, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In close connection with that article, maybe we could make an article starting from this about the bribing scandal? --Pelotas^talk 16:07, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I want to help, although I might lack a bit of time in the near future (examination + holiday trip). But I'll try my best :-) Karma-AH (talk) 15:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by extra tag, but in the bottom of the squad information and players in / out tables there are explanation about the age: end of the season for squad information and signing day for players in / out. So, for example, if you take a look at Arsenal_F.C._season_2007-08#In code, you'll see something like this age={{age|1985|4|18|2007|5|25}}. I hope that's a solution. If you have a better solution, please lets discuss it. Regards. --ClaudioMB (talk) 16:39, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If we could specify a date for all players just once, that would be great for Squad information table (for player in / out is better use the day of the signing). I don't know how to do it, if you know it, please, could you do it for Arsenal_F.C._season_2007-08#Squad_information. I guess the date should be the date of last match of the season (11 May 2008). --ClaudioMB (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - maybe you don't realise you need to change your preferences ... Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. Regards --Matilda ^talk 01:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

okidoki... i just have a different idea of minor. I've always used it except when I added at least 5 lines of meaningful text. --Pelotas^talk 03:20, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Pelotas...I see that you have requested help in getting your user page in order and am willing to help you. My suggestions will not be full of a lot of flashy formatting. In my opinion, the less a user page looks like a Wikipedia page, the harder it is to read and navigate. You can go to my user page to see how an infobox can handle most of the routine information which you can expand upon if you so desire in the body of your user page.

To keep this conversation all in one place, you can respond on your talk page here. However, I ask that you put {{Talkback|Pelotas|User page help}} on my talk page to alert me to your response. Either way, I would like to hear back from you.

Have a nice day! - LA @ 02:21, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh, that's nice, but Finns already offered to renew my page here. However, that was in April/May 2008 and I haven't heard from him/her since. :s About your ideas, I like having a user page which does not look like a traditional wikipedia article at all, just to show the difference. Your page does look nice though, maybe if I write more about myself I could make it look better too. But I would at first thought choose a user page like this or this. --Pelotas^talk 17:23, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pelotas, I am adamantly against such pages. To me they are an eyesore. I prefer going with the K.I.S.S. principle when designing a user page. Many of the flashy user pages have so many redundancies that they become insulting. I know where the links to the user's talk page, contributions, and e-mail are. (Talk page link on top, the latter two in the toolbox.) You are invited to check out this template to help get you started. I wish you the best of luck, but I will not design such pages. Have a nice day! - LA @ 17:57, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, still interested in getting a review for that WP:ER request you submitted in May? Peace, delldot talk 16:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes sure I'm still very interested. --Pelotas^talk 17:34, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made the change because of the following reasons:

1. Better access to a certain result, in correspondance to the unwritten "create easy access to every fact" rule
2. Alphabetical sorting is broad consensus in almost all UEFA season articles for this season, especially in the top leagues

However, it would be okay if the edit would be reverted, provided that there is consensus (either already reached or to be built in the future) on sorting the results by last year's position. Hockey-holic (talk) 15:51, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 December, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Van Rompuy I Government, which you created and substantially updated. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦C 20:29, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Listen, the thing is that Oleh, I suspect, was not fully aware of citizenship laws of Ukraine and I think that people who let him to obtain a dual-citizenship was under-quilified as they failed to warn him about this issue. In Ukraine recently a newly naturalized Serbian Marco Devic had to give up his previous citizenship in order to play for Ukraine. It's a big issue as one needs to think not twice, but make a final decision whether it is worth to give up one's citizenship for the other country's. Him thinking that he has a dual citizenship would that truly be correct? His dual citizenship does not hold any ground as it is not recognized by his native country. Putting a Ukrainian flag only adds a confusion to that issue. Yes, he is truly a native Ukrainian and his last name can not get any more Ukrainian. However, he is a naturalized Belgian citizen and at his age there is no really a reason for him to change it back. Therefore consider him as Ukrainian somewhat discrimatory as by law he is an accepted Belgian citizen. On personal note, I feel bad that he was not given a single chance to play on the international level as he truly desrves it. And, in my opinion, Ukraine national really needs such players. Pelotas, do not take my message personally as I try to make a point. Yaschuk could easily play for Belgian national, but he is being a stuborn jackass. In his situation that would be the way show his skills. But if he prefers his pricipals over his career or a chance to make a national team then it's his personal issue. Very respectfully, Aleksandr Grigoryev (talk) 18:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So yeah, in the interest of clearing up backlog, I've taken up a crusade to remove backlog from the Design Center. Congats- your'e next! The beta is in my sandbox. Just please don't edit it, I'm currentloy working on it and an edit conflict would be an ugly thing ideed. ResMar 01:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now you can edit it; 75% done. Hope you like the design. ResMar 17:00, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? ResMar 18:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looks very nice, however I have a rather small screen and the right menu is moved below the left part. Maybe you could make the left menu smaller? (e.g. Just as big as the where I've been/What I am thinghy?) But I like the way it looks! Very nice thanks. --Pelotas^talk 18:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Give me a moment. ResMar 18:10, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 result-Done Compromised the left "Where I've Been" and "What I Am" to reduce genral width of total left structure. Also added filler effect to background. On a small moniter, the gap between the two columns will shrink to match to width and aspect ration of the computer. ResMar 18:27, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that the Signpost refuses to align correctly. ResMar 18:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Works in IE; doesn't in Firefox ResMar 18:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see the problem. Internet Explorer automatically floats the Userboxes right. Firefoc dosn't. The problem here is that specifying float sends the Userboxes smack where left column is. ResMar 18:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pelotas,

first of all, thanks a lot for your work on Belgian First Division 2008–09, especially with all those goalscorers. However, there is a minor issue existing. Is there a reliable source for the complete list? I'm asking this because there has been some trouble lately over at the Serbian Superliga 2008–09 article. A couple of anon editors were edit warring about details in a list similar to the one on the Belgian article, but with one fundemental difference - there exists no source at all. As a result, the number of goals in the table (307) is not in tune with the number of goals credited for all scorers (304), so I had to issue a warning on the talk page about WP:V and its consequences. All of this would certainly not have happened if there had been a reliable source.

So, in order to prevent those... I don't know how to call them... from arguing "But there is also a unsourced list of scorers on the Belgian article, yet it goes unsanctioned" - could you please add a source to your list? Ideally, it should be something similar to this (German Bundesliga) from either the Belgian association or another reliable source.

Once again, keep up the good work! Cheers, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 20:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Although I'll be honest, I just added the three most used sites by myself when I want to look up any information about the league, instead of veryfying the wikipedia content with those three sites. I do not use them to update the goal scorer list, because if you investigate those closely, then different sites will always give different results. So how do I know it is right? Well, I have a huge excel sheet in which I add each and every goal scorer in each match played. Once you have the list it's no so much work to update it every week, I even have more trouble with keeping the length of the columns the same ;) --Pelotas^talk 20:45, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! By the way, it doesn't matter how it's done as long as the sources are good to go... :-) --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 21:24, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer-holic and I are trying to improve league articles in general, especially when talking about colors used in league standings. We are thinking that codes (colors) should be unified and used in the same way in all articles. So take a look at this Soccer-holic's subpage: User:Soccer-holic/League season article, which explains parts which every league articles should consist of, as well as using the colors in the right order and code. Please leave your comments and improvements (if needed) so we can take the final proposal to the community on Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. SonjiCeli (talk) 15:18, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can see where this unified color scheme would be useful indeed, maybe we should make a standard template which explains the colors, as they did for formula 1 here (It is added as a key for instance here). Also, in the standings by round we should create unified templates there also, as for instance the color scheme for the Spainish league (here) is completely different from the standard one here and the colours should probably be linked to the ones chosen before... --Pelotas^talk 15:38, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you have been linking some dates at 2009 Belgian Cup Final recently. This practice of linking dates for the purpose of autoformatting is now deprecated. Please see WP:LINKING and WP:MOSNUM. Furthermore, there is an temporary Arbcom injunction on mass linking/delinking of chronological elements. I'm happy to respond to any inquiries you may have about the matter. Thank you for your attention. Ohconfucius (talk) 05:13, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Maxime Bouet. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Brice Feillu. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Pelotas. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 14:07, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a current or past contributor to season articles within Wikipedia:WikiProject Football, I thought I'd let you know about the season article task force, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of season articles of all kind. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the task force page. Thanks!

Hi there. I just sent you an email. Amsaim (talk) 11:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, don't have the time right now though. Also never heard of her before :) But maybe I will do it towards the end of this week if I find some time. Pelotas^talk 14:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There was no reason to revert my edit, especially as it was correct. Kostja (talk) 18:05, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Have not looked at it again, but I'm quite sure it was wrong or at least incomplete. It is mentioned clearly that the results of the last team are not counted in this ranking. I'm guessing you did add them, or forgot to add the results against a another team. If however I did make a mistake, then sorry. Pelotas^talk 18:57, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my bad. I simply overlooked the update date. On the other hand, consider a restriction of the section (as it is the WikiProject standard) to the best ten scorers plus, if there aren't too many, those who have the same amount of goals as the 10th-best scorer. The Wikipedia policy behind this is WP:NOT#STATS. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 08:11, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Denis Odoi. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Nils Schouterden. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:16, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've noticed that you are creating new articles about living persons but are not including references. While I appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of football, articles need to have references so the information can be verified and to establish the notability of the subject of the article. I expect that you are using some type of reference (such as www.vi.nl, www.playerhistory or guardian.touch-line.com) to create the article, so please just add it. You can check how I did it on the Denis Odoi article, or feel free to ask me questions if you need help. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 13:25, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. My name is Edson Ortolan (from Brazil). Another day I suggested to add in some place (new article or new entry in another page) the former matches between the teams of the Fifa World Cup 10. I listed all plays until Group D. The reference is the Wikipedia. I don't know how the Wikipedia works to these contribuitions. I didn't know about signature, address and other things. Example: must I let my email in the message ? Thanks in advance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.0.123.234 (talk) 15:17, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Edson, I'm not quite sure what you are asking, but in theory you could just ask what you want on each page. If it's correct meaningful information, somewhat structured and in theory following the wikipedia guidelines, then you cannot do anything wrong. If you do, someone will correct it anyway. In this case, you could for instance add the info on pages 2010 FIFA World Cup Group A through 2010 FIFA World Cup Group H, as a section at the top, or for each match individually within the article. Anyone can edit wikipedia, that's the basic idea! :) So you do not need do put your address or email anywhere. If you create a (free) account however, then you avoid problems with blocked pages (Sometimes this happens because many unregistered users try to ruin pages). Now whether you create an account or not, when posting on talk pages, you should sign your comment by putting ~~~~, this automatically changes into your ip address (or nickname) and adds the time of posting. If you have more questions, feel free to ask! Pelotas^talk 16:08, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I understand. I was curious for search the results between the teams of the 2010 World Cup, because Brazil played against Portugal in 1966 World Cup (Portugal 3 X 1 Brazil) in Round 1 and I rememberd that Portugal beat Korea DPR (5 X 3) in Quarters. So I found all results of the other plays and I wrote one list with them. My question is: is there the possibility to put it in any place (new article, new topic)? Do you want to see the list ? Thanks.201.0.123.234 (talk) 17:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes I like the idea, but it's too much detail to put it on the main article page. So maybe you should add the information at the individual match paragraphs, so at 2010 FIFA World Cup Group G#Portugal v Korea DPR for instance for the 5-3 result of 1966. Pelotas^talk 18:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I send the list, but here it will be confused because the format. Look at: Group A: South Africa X Mexico: first match; Uruguay X France: England/66: Uruguay 2 X 1 France - round 1; Korea Rep-Japan/02: Uruguay 0 x 0 France - round 1; South Africa X Uruguay: first match; France X Mexico: Uruguay/30: France 4 X 1 Mexico - round 1; Switzerland/54: France 3 x 2 Mexico - round 1; England/66: France 1 x 1 Mexico - round 1; Mexico X Uruguay: England/66: Mexico 0 x 0 Uruguay - round 1; France X South Africa: France/98: France 3 X 0 South Africa - round 1 --- Group B: Argentina X Nigeria: United States/94: Argentina 2 X 1 Nigeria - round 1; Korea Rep-Japan/02: Argentina 1 X 0 Nigeria - round 1; Korea Rep X Greece: first match; Argentina X Korea Rep: Mexico/86: Argentina 3 X 1 Korea Rep - round 1; Greece X Nigeria: United States/94: Greece 0 X 2 Nigeria - round 1; Greece X Argentina: United States/94: Greece 0 X 4 Argentina - round 1; Nigeria X Korea Rep: first match --- Group C: England X United States: Brazil/50: England 0 X 1 United States - round 1; Algeria X Slovenia: first match; England X Algeria: first match; Slovenia X United States: first match; United States X Algeria: first match; Slovenia X England: first match; Obs.: 1) Slovenia separated from Yugoslavia.--- Group D: Germany X Australia: Germany/74: West Germany 3 X 0 Australia - round 1; Serbia X Ghana: first match; Germany X Serbia: Switzerland/54: West Germany 2 X 0 Yugoslavia - Quartes; Sweden/58: West Germany 1 X 0 Yugoslavia - Quartes; Chile/62: West Germany 0 X 1 Yugoslavia - Quartes; Germany/74: West Germany 2 X 0 Yugoslavia - round 2; Italy/90: West Germany 4 X 1 Yugoslavia - round 1; France/98: Germany 2 X 2 Yugoslavia - round 1; Ghana X Australia: first match; Australia X Serbia: first match; Ghana X Germany: first match; Obs.: 1) I included the matches of the West Germany (1954-1990) 2) I included the matches of the Yugoslavia (1930-1999) and Serbia and Montenegro (2006).--- Group E: Netherlands X Denmark: first match; Japan X Cameroon: first match; Netherlands X Japan: first match; Cameroon X Denmark: first match; Denmark X Japan: first match; Cameroon X Netherlands: first match --- Group F: Italy X Paraguay: Brazil/50: Italy 2 X 0 Paraguay - round 1; New Zealand X Slovakia: first match; Italy X New Zealand: first match; Slovakia X Paraguay: first match; Paraguay X New Zealand: first match; Slovakia X Italy: Italy/34: Czechoslovakia 1 X 2 Italy - Final. Obs.: Slovakia was part of Czechoslovakia.--- Group G: Brazil X Korea DPR: first match; Cote d'Ivory X Portugal: first match; Brazil X Cote d'Ivory: first match; Portugal X Korea DPR: England/66: Portugal 5 X 3 Korea DPR - Quartes; Korea DPR X Cote d'Ivory: first match; Portugal X Brazil: England/66: Portugal 3 X 1 Brazil - round 1 --- Group H: Spain X Switzerland: England/66: Spain 2 X 1 Switzerland - round 1; United States/94: Spain 3 X 0 Switzerland - round 2; Honduras X Chile : first match; Spain X Honduras: Spain/82: Spain 1 X 1 Honduras - round 1; Chile X Switzerland: Chile/62: Chile 3 X 1 Switzerland - round 1; Switzerland X Honduras: first match; Chile X Spain: Brazil/50: Chile 0 X 2 Spain - round 1. 201.0.123.234 (talk) 19:13, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pelotas. Here is Edson Ortolan, again. Your suggestion of the links is good, but I don't know make them. Can you help ? Thanks. 200.153.229.80 (talk) 20:34, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, for instance use 1966 FIFA World Cup#Group 1 at 2010 FIFA World Cup Group A. :) Pelotas^talk 20:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pelotas, I will edit the 2010 FIFA World Group A, but I don't know to put the links because my informatical knowledge is poor. Look at my work. Other argument to remember the importance of the former matches: we are in the 19th FIFA World Cup and we build a tradition and history of the plays and emotions. Thanks.201.82.254.144 (talk) 22:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pelotas. Your text of the Group A is very good !!! If I wrote very well in English (I read and understand very well) and if I had the know-how, I would expand the texts.201.82.254.144 (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Pelotas. Why was the comentaries and ancient results deleted ? It was a good information to inform the football lovers. I'm sad.200.153.228.55 (talk) 22:02, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably too much side information without sticking to the core of the article. You can ask on the discussion page and maybe it can be put back on. I'm thinking that it will only get 'more' though as there are more and more world cups. So maybe it's not the most ideal place. Maybe you could create a new article, somthing like: "frequent fifa world cup matchups" or so... Pelotas^talk 23:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Pelotas. I will try to write an article in Portuguese to the Wikipedia. Thanks.201.92.15.84 (talk) 13:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Pelotas. I created the article (in Portuguese).

Look at: http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/COPA_DO_MUNDO_DE_FUTEBOL_(FIFA):_RETROSPECTOS

I don't know to make it with the rulers of the Wilipedia (links, flags, fonts etc.). And I didn't find the fourth play between FRA vs. MEX and the third play between ITA vs. CZE. Your texts was cool and can I translate to Portuguese and put in my article? I want to hear your opinion. Thanks, again.201.92.15.84 (talk) 18:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations in finding my first secret page, you have earned a barnstar for that, but there are harder places to look...

		- The Super Hidden Barnstar
		This user has found Damërung's class-3 secret page, and therefore is entitled to display this barnstar. Do you think you can find it too?

-- Woglinde 02 (talk) 03:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Jared Jeffrey. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pelotas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 11 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 311 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Serge Gumienny - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Simone Cadamuro - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Evgeni Petrov (cyclist) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Rogier Molhoek - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Daniel Tchuř - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Nick Gates - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
7. Matteo Tosatto - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
8. Haimar Zubeldia - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
9. Christophe Le Mével - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
10. Samuel Plouhinec - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks foor your message. K Rupel Boom is the first page I've added. Wasn't all as simple as I thought :-). For some reason I can't change the name K Rupel Boom FC to K. Rupel Boom FC, you may change if you want. I've just started to ad pages for the individual players, I'll try to mension the references. Keep up the good work and you know... Boomkes till I die :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennethcelie (talk • contribs) 10:03, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 20:00, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Pelotas, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 22:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since the new season of Belgian First Division introduces new relegation play-off, I wanted to ask you if you could modify the Round-by-round template(s) so the table can display a lighter shade of red for both 15th and 16th place. I would do it myself but I really don't know how. Also, while making these changes (assuming they're possible, of course), it would be great to somehow make a difference between this season's and the previous season's templates so that the 2009-10 RbR table could still keep the darker shade for the 16th position. SonjiCeli (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Yes sure that makes sense you have a good point. I'll do it this evening. Pelotas^talk 08:05, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jupiler League.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Charlie Dopékoulouyen. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:28, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Charlie Dopékoulouyen has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Epbr123 (talk) 18:38, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

for the team season template. Why not include the Pro Continental teams? Just do whatever teams we've got articles for. Green-eyed girl (Talk · Contribs) 02:00, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• That makes perfect sense indeed. :) I'll have a look maybe I can do it this afternoon, Pelotas^talk 10:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A big thank you! Keep up the good work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.109.83.118 (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well... that's it. Thank you for the correction. I know comments are for the talk page. I am pissed off with WP and acted in a rush and foolishly. My apologies to you, I didn't mean to disrespect your efforts. BTW, I wrote a few lines about that at the Village Pump, in case you'd like to understand why. - 2.82.175.120 (talk) 13:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok geen probleem, ik zie dat je een vlaming ben dus antwoord ik even in het Nederlands.

Ivm uitgeleende spelers van het voorbije seizoen, mag ik die toevoegen of moet ik wachten tot 1 juli want ik weet niet precies wanneer die uitleencontracten aflopen.

groetjes, Dirkinho — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirkinho (talk • contribs) 14:23, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Voor aflopende contracten lijkt het mij logisch dat ze bij End of 2010-11 season komen. Voor nieuwe loan deals normaal op de afgesloten datum, is de datum onduidelijk, dan kan het msschn best ook bij End of 2010-11 season. Zie bvb Gertjan De Mets, loan einde staat bij "end of season", terwijl hij ook op 14 maart staat wegens dan nieuw contact getekend. Dit is hoe ik het oorspronkelijk heb opgesteld, maar als je een beter en overzichtelijker idee hebt, stel gerust voor he... Pelotas^talk 14:51, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Pelotas, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Monterey Bay (talk) 02:35, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Pelotas. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Miguel AG (talk) 11:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, do you have a reliable source to verify the fact that Khaleem Hyland had two spells (one loan, one permanent) at Zulte? Regards, GiantSnowman 17:40, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Good point. Refs added (in Dutch). Pelotas^{talk|contribs}