User talk:Stuart Newmanite

Moon Car, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 01:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oliver Locker-Lampson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harold Roberts. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Patrick Donnelly (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles O'Neill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stuart Newmanite. Thank you for your work on Central Hall, University of York. Cocobb8, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

I've marked the article as reviewed. Thanks for your contributions!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Cocobb8}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cocobb8 (💬 talk • ✏️ contribs) 15:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have reverted my removal of Joseph Whitaker (publisher) from the list of alumni of this school, and cited the DNB. Could you have another look? I have looked at the ODNB and I think it was his son who attended Bloxham School. The article says "Whitaker had a family of fifteen children, of whom the eldest was Joseph Vernon Whitaker (1845–1895). He was born in London on 3 February 1845, and was educated at Bloxham School". Joseph Whitaker the elder was apprenticed at 14 so it seems unlikely he attended Bloxham, and the ODNB doesn't sugggest he did. Thanks, Tacyarg (talk) 17:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right. I've undone the edit. Thank for checking up on that. Stuart Newmanite (talk) 23:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stuart Newmanite,

Thank you for creating Durham University Conservative and Unionist Association.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article may benefit from inclusion of additional viewpoints. The sentence about the 'Newcastle Section' seems to be a fragment only, and doesn't make sense as currently written.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 22:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bastun,

I have added some more viewpoints which I feel has balanced out the page a bit, although I feel my wording is a bit messy. If you don't feel that the issues have been addressed, I'm happy to tinker away a bit more.

I have also resolved the Newcastle section. I'm not quite sure why I stopped the sentence mid-way, but at least that's in order now.

Thanks Stuart Newmanite (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article University of York Swift Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEWS. A student society being sent a gift by a pop star is not reason for their inclusion in WP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tagishsimon (talk) 20:42, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of York Swift Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of York Swift Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Tagishsimon (talk) 23:31, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]