User talk:Proofreader

Welcome!

Hello, Proofreader, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Ghirla ^-трёп- 12:15, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for welcoming me. As I am quite active in German WP, I am not a total newbie but of course I am always thankful for advice concerning the specifics of en WP. Though I am a translator, my English is not always 100% perfect, that's why I will concentrate on minor edits and interwiki links. --Proofreader 17:02, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou very much Rainer Doehle for your help in proofreading this article - de:Wahre Jesus Kirche; It is very gratefully appreciated. (I should of thanked you a long time ago in July last year).

Also, I cannot speak Fijian so I am unable to write this article completely into the Fijian language.

Regards -- Jose77 09:35, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I remember, indeed I translated your artcle into German almost a year ago, it was a pleasure to help. I see that you try to have this topic in minor Wikipedias, which in principle is no bad idea, but maybe one should check whether this is not too special a topic for these - at least as long as these languages don't have articles about "Jesus", "Religion", "Christianity" (feel free to add these first). In case of Fijian I see no problem, though, as they already have several articles in the religious field. Unfortunately I don't speak that language good enough to write articles so I am afraid you would have to contact another user of fj WP for your purpose. --Proofreader 12:04, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I agree with you. I didn't know it was 1931 fire. Even before your message, I have removed the image from the article: [1]. Thanks. ←Humus sapiens ^ну? 21:36, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You asked for the location of the Rheinwiesenlager. The article Rheinwiesenlager in German and English Wikipedia now shows a map with the locations of the Rheinwiesenlager. Thw1309 11:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. --Proofreader 07:26, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of state leaders in 930s BC, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com/drug_information_online.asp?title=List_of_state_leaders_in_930s_BC. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:30, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are quick. My WP-text is the original, I pieced it together from the Monarchs' lists that exist in en WP. The copyrightvio therefore has been made by http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com --Proofreader (talk) 20:33, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, no copyvio - the website itself gives Wikipedia as a source. --Proofreader (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of state leaders in 850s BC, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.prescriptiondrug-info.com/drug_information_online.asp?title=List_of_state_leaders_in_850s_BC. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:06, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No copyvio; see above. --Proofreader (talk) 10:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am glad someone is fixing some of these Chronological list of saints and blesseds. If you are not aware already, these Category:Christian saints by century could be helpful to you. --Carlaude ^(talk) 20:47, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. I am currently writing new articles about early saints in the German Wikipedia and the chronological lists is something of a guideline for me and of course, whenver I find inaccuracies comparing the lists with other sources, then I correct them. The categories will indeed be of good use for me as I have already found the corresponding categories in the German Wikipedia very helpful. --Proofreader (talk) 20:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI-- These chronological lists seem to have orgininated from a single editor entering infomation from a single published source (a book), with only occational updates from others to remove some obvious errors. The upshot of this is that if any other sourse (such as the English Wikipedia article) gives a death date or other infomation on a saint (and it is the same saint, not another by the same name) I would trust the other source over these chronological lists. --Carlaude ^(talk) 04:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The latest example I found was Eudocia who had been given a death year 152, although the article stated 100 (as in this source: [2] while others sources say 107 or 114, but definitely under Trajan). I will go through the lists and check the entries of the first 3 or 4 centuries. It is useful as a rough guideline, but when it comes to details it is really not that reliable. --Proofreader (talk) 11:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I thought you might be interested in my proposal for democratic reform of wikimedia governance structures Ich bin übrigens auch Übersetzer Pnd (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 11:45, 11 May 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for the link. My main activities are on the German Wikipedia where I have gained some reputation as a critic of intransparent structures and the role of admins (see e.g. this text [3]). I guess my "independent" attitude helped me a few years ago to become elected as a member of the de WP arbitration committee (Schiedsgericht) while at the same time I have constantly refused to become admin. I don't shy away from taking responsibilities but the way most admins behave didn't really convince me to become part of them. I must confess that I am actually not completely aware of the situation here on en WP but on de WP we at least introduced a while ago the possibility to deadmin, but the conditions under which such a deadmin procedure is possible are in my view still way to limited so that it's rather the exception than the norm that you can get rid of someone who clearly shows unacceptable behaviour. I am also somewhat disappointed about Jimbo's behaviour and that he obviously only gave up his founder flag rights after immense pressure from the community. He does of course have his merits and deserves recognition for starting this wonderful project but neither he nor any admin has the right to rest on his laurels and think that he is in a position where he can get away with actions that grossly violate comminity consensus. So, yes, you have my support for any reform that would make the Wikipedia more transparent and democratic. --Proofreader (talk) 15:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Proofreader. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Proofreader. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Proofreader, no it was a mistake I did not do what your name indicates, proofread before posting. There is only one Harold Lockley Bashereyre (talk) 08:54, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing it out. It was simply a careless error of mine, sorry, and very eagle-eyed of you to spot it.Rcb1 (talk) 07:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)rcb1[reply]

Not so much eagle eye but rather systematic checking of the deaths in past years. If you do this clean up you can't help but stumble over these cases. Granville Stack's date of death is still not referenced in his article, though - going to have to point this out to the user who edited this information but I assume that the information itself is correct. --Proofreader (talk) 10:05, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Proofreader, thanks for creating Harald Kleinhofer (luger)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for one issue.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Actually, I just wanted to create a stub for a start as there was a mix-up of two namesakes. I am afraid I am no expert in this sport so was a bit afraid I wouldn't get all the terminology etc. right which is why I added the note referring to the German article that could be used by someone with more expert knowledge than I have to expand the article. Sorry for leaving this unfinished job to others but then again this is what wikipedia is about. --Proofreader (talk) 16:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Proofreader. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:21, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cultural depictions of Abraham Lincoln, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Drinkwater. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. It's fixed now. --Proofreader (talk) 12:08, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Mpongwe, Copperbelt, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 15:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Proofreader. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mpongwe, Copperbelt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:34, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Proofreader. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mpongwe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Santino Barnard, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 11:57, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Proofreader. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Santino Barnard, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:46, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1409, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of Prague.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The link is corrected, the specific university was Charles University. --Proofreader (talk) 11:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your contributions!! :D xRozuRozu (t • c) 04:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. :-) Proofreader (talk) 09:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]