User talk:Visor

Please leave a new message.

Archives

Archive 1 (Aug 2005—Oct 2007)

The article that you made regarding the Academy of Learning is really confusing. I have a feeling that it has some meaning that should be in Wikipedia, but it should be expanded and clarified and have some notations/citations. --Pmedema (talk) 22:06, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up conducted - removed clarification tag. Thanks --Pmedema (talk) 22:23, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Visor! Specifying thumb sizes is discouraged. Take a look at: Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Images. The good news is that you can set your preferences to make them smaller :) -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 21:54, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've heard that a few people have the images over the Notes column. But a majority of people don't seem to have a problem, and the MOS guideline says if you *do* have a problem you can set your preferences. I know W-Z had the sizes when it got FL, but [1] and [2], FL'd *without* sizes. T-V FL'd *with* sizes, though those were set at 200px.

As a compromise, what if we switched the References and the Notes columns? That way if a column gets hidden, it's the mostly empty Notes column rather than the much more important Ref. column? -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 22:45, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We *could* leave it alone, but at the moment it's the only one of the lists that has the images with set sizes. And I've been spending a *lot* of time on these lists trying to a) expand them and b) standardize them. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:11, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh - I'm glad that worked! Thanks for letting me know! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 23:34, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Official Wielkopolska site. In the reference is en axcerpt from the book by Zakrzewski Wspominam Poznań about the pranks in Berger Gymnasium which only an insider could know. See also [3]. Will do? greg park avenue (talk) 22:44, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that: I deleted it automatically when you requested the article page to be deleted. Do you want the actual text, or the entire page itself restored? Acalamari 22:05, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, you didn't request the talk page to be deleted: I deleted it automatically, thinking you were going to want it deleted. The talk page has been restored now. :) Acalamari 22:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) Acalamari 23:26, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Polish Barnstar of National Merit, 2nd Class
		I, Tymek (talk) 04:47, 17 January 2008 (UTC), am awarding you this Polish Barnstar in appreciation of your good work on topics related with our fatherland. thumbs up and keep up your good job![reply]

Yes, congratulations. Fatherlands are important. Fatherlands are like health. Dr. Dan (talk) 15:24, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry Dr Dan, you will also get a nice Barnstar one sunny day. Just be productive, not disruptive. Sudie. Tymek (talk) 03:01, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but keep close tabs on something upload my images, you will than my upload images was deleted on my request and please: No meddle in my userpages. Your conduct IMO was stupidility. And I'm reverted your edition. I'm sorry, but I'm not interesing strife with your. This is wikipedia, it'isn't place on strife. Greets. Alden(Sharon boyfriend) or talk 07:53, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Przy okazji moim ojczystym językiem też jest polski, więc jeśli mogę prosić, to mógłbyś pisać po polsku? Kasia a.k.a KatLos 07:55, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot be awarded for something you haven't done. Should I explain that for you? :) Even if your screenshots wouldn't be deleted... Are five typical game screenshots worth the award? I'm removing this barnstar per WP:BARNSTAR & WP:BOLD. If you still disagree and think you really should have barnstar received from your gf (according to your sign) for 5 typical game screenshots, now deleted per your req, start discussion at WP:DR. Thanks. Visor (talk) 12:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No właśnie tę gwiazdkę dostałem za "stare skasowane screeny". Dlatego prosze Cie, albo usuń user:Alden Jones/stars, albo zrewertuj swoje edycje. Proszę o 3 dniową blokadę za to, co mówie teraz. Alden(Sharon boyfriend) or talk 16:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar za screeny z gry komputerowej? Litości... Wrzuć na stronę User:Alden Jones/stars szablon {{db-author}}. Blokadę? A dlaczego? Visor (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jak Boga kocham - nieporozumienie. Teraz kwestia 3 dniowej blokady. Otóż od niedawna udzielam się na polskiej wikipedii, i chcę aby napadł mnie tam wikipediholizm, no ale bez przesady:-), no i też za to, że moje wypowiedzi w Twojej dyskusji mogły ocierać się o trolling. Przy okazji - co to za zwyczaje kopiowania mojego pytania i Twoje odpowiedzi na moje pytania. Pozdrawiam serdecznie:] Alden(Sharon boyfriend) or talk 17:01, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heheh no co Ty, bez przesady. Raz że nie mam uprawnień do blokady, dwa nie mam powodu żeby takie coś zastosować wobec Ciebie. A jeśli chodzi o kopiowanie dyskusji, to jest mój osobisty zwyczaj. Dzięki temu łatwiej ogarnąć całą dyskusję. Pozdrawiam ciepło. Visor (talk) 17:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Przynajmniej wiem dlaczego. No a wracając do tematu - może i dobrze, nie wpadnę w wikipedioholizm na polskiej wiki. Niestety chwilowo mam masę obowiązków:praca zawodowa+studia(studiuje 1 rok informatyki), ponadto drobne problemy osobiste. Przy okazji jesteś w posiadaniu komunikatora internetowego? Alden(Sharon boyfriend) or talk 17:30, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GG: 1515245, Jabber: visor AT jabber.org; też jestem ostatnimi czasy zajęty ;) Visor (talk) 17:34, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Niestety takie są czasy, dla studenta styczeń to horror, tym bardziej że jestem jeszcze z tym nieoswojony, dopiero 1 rok informatyki. Ja tylko posiadam gg:5059222. Powinienem na nim być po 19.30(siedzę sobie na dwóch IRC-ach):-). Pozdrawiam Alden(Sharon boyfriend) or talk 17:44, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your input would be appreciated. Is the horse notable or not? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:36, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I thought that the point about Crowley was covered by the "see also" and the To Mega Therion article, but it's not really. My bad. --Bobyllib —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobyllib (talk • contribs) 22:53, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Visor, I have granted rollback rights to your account. The reason for this is that, after a review of some of your contributions, I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of reverting vandalism: I do not believe you will abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck. Acalamari 23:40, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! :) Acalamari 17:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. If you ever want it back, just let me or another admin know. Acalamari 23:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing a quick clean up of Polish companies. I think the following don't establish their notability: Herbalux, Ran Guitars, Ravel (clothing company). What do you think? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 05:57, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I started an article (one in a series under construction) about 10 minutes ago and already you and another have tagged, retagged, edited, deleted etc about 5 times! Pl check what is going on before wading in - thanks. Sarah777 (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 23:06, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Visor. How are you? I am Masterpiece2000. I have noticed that you have made contributions to Polish novelists. Please look at the biography of Bolesław Prus. It will really help if you can make some contributions. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 09:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions! Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Visor. Thank you for your contributions to List of Polish novelists. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 03:19, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ach witaj. Moim zdaniem obserwując nowych (znalazłam to na twojej podstronie użytkownika user:Visor/Watches, odbierasz im motywację. Czy czułbyś się komfortowo, gdybyś był stale obserwowany i śledzony? Ta wikipedia angielska jest coraz gorsza.. Kasia a.k.a KatLos 11:40, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nie, nie chodziło mi o to. Patrząc na Twoją listę widziałam, też nie tylko siebie i Aldena, ale innych użytkowników i w ich obronie stanęłam. Myślę, że nowicjusz który jest obserwowany i rewertowany powinien znać powód rewertu (albo reverta, nigdy nie mogłam znaleźć skutecznej odmiany:), trzeba wyjaśniać, co było źle i dlaczego zostało zrevertowane, bowiem to bardzo pomaga w pracy z nowicjuszami. No i pewnie myślisz, że mam jakieś dziwne pomysły, że 2 krotnie chce skasowania swojej strony, a potem ją odtwarzam.. Teraz stwierdziłam, że będę tylko trzymać to co potrzebne. A i jak mam zrobić coś na wzór Twojego {{user Visor/menu}} z tą różnicą że to ma być {{user KatLos/menu}}. Pzdr Kasia a.k.a KatLos 20:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for completing my edit in Kordian Józef Zamorski. // Dzięki za uzupełnienie mojej edycji w haśle o Kordianie Zamorskim. --CiaPan (talk) 09:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the trainings suit looks realy like this on the picture —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.95.142.179 (talk) 12:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I want to know what is wrong about the section hall of fame, the artivles about the achievements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.201.55.6 (talk) 17:41, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Sportvereinigung_(SV)_Dynamo#Dynamo-Hall_of_fame section should be better organized to became more readable. I suggest to clean up this section by one of the following way:

• Use bulleted list (*); see Wikipedia:Lists#Bulleted_lists
• Create a separate category and categorize these people; see Wikipedia:Categorization
• Create separate article as a list

If you still need some help, feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Greets. Visor (talk) 10:44, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK; but I'll need much of time for this. This is so much about it, than I can't edite it in one day. Why you don't edite this:* Use bulleted list (*); see Wikipedia:Lists#Bulleted_lists

• Create a separate category and categorize these people; see Wikipedia:Categorization
• Create separate article as a list? I'll try it, but is so much for one editor on Wiki. Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.95.142.179 (talk) 12:31, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Na mojej stronie prowadzicie z Kuminalem wojnę edycyjną. Zacznijmy więc od Twojej zmiany z 11 marca 2008 godziny 21:36. Potem edycja Kuminala i potem znowu Twoja edycja. Chcę rozstrzygnąć ten editwar między Wami, po pierwsze dlatego, że tworzymy tu jedną społeczność, a po drugie, dlatego że uważam, że ja mam największe prawo do decydowania o swojej stronie. Chcę znać powód Twoich rewertów Kuminala (co w nich było złe itd.). Z poważaniem Alden or talk with Alden 11:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Czyli de-facto wynika jasno z tego, że to Ty miałeś racje. Ja na technice się nie znam i się za pewne sprawy nie zabieram. Jednak dość dziwne wydaje mi się zachowanie Kuminala. W każdym razie dzięki za odpowiedź. Alden or talk with Alden 12:07, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I or another editor were to nominate you for adminship, would you accept or reject the nomination? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For this moment, I'm not ready to be a WP administrator. Firstly, I haven't got enough time to work as admin and secondly, I have lot of things to do as user. My English language skill is not advanced and still make many mistakes. Thanks anyway for such question, maybe I will think about that someday. ;) Visor (talk) 19:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and closed the AfD for procedural reasons--in case he recreates it again, it'll be speedied per CSD G4 (recreation of deleted material) and probably salted as well. Blueboy96 21:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I noticed you've removed the links that I added to the Quake 3 page. Do you mind explaining why? As I noted in the comments, the way I added the links was to make them the same as the ones on the Doom page. So how can it be ok to have them that way on the Doom page but not on the Quake 3 page? Thanks.Ben 2082 (talk) 21:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that Doom IS a featured article, I said it has been a featured article. Also about the headings- the Doom article has them and no-one has a problem with it. Also the links I want to add to the Quake 3 article are identical in nature to those in the Doom article- again, no-one has a problem with those being there, and they've been there for months if not years. That link about wikipedia links you gave me says that wikipedia shouldn't include links that aren't relevant- but these are. If you look in Wikipedia:External links it gives the following information about what to use as a link:

"3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues, amount of detail (such as professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks) or other reasons."

The sites that I linked to fall into this category because they provid comprehensive information about fan-created content for Quake 3 that obviously you couldn't fit in the article, but it's still neutral and accurate material. Thanks for your time. Ben 2082 (talk) 22:12, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So do you think many of the links in the Doom page should be removed? Also when you say "Links given by you provides information about fan-created content for game, but has no encyclopedic value, in opposite to "professional athlete statistics, movie or television credits, interview transcripts, or online textbooks" "- why are those things encyclopedic whereas information about fan-created content isn't? Ben 2082 (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see you've removed the Planetquake page, as suggested in that article you mentioned. But why havn't you removed the Mobygames page, too? That falls under the following category:

"The video game's page at 1up, GameSpot, IGN, GameSpy and other commercial video game news and reviews sites - Such links can be seen as promotion of the associated commercial sites."

Quake3world probably should go, too because it falls under the following:

"Forums, even if official forums provided by the developer/publisher of the game - Again, these are self-published forums and are not appropriate"

I'm guessing that Open Directory project thing is supposed to be an extensive list of links but it's missing a lot. It's a pity there isn't some kind of "wiki-link" or something, where people can put in useful links for stuff, then you could just have a link to that from the main wikipedia page for something. I just mean so that people can find good websites easily. Ben 2082 (talk) 12:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ok, jak pozmieniac te rzeczy aby link nie zniknął. No i jaki ton jest zły? Kantata666 (talk) 15:24, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jedno jedyne źródło - wydaje sie na podstawie książki o absolwentach liceum. Z życia nie widze nic 'ency' :> AfD? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:06, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out with the band and Adam Nowak articles. I found out yesterday that nobody had created articles on them, and Raz Dwa Trzy are one of my favorites. Do you know them? Tymek (talk) 01:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Piosenki Agnieszki Osieckiej w ich wykonaniu sa super, bardzo tez lubie plyte Sufit. Polecam. Tymek (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bardzo dziekuje za wyczerpujaca odpowiedz :) Ok, przeczytam sobie wszystko i postaram sie jak najszybciej naniesc zmiany, ewentualnie czy mogą byc odnosniki do stron: animadamnata.com, http://www.myspace.com/animadamnata czy www.metal-archives.com/band.php?id=10558 Kantata666 (talk) 09:59, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, to jak mam to teraz zrobić? MySpace jest oficjalna i zrobiona przez członków zespołu Kantata666 (talk) 08:05, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki. Właśnie zauważyłam ze artykul jest dodady do mozliwego usunięcia. Jak wstawic te referencje co? Ton juz poprawilam przeciez a tu nic nie znika :) Pozdrawiam Kantata666 (talk) 07:52, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jeszcze mam pytanie w sprawie cytatów, nie wiem czy oni w ogole mają jakies wywiady po angielsku, same po polsku, moga byc? :)

Tutaj jest kilka rewievs: http://www.metalreview.com/1190/Anima-Damnata-Agonizing-Journey-Through-The-Burning-Universe-and-Transcendental-Ritual-of-Transfiguration.aspx

http://www.burningmisery.com/modules.php?name=Reviews&rop=showcontent&id=43 http://www.burningmisery.com/modules.php?name=Reviews&rop=showcontent&id=852 http://www.burningmisery.com/modules.php?name=Reviews&rop=showcontent&id=44

link do opisu zespołu: http://www.burningmisery.com/modules.php?name=topMusic&op=artist&idartist=14

pozdrawiam Kantata666 (talk) 08:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its tone or style may not be appropriate for Wikipedia. Tagged since March 2008." -- ton juz zostal zmieniony, d;laczego to nie znika? :) Kantata666 (talk) 13:52, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppse sorry, I missed that when I was reviewing the changes, and I had just not done it on his own page... har hum --Nate1481(^t/_c) 13:19, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to your comments to my edit, you're welcome. I did Capoeira for about two months at Carnegie Mellon University and I've signed up for a school here in Philadelphia. ^_^ I'm still learning, but aren't we all? -Fuzzy (talk) 03:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Come on whats is wrong with this explanation on mebuy.pl.... i think i havent done anything wrong.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tintin72 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Blox. What do you think? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:25, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Check this out: Proteus OX19. Came out when I looked at Category:Polish resistance during World War II.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:48, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Filip Skutela.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:51, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prod or straight AfD. A test by fire seems needed :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:38, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have not written there were albums released to public, I have even mentioned there are not public. As this is my first article (and beginning at wikipedia) I'd like also to ask how can I improve my articles' credibity? There's lot of knowledge where just can't type something in Google, but have to know of specific lives of people involved in many no specially loud-medial ventures. Just send a word and I'll do my best to share other entries to Wikipedia better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TomaszMilczewski (talk • contribs) 09:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I say try AfD on him, yes.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 23:53, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

We conversed a while ago about the Quake 3 article, and you seem like a pretty fair editor when it comes to wikipedia. I'm trying to edit the Final Doom article, but this guy keeps coming along and screwing around with it, deleting stuff that shouldn't be deleted- basically some stuff in the Trivia sections that is noteable, and should clearly be in there. Any chance you could take a look at it? Thanks.Ben 2082 (talk) 11:43, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games Newsletter

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter Volume I, No. 1 - April 9, 2008 Archive After To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list. Project at a Glance As of 2008-04-07, the project has: 82 Featured articles 10 Featured Lists 7 Featured Topics 1 article in Featured Article Review 184 Good Articles 15 articles for Peer review 3 articles for Assessment Featured Articles, Lists, and Topics Candidates and Reviews Featured Article Candidates Guitar Hero Featured List Candidates List of songs in Guitar Hero II Featured Topic Candidates None Featured Review Final Fantasy VII (FA) Changes to Featured and Good articles, lists, and topics in March Promoted FA: Final Fantasy XI, Super Smash Bros. Melee, Defense of the Ancients, List of Halo media, Giants: Citizen Kabuto, Grim Fandango, Spyro: Year of the Dragon, List of songs in Guitar Hero Demoted FA: Metal Gear Solid Topic: Castlevania: Aria of Sorrow Promoted GA: Grim Fandango, Rise of Nations: Thrones and Patriots, Super Smash Bros. Brawl, Metroid series, SimCity series, Characters of Halo Demoted GA: Final Fantasy III, Star Fox 64, Star Fox Adventures News Current proposals and discussions Well, gee, thanks 1up! 1UP.com has recently changed their rating scale. A list of affected articles can be found here. See discussion for details. Inactive project cleanup Proposal to consolidate inactive projects and taskforces. Project page can be found here. Feature The Importance of the Lead The lead is one of the most important parts of any Wikipedia article; its job to summarize the article in 2 to 3 paragraphs in order to familiarize the reader with the structure of the content that you will providing them as well as to give a quick one-minute overview of the topic. Many articles that are processed through Good Article or Featured Article assessments will be heavily scrutinized for a poor lead section. For articles dealing with video games, a common practice has developed for leads, being a 3-paragraph discussion. First paragraph The first paragraph should state the name of the game (using both bold (to identify the article's name) and italics as per the manual of style), along with any other alternate names the game may go by. The genre of the game should be clearly identified as well as the developer and the publisher. If a notable person has been cited by the game as having worked on the game's development (such as Tim Schafer or David Jaffe), this should also be noted. Release dates should be given, along with the release of any ports, remakes, or sequels. Second paragraph The second paragraph should summarize the plot briefly in one or two sentences; a high level overview is only needed to set the stage for further discussion. One or two sentences should be included to discuss the gameplay, including any notable features of the game. Third paragraph The third paragraph should cover the reception of the game, citing its general critical reaction and any significantly notable successful or failing elements in the game. If the game has won awards, this aspect can be noted, but specific mention of any award is discouraged. This approach should help you to write a good lead for nearly any game, though this may need to be altered for other games. If there's not a lot of reception information for a game, it may be worthwhile to combine the listed first and third paragraphs into one paragraph. There may be need to talk more about an aspect not normally covered in video game articles (such as with E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (Atari 2600)) which should be noted in the lead. Things you can help with: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs Game Sack (0 participants) Delibird (6 participants) Quiver (video game) (3 participants) Melee weapon (3 participants) Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (4 participants) Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (4 participants) Julia Chang (7 participants) Pokémon: Mewtwo Returns (6 participants) Araya (video game) (2 participants) Looky (Rainbow Friends) (13 participants) Dreamcutter (5 participants) Chao (Sonic the Hedgehog) (6 participants) Cory Schmitz (4 participants) Gravity Rush (franchise) (6 participants) HellCup (3 participants) Crazy Bus (9 participants) Reforj (8 participants; relisted) Parkour Civilization (13 participants; relisted) Merge discussions 2024 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series (discussion) 2023 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series (discussion) Harvest Moon DS: Sunshine Islands (discussion) Input lag (discussion) Neo Geo Pocket (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates The Sims 4 (nom) Five Nights at Freddy's: Help Wanted (nom) The Suicide of Rachel Foster (nom) Claire Redfield (nom) Celeste (FPC) Pokémon episodes removed from rotation (nom) Donkey Kong (nom) Good article nominations Tina Armstrong (start) Kim Kitsuragi (start) Miner 2049er (start) Pixel Piracy (start) Dr Disrespect (nom) The Outer Worlds (start) River Raid (start) The Great Giana Sisters (start) Haunter (Pokémon) (start) Bit City (start) Dendy (start) SimsVille (start) Dark Urge (start) Pokémon Scarlet and Violet (start) Jeanette Voerman (start) Mario Party 7 (start) Crono (start) Deathloop (start) DYK nominations No did you know nominations Reviews and reassessments The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom) Pokémon Channel (nom) A Space for the Unbound (rev) Articles that need... assessment (4) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (7) infoboxes (13) cover art (255) screenshots (8,834) photos (64) translation from japan (188) creation merging Project Navigation VG Project Main pages Main project – talk Project category – talk Portal – talk VG Project Departments Assessment – talk Cleanup – talk Peer review – talk   Magazines – talk Newsletter – talk Video Game Images – talk

Bili Sarny detention centre. See talk.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:55, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange one: Mazurka in F-sharp minor (Chopin, opus 6). Piece by itself may be notable, but the sources... OR...? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 04:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Codeminion. Hmmm. Factor T. What do you think? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you create [4] it? This is template about content "This user is able to contribute with a upper intermediate level of English.". Regards. Zun and talk page 20:23, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Hello, can I upload screenshots from Windows XP to article about Windows XP on Fair use licension? I'm asking, because I don't know nothing about licension on EN wiki. Zun and talk page 09:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

And please about answer on my talk page. Zun and talk page 09:51, 19 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunpl (talk • contribs)

Nie chce mi się już pisać po angielsku więc spytam po polsku:) Czy na en można ładować screen z polskiej wersji XP lub z polskiej wersji instalatora XP? Zun and talk page 14:28, 19 May 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunpl (talk • contribs)

Please delete me from your watch list, because I won't never back to English Wikipedia, never, you'll see it. Really I won't back to EN-Wikipedia, because in real life I have a lot things to do. Katlos 22:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moved here for a wider audience.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 16:22, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć. Zrobiłeś kiedyś takiego stuba - jakbyś miał ew. ochotę rozszerzyć, to w plWiki jest już całkiem rozbudowana wersja. To hasło w PWN, na podstawie którego pisałeś, ma trochę za daleko idących uproszczeń ;-). Pozdrawiam. Gytha (talk) 13:06, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dzięki za informację! Aktualnie nie zamierzam rozszerzać tego stuba. Visor (talk) 13:24, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We are now dividing our members into active, semi-active (have not edited a Poland-related article in more then three months) and inactive (have not edited at all for three months or more). You are active on Wikipedia but I see you've not edited any Poland-related articles in in many months; we are moving you to semi-active category. Please consider participating in our project activities again in the future.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:49, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Since you spearheaded the attempted removal of the Pawel Szajda article in 2008, I thought you might like to review the complete rewrite of the article I just completed. I know it's still not up to ideal standards, but it's a work in progress. For example, there's another article with several bits of information and quotes I plan to selectively include. There are more lurking out there, too. The main reason I am writing is to make sure that you agree that the actor is notable enough not to warrant any more deletion nominations, or if you still don't believe he is notable. I would have to say that as it stands now, this article is considerably better than many actor-related AFDs that result in Keep. I hope you agree. If not, please don't prod it. Discuss the matter with me, and I will try to address the issues. I probably will be away from en.Wiki for about a week, but looking at my edit history, you know I am legitimate and will return to do as I say. :-) Have a great day! --Willscrlt (Talk) 15:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For your kind words at the arbcom. I hope this means you'll be increasing your activity in the content arena as well, WPPoland misses the day you were most active! If you need any help with User:Visor/Lists of articles/Biographies from Internetowa encyklopedia PWN please feel free to ask me. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 19:29, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I really miss those days, but I had to move my free time toward commercial-oriented activities. You know what I mean. Hope will be back and strike again soon! Keep up the great work Piotr. Visor (talk) 19:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you explain at my talk page or at the article talk page, why you removed an image credit at Makinti Napanangka? Thanks. hamiltonstone (talk) 21:50, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:CAP. Visor (talk) 21:24, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need you to take a look at this, thank you. • GunMetal Angel 18:35, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Visor! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 6 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 439 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Erik Gustafsson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Magnus Barthelsson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Andreas Wallan Wahl - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
4. Fredrik Isaksson - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
5. Lars Rosenberg - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
6. Sami Karppinen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All listed articles are referenced now and {{unreferencedBLP}} tag has been removed. Thanks for notice! Visor (talk) 21:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey would you like to help with the Nikt Nic Nie Wie entry?javascript:insertTags('Noodlesteve (talk) 02:18, 4 February 2010 (UTC)',,)[reply]

I have nominated Therion demo albums, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Therion demo albums. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:34, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:E.Zawadzka Zo 1943.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Masur (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The reference I placed for Maria Kaczynska's DoB is an outside source. What information do you have - besides another Wikipedia project - that confirms that my reference is unreliable? -- Michael David (talk) 15:18, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find evidence which would confirm that znanipolacy.pl is a reliable website. It is just who-is-who database with paid ranks and spam-links (SEO purpopses) at footer. No references, unknown authors and publisher. I've added a more reliable reference. Would you agree with this source? Visor (talk) 16:05, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know how one determines that a particular website is completely reliable - including Wikipedia. Since I don't read Russian, I couldn't tell what the reference you placed said. But, since the DoB you inserted in the Article differs by only one year, I will take it on faith and be satisfied with that. --- Michael David (talk) 16:23, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't said Wikipedia is a reliable reference. For this moment other Wikipedias, including Polish, has different DOBs for Maria. I can only tell that znanipolacy.pl isn't reliable by arguments I've mentioned above. The reference I've placed includes scanned list of passports of the Tu-154 flight. If you don't read Russian, I can suggest you Google Translate tool. Date of birth of Maria was under dispute since ca. 2006 (there is a discussion here). There is also a little chaos around that, you can see that one source—Gazeta.pl—gives two dates in one article: 1950 (ur. 1950 means born in 1950) and 1943 (image description says "1943 - 2010"). Visor (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Visor. One of the things that does make Wikipedia a much more reliable source than most others is the amount of research and discussion that goes on behind the scenes - like ours. And, I have found that with birth dates, sometimes the subject themselves (when it comes to publicity) can be the least relaible :-). Also, the notes you added to the Article help a lot. Thanks, and be healthy. -- Michael David (talk) 17:21, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This debate is still open of course, the more reliable reference is needed for that point. Thanks for the discussion. Visor (talk) 17:42, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of Therion demo albums has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:MUSIC. Demos are not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. None provided, none found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 01:06, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... to resuming your project dealing with missing encyclopedic articles? I thought it was a great idea. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 10:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but because of lack of the time, I will not resume this project very soon. Visor (talk) 10:35, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You undid an edit I did in Sitra Ahra article telling that it is scheduled to be released in 17 September 2010, as it is stated in Nuclear Blast youtube page (When I did it I was not logged on Wikipedia). What is the reason for doing that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dödnatten (talk • contribs) 15:37, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Description at the Youtube channel can quickly change. I've provided better ref and hope you have no objections about this one. Visor (talk) 18:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:House of Kicks Records albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:S.P. Records albums, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Clubroot (musician), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clubroot (musician). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ridernyc (talk) 13:28, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I think different versions of Microsoft Windows should be on because it already says "Microsoft Windows" for "Platforms". And the game doesn't work on all versions of Windows (the very old ones, such as Windows 1.0, Windows 2.0 and Windows 3.0). If you still think it just should say "Microsoft Windows", then just revert my edit. 90.199.49.37 (talk) 19:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I agree with you. Thanks for replying. 90.199.49.37 (talk) 20:30, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Erik Gustafsson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This bass guitarist fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolovis (talk) 01:50, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • April 2011 For our freedom and yours Welcome to our first issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper). Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; in this year alone about 40 threads have been started on our discussion page, and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop: we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 80,000 pages as Poland-related, out of which 1,500 still need a quality assessment, and 20,000, importance assessment. we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. once an article is assessed it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions. you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is another good place to watchlist!) also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, and its creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project we are maintaining a Portal:Poland automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s) This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools! With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself? You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a [member link] at WikiProject Poland. • Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:23, 25 April 2011 (UTC) [reply]

This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 17:17, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albatross (Monty Python sketch) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albatross (Monty Python sketch) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jclemens (talk) 07:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Malgorzata Braunek.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Electronic sports players by nationality, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ridernyc (talk) 15:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Mieczyslawa Trapszo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:43, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of WPPOLAND - we hope to see you back with us again one day! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 19:10, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The Analogs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:40, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On behalf of WPPOLAND - we hope to see you back with us again one day! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 17:19, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Putty Amiga.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Martina Astner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musicians.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 12:31, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Eye of Shiva.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clubroot (musician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clubroot (musician) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CaptainScreebo ^Parley! 15:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Poland Newsletter • January 2014 • Issue II For our freedom and yours Welcome to the second issue of WikiProject Poland newsletter, the Monitor (named after the first Polish newspaper). Our Project has been operational since 1 June, 2005, and also serves as the Poland-related Wikipedia notice board. I highly recommend watchlisting the Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland page, so you can be aware of the ongoing discussions. We hope you will join us in them, if you haven't done so already! Unlike many other WikiProjects, we are quite active; we get close to a hundred discussion threads each year and we do a pretty good job at answering all issues raised. Last year we were featured in the Signpost, and our interviewer was amazed at our activity. In the end, however, even as active as we are, we are just a tiny group - you can easily become one of our core members! In addition to a lively encyclopedic, Poland-related, English-language discussion forum, we have numerous useful tools that can be of use to you - and that you could help us maintain and develop: we have an active assessment department. As of now, our project has tagged almost 83,000 pages as Poland-related - that's an improvement of over 3,000 new pages since the last newsletter. Out of which 30 still need a quality assessment, and 2,000, importance assessment. We have done a lot to clear the backlog here (3 years ago those numbers were 1,500 and 20,000, respectively). Can you help assess a few pages? assessing articles is as easy as filling in the class= and importance= parameters on the talk page in the {{WPPOLAND|class=|importance=}} template. See here for a how-to guide. once an article has an assessment template, it will appear in our article alerts and news feed, which provides information on which Poland-related articles are considered for deletion, move, or are undergoing a Good or Featured review. Watchlisting that feed, in addition to watchlisting our project's main page, is a good way to make sure you stay up to date on most Poland-related discussions. you can also see detailed deletion discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Poland (which is a good place to watchlist if you just want to stay up to date on possible deletions of Poland-related content) we have also begun B-class quality reviews on our talk page, and if our activity increases, hopefully we will be able to institute our own A-class quality reviews. As of now, we have about 500 C-class articles in need of a B-class review. If you'd like to help with them, instructions for doing B-class reviews are to be found in point 10 of our assessment FAQ. In addition to this automated list, you are also encouraged to help review articles from our B-class reviews requested list found here. also, those articles will be included in our cleanup listing, which allows us to see which top-importance articles are in need for attention, and so on. We have tens of thousands articles in need of cleanup there, so if you ever need something to do, just look at this gigantic list. (I am currently reviewing the articles tagged with notability, either proving them notable or nominating for deletion; there are still several dozens left if you want to help!). did you know that newly created Poland-related articles are listed here. They need to be reviewed, often cleaned-up, occasionally nominated for deletion, and their creators may need to be welcomed and invited to our project if they show promise as new authors of Poland-related content. we are maintaining a Portal:Poland automated Wikipedia:WikiProject Poland/Popular pages lists the most popular Poland-related pages from the previous month(s) Breaking news: we are looking for a Wikipedian in Residence for the New York City area. See Wikipedia:GLAM/Józef Piłsudski Institute of America for details. This is not all; on our page you can find a list of useful templates (including userboxes), awards and other tools! With all that said, how about you join our discussions at WT:POLAND? Surely, there must be something you could help others with, or perhaps you are in need of assistance yourself? It took me three years to finish this issue. Feel free to help out getting the next one before 2017 by being more active in WikiProject management :) You have received this newsletter because you are listed as a member at WikiProject Poland. Please remove yourself from the mailing list to prevent receiving future mailings. Newsletter prepared by Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here and sent by Technical 13 (talk) using the Mass message system.

The article The Wand of Abaris / Path to Arcady has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 23:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Wand of Abaris Path to Arcady.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:53, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)