User talk:Royboycrashfan

This user may have left Wikipedia. Royboycrashfan has not edited Wikipedia since 12 August 2008. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archives:

• User talk:Royboycrashfan/Archive 1 (20, November 2005 to 28, February 2006)
• User talk:Royboycrashfan/Archive 2 (March 2006)
• User talk:Royboycrashfan/Archive 3 (April 2006)
• User talk:Royboycrashfan/Archive 4 (May 2006)
• User talk:Royboycrashfan/Archive 5 (June 2006)
• User talk:Royboycrashfan/Archive 6 (July 2006)

Hi. Back in July you deleted the article for the Illinois College Republican Federation. I have requested an undelete and would be grateful if you would take a look at my comments on the review page and reconsider the deletion.

Thanks,

67.165.153.107 05:32, 31 October 2006 (UTC) Rick Veenstra, [email protected][reply]

Hi Roy, Thanks for participating in my RFA! Ultimately, no consensus was reached, but I still appreciate the fact that you showed up to add in your two cents. Thanks for giving me your support even though I didn't quite make the cutoff. You can feel free to talk to me about it or add some advice on my improvement page. Sincerely, The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me)

Why on earth have you deleted the article on the Orkney Antiquarian Society? Can you please undelete it? Mallimak 07:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I think the Orkney Antiquarian Society was a notable learned society and ought to be included in Wikipedia. At this point, an AfD might be more appropriate than a speedy deletion. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou for your participation in my RfA. Due to an almost even spread of votes between Oppose and Support (Final (16/13/6)) I have decided to withdraw for now and re-apply in a couple of months as suggested. I thank everyone for their kind support of my editorial skills; it meant a lot to me to get such strong recommendations from my fellow editors. If you ever have any hints as to how I can improve further, I would love to hear from you. Viridae^Talk 15:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		I award Royboycrashfan this barnstar for his efforts in deleting thousands of pieces of unworthy content from Wikipedia.Blnguyen | rant-line 01:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am just curious to understand why {{bio-stub}} was removed from the page. Thanks. It was inserted with an intention to let editors know that the bio needs to be expanded further. Raanoo 03:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Category:People stubs is sort of a general category and pages in the category should be sorted into different stub types, which it already was. Roy A.A. 05:04, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You just speedily deleted the HVPB with the statement that it is a non-notable game. Unfortunately in the case of games this isn't a criteria for speedy delition. Hence, out of process and the page needs to be reinstates (possibly adding a prod to it). -- Koffieyahoo 05:25, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Considering your argument, I've prodded it rather than speedying. Roy A.A. 20:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks. Wanna bet that you'll be deleting it again in five days ;-) -- Koffieyahoo 00:59, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see from his talk page that you once blocked http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&target=194.143.212.42

Might you do it again? He's up to his old tricks and further, it seems that all his edits have been disruptive vandalism. If you are unable to do this, please let me know. And thank you for your time. -Brian1979 (talk · contribs)

Hi there, I just noticed that the page for Bard Of Ely was removed from Wikipedia. [[1]] I feel that there should have been some sort of tag attached to the page before removal. I also am mystified by the reference of the dismissal of the the page due to your comment,(promotion written by a friend). I have found that indeed Bard Of Ely is a noteable artist, and should have remained in the Wikipedia listings. For instance, did you know, Bard Of Ely has an EP out on a proper label(Crai Records), and he worked with musicians such as Crum(ex-Hawkwind[[2]], Phil Moxham (Young Marble Giants), Robin Williamson(Incredible String Band) and Gruff Rhys (Super Furry Animals)and having compered and played at Glastonbury Festival [[3]] and the Green Man Festival [[4]] as well as having been rave reviewed in the NME [[5]]. I suppose it's up to the wandering editors to make these decisions. But, how do you determine a friend wrote the info on Bards page ??? For instance, I do not know Bard Of Ely personally, and could be considered a professional associate of Bard. Does this mean I can write a page about Bard Of Ely and it won't be removed ???? Please clarify the standards by which you elected to remove Bards page other than it may have been written by a friend. ie; For instance, the content was not verified and credible. Also, please indicate what makes an article not to the standard of Wikipedia, when in fact the references made in the article are internal links that have a direct relavence to the encyclopedia itself. I'm not trying to cause a stir here, but, I find it strange that Bards page was ripped down, when in fact I have found a few other artists pages that have been left up, and do not contain the same concrete documentation as Bard Of Ely's did. If you would like me to point those out to you, all you have to do is ask !!!! Take care, and please understand, that I am trying to understand some of the standards you work under for deciding to remove pages of Wikipedia noteable musical artists. Thank you, be well, and please accept my questions with all seriousness.

Cheers,

ZEST 14:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you speedy the article Kathy Fountain without any discussion? I think that was completely inappropriate, and apparently you don't know the past consensus about articles of this type. I will request that this be undeleted. Thank you. --CFIF (talk to me) 20:26, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete Abstract Tonality and add to it the reference http://www.secessionistmethod.com/secesionist.htm which explains it a bit better. Someone tagged it as nonsense when it fact it is jargon. Thanks. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:36, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I've done as you requested. Roy A.A. 00:39, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thank you. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please undelete Orkney Antiquarian Society? I think that it's a notable learned society, albeit a defunct one. Many thanks. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 03:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roy,

Could you inform me as to why you 'speedily deleted' (and then protected, so I can't re-create) the wiki page for edPod? Was it too short or something? If so, over the past few days I have been working on a more in-depth version. Or perhaps the problem was with copyright of some sort? If that's the case, I can't see why, as I'm both the owner and creator of the wiki page and edPod itself.

Sorry if there has been some misunderstanding, and I look forward to your reply.

Zarino Zappia

-- Zarino 09:12, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I like that series too.Just had say it to the Degrassi lovers--Always Gotta Keep It Real, Cute 1 4 u 16:36, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Royboycrashfan! Thank you for taking part in my RfA! Ultimately, it ended with a final result of (62/23/7), and with only 73% support, no consensus was achieved. Nevertheless, I thank you for your participation, and I will definitely look into Andypandy and Adam Biswanger's comments.  G.He 19:25, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that in the {{legendary-creature-stub}} you removed the </td><tr></table> from it. I realize that you likely did so to shorten the coding, but please don't do that again. It causes problems when HTML does not include end tags in the Wiki. In this case, it causes stubs to appear out of order on those articles that have more than one stub template attached. The code is thus there for a reason in the stub templates and should not be removed. Caerwine Caerwhine 00:40, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't recall doing that, but thanks for informing me. Roy A.A. 00:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for participating in my RfA! Unfortunately, it ended with a final result of (32/31/5) which no consensus was achieved. Nevertheless, I'd like to thank you again for your support and to keep an eye out for me within the next 3 months. Also, please so kind ans to drop by my suggestions page for my next RfA :) SynergeticMaggot 21:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support on my RFA, which closed successfully this morning with a result of (53/2/1). I've spent the day trying out the new tools, and trying not to mess things up too badly :). I was quite thrilled with all the support, both from the people I see around every day, as well as many users who I didn't know from before, yet wrote such wonderful things about me. I look forward to helping to serve all of you, and the project. Let me know if there's anything I can help you with. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 04:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I occasionally go through and check up on old vandals and problem users I encountered. I thought this might warrant a mention, since you were involved in the original blocking I'm mentioning it to you first. It involved this user 219.91.203.71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). I've discovered through his edits he's created several accounts, Aristotle,laughing (talk · contribs), Newbie,learning (talk · contribs) and User06201 (talk · contribs). If you recall this user left long rambling uncivil and attack messages on several user pages. Given his history, I thought a record of the multiple accounts should be brought to someone's attention--Crossmr 21:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crossmr's comments are not of the nature of a personal attack, and deleting someone else's comments on their talk page is VERY inappropriate. Vpoko 18:13, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was me who wrote the article and it was me who requested the deletion of it! Robert II 22:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)Robert II[reply]

   * 01:28, 14 July 2006 Royboycrashfan (Talk | contribs) deleted "Frontline Ministries International" (UE) 

What was the reason for the delete? I don't know what the "UE" code means.

Thanks, Joshua

Hi Royboycrashfan, please check the history of articles before speedy deleting them. User:Jerodd wrote a good article that was overwritten by a copyvio. silsor 16:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I made a new contribution for Ford Grey, 1st Earl of Tankerville. If you don't approve of it, let me know. I'm sorry about the Anna Kneeland Haggerty situation before.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Amy Zidian. Since you closed the deletion discussion for (or speedy-deleted) this article, your reasons on how or why you did so will be greatly appreciated in the above review. Lid 04:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC).[reply]

You've haven't been around in a while, I hope everything is ok. Yanksox 20:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find who originally deleted Knoxs Korner, but I know you deleted the "previously deleted material." I was wondering if I could start a Robert Benfer (creator of Knoxs Korner, musician, and film maker) page. I created the Jason Steele page (Jason is a frequent collaborater (sp?) with Robert) and I have a lot of information prepared (from his radio show and IMDb) and will e-mail him for more information if needed (as I have done with Jason). Please allow me to create this article, seeing as (if Robert gets his way) Villain is going to be released into theaters and he'll become a very important film maker. Thank you for your time. 01:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC) The Hero of Time

Just searched again and there is an incredibly short Robert page. Sorry about that. Now I'm just curious that, if I were to extend it, would it be allowed to stay on wiki? 01:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC) The Hero of Time

		The Original Barnstar
		For your hardwork and dedication to making Wikipedia a better place. I, Sharkface217, award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! :-) Sharkface217 04:41, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

heyyyy .. help me please. you and whole bunch of mods sent me warnings for vandalism when i havent edited anything!!! i havent even been on wikipedia for a long time.. thank you my page

why did you delete the article on the original dangerous dave :( —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.108.159.164 (talk) 16:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

You may want to change your signature, because it violates WP:Signature. (hint: Texas image) Bearly541 14:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could I ask why you userified this article? x42bn6 Talk 17:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see that on March 8th you deleted a short paragraph from "hors d'œuvre" shortly after making two other changes; did something catch your eye? did you understand it?

Hello, Royboycrashfan. An automated process has found and removed a fair use image used in your userspace. The image (Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg) was found at the following location: User talk:Royboycrashfan/Archive 3. This image was removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image was replaced with Image:Example.jpg, so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image to replace it with. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 22:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The following article has been re-created for the fourth time: Aaron Laffey (please see: [6]). I am notifying you because you are one of the three Wikipedians that have once deleted the article. Just letting you know that it's back and that Laffey is still nn. Thanks. 98.198.100.202 03:40, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to create a stub for Elizabeth Cohen, which was evidently previously deleted by yourself as the administrator. Is there a reason for the deletion that suggests I should not create the article? --Kenneth M Burke 00:07, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:Counter-Vandalism Unit project is under consideration to be moved to {{inactive}} and/or {{historical}} status. Another proposal is to delete or redirect the project. You have been identified as a project member and your input as to this matter would be welcomed at WT:CVU#Inactive.3F and at the deletion debate. Thank you! Delivered on behalf of xaosflux 16:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHY WAS IT DELETE??? Is there a reason for the deletion? It mentions that is was previously deleted???? I would like a reason.....as how is this page different some say this: [7] (Damo789 23:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:1915 Dance by Rodchenko.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Xie Qiuping, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Donald Albury 13:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia article Bruce Simpson has been nominated for deletion by Tercero. Maybe Bruce has some funny views sometimes and rubs some folk up the wrong way, but his achievements are significant and he is certainly suficiently notable for an article in wikipedia. Since you have edited this article, you might care to post a comment in support of retaining it here. Thanks --Pakaraki (talk) 07:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO I AM DINO WEST.. MY NAME WAS DELETED, I DID NOT CREATE MY OWN PROFILE SOMEONE ELSE DID.. i 100% HAVE RELIABLE RESOURCES IN FACT MY NAME IS MENTION SEVERAL TIMES ON THIS SITE..INCLUDING ARTIST SECTION FOR nOLIMIT RECORDS OR GUTTAR MUSIC ENT..I WAS SIGNED TO mASTER P LABEL AND I HAVE 6,290,000 SEARCH RESULTS ON GOOGLE.. PLEASE ID LOVE TO BE ON UR SITE CAN U GIVE ME A CHANCE TO REDEEM MYSELF? IL PROVE ANYTHING ITS ALL IN THE PUDING THANKS ALOT..RESPECT --Denzelday (talk) 19:45, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you deleted a page for Shake It Records in the past (2006) and I was hoping to restart the page on my own. I understand that it was because it was simply advertising for the store/record company. The company is a legitimate store with real influence in the Cincinnati music scene. I will be editing the page for a while on my own and then put it up onto Wikipedia. Please let me know if you have any concerns about the page before I put it up.

Thanks

Ryan

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:17, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mario timeline. Since you had some involvement with the Mario timeline redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 16:38, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User I want some help in Wikipedia English I use Wikipedia Arabic--SkoreBot (talk) 02:18, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

SandSsandwich has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

SandSsandwich (talk) 06:39, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I am Darriel, a newbie from the Philippines. Well, I had just found you by jumping through talk pages here. We have the same birthday. I know its not really a big deal, but I'm finding friends here and I hope you'd be one. ) me.darriellouie (talk) 14:08, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]