User talk:SKS2K6

Archives

/Archive1, /Archive2

Please make new comments at the bottom of the page. Thank you! SKS (talk)

Nice additions and thanks for the help...:)--Maester Seymour (talk) 05:25, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Could I please get in touch with you by e-mail? I can't find your e-mail address.My e-mail is janeyjkhotmail.com.THANK YOU SO MUCH Janeyjk (talk) 14:56, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Im asking since i'm not at all very sure, but would appearances in Variety/Reality shows count as part of an acting career. The article in question is about T.O.P ^N_P^e_e^e_r^b_v^s_e^s_z (Push) 08:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. So any one off appearances is not really notable to be mentioned on Wikipedia for a Korean star . I seem to removing those 'one off' appearance on variety shows for T.O.P but a certain user keeps re-editting them. Oh well, I'll have to stop in order to avoid an edit war. ^N_P^e_e^e_r^b_v^s_e^s_z (Push) 16:47, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its a pleasure dealing with nice and friendly people such as yourself on wikipedia, if only others were the same...:) have a great day!--Maester Seymour (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a quicksummary of this:

게다가 동방신기의 도쿄돔 입성은 한류가 아닌 철저한 현지화 전략을 바탕으로 이뤄낸 성과라는 점에서 더 큰 의미를 지닌다. 일본 내에서도 전국 투어를 마치고 도쿄돔 2회 공연으로 피날레를 장식, 25만명의 관객을 동원할 수 있는 가수는 극 소수인 만큼, 세계 2위 음악시장인 일본에서도 인정받은 동방신기의 높은 위상을 입증해주는 쾌거라 할 수 있겠다.

Thanks. MS (Talk|Contributions) 01:05, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! Let's talk: WP:COVERDISCUSS. - eo (talk) 12:04, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's not fake cover, it is a remix cd/ vinyl cover! PlatinumFire (talk) 23:22, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well it's not me who put that cover there but I think it should be there. And I added to the article that it's an unofficial release cause it is unknown if it is otherwise! PlatinumFire (talk) 11:59, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure where to put this but no one visits the discussion board for the article so I'm writing this here. hehe. I am editing out the article Family Outing, and I am new at editing wikipedia articles, so i was just wondering what specifically should be added on the article or revised. The tags you added are for additional references, list of misc, and not encyclopedic.

Since most of the information written are personally created and edited based on the show itself, i thought everything was factual, this is referring to the additional references and the not encyclopedic tags.

What specific part on the article is the list of miscellaneous one? Is it the guests section? Lastly, since I am not a Korean, just a fan, I based some of the editing from various english subbed videos. I crossed referenced some of them, with the information written. Hoping to be assisted, hehe. Thanks. Mariolawpanda (talk) 09:45, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I'll try to find more sources. It's kinda hard since I really don't understand korean at all. hehe. But thanks, and I'll "try" to read up more on the guidelines here and all. thanks again. :3 Mariolawpanda (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that twitter and offical (I believe that may mean run by the party in question) fan sites are good as external links if they are in fact run by the party in question (the reason that templates for them have survived deletion attempts) ... so I would deduce that material from them is fine as well.--VMAsNYC (talk) 06:17, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why I erased the information you posted is because you erased all of the information which I posted. I have edited the career, music style, and biography of G-Dragon and you erased it all. I'm not gonna lie that was quite a rude action that you made. Why don't you explain why you erased all those facts first before you criticize anything that I do?.--marbles111 (talk) 29 September 2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marbles1111 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that it is you who is changing the G-Dragon's wikipedia page every time. I remember the ip address of the person who was changing the page not "neutrally" but instead, he or she was erasing all the facts (including awards and collaboration information) and merely added the negative stories which were not even true at the time. Please note that someone was doing this on purpose that was not sincere and was rather bias towards this indivisual. They erased all the right facts without talking on this talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marbles1111 (talk • contribs) 23:56, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm affraid that's unlikely at the moment. If something turns up I will add it. But if you Google other stuff for artists you may not find something saying "This album has gone platinum". I think her website and head on Universal music would know. But to put your mind at ease I will look around for a different source but if I can't find it I think the current source should stay. Jayy008 (talk) 22:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recieving a Platinum plaque would just mean being certified Platinum though? I doubt they'd give her a platinum plaque if she didn't actually go Platinum. I mean she may not have sold Platinum only shipped! Jayy008 (talk) 09:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I got this request on my talk page, and I don't have a Korean certification source. Can you help?—Kww(talk) 01:39, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone's infalted the figures again can you sort it out? I don't know which editor it was but I saw you corrected it before Jayy008 (talk) 23:40, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. No it was Memoirs I think as I clicked history to look who did it, you had just fixed it at the same time but thanks for the info! Jayy008 (talk) 16:38, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SKS, I saw your post on the discussion on the charts page about Billboard Korea and I clicked the link and the website seems to be up and running but I can't make sense of it. Can you have a look at it? Jayy008 (talk) 22:26, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That's very strange, and leaves us with a dilemma. I don't mind what to do but since it's first week seems to be #2, I think maybe we should re-edit the page to include the official chart website citation instead rather than Carey's website. Although it only sold 529, is that reliable? Maybe it shipped enough to go Platinum, I think for the certification that should stay but the chart should be changed to #2. What are your thoughts? Jayy008 (talk) 21:42, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As you're the only one who replied I thought I'd reply here, I agree so I'm going to remove the international listing for Japan on Memoirs of an Imperfect Angel but keep Taiwan as I have no idea where the main where is (Help please if possible) to add it.

As for Korea as we spoke of above, Hanteo lists as #2, I'm thinking maybe her website exaggerated it OR maybe Korea has an international chart and they meant #1 for international?

Please reply with your thoughts on this Jayy008 (talk) 19:46, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right I understand what you mean. It's very debatable but I removed International Japan charts. I don't know why it all has to be so confusing. For now I will leave Korea as #1 or do you think I should change it to the Hanteo number with Hanteo source?

Also lastly Taiwan do you know if they have a main chart? Jayy008 (talk) 20:04, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Right one more thing before I go, do you know of a particular user I can ask about Japan charts, I have asked Kww but I don't know if he would know. Jayy008 (talk) 20:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bother you again and make a new section but I've noticed something on the Hanteo pages on the monthly chart Whitney Houston's sales are there and on the weekly charts Mariah Carey's sales are there and on the yearly chart Paul Potts. All the #2 postions on the 3 charts they are show the sales. But the other chart positions have clickable links.

As you're the only user who reads Korean can you explain why or research. If you need the links just ask Jayy008 (talk) 20:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I happened upon a thread where you were mentioned as an expert on recent Korean record certifications and chartings! I wonder if you have access to any information from previous decades there. I'm interested in information about Laura Branigan. She had a South Korean greatest hits album in 1988. Was there a pop chart in Korea throughout the '80s and were any of her singles or albums chart hits and/or certified there in the '80s or '90s? I know that four of her studio albums charted in Japan, but I've never been able to find any information about the Korean market, other than that the greatest hits collection was released there. I'd be obliged if you could enlighten me, or point me to where I might search (in English) for the information. I'll watch this page for your response. Thanks, Abrazame (talk) 21:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.  :) And I'm not an expert; I just happened to be one of the few Wikipedia users who a) can understand Korean and b) edit a lot in the music area of Wikipedia. Anyway, here's the thing: Korean chart statistics are hard to come by, because there isn't one main source for that, unfortunately. There used to be a Recording Industry Association of Korea (which somehow shortened to MIAK) that has statistics from the 90s to now, but the group has since been disbanded and replaced by the Korea Music Content Industry Association, which has no sales data whatsoever as of yet. (In other words, the Korean equivalent of the RIAA just disappeared, and any info it had with it.) And with Korea in general, it's extremely hard for non-Korean speakers to get any info. Like, because I can read Korean, I can try looking up "로라 브레니건" (Laura Branigan in Korean) and trying to find news on her, but it's extremely difficult. There's only one news result on Google, for example. And any current online resources (like Hanteo, which is essentially a sales tracking company) would only have recent sales (for the past couple of years), and most likely you would have to pay for the numbers/certifications.

I wish I could be of more help to you, but as I didn't grow up in Korea, I would have no idea how chart stats would have worked back then (not that I have a good grasp of them now). The only other way I could think of would be to access Laura's label's site in Korean and seeing if there are any facts on there (but again, that would require the ability to read and understand the language).

Let me know if I can clarify anything else. SKS (talk) 21:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for your response! It's a shame that the MIAK information was lost—perhaps a suggestion that there was reason for not trusting the figures? And I guess that wouldn't even have covered the '80s when Branigan had her biggest successes. If you should ever happen to stumble upon anything official for that decade, I'd love to know, but it sounds unlikely. Branigan and Atlantic Records parted ways nine years before her untimely death, and while her two biggest albums are still in print on the Atlantic label (others are re-issues on sister labels), the '80s seem to be a lost decade for the company in terms of their stewardship of information about Branigan and even her master recordings. Thanks again, and best wishes, Abrazame (talk) 03:53, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Sorry, I didn't realise I'd left Jessica out of the infobox! God only knows what that IPs beef is with her but they certainly don't seem to like her. I've never even heard of the group before today. Sorry again :) --5 albert square (talk) 22:34, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in WP:Requests for adminship/Kww 3
Sometimes, being turned back at the door isn't such a bad thing

—Kww(talk) 18:46, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: My comment. Well, it's true. (Paul237 (talk) 19:23, 29 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Re: Your reply. How did you 'win'? The page exists now, as I said it would. Also, I wasn't even discussing Korean pop, so that comment wasn't even relevant. (Paul237 (talk) 18:19, 27 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

The honeybfly fan club really had the track listing of the remixed album. I'm so sorry if I am too excited to put in the sources. Thanks for the reminders. 112.201.50.67 (talk) 08:42, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SKS2K2

Just off to work in a minute and noticed your message about listing the above article for deletion. I have taken on board your comments and will read up on the deletion process from the links you supplied so I understand how it all works.

I guess the problem is that this information was on the main Guy Sebastian article but it was removed because the article is getting too long even with trimming off contributions as they become no longer current or relevant, however his Idol win and the songs performed are an important part of his life as this is what launched his career. So I guess any suggestions about where to put this information should the article be deleted would be gratefully received as putting it back on the main article will really impact on the length of an already long article.

Bye for now.

Kind regards

--Diane (talk) 21:21, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hello! uhm...just reli wanna ask you by trivia..do u mean the lyrics and composition? becoz i actually feel that it is an information regarding about their singing career..it is definiely not a trivia but a factual relevant infomation about their career..and more importantly bout their songs. I did not delete anything from the previous article but merely just added more to it.

Can you please tell me what informations have i added are "Unsourced Materials"???? Thank You! Evaz93 (talk) 06:28, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, the fact that they have written their own lyrics are proven when they talk about the songs they wrote in interviews and variety shows.

ok..why arent the music bank and inkigayo awards?? I got the number of copies being sold from k pop articles

.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Evaz93 (talk • contribs) 07:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ok..well.i would like to stop this talk right now bcoz i am no longer interested in further editing any of ss501's informations so feel free to edit the article however you want it. ..thank you and bye! Evaz93 (talk) 00:46, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering whether you would agree on just removing the bios on each member of big bang and just replace them with a set of links to their individual articles.
I am suggesting this because a lot of good articles such as The Fray and Aerosmith have just a very brief list of their members. Plus TVXQ, does not even have a triv like list of members. I'm sure that 'The Fray' and 'Aerosmith' have their own different consensus given the fact they are actual instrument playing bands and Big Bang is a korean boy group. However, this section is merely a lot of fan triv, most of which is already incorporated into their respective articles already. Deleting it without discussion would probs lead to a fangirl/boy uproar. I'm asking for your opinion since I'm getting nothing from the Big Bang talk page :/ ^N_P^e_e^e_r^b_v^s_e^s_z (Push) 17:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, K Pop article often need a lot of work due to fanboys/girls. I was, similarly, pretty much in a 'cannot be asked' mood when editing the U Kiss article ;) Even though, you need a bit of praise when it comes to K Pop articles, since you do much of the editing & cleaning up. :D ^N_P^e_e^e_r^b_v^s_e^s_z (Push) 10:13, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know whats your reason of moving down beast pictures, but anycase if you think i cant use that picture, please do upload yourself, cause it seems pretty rude to me that you just destroyed someone work and left on your own. please do have some courteousy though I dont know how to upload a picture correctly but do understand that beast wiki page is mostly done by me alone , so please, at least tell me a reason before you delete something, many thanksNicky456 (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for expanding the article. Just wondering if it's okay to mention the collaboration's she's done for like 4tomorrow & Brave Brothers? + npervez ☂ 17:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You did a really rude action.

Firstly, I am fine with you removing the promotional poster. But at least I gave an copyright code which the other user didn't gave. Next, even though allkpop is not a reliable source. At least it provides english news to fans around the world. Third, I edited the History section to make it more accurate as SM Entertainment DID NOT confirmed that the group will be back in February 2010. <- that was just rumors. But you removed it away. Fourth, Promotions section. Oh! is an album. Yes, but under the promotion section, adding of the 30sec teaser was needed. This will show that there's a teaser being release to promote the new album.

Kindly explain your reason for doing so as I think this was a really rude action you did. In which I had spent like 1-2 hours trying to edit the page. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SmilesMemories (talk • contribs) 19:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is allkpop not a reliable source? It's a news site.DaiZengar^{Smite evil} 00:43, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. Thanks for your help(and being polite about it)!DaiZengar^{Smite evil} 05:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, SKS! I agree with the move 100%. I am currently fighting for How You Sell Soul to a Soulless People Who Sold Their Soul??? - with 3 question marks intact - and the CIVIL warS: a tree is best measured when it is down - with unusual typography intact. It's good to know I'm not alone in fighting a ridiculous interpretation of WP:MOSTM (among other things)! Cheers! Wikkitywack (talk) 21:23, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Harisu/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:46, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TVXQ has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. SandylovesMicky (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be appreciated if you could add your opinion to the above discussion to try and resolve the situation and if you could please vote on this non-consensus binding survey. Official Telephone Cover Conflict Resolution.

Thanks Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does this even qualify as original research? I mean, if you can count, use division and have some sense of rhythm, you can do it yourself... And it's not like figuring out the BPM of a track is a subjective process either, it is what it is... And in this case the BPM is especially fascinating since it's a fast-paced track despite only having a BPM of a 100 which is really interesting and personally I have no idea how they managed that... (Djungelurban (talk) 14:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

No worries, found a source and all is well now... (Djungelurban (talk) 15:03, 19 April 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Park Kahi, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. We have some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. No valid reason given for re-moving. EunSoo (talk) 05:03, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually no they aren't under the correct name. If you do your research go to official sites her full name is Park Kahi, also it is unique to Wikipedia search engine, instead of Kahi (entertainer). Sorry about the vandalism I am still getting used to the editing process. I tried to use the move but it wouldn't let me because the titles already exsisted. EunSoo (talk) 05:08, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay yes but we are also adapting it to Wikipedia as Kahi is already taken in WIkipedia right? So why put up Kahi (entertainer) when you can use their full name. Same thing with Rain, it's already taken. So Bi Rain would be best fit. Wikipedia uses full names for American's why not Asian's? EunSoo (talk) 05:15, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think there full stage name is best because it cuts down the disambigutation pages and makes it easier for search. If you are going to put (entertainer) then you might as well do it for everyone in the entertainment industry, because (entertainer) is such a general word. EunSoo (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's not exactly my point. We are adapting to Wikipedia as well. So Park Kahi or Kahi Park makes it unique (entertainer) is still a general word to use when she is in music, actors are entertainers as well. BoA has BoA and not BoA (entertainer). I am saying there is no need to put their job title, because they have their full name. So if it absolutely came down to it without no other choice of for example Park Kahi and Kahi is already taken then you would use their job title. As for the Madonna the Madonna page itself is a disambiguation, shouldn't it be Madonna_(disambiuation)?? I just realized that for User as well. It is such a waste when Wikipedia could use Madonna (entertainer) for Madonna and User (entertainer) for Usher. Those 2 should have (disambiguation) at the end of them. EunSoo (talk) 06:02, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wah, SKS I didn't know posting requests on Wikipedia could be so tiring. I am literally fighting to get my point across LOL! It's like a debate. EunSoo (talk) 07:00, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see User talk:Anthony Appleyard#Un/Controversial moves. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:20, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, join the discussion here. Max24(talk) 20:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SKS2K6! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 329 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Shim Eun Jin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please participate in the discussion for criteria of listing at Talk:List of Korean musicians. Thanks! Farjad0322 (talk) 18:10, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The comment was originally added by IP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.243.108.148 (talk) 01:26, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who has taken part in previous discussions regarding the use of succession boxes in articles for songs and albums, I'd like to notify you of a request for comment that is taking place at WT:CHARTS#Request for comment: Use of succession boxes. It would be nice to finally come to a resolution on this. If you have already participated in this RFC, then please disregard this notice. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 00:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm a new bie at wiki page so forgive me if I stumple on something rather obvious :D I saw you had been editing for Shinhwa memembers' individual page, specially Min Woo's. I wonder if you could help me with Eric's page since right now it looks rather bare compare to other members'. It would be a major revamp and I'm quite overwhelming with wiki codes. Could you email me at [email protected] - Thanks in advance Shinhwaluv (talk) 00:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cube Entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 21:25, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cube Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cube Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.   ArcAngel   (talk) ) 15:16, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kiss (South Korean group) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A7 -- no indicia of notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 06:13, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kiss (South Korean group) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kiss (South Korean group) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 04:43, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the thoughtfull edit. I admit I am new to this and probably could have done a better job, but my main goal was to remove the vandalism and maybe bring it to the attention of a decent editor. as you appear to be. Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonyBap (talk • contribs) 10:08, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. May I ask why is Allkpop considered an unacceptable source? Thank you. Toothswing (talk) 07:21, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are taking the surnames out of the titles, but want to use surname only in the text? All I can say is, we are going to have a lot of weird-looking K-pop articles if you keep this up. What about the Madonna article? Should the text say "Ciccone"?

I think you may misunderstand the meaning of "(entertainer)" and the other parenthetical disambiguators. They are often added by people who don't like the performer to deny him or her primary topic status. Kauffner (talk) 14:29, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I don't understand the problem. Choi Soo-young was in Hello, Schoolgirl under her full name, as you can see here and here. Kauffner (talk) 16:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The data on IMDB is user submitted. See Han Cinema. Kauffner (talk) 17:02, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW, I agree with this edit and its summary at least in general--chart positions might be reliable, but I don't trust it as a source for BLP information. But this is an uphill battle given the number of K-pop fans who are writing fan pages all over Wikipedia. If you wish to make it stick, take it to WP:RSN and make your case: I will support it as much as I can (given that I don't read or write Korean). Drmies (talk) 15:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your ID on WikiProject and so I thought you might be interested in a debate at Template Talk on the topic of merging Infobox Korean Film into the generic Infobox Film category, deleting the Hangul/hanja/RR/MR information, or keeping it separate (as it currently is). I would appreciate it if you to contribute your thoughts or at least glance over it. The more people looking/thinking about it will give us better ideas as to what should be decided. Thank you. ₪RicknAsia₪ 09:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note I mentioned your (correct) revert of a cut-and-paste attempt to revert undiscussed move at Talk:Kim Hyun-a. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:57, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Ji Hyun is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Ji Hyun until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 10:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ItsHyorish.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi SKS2K6! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 20:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Talk:Sooyoung#Requested move regarding the issues as before. Thank you. Sawol (talk) 13:14, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Korean male singers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 06:31, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tiffany (korean singer). Since you had some involvement with the Tiffany (korean singer) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 13:41, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I recently started a userspace draft of Door County, Wisconsin at ko:Epiphyllumlover/연습장#커뮤니티. Since both the Door and Korean peninsulas have a pleasant climate, a tradition of fishing, a history of war, politically contested islands, and divisions between the North and South, I think this article will be interesting to Koreans. Although ostensibly it is about a county in the U.S., to a Korean it is more of a mirror to compare life on a peninsula with. I have worked the machine translate tool about as good as I can get it and if you feel up to completely rewriting the machine translate feel free to join in.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 18:20, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A stub has been created at ko:도어군.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]