User talk:Thevampireashlee

Hello Thevampireashlee! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:45, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects Getting your info out there Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy Getting more Wikipedia rules Policy Library Getting help New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions Getting along Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution Getting technical Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie J Illuminati Hand Gesture.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 22:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Research Participation Barnstar
		For your participation in the survey for Anonymity and conformity on the internet. Michael Tsikerdekis (talk) 13:17, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Jeffree Star, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page True Colors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you edit quite frequently on Porcelain Black articles! If you're interested, I've started the Black Rainbow page in my sandbox and you could edit freely over there! I could use some help grammatically and some extra eyes for reliable sources :) WikiUhOh (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So according to Porcelain's twitter, she claims she never confirmed the albums track listing and name....... What is wrong with this woman??? I really feel like we can control this albums release date and content through the wikipedia page! LMFAOOOOO WikiUhOh (talk) 21:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh yes!! And wikipedia is so stubborn with it's sources, i feel like we're already pushing it with the critical reception websites already used in Naughty Naughty... But oh well, a lot of reliable sources should review the album, right? :D Whenever that comes out -_________- WikiUhOh (talk) 22:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, I've begun work on a "How Do You Love Someone?" page. Since Black is recovering it, it's elligible for it's own article, we just need its official release and/or the albums official release. Idk I have this feeling to let you know these things, since you are practically the only other trainwreck on here! HAHAHAAAA WikiUhOh (talk) 14:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jessie J Illuminati Hand Gesture.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Porcelain Black Music Video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:40, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,
the wub (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hell Yeah (Midnight Red song) cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 07:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Breakfast (Syrup), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chorus (music) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:39, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note about your good article nominations. I may take a crack at reviewing one of them in the near future. —Torchiest ^talk_edits 15:03, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Roman Holiday.ogg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thevampireashlee, Thanks for your note. I'm quite happy for you to continue editing/improving the article, provided that it involves simple things such as correcting spelling, improving grammar, etc. Life gets a bit more difficult for the reviewer if the editing involves moving text around and/or replacing big blocks of text. So if you could hold back any of those big changes that would be great. Pyrotec (talk) 08:32, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You've now get GA. Congratulations on your hard work. Pyrotec (talk) 08:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Nicki Minaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your very welcome to help out with the reviewing process! The Career sections still need tidying up in places especially, and so far your help has been great! :) Jennie | ☎ 09:29, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kesha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lyric (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nicki Minaj took forever! I'm so glad that it was passed, and thankful for all your help as it did need significantly improving in parts. The Madonna article is going to be another daunting challenge, so your assistance would really be needed. I would be glad to look over Porcelain Black - I'm not familiar with this artist at all, but I think I could tidy some things up. :) Jennie | ☎ 10:32, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it could be good enough for GA status, if you want to nominate it, then I would be happy to review it for you. Jennie | ☎ 10:37, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've accepted to review it and I will probably later today. Ahh, I see - reviewing GA's is not that hard to be honest, if you want more of an idea I would recommend looking at WP:GACN, which is probably the most informative article of all. I think Madonna is a little tricky at this stage, but if you look through WP:GA/N - is there anything your interested in reviewing - I would say to just jump right in! Jennie | ☎ 12:00, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be fine now, I see your comments -- is there a still problem? Jennie | ☎ 15:54, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The template is to mark that sufficent rationale exists on the page :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

I'm sorry about leaving you waiting with one section to go, but I have been a little busy recently so I managed to complete it just now. Congratulations - Porcelain Black has been promoted to good article status. I would add that the article may well come under reassessment in months/years to come as the artist hasn't released her debut album yet (and I have a feeling she may be quite big), so the article might come under major expansion/disruption. But for now, well done and congratulations on making a high-quality article of this length! :) Jennie | ☎ 20:58, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's such a shame! It must be annoying to have to wait for so long for a debut album. To think I'm annoyed waiting for an album over 2 years, when you and other fans have waited 6! I hope you get it soon, how is your GA reviewing going? Jennie | ☎ 21:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh none in particular! I was just referring to the average time for artists like Beyonce and Nicki Minaj that I have to wait :) Jennie | ☎ 22:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I just wanted to say thank you for reviewing the article and passing it as a good article. It was a very pleasant experience, I found the review very insightful and I found your comments were very encouraging as well as specific and direct. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 22:29, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Synthpop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sequencer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thur can u revie Muisc pls i listed it as gewd article.--HURTICLES (talk) 19:55, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thankyou for helping out with some of the actions listed in Talk:Madonna (entertainer)/GA1. The review has been completed and is now on hold. If you can help with the remainder of the actions to pass the GA review, that would be very much appreciated. --Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Stan (fan) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Decatur, Forum, IE and David Russell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paradise Edition of Born to Die by Lana Del Rey.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:56, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paradise Edition of Born to Die by Lana Del Rey.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:02, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jessie J's upcoming second studio album (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Voice

Lana Del Rey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Digital download

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Paradise Edition of Born to Die by Lana Del Rey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thevampireashlee. You have new messages at CactusWriter's talk page.
Message added — CactusWriter ^(talk) 18:49, 1 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paradise (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Audio CD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You are going excellent with this article.Keep this spirit up.You do let me know if i can help you anyhow.By the way i've left a query on article's talk page,check it out.Best of Luck and Kind regards.Thank You. 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 14:38, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should do a review deletion instead. It'll just be deleted again if we upload it and possibly blocked. Yeah, I went to the screening. It's great! --MrIndustry (talk) 22:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah! It looks great. Let me open one now.--MrIndustry (talk) 22:24, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just tried listing it but I think I did it wrong? I can't get it working?! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review --MrIndustry (talk) 22:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thevampireashlee. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 20:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there.

I notice you've added the synthpop category to many articles. Are you sure they all fit the criteria? Some do, some don't, and a number again are dubious - for example; Madonna? Not sure about that one. Do you have sources or reasonable grounds for these additions - as there are no edit summaries to support your changes. Thanks. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:58, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zowie, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peaches (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ride Screenshot.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blue Velvet Lana Del Rey.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:26, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous. I opposed all images for deletion. I swear Wikipedia hates Lana. lol --MrIndustry (talk) 00:49, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. As you appear to be one of the most active users who edit Lana Del Rey articles, I just wanted to clear something up with you. The Paradise Edition release is just like Lady Gaga's Fame Monster release back in 2009. All singles released are from the EP. The new EP is simply packaged with the original album in some editions. Zac (talk · contribs) 21:16, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is not. The Fame Monster is an EP. In this case, two releases exist. Born to Die - The Paradise Edition is a re-release including the songs from Born to Die and Paradise. Paradise is an EP only consisting of 8 songs. The Fame Monster was supposed to be a re-release but was released as an EP instead, so you can't compare the two. The Paradise EP isn't even released worldwide so you can't say all of the singles are released from the EP. teammathi (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm not going to participate in an edit-war beacuse I think we should come to a conclusion first. teammathi (talk) 11:22, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the userbox buddy.Best of luck.25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 14:49, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Monsters (social network) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Monsters (social network) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ṞṈ™ 21:24, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Warrior (Kesha album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Auto-Tune, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lollipop (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I don't think the Medoner image is free. Maybe we should ask David if he can provide us with a free image of the characters? Xwomanizerx (talk) 15:10, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do you really think that it should be part of Madonna's WikiPRoject, or any other artists'? Xwomanizerx (talk) 15:12, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested in an edit-war so I think we should discuss this and come to a conclusion here. Lana Del Rey: I think letting the sentences start with the date the event happened, makes everything clearer and neater. Like this, the reader knows from the beginning exactly when something happened. Your edits were good faith-edits but they weren't necessary. It is absolutely not messy, it is neater and easier to read and understand. Paradise (EP): I think Template:Cite web#Examples and Template:Cite news#Examples are pretty clear on how the references should be formatted. It is a lot neater this way, easier to read and easier to edit. Without the spacing every reference is just one big chunk of words which is hard to edit. teammathi (talk) 19:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree that this type of formatting for the source is neater, but first, let me explain that the edits you have made to Paradise and Lana Del Rey actually contain more spaces than are presented in those examples. Besides, I am using the citation tool that appears in the tool bar every time you open an edit window. The spacing this tool employs must be correct, since it's live across all of Wikipedia every time you edit a page. Personally, I think it's easier to read, locate, and mend sources when there are less spaces; that's my personal opinion which you seem to disagree with.

As far as prose goes, starting every sentence with "On this day," and "On that day," is not only boring, but it seems to be advised against in the manual of style. First and foremost, I have participated in the Good Article project here on Wikipedia, as well as on various other wikis (some of which I am an administrator). I also have a degree in Creative Writing; I know good prose when I read it. English also happens to be my native language. That aside, I have witnessed on Wikipedia that this exact type of sentence structure has failed Featured Article nominations, as in: the article failed becoming a Featured Article because of this same exact phrasing. I want this article to shine and reading sentences that start with the exact same formula is bland and reads like a chronology, which the Lana Del Rey is not. What is the harm in trying to make the article the best that it can be? The prose is still 100% accurate. After my edits, more sentence variation exists, making it "exciting, even brilliant, of a professional standard;" as the the Featured Article criteria outlines. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 19:18, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I use this citation tool: http://toolserver.org/~magnus/makeref.php which formats the references like this and I just think it's neater and easier to edit by other editors. I agree that the article needed more sentence variation but this is an encyclopedia, so the dates should definitely be included. teammathi (talk) 19:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree. Dates make the world go 'round, and I've tried to keep them in. But, it seems a bit over the top to have one sentence reading, "On October 12, she did this." then, having the next sentence read, "On October 14, she did this." when we could just say something like, "On this day, she did this. Two days later, she did this." It's more cohesive. At any rate, I think we have a third party interested in the debate. They edited Paradise (EP) under as an IP. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 19:33, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. is this tool an official software of Wikipedia? It appears to be a user-creation. The one I'm using is embedded right into the plain-jane edit window. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 19:34, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that we shouldn't add dates that are that close to one another. I found the tool here: Help:Citation_tools#Tools. I never saw that edit tool. I guess I'll start using that from now on. teammathi (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's easier to use. :) --Thevampireashlee (talk) 19:56, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At this rate, I don't mind if you completely undo my changes. As of late, I've been extremely discouraged from contributing to Wikipedia. I feel as though my contributions are unwanted (not by you). There are editors who have embarked on a personal vendetta against me, and I'm tired of dealing with it. Wikipedia should be fun. It shouldn't be about proving a point or attacking people who aren't in your clique. I'm sorry if I've offended you in any way. It's really not about you at all. I felt like we could collaborate and work things out, which is very very rare around here I've noticed. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 21:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know what sucks here? Editors who think they know better and revert editors who actually do know better. See Paradise (EP): "dangling modifier" has nothing to do with that construction; you want to look at Comma#Parenthetical_phrases. Happy days, 66.168.247.159 (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thevampireashlee, I completely understand. I've also been discouraged from contributing to Wikipedia for a few weeks. You didn't offend me at all and you've contributed significantly to the articles as far as I've noticed. teammathi (talk) 22:23, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Wanessa, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 20:49, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Enrique Iglesias, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And this is for all the other pages. Just because an artist releases a few works within a genre doesn't make that it must be labelled by it. Also note that the correct genres are Pop and electronic music per Template:Infobox musical artist: "The genre or genres of music performed by the act. Aim for generality (e.g. Hip hop rather than East Coast hip hop)." Just because the "sky is blue" does not mean it cannot have other tones. And you are not discussing about the colour of the clothes they wear, you are editing WP:BLPs, you have to understand the difference. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 01:46, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want you to leave Wikipedia, your editing was totally irrelevant to me until today when I saw your editing. You are basing on Wikipedia articles or what you hear, and using an essay as a shield, which is a weak defense. Regardless if BLP applies or not, WP:V do applies, and therefore the whole pillars, and it doesn't matter that Minaj has two albums with electropop/synthpop influences those are not their genres (read both articles, Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded and Pink Friday), also, that is not a justification for Enrique Iglesias, Paris Hilton or others. Iglesias released multiple Latin pop albums throughout his life, and Hilton released just one album with a few or none (I never heard that album) electropop songs--also with no references of electropop style. Even if they released one song or album with synthpop influences, their whole music career should be labelled like that, like in Aguilera's or Ciccone's biographies? This is not a vendetta of nothing, it is just you that cannot discuss properly with other people when there are talk pages, and mine seems to be the second talk page out of multiple pages you edited on October 15 to discuss if "synthpop" is a correct genre. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:50, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Medoner.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You can add a sentence about that genre on Musical Style section or something. But not for biography infobox, because we only list major genre like pop, R&B, rock, etc. Bluesatellite (talk) 06:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Blue Velvet Lana Del Rey.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:00, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I partially reverted your recent edit to Pink Friday. The Beat.au article you cited for electropop as a genre on the album only mentioned it as an element in Minaj's vocals/lyrics; the 6th paragraph ("Minaj’s impish humour and played-up incredulity works in bursts, but sounds positively insipid when combined with a cheesy electro-pop backing", followed by examples of lyrics/vocals) Both the Allmusic and Billboard citations cite the combination of "hip hop, R&B, and pop", so that choice is the strongest in being supported. I kept the genre categories, although the style guide for WP:ALBUMS (here) suggests to exclude those and instead place them at the artist's albums category page here (the particular genre categories you added may only apply to the two studio albums, although the mixtapes included in Category:Nicki Minaj albums shouldnt be there to begin with) Dan56 (talk) 01:10, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Katy Perry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to TMZ

Nobody's Real (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Encore

Paradise (EP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Audio CD

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll definitely help cleaning up! I will also try to help paraphrase the sentences in the "Video Games" article. I hope we can get them promoted! teammathi (talk) 17:46, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look for a source for those. I think that'd be a good idea. I think a few editors would definitely be interested teammathi (talk) 17:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stop looking for sources that mention "electro-pop". The paragraph you added to the composition section is original research; synthesizing sources to suit your interpretation ("the vast application of the electropop genre"). Stick to what the sources say; none of the sources you cited explicitly say "especially electropop, on Pink Friday: Roman Reloaded. Her debut album Pink Friday marked her exploration of the genre, spawning a string of electro-hits". Per WP:NOR, "Best practice is to research the most reliable sources on the topic and summarize what they say in your own words, with each statement in the article attributable to a source that makes that statement explicitly." Not the Boombox (some AOL blogs) and a minor Australian music magazine, whose only mention of "electropop" is a critical commentary on Minaj's performance: "Minaj's impish humour and played-up incredulity works in bursts, but sounds positively insipid when combined with a cheesy electro-pop backing." Do not restore your changes without addressing your proposed changes at the article's talk page and addressing the guidelines I cited. Original research just cant be accepted. Dan56 (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bobby Vinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blue Velvet

Lounge music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blue Velvet

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paradise (EP), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thevampireashlee. You have new messages at Begoon's talk page.
Message added 22:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Begoon ^talk 22:03, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I have no idea where to find that. teammathi (talk) 14:30, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited American (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Radio - Lana Del Rey cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Statυs (talk) 12:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Daily Record (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ke$ha Today Show 2012.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Ke$ha Today Show 2012.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ke$ha Today Show 2012.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Ke$ha Today Show 2012.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Ke$ha Today Show 2012.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Ke$ha Today Show 2012.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 07:53, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Ke$ha Today Show2 2012.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, File:Ke$ha Today Show2 2012.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Ke$ha Today Show2 2012.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Ke$ha Today Show2 2012.jpg and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at File talk:Ke$ha Today Show2 2012.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Ke$ha Today Show2 2012.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. — ξ^xplicit 07:56, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 December 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Off to the Races (song), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that "Off to the Races" by Lana Del Rey has been lyrically described as "a freak show of inappropriate co-dependency"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Off to the Races (song). You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thevampireashlee. You have new messages at Begoon's talk page.
Message added 03:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Discussion links - for your information... Begoon ^talk 03:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyeswikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office ^connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thevampireashlee. You have new messages at Talk:Femme Fatale Tour/GA1.
Message added 06:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--WeirdWoman123 (talk) 06:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brighter Than Sunshine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Keane

Piano rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Aqualung

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the assumption about the meaning of the title should be included in an encyclopedic article. I don't think it matters how reliable the source is, only the writer, Lana Del Rey, can say what it means. teammathi (talk) 19:03, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Blue Velvet Bobby Vinton.ogg, which you've sourced to https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/blue-velvet/id192965779?i=192966046. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dark Paradise, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio 1 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Adam Freeland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Orbital, Ils, Lazy Eye (song) and Pressure Drop

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't turn others in for edit-warring and then do it yourself. If I see another revert from you without talk page discussion on "Heart Attack", you will be blocked for edit warring yourself.—Kww(talk) 23:52, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you feel that way. Hopefully the other party User talk:Status was also notified because he is edit warring too. I personally thought I was undoing vandalism, and I thought this situation and the situation with other editor were completely different. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 00:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've notified Arre 9 (talk · contribs), as she was the one who removed the image in the first place. One specifically stating the image has no use in the article is not vandalism. Zach 00:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As stated on Talk:Heart Attack (Demi Lovato song)#Picture of Ariana Grande, I feel the image has various reasons for inclusion. I'm sorry you feel otherwise, and I've believe that it should be included. But, because you have more people on your side, it'll get removed from the article, and we'll be back where we started. You know, I've been very displeased with the users I've encountered on Wikipedia. I enjoy contributing, but I do not enjoy the other contributors. --Thevampireashlee (talk) 00:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Young and Beautful.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hot Dance Club Songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turn Up The Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:59, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You stated here that the insertion of the Luxembourg Digital Songs is not working. I noticed now that there was a word missing in the template documentation, as the chart has to be inserted using "Luxembourgdigitalsongs" and not "Luxembourgdigital", as it was there until now. I have changed it and also tested it, everything works normal now. --Ali1610 (talk) 13:30, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrip stated that the promotional singles Blue Velvet and Burning Desire are singles but they are actually promotional. I bought the promotional singles and the covers are different from the 'real' singles such as dark paradise and ride. Hence, they are both promotional singles, can you please change it back?

Thanks,

) A Lana Del Rey Fan too. :P — Preceding unsigned comment added by 27.32.254.87 (talk) 11:48, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kesha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Verse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gucci Gucci may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:54, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	N/a
	Hey, I'd like to follow you on Twitter if you have it so we can comm better. Also RedOne dm'd me and said that Livin A Sin (Not Living In Sin or Livin' In Sin) will be on the album. DirtyLittleMonster (talk) 12:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Woman's World (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Demo, Closer to the Truth and Cher discography

Katy Perry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pop song

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lana Del Rey may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• recorded the cover of "[[Blue Velvet (song)#Lana Del Rey version|Blue Velvet]]" for [[H&M]], [[[filmmaker]] [[David Lynch]], who was the inspiration behind the song's video, positively

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:06, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to American Girl (Bonnie McKee song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• girls settle in for a pool day, complete with plastic water toys and tons of skimpy bikini action.}<ref name=mtvid/> Comparisons were drawn between the video for "American Girl" and "[[Teenage Dream

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You know it's true that Cher's "Woman's World" debuted at 25 on Bubbling Under Hot 100 Singles. Please don't revert my edit. It is true and you cannot revert it. --69.142.253.153 (talk) 22:35, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Deneuve15 (talk) 15:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crazy Kids, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Riff Raff (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in the page of billboard.com dont even update the charts for this week, but in twitter they said that in this week is in 41, and i dont know why you chang the position of UK, in the offical page it said that is 27. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablogarciadaz (talk • contribs) 01:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC) You can see in the hot 100 of billboard.com, crazy kids is #41 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pablogarciadaz (talk • contribs) 16:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]