User talk:Tzahy

Hello Tzahy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. If you're already loving Wikipedia and plan on becoming a Wikipedian you might consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor, just paste {{Adoptme}} into your userpage. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You might also consider joining a WikiProject so as to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Smeelgova 10:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Frequently asked questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Yours, Smeelgova 10:12, 5 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The first thing that jumps out is the layout. You should have a short lead (WP:LEAD) that summmarizes the article and then the rest should be broken into a section or two. I would add wikilinks to several terms such as Policy analysis, Social movement. Should isreali be capitalized. Click on the links in the wikification tag at the top and that should give you more help. You may want to add a see also section. Bounce around wikipedia and look at other articles, especially those in categories your article is in. TonyTheTiger 19:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks Tony, now I understand and we'll do so. Tzahy 06:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Thank you for your successful efforts in improving the content and character of Wikipedia. Keep up the great work! Ecoleetage (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks, you welcome Tzahy (talk) 08:48, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I added the notability tag because as the article exists right now I do not not believe that you have provided enough reliable, and independent of subject, sources. For example Haaretz (good) personal blog (not always bad, but not always good - Eli Eshed). I think that adding a few more news/scholarly/peer sources will solidify her general notability. I found a link that you could maybe fit into the article. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=PJoeAAAAIBAJ&sjid=Qs0EAAAAIBAJ&pg=3701,4202315&dq Orasis (talk) 03:52, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Emanuel tov.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:49, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i moved it commons and tagged it properly. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Amir, Thanks Tzahy (talk) 06:23, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:David witzthum.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I note that on 23 May 2009, you corrected the names of six recipients of the Israel Prize (in the lists according to year). As you may have noticed from the History of the site, I have been occupied recently towards expanding the details of the site to include ultimately the names of all recipients. As to the name changes made by you, I agree with your spelling of five of the names. As to the sixth, I have reverted the spelling (from Michel Confino) to Michael Confino, which I believe is the correct spelling in English, as a general Internet search will reveal, and is the name under which his books are published. I have also amended the other five names in the alphabetical list of names, in accordance with your spelling. Based upon your experience in Hebrew Wikipedia, I look forward to your adding Wikipedia articles in English for many of the recipients who currently do not an article of their own.Davshul (talk) 19:30, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Davshul, it's the right spelling. Tzahy (talk) 02:41, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The list of Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities members isn't updated, if you want to revise it you are welcome. The full list is in the academia site Tzahy (talk) 02:53, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding external links to the Jewish Women's Archive. I've opened up a discussion regarding the merits of these links at the external links noticeboard. You're welcome to discuss the links there. ThemFromSpace 22:36, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I answered there. Tzahy (talk) 22:44, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going ahead with the cleanup of the spammed links. --Ronz (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tzahy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 178 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Tamar Fish Nachshon - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know much about this debate? It has become a hot issue at the Jesus article and the Yeshu article, where a couple of editors insist Yeshu=Jesus. It is my impression there is actually some real debate about this, but I am not expert. Can you speak to this in a well-informed way ... or do you know other editors who could? Slrubenstein | Talk 23:30, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joseph Sadan has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —mc10 (t/c) 22:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, I just upload it, and didn't have time. Tzahy (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Moshik Roth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:30, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Moshik Roth, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Tzahy (talk) 14:39, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Moshik Roth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not clear if it is about the person or about his restaurants. In either case, adequate establishment of WP:NOTABILITY is required which must meet our criteria for WP:BLP (living persons) or WP:ORG for companies.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:02, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, as a fellow administrator in the Hebrew wikipedia I was surprised to see the speedy deletion on this article. As I am not so familiar with the English wikipedia could you please explain the reason for the speedy deletion mark. Thank you and a happy Sukkot! --Yoavd (talk) 14:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The page has several issues. Firstly, it's not clear if it is about the person or about his restaurants. In either case, we're very strict here on requiring adequate establishment of WP:NOTABILITY which must meet our criteria for WP:BLP (living persons) or WP:ORG for companies. Both must meet general notability at WP:GNG The fact that he got 32 Mitchelin stars may mean that he is notable, but it must be asserted by sufficient press coverage in WP:RELIABLE SOURCES. If you can meet these criteria, it would be fine,, so I have removed the CSD and convert ited to a PROD. That will give you 7 days to find reliable sources. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

יואב מחוץ לחשבון — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.181.200.64 (talk) 18:40, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, All the information and more based on the references in the entry, I added enough press articles. Tzahy (talk) 18:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources, not covered in any selective major databases. does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 20:42, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I answered there. Tzahy (talk) 21:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Crusio (talk) 03:48, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yael Tal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alena Yiv, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaily Lipa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks; I think I connected the right links. Tzahy (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hen Yanni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Israeli, Kenneth Cole, V Magazine and David Sims

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Yanki Margalit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Israeli, Singularity, Speaker and Hardware

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Tsion Avital

added links pointing to Israeli, Guggenheim Museum, Abstract and Noetic

God and Elvira

added a link pointing to Spiritual

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Art versus Non art : Art out of Mind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Art versus Non art : Art out of Mind until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:56, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article God and Elvira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/God and Elvira until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 22:59, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited God and Elvira, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spiritual love. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Meron benvenisti.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [email protected], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [email protected].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 10:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Michael Karayanni, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dean. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Yossi Atia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Occupation. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zvi Eckstein, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Consumption and Pennsylvania University. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Wallach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Liad Shoham, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thriller, Nrg and Bestsellers. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Hackmey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamps. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Benjamin Z. Kedar

added links pointing to Frankish, Venetian, Genoese, Latin Europe and European

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zemingo Group, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages HP, Startups and Gulfstream. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Tzahy (talk) 17:08, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nino Herman, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages IDF, Nrg and Alijah. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, done ! Tzahy (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nino Herman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sigal Avin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We use the term film not movie on WP. And not every sentence needs a paragraph too. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 18:23, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Tzahy (talk) 18:24, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tzahy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:17, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would be willing to restore it to draft space to allow you to continue to work on it and submit it through Articles for Creation, but I believe it met the criteria for deletion in the mainspace. If you find that unsatisfactory, you may use Deletion review. 331dot (talk) 13:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

By the way as a matter of policy I discuss all Wikipedia related matters here on Wikipedia, unless they involve sensitive personal information. 331dot (talk) 13:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear 331dot, I will be grateful. Tzahy (talk) 13:57, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is now at Draft:BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics with a submission template when it is ready. 331dot (talk) 14:02, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 331dot, Tzahy (talk) 14:05, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tzahy! Just to let you know, it seems that you commented on Talk:Ilan Amit when you meant to comment on the articles for deletion discussion page (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ilan Amit). Kyuko (talk) 18:43, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kyuko, thank you. 18:58, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User: Tzahy, This will acknowledge that I got your e-mail. Draft:BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics, the article looks thick, deep and highly technical; it is in an area where I have little, if any, expertise or command of the subject matter. Getting involved will take a major commitment of time and brain, and that is something that I can't spare for awhile. I am busy in real life. I apologize, but I just can't handle it for at least a month. So I suggest you try elsewhere. Best regards. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:42, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 7&6=thirteen . Tzahy (talk) 22:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

still too promotional in the following respects:

(1) Lack of clarity about what the company does . It would appear to a reader who has no familiarity with the industry , that the company invented the product. --the 10K is clearer, it says that "The Company, through BCT, holds rights to commercialize certain stem cell technology developed by Ramot of Tel Aviv University Ltd.. "  

(2) overeemphasis of changes of corporate staff, which are not of encyclopedic significance (the ceo is, but not others unless a really major company) (3)statements about therapeutic usefulness not documented in the refs. e.g, autism. (4). Like all the news articles, failure to give the actual results from the trials, which fo the key trial in JAMA-N, that the 70% who responded still had functional decline, but only 3/4 as fast, which, as the article says , is at the borderline of possible clinical significance. (5)it's curious that when the results of the trial were announced, the stock went down. Competent investors in this field know how to read scientific articles. (6) They also know how to read financial statements, and know that tho the prose will be as optimistic as possible, all possible negative factors must be said. The last 10K talked extensively about the competition, & the facto that because of the Orphan designation, only one firm can succeed.

I suggest you wait until the forthcoming 10K.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BrainStorm Cell Therapeutics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 07:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 07:15, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you DGG. Tzahy (talk) 07:44, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I should mention, that dealing with articles on biotech firms who do not yet have a commercial product is quite difficult, and there are few established standards, because most sources are subject to objections under WP:NCORP. And another part of the problem is that lay sources are not reliable for biomedicine, but fortunately you do have one very good source. BTW, check the article-- I modified the explanation I gave. And altho I suggested waiting a few months, there's enough for a viable article. DGG ( talk ) 19:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DGG. Tzahy (talk) 19:11, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.penguinrandomhouse.ca/books/222614/jewish-soul-food-by-janna-gur/9780805243086, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:59, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Diannaa, thank you for noticing and erased my wrongdid. Before I create an entry, I used to edit and save version after version in my computer on a word file - version 1, version 2... version 20... etc. I was probably tired and haven't noticed that I upload an older version, sorry. 16:00, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Journal-Gazette: yes, okay, although that's not so much about him specifically as it is "what it's like to live in wartorn Israel".

Times of Israel: that's an excerpt from his book. It's not about him. Yes, there's a capsule bio... and who wrote that? From the way it describes Mr. Greenberg's immediate family, I think we can safely conclude that Mr. Greenberg wrote it himself.

IndieReview: that's an interview. Interviews are good for facts but terrible for notability.

Ha'aretz: not about Mr. Greenberg. It mentions him. "44, a Texas native who immigrated to Israel in 1990", "independent marketing consultant who lives in the central city of Kadima", "spent four years writing his novel and didn't want to wait", and then moves on to the Kindle store and free downloads and other authors and e-publishing in general.

SDJW: not about Mr. Greenberg, it's about his book.

So: five sources, of which four are not useful and the fifth is... maybe sort of halfway useful.

Plus, all those awards... I'm willing to be convinced that the awards bestowed by BookMarketingProfits, by BeverlyHillsBookAwards (sponsored by "Smarketing"), and by ReadersFavorite ("It’s a fact. Awards grant instant credibility and influence book sellers and buyers alike!") are anything more than marketing gimmicks and shams, but it'll take a lot of convincing. DS (talk) 18:28, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DS, thank you for you thorough examination and answer, but I think altogether there are five good reliable sources that established notability: if they think his books are notable enough to write about and deem him notable to conduct an interviews so he's important, why is a man of letters important if not due to his literary volume ? Tzahy (talk) 18:39, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not how it works. Having published a notable work does not make an author notable, and being by a notable author does not make a notable work. There may be five good reliable sources that establish notabiltiy for Mr. Greenberg, but you supplied none of them. And never confuse "notable" with "important". I would further point out that the Journal-Gazette piece isn't about Mr Greenberg's book, and neither is the Ha'aretz piece. IndieReview seems to be pretty much a group promotional effort. DS (talk) 00:08, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DS, can you restore the entry and put a template of notabilty above it and let a broader forum of editors to decide ? Tzahy (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. If anyone restores that page, I will immediately put it up for a full deletion debate, after which there will be a public record remaining of the discussion of why the author does not meet notability criteria and why his awards are all fake. Are you sure this is what you want? DS (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Landau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:34, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		Mary Wollstonecraft Award
		On behalf of WP:WPWW, thank you for creating the recent new article on Dana Amir, Israeli professor, clinical psychologist, psychoanalyst, poetess and literature researcher, who is a recipient of the Adler National Poetry Prize (1993), The Prime-Minister National Prize for Hebrew Literature (2012), and the Nathan Alterman poetry prize (2013). --Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much dear Rosiestep. Tzahy (talk) 17:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

We don't normally link them unless there is something clearly relevant in the linked date - there used to be terrible edit wars over this. Doug Weller talk 17:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Doug Weller. Tzahy (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

David Wallach

added a link pointing to Rector

Guy Stroumsa

added a link pointing to Trinity College

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article INX (company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability not established, no reliable sources are cited. CoinDesk is not citable. The only reliable source is Jerusalem Post, which doesn't cover the subject in-depth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ysangkok (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ysangkok, INX got full-length articles several times in Globes and Calcalist - two of the three main Israeli economic newspapers, they are far more serious than the Jerusalem Post; I removed the tag accordingly. Tzahy (talk) 04:54, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CallUp logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article INX (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/INX (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ysangkok (talk) 06:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dorit Rabinyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestinian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tzahy

I am not quite sure what you meant here "how do you know that"? Do you mean whether full professors are notable or not? This is written in WP:NPROF, the only reason somebody would be eligible just based on the position is WP:NPROF#5 "The person has held a named chair appointment or distinguished professor appointment at a major institution of higher education and research, or an equivalent position in countries where named chairs are uncommon." so this means (i) major institution and (ii) named prof and (iii) full professor which would make them automatically notable. Now Eli Barkai is simply not automatically notable by his position, but he is notable due to the work he has done. Does that answer your question? --hroest 16:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear hroest, thank you for you thorough explanation. Tzahy (talk) 17:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy,

Thank you for creating Clawee.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This page needs a fresh presentation of this product.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Whiteguru, could you please specify what exactly do you want me to improve ? Tzahy (talk) 12:08, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional independent, reliable sources are needed. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:19, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Whiteguru. Tzahy (talk) 16:14, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy

Thank you for creating Hadar Gad.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

What are great article and stellar artist. Astounding.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creepTalk 11:24, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

Thanks for uploading File:Perimeter 81 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DriveNets, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PICKLEDICAE🥒 18:46, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy,

I have untagged this article but knowing the page tagger, this will likely be sent to WP:AFD. I think you need to be sure that there is no promotional language in the article so that it doesn't seem like a company's annual report, bragging on their accomplishments. If there is criticism of this company, be sure to include it. Good luck. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Thank you very much Liz, I'm familiar with the guidelines and wrote it after thorough reading and rewrite it meticulously many times before I upload it to Wikipedia. I reckon it's merit an entry according to GNG and don't think it's promotional, but others can disagree with me; however anyone is more than welcome to edit the entry. Tzahy (talk) 23:27, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Inspira Technologies, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:32, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Inspira Technologies, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Article needs significant work. Notable but references including listing of company formation documentation does prove the company is notable. scope_creep^Talk 07:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you scope creep. Tzahy (talk) 16:08, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Inspira logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on CredAvenue requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 13:28, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy. Thank you for your work on Sofwave Medical. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy,

Thank you for creating Ya’ara Keydar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The page reads as an extensive resume and notability of its subject is questioned per WP:NACADEMIC notability criteria. It appears the main point of recognition in news coverage is Vanity Fair's selection of an exhibition the subject curated as "one of the 15 exhibitions in the world not to be missed in 2018" according to a single fashion editor, which in and of itself is not sufficient criterion for notability. Sources are mostly routine coverage that do not appear to substantiate the subject's influence beyond a career similar to that of thousands curators worldwide.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ppt91}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ppt91 (talk) 19:13, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ppt91, please read the sources closer and meticulously, she is less academic, and shouldn't be judge as one, she is a curator. The curator's main creations' are the exhibitions he creates. 1) Keydar's exhibitions got dozens of deep-full coverage from major media outlets (I brought a handful of them, especially in English, there are a lot more, in many languages). 2) The exhibitions are presented in established museums and galleries. 3) All the facts are based on sources, I added them in the footnotes. 4) She wrote 5 exhibition books, one biography book, and two academic articles. Tzahy (talk) 19:34, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tzahy Thanks for your reply. I know it might be disappointing given the amount of work you have put into the article, but unfortunately this is not enough to pass WP:NACADEMIC and WP:BIO criteria. Note directions from WP:NACADEMIC: "Having published work does not, in itself, make an academic notable, no matter how many publications there are. Notability depends on the impact the work has had on the field of study."

There are hundreds of exhibitions on view across the U.S. and thousands more across the world curated by career curators working at reputable institutions who do not meet notability criteria. Critical reviews are expected and are not sufficient to justify an article for a singular curator. Otherwise, we'd need to have a page for every established curator at major institutions, which is not feasible, just like it is not feasible to have a professor page for every faculty member with a published book that was later reviewed.

Unless the specific impact and notability of this subject can be proven and explained with reliable sources, it might be a candidate for deletion. I hope this clarifies things. Let me know if you have any more questions. Ppt91 (talk) 19:43, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ppt91, Keydar is not an academic and shouldn't be judge as one, she is a curator and should be judge as such. You didn't dedicated to this entry sufficient time, I suggest you will do that. Each one of the exhibitions she curated got an extensive-deep-multiple coverage by major media outlets: The New York Times, Haaretz, Jerusalem Post Vogue, Vogue Italia, The Hollywood Reporter etc. Keydar change completely the attitude to fashion in Israel and her exhibitions attracted hundred of thousands of visitors (everything sourced). 19:52, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

@Tzahy Again, if you believe that the subject is notable, then it needs to be made evident in the article and sources need to reliably confirm those claims rather than just describe her exhibitions. As of now, it reads more like an extensive resume that could be easily written for a lot of other career curators (I can think of plenty myself). Perhaps it's a matter of cleaning up content or adding more verification of her important role in promoting Israeli fashion history. Overall, curator pages are not very well developed on Wikipedia and many have questionable notability imho, but here are two examples Andrew Bolton (curator) and Ariella Azoulay to illustrate their respective impact in the field. I am also tagging Mccapra if you would like a second opinion from another reviewer. Ppt91 (talk) 20:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ppt91, each entry could be written in million different legitimate ways, I can abridge it, no problem, and write it in many different ways, but I believe I wrote it properly. I know my stuff and have a vast knowledge of art and Israeli art. I think you didn't read the entry adequately and didn't read the articles sufficiently and I suggest you will do that. The entry speaks for itself and it's shoring up by multiple sources. It's crystal clear undoubtedly. Tzahy (talk) 20:18, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tzahy There is no need to be combative. I never questioned your knowledge. My goal and responsibility are to ensure high quality of articles that fit into specific criteria rather than prove anyone wrong. That said, I see from your talk page that you often contest opinions of reviewers regarding notability, so I've asked another editor for second opinion. Ppt91 (talk) 20:37, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ppt91, if you will read the articles on which the entry is based, you will understand the notability, I'm sure of that, please do that! Tzahy (talk) 20:50, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for tagging me. I agree with Ppt91’s assessment. The notability of the subject is not clearly established and there is a lack of in-depth coverage in the best sources you cite. The ToI article doesn’t even mention her. The Hollywood Reporter piece is a passing mention and clearly shows that the inspiration and creative work behind the exhibition was done by someone else. The Vogue Italia piece quotes Keydar but provides no depth about her. I’m not really seeing anything here to distinguish her for many other early-career curators. Mccapra (talk) 21:11, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Almost all the articles are about exhibitions she curated, they are her own creation, so they are actually about her (when there is a review of an art exhibition it's discussing the exhibition, and it's the same, when there is a review of this kind of curator that created her exhibitions from scratch, she initiated them, she invented them, they wouldn't exist without her, because they are theme exhibitions and not contemporary art exhibitions. Keydar change completely the fashion exhibitions in Israel, it was a neglected zone, and her exhibitions attracted hundreds of thousands of people and were exhibited in public museums and renowned galleries. Tzahy (talk) 21:14, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can see also this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this, and this. Tzahy (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mccapra thank you. I've moved it to draftspace. Would you kindly remove redirect to ensure the editor is given sufficient time to rewrite and establish verifiable notability before submitting for article review? Ppt91 (talk) 02:20, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Ya’ara Keydar. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and Page is moved to draftspace to provide the author with more time to establish notability using verifiable sources per discussion on the editor's talk page as it currently does not satisfy WP:BIO criteria. . Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ppt91 (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, dear Ppt91, I apologize if I hurt you. Tzahy (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Tzahy! Just a quick thank you for the note you sent. I appreciate your taking the time to explain the situation. I know you have made a lot of valuable contributions to enwiki and am fully aware of how taxing the entire process can be, especially in case of BLP subjects. Please always feel free to reach out if and when I can be of help! Sending my best wishes. Ppt91^talk 19:26, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ppt91, I'm ashamed for being so blunt previously. Tzahy (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tzahy Please don't be! And I hope my comments were not misconstrued as personal at any point. Ppt91^talk 19:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ppt91, I'll get over it, thanks; I appreciate your opinion and professionality. Tzahy (talk) 20:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inspira Technologies, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tzahy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Inspira Technologies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:10, 6 June 2023 (UTC) Dear Liz, thank you for noticing me. Tzahy (talk) 11:46, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tzahy. I am the declared COI editor for Nefesh B'Nefesh and realized your interest in editing Israel and Jewish-related content on Wikipedia. I recently posted a draft of an article for Rabbi Yehoshua Fass, the founder of Nefesh B'Nefesh, and was hoping you would consider publishing this draft in mainspace. In 2021, a discussion about a previous draft resulted in a redirect, but this new draft includes significant changes and expanded coverage about Rabbi Fass which now justify an independent article. I'd be grateful for your assistance and input. Thank you LA for NBN (talk) 06:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear LA for NBN, thanks for reaching out, I am unfamiliar with the subject, and I'm quite busy at the moment, sorry for letting you down. Tzahy (talk) 13:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]