User talk:Po Kadzieli

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Korwin-Szymanowscy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Korwin-Szymanowscy was changed by Po Kadzieli (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968001 on 2014-12-27T15:37:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Korwin-Szymanowscy page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Lycée Français Charles de Gaulle

added links pointing to Brevet, Lumière, Neo-Georgian and Counter Culture

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Po Kadzieli forgot his password, so henceforward his new contributions are in the name of Po Lityk. Thank you for your attention. --Po Lityk (talk) 10:08, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ordination of women, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vatican. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC) Sorry for the confusion, I'll attend to it now. Thank you for noting it.--Po Kadzieli (talk) 11:35, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cygów, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poświętne. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Thank you! As ever you are right. --Po Kadzieli (talk) 11:44, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kazimierz Brandys

added a link pointing to Polish communist party

Marian Brandys

added a link pointing to Polish communist party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Po Kadzieli. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Po Kadzieli (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been blocked by an intemperate user who made baseless assumptions about me. The reason I ended up with 2 accounts (which I did not want anyway) was because I was advised to do so by a French editor who wanted my help with several now award winning articles on Fr.Wiki. I had failed to note my password, as I am getting older, so he told me to open a new account so he could email me. I am extremely put off by the treatment I have received on English speaking Wiki. I would like an apology from the miscreant who did this.--Po Kadzieli (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Intemperate? Miscreant? WP:NOTTHEM; WP:NPA. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:05, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Young, City architect and surveyor, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hackney, Lindsay and Laughton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Brompton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lords and Stamford Bridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

{ { Help Please } }

Apparently, the infobox is a duplicate. What does it mean? Is it necessary to merge it with the previous one. Thank you for any assistance. --Po Kadzieli (talk) 12:58, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Earls Court Exhibition Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital and Counties. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stefan Themerson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• first screenings of French and English on their return to Warsaw. They also founded a review ''Film] Artistique'', Stefan as editor, Franciszka as artistic editor (the journal of the film-makers' co-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The referencing has several problems; the first three are not actually references and the fifth one is stated to be from a digital library but does not include a url for the book. Finally, entire sections and paragraphs have no references at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Po Kadzieli, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 23:47, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 15:03, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 15:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like it's fixed now, good luck with the nomination. In few days someone will post review comments, I am sure. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 01:10, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 05:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

BlueMoonset just delivered a message; your article was reviewed by User:Gerda Arendt who seems to have forgotten to notify you here. I think she thinks that the hook does not need links to customs union, a central bank, and a single currency, which is probably a good idea (removing them, that is). I am not sure what's wrong with the external links, she will have to explain it in more detail, but I did add a few citations needed where inline citations are needed. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have also added some comments for improving the referencing. See here for an essay I wrote on good referencing skills on Wikipedia: User:Piotrus/Wikipedia:Why most sentences should be cited, and see also the important points at WP:PRIMARY. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can we discuss at the nomination, please? I have not "forgotten", just expect a nominator to watch the nomination, using the template only if nothing happens for a longer time. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:24, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can certainly attach the link, but also we have to make sure it is possible to easily trace information from each sentence to a source, preferably non-primary. A source like a book should also give a page range, so the verifier doesn't have to read the entire book to verify a given fact (or facts). A page range is acceptable, of course.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:53, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, have a quick look at convent and the links from it. You'll see that Aylesford was correctly described as a convent, but as you say for men only. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 08:34, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexandre Minkowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Anna Nakwaska

added links pointing to Duchy of Poland and Gołąb

Rosa Bailly

added links pointing to Polish Republic and Pau

Tekla Teresa Lubienska

added links pointing to Wedekind and Paeon

Adam Jerzy Czartoryski

added a link pointing to Hull

Polonezköy

added a link pointing to Polish Republic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am very pleased with your edits and contributions to the article on Adam Jerzy Czartoryski. I am honestly intrigued about what you have said in relation to us being related through the 18th century connection. Please explain I'd love to know more! With best regards - Oliszydlowski (TALK) 6 August 2016, 20:54 (UTC)

• Well, Marianna Szydłowska, elder daughter of Teodor, married Dyzma Szymanowski around 1750, which is how the name Teodor keeps repeating in that Szymanowski line and furthermore, Teodor Korwin Szymanowski (1846-1901) took up (directly or not) Czartoryski's idea of a unified Europe. I am a direct descendant of TKS, so if you are connected to Teodor Szydłowski, see Polish Wiki, then QED. Warmest wishes, --Po Kadzieli (talk) 11:11, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to Fawley Court. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks!! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 August 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski (pictured), one of the earliest promoters of a Unified Europe, proposed a customs union, a central bank, and a single currency as far back as 1885? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:01, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Polish people in history

Thank you for quality articles about Polish historic personalities such as Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski and Anna Nakwaska, for adding detail and an infobox, for helping the French Wikpedia and improving references with patience, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:05, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Three years ago, you were recipient no. 1456 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Château de Montrésor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montresor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jerzy Świrski, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Devonport, Dunay and Ukrainian Hetmanate. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for your continued edits to Polish-related topics! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:24, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a comment on the Talkpage of the above article and would ask that you give it your urgent attention. The contentious material should be properly sourced or removed, and I shall undertake the latter in the next 48 hours. KJP1 (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments and the time you have taken over them. Some of the later Polish material is, as you identify, difficult to convey. It is not actually libellous, but some of it is certainly shocking. Much of it comes from newspaper reports of court cases. The Polish 'info' website is a collection of sources, including English ones: newspaper articles and in the case of the Museum, a peer reviewed book about the collection and a peer reviewed article, in Polish, about the demise of Polish libraries in the West, including the fate of the one in Fawley Court. The difficulty we have is that a reader with no Polish can only take the verifiable Polish sources on trust. Otherwise they need to be removed and what we then have is close to a cover-up. I am afraid the 48 hour time frame is not practical in my case as I shall be away very shortly. There could be others who have the possibility of addressing the challenges you present, as they return from holiday. I am in agreement with you that the text should be made more 'water tight'. Regards, --Po Kadzieli (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I've moved your response from my Talkpage to here. It's easier to have the discussion in one place. Now, the discussion. Wikipedia isn't involved in a "cover-up", it's involved in trying to produce encyclopaedic articles that have verifiable sources. The claims you make on Fawley Court don't have verifiable sources for the reasons I've outlined. And the reference you've just added isn't a verifiable source either. It's a letter, published in a newspaper, which expresses an opinion. But it does nothing more than that. Similarly, much of the Fawley Court article, as you've written it, is opinion, not verifiable fact. And some of it is certainly libellous. And potentially offensive to the families involved. So, either source it properly or I'll remove it. You need to understand that Wikipedia is not a platform for your views and opinions. Use your blog for that, and I won't trouble you at all. KJP1 (talk) 22:51, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As indicated, I have removed material that was highly POV and potentially libellous. Please don't put it back in, unless you re-write it in a neutral tone and supply non-partisan, verifiable references. KJP1 (talk) 06:08, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since I was asked to comment on this: forums for asking for others to comment are at WP:30 and WP:RFC, as well as one can notify various WikiProjects like WP:POLAND. User:KJP1: it is all well and good to disagree on the inclusion of something, but please do not tell others they should post on a blog rather then here. The disputed content is not perfect, but it does not justify such a harsh and offensive rebuttal. Let's all remember WP:AGF and WP:CIVIL. I will comment on removed content at Talk:Fawley Court. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:44, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"harsh and offensive" - well, I think if I was looking for an example of a harsh and offensive comment, I'd go for this; "To some the sale represented a descent into the depths of moral turpitude by an ill-informed, secretive and philistine religious body;" added here [1] by User:Po Kadzieli. The comment's completely unreferenced, by the way. I'll respond to the substantive comment on the article's Talkpage. KJP1 (talk) 10:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nice one, may I suggest another DYK? Template:Did you know nominations/Theodore de Korwin Szymanowski worked out pretty well. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:55, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the article, I looked at it again and for DYK you'll need to make sure all paragraph have inline references. For the image, you should be able to upload it to Wikimedia Commons - see the Upload File link in the toolbar on your left, it should take you to [2]. Let me know if this is not clear. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:56, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ignacio Matte Blanco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of the Sacred Heart. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've done a good job in referencing the content, and presenting it from a more Neutral Point of View (NPOV). Well done. Now, if you would just do a similar job on the Marian Fathers page........ All the best. KJP1 (talk) 17:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your Roscommon edit has no source and the subjects own article says County Roscommon not Roscommon town. Which is correct? Thanks ww2censor (talk) 08:42, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your query. The answer is no, for the town, yes, for the county. The source is Burke's Knightage etc. I am awaiting a reply from the Roscommon Museum as to further details of the family. My recent searches were limited to books in Galway, with few results. I was not able to stop in Roscommon and it may be necessary to visit churches and libraries there. I am currently on the other island so most of what I have found concerns his activities in UK. Interestingly, the only obit I came across for him is in the Nenagh Guardian of 1868, but you have to buy it on-line. The Illustrated London News mentions his passing. He sounds quite a character and deserves an independent publication of his own. Anything you can think of to help with his Irish connections will be gratefully received. Kind regards,

--Po Kadzieli (talk) 20:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. So, I see your removed it and added it to the county article. I'm not on either island and when I get there in December will not have any time to investigate such topics. Have you looked from books at archive.org? ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fulham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LCC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fulham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kensington and Chelsea. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your addition to the people of H., but I note that you forgot to supply the required citation. This is necessary to demonstrate notability and relevance, the section being subject to crufty additions... Thanks, Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:26, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I note your reply (which should have been here, really). To be brief, it's always best to find the ref first, then make the addition, with the ref there and then. Why? Because otherwise, the boring bit is easily skipped. It's happened (tens of) thousands of times already. I've tidied up the result, and there's in this case no doubt she (and her pic) deserve to be there. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Kadzieli,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Lord Alan Spencer-Churchill should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Alan Spencer-Churchill .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, TheLongTone (talk) 14:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I don't know the topic and I merely added the italics because Jungfrauen is a foreign word. Best wishes for your editing. Mauro Lanari. --82.84.18.19 (talk) 05:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest to you a third way: at this moment, in the Carl [Gustav] Jung article Jungfrauen is present only in the "See also" section. But you could expand the topic into a short section with above the template {{main article|Jungfrauen}}. What do you think about? Mauro Lanari. --82.84.25.252 (talk) 14:04, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello talk, thank you for the third way suggestion. My point is that the Jungfrauen topic does not merit being a main article at all. It is a pun, a joke etc. but it has no standing relative to the myriad other topics that could/should have an article. I have toned it down considerably from what I found there, but it lacks notability per se. It needs removal and I don't know how to do it politely. Kind regards, --Po Kadzieli (talk) 21:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Wiki protocol"? "Wikiquette"? Don't you know that (also) here on Jimbopedia the law applies to enemies and is being interpreted for friends? Have a nice survival. M.L. --82.84.27.63 (talk) 09:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Kadzieli. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Still not enough in-depth third-party sources overall.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Po Kadzieli/Children's Day Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 03:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello talk, thank you very much for your prompt evaluation and guidance. I rather thought it was thin on 3rd parties. I'll get there eventually. Today is the funeral of the late Sister-in-charge, which is why I wanted to get it done asap. Kind regards, --Po Kadzieli (talk) 11:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Children's Day Hospital, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 06:46, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed some of the content you added to the above article, as it appears to have been copied from http://slam.nhs.uk/our-services/service-finder-details?CODE=SU0233, a copyright web page, or elsewhere online. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, copied, but not directly by me! I received it in an e-mail from a doctor who, like me, accepted it in good faith as an update from a third party. Well spotted and I agree with your removal.

 I will let them know about the copyright, they obviously had no idea and I am afraid it had not crossed my mind either. Regards, --Po Kadzieli (talk) 01:42, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply] 

please help translate this message into your local language via meta

The 2016 Cure Award

In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Po Kadzieli. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:39, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]