User talk:Vanjagenije

Main Articles Files Userboxes Awards Tools News Deletion log Talk page Hello, welcome to my talk page! If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~ Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere. Thank you! Vanjagenije (talk)

Archives Index Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 10 sections are present.

Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to Municipalities and cities of Serbia.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref> and one or more <ref name="foo"/> referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref> but left the <ref name="foo"/>, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/> with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 23:30, 23 August 2024 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}} to your talk page.[reply]

Sorry, it was my error. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vanja; I hope you are doing well. Can you please tag the userpage of the indefinitely blocked sockpuppet Lumbarschen, per WP:SOCKTAG? It appears both you and EdJohnston – whom I also notified (here) prior to the archiving of the case (diff) – forgot it. Thanks in advance for your time. Demetrios1993 (talk) 01:45, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Demetrios1993: Tagging is not always needed per WP:DENY. Why do you think it is necessary in this particular case? Vanjagenije (talk) 23:27, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response Vanja. I don't know if you have an older revision of WP:DENY in mind (I didn't check earlier ones), but the only relevant text I see is the following:

• In general, "socktags" on blocked sockpuppets' user pages should only be added, removed, or modified by administrators or sockpuppet investigations clerks.

The relevant template {{sockpuppet}} gives the same reasonable guideline:

• Usage: In general, this template should only be applied by Administrators or Clerks as part of the Sockpuppet investigations process.

Regardless of that, even if the former did suggest cases which would deem the use of the aforementioned template unnecessary, shouldn't the common established procedures presented in WP:SPI/AI take precedence over an essay such as WP:DENY? To be honest, I thought it was a given to tag the userpages of indefinitely blocked sockpuppets, which also adds them to the – certainly useful for future investigations – "confirmed" and "suspected" categories.

On another note, shouldn't the remaining text from the already closed and archived 17 September 2024 case in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GJOLEKA, be either deleted or archived appropriately? It appears that it was unnecessarily copied from the Wikipedia talk namespace to the Wikipedia namespace (diff).

Thanks again for your time. Demetrios1993 (talk) 19:54, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With the creation of the disambiguation page Novomoskovskaya (Moscow Metro) you have created a link to a disambiguation page in Template:Troitskaya line RDT. For some strange reason I am unable to point that link to the correct article. Are you able to fix that issue? The Banner talk 11:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Banner: I don't know how to fix it. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have applied a poor men's solution in the hope an export will come along. The Banner talk 01:30, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

will make adding cases to some problem children much easier. Star Mississippi 01:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Checkuser's Barnstar
		Also wanted to add my thanks for the clearout. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tanks. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ooh didn't know that existed @AirshipJungleman29. Consider it granted from me too @Vanjagenije. The work you and Izno did these last few days was much appreciated Star Mississippi 02:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wagner swat‎‎ was requested to merge to another SPI. You just merged it in place. - UtherSRG (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@UtherSRG: I archived the closed investigation, I didn't "merge" anything. I see it was not necessary as tho whole case needs to be merged anyway. The merge has still not been done. What exactly is the problem? Vanjagenije (talk) 22:25, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I misspoke. I meant "archived in place". I thought the merger would happen first, then the archive. Am I wrong on the process? - UtherSRG (talk) 23:26, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right. But, some previous investigations were already archived before my archival. So, the archive needs to be merged too anyway. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:41, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Fair enough. :) - UtherSRG (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hi Vanjagenije. Thank you for your work on Belgrade Open. Another editor, Demt1298, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing this article for Wikipedia. I have marked it reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Demt1298}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Demt1298 (talk) 19:43, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Happy adminship anniversary! Hi Vanjagenije! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of your successful request for adminship. Enjoy this special day! Adr28382 (Talk to me!) 19:38, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thank you for you edit on Stalać rail crash, take care :) The Emperor of Byzantium (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==Happy (Belated) Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Vanjagenije a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Birthday Committee! Best wishes! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I am so sorry for the lateness. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]