User talk:Wk3v78k23tnsa

Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 22:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvin Gaye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Depression. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Wk. I notice you have made a number of edits recently where you removed text from articles because the same information is also listed in an infobox. I believe you have misunderstood how infoboxes work in relation to article content. Infoboxes summarize key points, but it is expected that the same information would also be in the text of the article. You may want to take a look at WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE for more about this. I encourage you to reverse these recent changes. --RL0919 (talk) 23:43, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello RL0919. Thank you for reaching out to me. I do agree and perhaps I should have used a modified reason for reverting. Based on other film articles for short films (using the Laurel and Hardy filmography as a guide), the mention of the Stooges names in the opening paragraph is redundant since it already states that this is a film starring the Three Stooges. Their names then appear in the text of the page, usually in the plot. The pages have been like this for quite a few years and the addition of the Stooges' names adds nothing to the page that is not already there. In short, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Your thoughts. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 23:54, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, that is a more complex situation than just redundancy with an infobox. I don't think it is an exact parallel to Laurel and Hardy, since the lineup for the Stooges did vary. If the actors' full names appear in the body of the article (for example, if there is a Cast section, or actor names are mentioned parenthetically after character names in the Plot section), then it's arguable whether the detail of the lineup needs to be in the lead -- it becomes a lead vs. body question rather than infobox vs. article text. But actor names don't appear anywhere else except the infobox, then it should be put in the text somewhere. Also, it looks like some of the reverts took out other details, such as the year of release, which does belong in the lead of film articles. So at the least I think the changes should be made a bit more carefully. --RL0919 (talk) 00:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) I agree with User:RL0919. The year of release certainly belongs in the lead; it is now missing from Slippery Silks and some others I checked. It is good for the lead to specify which Stooge lineup is featured. Film articles from the Laurel and Hardy filmography may not be the best guide to follow, as the articles are of variable quality. It would be better to follow the model of A Cure for Pokeritis, How Brown Saw the Baseball Game, Alien vs. Predator (film), and other film Featured Articles (listed here). Ewulp (talk) 00:58, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, not a problem. Nothing that cannot be fixed. I will go through these articles today and readd the info in a less klunky fashion. Thanks all. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:41, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me; thanks for your openness to feedback. --RL0919 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Frankly, I take the rotating Stooge line-up for granted, thinking any casual viewer knows there were several "third" stooges; hence the reason not to mention it from the get go." I started rewriting yesterday. Will try to wrap up by Monday.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rock Spectacle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Week. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:NFCC, which governs our policy concerning copyrighted images which are allowed under "Fair Use". Images should be around 300px in width (if landscape) or 300px in height (if portrait) to comply with these policies. Please do not upload full size copies of copyrighted images. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:57, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:UK Single - I Want To Hold Your Hand This Boy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BJ sgaw elunow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 07:23, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Karen Valentine. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:15, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Not certain why I am getting this. Basic information on Karen Valentine is available at [[1]].Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:17, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Karen Valentine. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Please do not copy content from the IMDb to Wikipedia. This is user-generated content, and the IMDb should never be cited in a BLP. I recommend you read WP:RS and WP:BLP before you make any further edits to BLPs. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fine. This will be the source of the most basic, readily available information on the subject. http://www.vipfaq.com/Karen%20Valentine.html, https://www.allmovie.com/artist/p72636 or https://www.famousbirthdays.com/people/karen-valentine.html. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 23:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harrysemelsdisorder.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:31, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• • Required information has been added.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 19:08, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Cb-pub-still.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:04, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Duke concert prog 80.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang Cousin Wilbur 1939.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Duke concert prog 80.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 July 17 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

• File:BeatlesXmas63.jpg
• File:BeatlesXmas64.jpg
• File:BeatlesXmas65.jpg
• File:BeatlesXmas66.jpg
• File:BeatlesXmas67.jpg
• File:BeatlesXmas68.jpg
• File:BeatlesXmas69.jpg

Thank you. JG66 (talk) 05:21, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BeatlesXmas63.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it appears the plot for 'Fraidy Cat has been copied directly from sources where reuse was not clear, and without attribution, so I have removed it on copyvio grounds. SportingFlyer T·C 22:30, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ThatWasThenUKcover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bewitched episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernard Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:IFeelFine UK.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of The Addams Family episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Caruso (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:21, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:3stooges-have-rocket-will-travel-colpix.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Abacab Gen program 81.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:3stooges-have-rocket-will-travel45.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1923 BoysToBoard.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You continue to insist that the opening title card you've shared on the Telling Whoppers page is the original, and ask for "proof" when it's been removed.

As mentioned by another editor, the card in question was Photoshoped using a photograph of Joe Cobb taken a good 2-3 years after Telling Whoppers was produced. You can find it easily with a Google search, which is likely what the editor of the card did. In fact, many of the title cards for the silent films circulating the web right now are fan made. Well-made, yes. But nevertheless non-originals.

Furthermore, none of the Our Gang title cards from that period (pre-1936 - aside from 1932's Free Wheeling) used photographs of the kids. Some of the earliest ones used illustrations of the cast, but by the time of Telling Whoppers, Hal Roach Studio title cards typically used a more generic look.

So where is the original title card for Telling Whoppers? It's lost, like so many of the others. Comedy3 (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Ok, thank you for clarifying. Either way, there is no harm retaining it since a recreated title card is better than leaving the spot blank.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 23:01, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was able to unearth an ad for the film that appeared in The Film Daily to replace the recreated title card. Hope this resolves this issue. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • For the record, Boys Will Be Joys featured four moving head shots of the boys during the opening titles, which is why I thought the recreated title card for Telling Whoppers was an original.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:49, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Title card has been replaced with original ad featured in The Film Daily. Deletion of Our Gang 1929 TellingWhoppers.jpg is fine. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 20:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to indobox images should have consensus first. - FlightTime (open channel) 23:53, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for alerting me. Was unaware. Is that rule listed on Wiki somewhere?Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 00:00, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on The Chipmunks See Doctor Dolittle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at [[{{{value1}}}]]. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 05:26, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The page File:AddamsFamily TCcolourized.jpg has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image was an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links were updated.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Colourized Munsters.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AddamsFamily TC colourized.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Munsters Season2 TC colourized.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HarleneWood Dizzydoctors.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Boynamed2014.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:DaffyDuckDinosaur-TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Awfulorphan TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wk3v78k23tnsa,

Thank you for creating North Beach (album).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Could use a couple more sources to strengthen notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello. Yes, I am aware that this article is in need of additional sources, which I am actively looking for. I guess I should mark the article as a "stub" for now.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 14:13, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FirstKissCB-betterquality.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding some material here but I have to revert for several reasons. First, you cited an invalid source with Discogs.com. Secondly, you've changed the track listing to use {{track listing}} but why? Finally, you've included the small HTML tag when there is no fine print in the article. Can you please explain why you made these three changes? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:01, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To add: I'm also confused as to why you added songwriters using the Note field. Why did you do this? Also, why did you include the back cover of the album? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not highlighting reasons behind the changes. 1. I was unaware that discogs is an invalid source, particularly since the proof is indisputable based on photo uploads of original album releases. 2. The track listing required additional details and was incorrectly formatted as it pertained 1988, 2006 and 2014 re-releases. It appears those tracks were thrown in without regard to format. 3. The new format is consistent with other articles pertaining to this artist. See Jazz Impressions of A Boy Named Charlie Brown, The Eclectic Vince Guaraldi and Oaxaca (album). In general, most classic albums should be represented by their original release, with notes added pertaining to remasters, re-releases and such. 4. The rear cover was added for historical purposes because it is part of the original release and is not included in any re-releases. Please advise why these are issues. It appears this is nitpicking and splitting hairs when sources are added. Are these "problems" or are these just questions as to why? For an article that is as high profile as this one, it needed a considerable amount of formatting.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wk3v78k23tnsa, 1.) Yes, this is an issue: Discogs is an invalid source. If your source is the liner notes to an album, then cite those instead of a scan of them on a third-party site that accepts user submissions. Why would that be better than using the actual source itself? 2.) Yes, this is an issue: there are several valid ways of styling a track listing and existing styles should be retained. Additionally, randomly inserting things that have semantic meaning like small because... you like to? is bad form and in some measure hostile to the intelligibility of the page. 3.) Yes, this is an issue: by your own reasoning, these articles should have track listings as plain lists per MOS:VAR. 4.) Yes, this is an issue: as I noted in the deletion nomination, this violates WP:NFCC#8. It is not "splitting hairs" for me to revert you for adding invalid sources (and seeming to have no understanding of WP:RS), inserting nonsense semantic content, and including non-free media without a valid rationale. I'm happy to have your help collaborating on this but the fact that you don't understand the importance of these issues is concerning. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:11, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to explain. Using small was not done because I "like to" (please cease the MOS:YOU). I had seen this format style at some point in the past and used it moving forward. That's all. I will use proper format moving forward. WP:AAGF. In all my years of using Wiki, I have never had issues with source citing until now so the accusation of "seeming to have no understanding of WP:RS" is grossly insulting. Thank you kindly.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 22:16, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wk3v78k23tnsa, It was not clear to me why you used that tag, so thank you for explaining. I was assuming good faith that you were trying to improve the encyclopedia and sure enough, many of the changes you made were improvements, so I tried to temper my criticism with appreciation: I respect anyone who gives free labor to this project. Since WP:RS is a pretty key extension of WP:OR, I take it pretty seriously. It so happens that I recently looked at Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Sources and learned quite a bit myself, so I would encourage you to take a peek there to see some sources considered acceptable and not acceptable by that project. All of us have things to learn (myself included) and all of us have things to give (yourself included), so I appreciate you working with me to make this reference work better. Thanks again and pardon me if my tone was too hostile. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, do not insert {{track listing}} per MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:45, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Just so I am clear. Formats contained in articles like Halcyon Days (Ellie Goulding album)#Track listing and Man of the Woods#Track listing are NOT correct, but your unique version is. Got it. I did not realize you were a Wiki legend with his own self-serving Wiki autobiography. Cheers Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 00:28, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wk3v78k23tnsa, How is that what you got from me saying, "There are multiple ways to do the same thing"? I never wrote that one style is right and one is wrong: what I wrote was that since there are multiple styles, the existing style for that page should be retained. What is with your grossly negative and rude attitude? I could just as easily say, "Your unique version is right. Got it." but I don't write things like that because I'm trying to treat you like an adult with respect. Shame on you for this post. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:52, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Per MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLEGUIDE, please stop changing the type of track listing you find in articles. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:15, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. There is a clear template that is to be used. Template:Track listing. It is reiterated in the very source you cited - [[2]]. I am uncertain why you are choosing to ignore this as you have made no clear argument nor are any templates cited in your change lot. It clearly says there are several ways to do this, v. one over the other. This is clearly a personal preference of yourse that requires further discussion.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 18:22, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wk3v78k23tnsa, It is not "to be used" it can be used. Don't go to articles that already have an established style and change them. I've explained this to you several times and pointed you to guidelines that say the same. Why do you insist on changing stylistic things to how you like them? Have you looked at MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:31, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wk3v78k23tnsa, Why do you keep on reverting to add this template when you know you're not supposed to? See WP:BRD: you need to post to talk to explain why an existing style should be changed. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Guaraldi articles were all over the map, which is why I chose the new format that allowed occasional notes (something I know is to be used sparingly per Template:Track listing. Your reverts are deleting track lengths, a big no-no. Some albums are a terrible mishmash with error made by lazy record companies lacking quality control; this requires extra formatting to make sense of them. The Template:Track listing makes extra contingencies for these gaffes by record companies. I admit I made a error originally using <small>. My apologies, as I recall seeing that in an article years back. I have ceased using <small>. For know, can we please use Template:Track listing for the Guaraldi entries? It helps in dividing up unique takes. I am always up for compromise. Your thoughts. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 18:40, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No, we cannot. Please revert yourself per MOS:VAR. You have shown no comprehension of this page. Have you read it? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:48, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯. I am following all the work that Wk3v78k23tnsa has done for the Guaraldi entries. That being said, I have reviewed the MOS:VAR and WP:ALBUMSTYLE, the latter which gives quite a few track listing options. For someone like Vince Guaraldi, whose recorded output is a mess, I think Wk3v78k23tnsa is correct to use the formatting option that is specified in more detail Template:Track listing (which I see is a link from WP:ALBUMSTYLE). Wk3v78k23tnsa is also correct to have the "Notes" option available. That being said, I advise Wk3v78k23tnsa to not get into an edit war. As I have posted elsewhere, this is why I never wanted to create a username for Wiki in the first place, since it fosters a generally hostile environment and dominated by a few select editors (no offense meant to Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯, but it is true). Either way, thank you both for maintaining these Vince Guaraldi entries. His representation on Wiki was sorely missing and you are both doing a great job! OldandGood2876 (talk) 13:31, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OldandGood2876, I'm not offended and I agree that there are a lot of petty wars of attrition on Wikipedia. Thanks for the work you've done here in spite of the fact that it's sometimes pretty thankless. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 14:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You bet, Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯. It is a labor of love and a half. Thank you for keeping things on the up and up as well. Wk3v78k23tnsa - thanx for picking up the slack. I have been dealing with the effects of Coronavirus disease 2019 so it sidelined me for some time. You are both doing great work and I thank you both for it!OldandGood2876 (talk) 16:20, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ Speaking of using small HTML tag, you might want to take a look at this article: Music Box (The Monkees album). Caught this earlier today. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wk3v78k23tnsa, 198 instances! ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know, right? I thought I was bad. ☺ Hope all is well. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CBXmasSoundtrack65rear.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:05, 11 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Boycover1989.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:33, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:CBXmasSoundtrack65rear.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you created this article. Please see the article, make necessary changes, click on my name for help, and read the Wikipedia documentation before creating another article. Thank you.
Vmavanti (talk) 13:22, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to have been corrected by OldandGood2876. I am no longer using the small HTML tag and forget why I even started using that in the first place. I must have seen it incorrectly used in the past and thought it was a good idea. No worries. I got called out for it already by another user and learned my lesson. Cheers.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 22:39, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TweetSOS TC.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bobtvseries.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Title card was accidentally removed from article by poor editing. It has since been restored.Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ItsMagicCB TVGuidead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see a number of edits made to Vince Guaraldi topics that were made by an anon. Did you forget to sign-in? Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No. Why? I will check them out. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 15:06, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A number of anon edits were made to the topic you had previously been working on. It seemed unusual. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have a hunch who might be doing those edits. I suspect I have communicated with the person on social media before (using a handle rather than a real name) and the person prefers to make edits anonymously instead of establish a Wiki account. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 22:53, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted this elsewhere but I want to thank you for all the work you put into the Vince Guaraldi entries!OldandGood2876 (talk) 15:47, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. It has been rewarding. I am a stickler for researching before creating articles. Glad to see someone appreciate the efforts. Be well, and take care of your health. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 16:42, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than comment on my "careless work", you could avoid the public personal attack by focussing on the content instead of the contributor. Secondly, it was not arbitrary. You commented on my talk page asking for a reason, and I supply with every edit summary. If you can't find the edit summaries, I can show you how to. If you don't like the reason, a discussion on the talk page of the article is appropriate. In short, I've shown patience with your poor behaviour and I am treating you with respect. I expect you to do the same. Failure to do so will be on your own head. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Defensive, we are? It was a careless edit to not capitalize a title section. Plus, the discussion you had with newbie User:OldandGood2876 a short while back clearly revolved around the removal of redlinks, which I agree was a valid point. Except there are none now. Articles will eventually be created for the singles that need them. Other singles link to cover versions that have existing articles, negating the issue of redlinks. The reasoning you are citing for reverting is arbitrary and capricious. I will gladly treat any Wiki user with respect when it is deserved but this should have been discussed on the talk page first before reverting again. Considering how small the amount of singles there actually are, this seems like more arbitrary than most reverts. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AndreaElson-headshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AndreaElson-headshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:39, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BenjiGregory-headshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:44, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BenjiGregory-headshot.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:27, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dudley01pubphoto.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:46, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wk3v78k23tnsa. I've noticed that you've been recently uploading colorized versions of files such as File:46 RuthGodfreyWhite headshot.jpg and File:Joe Besser.jpg. The are some potential problems with doing such a thing that are currently being discussed at WT:NFCC#Colorized photos/screenshots. You welcome to comment there if you like, but it might be a good idea to slow down a bit until this can be sorted out. Nobody is accusing you of bad-faith or intentionally doing anything wrong; it's just that there may be copyright issues related to the colorized versions your uploading that might be a problem per WP:IUP and WP:NFCC. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:00, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi. I appreciate you reaching out to me. I had tried research this before uploading but could find anything. Thank you for sharing WP:IUP, WP:NFCC and WT:NFCC#Colorized photos/screenshots. I'll stop for now. Do not want to invest time in uploading only to have it deleted. Many thanks. Wk3v78k23tnsa (talk) 17:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • It's been suggested that the updated colorized versions you uploaded be reverted back to the previous black and white versions. If you agree with this suggestion, then you can help out by going back and doing the reverting yourself. If you disagree with this, then you probbaly should explain why in the WT:NFCC discussion so others can respond. If you do nothing, the files will likely be reverted by someone else and fairly soon before the older balack and white versions are deleted per WP:F5. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:13, 7 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ItsMagicCB TVGuidead.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:ABNCB70Columbia.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in A Boy Named Charlie Brown#A Boy Named Charlie Brown: Selections from the Film Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE and MOS:TVPRODUCTION.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:24, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above also applies to File:Abncb-soundtrack-cd-cover.jpg. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:A Charlie Brown Christmas (Rmst).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:43, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]