User talk:ZaDoraemonzu

Hi ZaDoraemonzu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Bernd Leno, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zoozaz1 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the references explicitly say that they have a football rivalry; see WP:OR

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:France–Spain football rivalry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:France–Spain football rivalry, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Greater Cambodia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mongolia v Myanmar (2022 FIFA World Cup qualification) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolia v Myanmar (2022 FIFA World Cup qualification) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

It may be good idea to not create any more football match articles until this AfD is concluded; general consensus is that individual matches are usually not notable unless they have been covered exceptionally in mainstream press (i.e. outside the sports sections). Such matches will include major cup finals or games which set statistical records. Black Kite (talk) 10:26, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Noahfgodard was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2020 Inner Mongolia protests and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2020 Inner Mongolia protests, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noahfgodard (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:2020 Inner Mongolia protests. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 20:54, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cambodia national football team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lee Tae-hoon. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mongolia–Turkey relations. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 06:25, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Joseph2302 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Clear consensus at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Draft:United States v Colombia (1994 FIFA World Cup) that this is not a notable match. If it goes into mainspace, it'll get deleted like the other non-notable match articles at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolia v Myanmar (2022 FIFA World Cup qualification)

Joseph2302 (talk) 09:16, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolia–Turkey relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that some of the material in the articles you wrote was copied from other wikipedia articles. That's completely fine, but make sure to read Wikipedia:Copying within wikipedia. Basically, you need to say which article you copied from. I hope you keep writing articles, the ones you have wrote so far are great. Zoozaz1 (talk) 00:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ZaDoraemonzu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Iran–Saudi Arabia proxy conflict that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Greyjoy ^talk 10:35, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Please do not use your account and an IP address to edit. Drmies (talk) 20:40, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at India national football team. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Can you please explain what was that??? Drat8sub (talk) 17:12, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zoozaz1 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is not a bad start. There are two things you need to improve on before this becomes an article. I've tried to fix some of it, but statements like "(all) Han Chinese nationalists are racist" is certainly not a neutral point of view. In general, try to make the article more neutral towards Han Chinese nationalism. Secondly, I've italicized the sections composed of original research/without sourcing. You cannot cite social media comments or videos and say that they are racist examples of Han Chinese nationalism. You must find secondary sources to say that, and then it can be included in the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Han Chinese nationalism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Han Chinese nationalism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zoozaz1 (talk) 22:08, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This will be a very difficult subject to write on, and you needs to write it in such a way as to withstand the inevitable attacks upon its neutrality and accuracy. You've been working with some similarly difficult topics, and you can expect similar challenges when you try to move the Han Chinese Nationalism draft to mainspace.

The various rulers and people of the different periods in the area are different people--your connection of the ancient imperialism of the Achaemenid Empire with modern Iran is either your own hypothesis, or needs to be source with quotations to extremely reliable academic sources, and it needs to be indicated whether it is the current view in Iran and elsewhere, or a fringe hypothesis.  .  

I do not immediately see that any of the sources does this, but if they do, you'll need quotes.

You also need to write more neutrally, not "Iran has been accused of..." as the beginning of successive paragraphs. Remember, that from the Iranian point of view, it has been the victim of successive imperialism conquests and attempted conquests from many. peoples: The Macedonians, the arabs, the Mongols, the Turks, the Russians, the British, the Americans.

It might help to use a more neutral title I'd sugest History of Iranian and Persian foreign relations, or something of the sort.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Iranian imperialism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Iranian imperialism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from France national football team into Football in France. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 19:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Football in Spain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iniesta and Basque Country.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kosovo–Russia relations. Thanks! Zoozaz1 (talk) 15:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone of the article is not neutral and encyclopedic. This article reads like a presentation of anti-Saudi viewpoints, all verified by sources, so that it has been reference-bombed with 78 sources, but that doesn't make it neutral.

Wikipedia should have an article on anti-Saudi sentiment. This draft can serve as the outline for developing that article, but this draft needs to be trimmed down first and then built up again.

This draft is not being declined for reasons of notability or verifiability, but tone and neutral point of view.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anti-Saudi Arabian sentiment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anti-Saudi Arabian sentiment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you mark almost all your edits as minor, even when they most definitely are not. Please read WP:MINOR about when to mark and when not to mark edits as minor. --T*U (talk) 19:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are still marking most of your edits as minor. They are not! WP:MINOR states that Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. As an example, calling this edit minor is obviously against WP:MINOR. Calling this edit minor is bordering on plain disruption. --T*U (talk) 07:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Naturalized citizens of Iraq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 11:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article England–France football rivalry has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable football rivalry. cites one reliable source whose other listings are somewhat dubious (it has Arsenal v Man Utd as the most intense English rivalry)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spike 'em (talk) 16:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chinese irredentism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pamir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azerbaijan–Iran relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Artsakh.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your personal attacks from Talk:Vietnamization. Please make yourself familiar with the Wikipedia policy about personal attacks at WP:NPA. --T*U (talk) 15:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you have added categories referring to the subject's ethnicity/ancestry to a number of biography articles. When adding such categories, you need to support it with reliable sources, especially if the subject is a living person, see MOS:BLP. --T*U (talk) 05:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia–United Arab Emirates relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:41, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The problem we are having is that even in the 2020 House and Senate resolutions, the US did not 'officially' recognize the AG. To do that, it would have to pass an Act, through both houses, signed by the President. That would write the recognition in stone. This has never happened. This is why I prefer 'formally' and 'recognized' and in 'official' statements, resolutions, submissions, etc. Do you agree with this form of words? Johncdraper (talk) 20:29, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I also dispute about how the US recognized the genocide. Up until 2019, the United States had not recognized genocide due to importance of its strategic relations with Turkey, in addition, only US-based organizations have acknowledged that genocide. Even now Trump's reaction reflects this problem. So I think it is clear to define an official recognition and unofficial one. The US only recognized it officially in 2019. Anyway, I think this is your choice of words, I don't see it a problem, just need to remember that only. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 06:41, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to India national football team, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Again, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Above that Verifiablity is a core content policy of wikipedia. You should not add any materials in wikipedia without a suitable reliable source. If you don't know how to add citation, then please go through WP:CITE.

Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

I am adding the concerned edit for you to understand where you did your mistake, this and this. Drat8sub (talk) 21:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Russia national football team matches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 16:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As I decline two of your current submissions simultaneously and read over your editing history, I strongly recommend that you review our neutral POV guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Racism in China and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Racism in China, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 21:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Snowycats were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

As I decline two of your current submissions simultaneously and read over your editing history, I strongly recommend that you review our neutral POV guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Han Chinese nationalism and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Han Chinese nationalism, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 21:51, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Australia–Croatia relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:49, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Anti-Chechen sentiment, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:17, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheSecretImpostor. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Hello its come to my attention that you aren't properly Adding descriptions to your edits, If you feel you have been judged to harshly please contact my user – TheSecretImpostor (talk) 13:35, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia–Italy relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

		New article Iran–Turkey proxy conflict reviewed
		Greetings. I wanted to thank you for creating Iran–Turkey proxy conflict and let you know I marked it as reviewed. I hope you continue to expand it. Best wishes from Los Angeles,   // Timothy :: talk  19:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amin Benmamoun has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 22:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Talk:Han nationalism, I am challenging your merger of Han chauvinism and Han nationalism. Per the usual please self revert and get a consensus before attempting this challenged move/merger again. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 15:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, ZaDoraemonzu! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you may find this tool useful for helping to create citations: https://citer.toolforge.org/citer.fcgi - although please note that you always need to check the result afterwards before posting because it's not always 100% perfect with dates and authors. Have a read of WP:BAREURLS to gain an understanding of why it's preferable not to use them. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saudi Arabia–Turkey proxy conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saudi Arabia–Turkey proxy conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sakiv (talk) 04:30, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ZaDoraemonzu: I am once again informing you that your move of Han chauvinism and Han nationalism has been challenged and you need to revert yourself until you get consensus. If you fail to do so I will escalate this to an admin notice board. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Russia–Turkey proxy conflict, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russia–Turkey proxy conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent articles, including Josef Pomiankowski, which I read with interest. When you create an extensive and well referenced article, you may want to have it featured on Wikipedia's main page in the Did You Know section. Articles included there will be read by thousands of our viewers. To do so, add your article to the list at T:TDYK. This can be also done through this helpful user script: User:SD0001/DYK-helper. Let me know if you need help, _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article cites "Charney 1994" but no such source is listed in bibliography. Can you please add? Also, suggest installing a script to highlight such errors in the future. All you need to do is copy and paste importScript('User:Svick/HarvErrors.js'); // Backlink: [[User:Svick/HarvErrors.js]] to your common.js page. Thanks, Renata (talk) 03:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Poland–United Arab Emirates relations, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.gov.pl/web/uae/bilateral-relations, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Poland–United Arab Emirates relations and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Poland–United Arab Emirates relations, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Poland–United Arab Emirates relations. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Poland–United Arab Emirates relations with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Poland–United Arab Emirates relations saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 03:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Armenia–United Arab Emirates relations, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://english.alaraby.co.uk/english/indepth/2020/10/6/could-the-armenia-azerbaijan-conflict-spark-a-proxy-war, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Armenia–United Arab Emirates relations and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Armenia–United Arab Emirates relations, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Armenia–United Arab Emirates relations. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Armenia–United Arab Emirates relations with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Armenia–United Arab Emirates relations saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 04:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 05:11, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Bait30, I removed 1/3 of France–Laos relations. I was tempted to delete the entire article because ZaDoraemonzu, sheesh, that is some poor writing. Drmies (talk) 18:03, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Edmund Majowski article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 15:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Pan-Turkism

added a link pointing to Native Americans

Turanism

added a link pointing to Native Americans

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of international goals scored by Paulo Wanchope, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source, and should not be cited in articles. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• User:Sir Sputnik, how many warnings for unsourced warnings, logged-out editing, copyright problems, poor writing, etc. does that make on this talk page? Drmies (talk) 18:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• @Sir Sputnik and Drmies: I think I’ve gotten further than most with this editor... But I had to basically yell at them on multiple pages to even be acknowledged. That above average engagement climaxed with them declaring "I'll never revert what I did. Besides, I expand the page, and I realize the poor scope of this article, and so I want to change and move to what I found is perfect. I did not delete Han chauvinism, but it is better to become "Han nationalism" since Han chauvinist attitude has a tendency of following nationalist traits, and chauvinist attitude has never been far away given Chinese history. I won't revert and I stand protecting it!” [1] and abandoning the discussion. Unbelievable this was *after* I’d linked WP:BATTLEGROUND. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2013 AFC U-22 Championship Final, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 23:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Two things, one of which you've been told before and really must try to understand and comply with:

1. You probably weren't aware that consensus is that scorer lists for a country's national team players are (in general) only created for that country's top scorer. Carlo Costly isn't Honduras' top scorer, so I've redirected List of international goals scored by Carlo Costly to Carlo Costly#International goals, where the content came from.

2. This is important: We may not copy content from other Wikipedia articles, as you did to create List of international goals scored by Carlo Costly from Carlo Costly#International goals, without clearly showing where the content came from. Please read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

Thank you for listening. Struway2 (talk) 10:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, neither Zidane is top scorer of French national team, too. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 10:43, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not denying there have been exceptions in the past, generally for big-name players. Still not something we should be creating a separate article for, for every player with a good number of goals. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly understand your concerns. Of course I am a football-mad fan. I do believe some players deserve better attention for their contributions to the national teams, though. So I think they should be recognized at the first place. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 11:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international goals scored by Roman Pavlyuchenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Roman Pavlyuchenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 20:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	I'd like to thank you, as a Circassian, for acknowledgeing the real side of events in the discussion. ~𝓐𝓭𝓲𝓰𝓪𝓫𝓻𝓮𝓴 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓕𝓲𝓻𝓼𝓽~ (Псалъэ) 14:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines v Tajikistan (2019 AFC Asian Cup qualification), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SMB99thx my edits! 07:23, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain namespaces ((Article) and Draft) for copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk🌴Help out at CCI!} 19:30, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZaDoraemonzu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Okay, so what did I violate copyright here? It doesn't make sense at all, there are many of multiple sources, and various information. What did I do wrong? I believe my contribution doesn't do harm and it just only reveals facts for some good reasons. What can be wrong? ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 11:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/ZaDoraemonzu for more info. You have been copying and pasting text from sources, which is against our policies. You will need to show that you understand how copyright works on Wikipedia before being unblocked. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 20:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

have seen the copyright law a bit. But I think it was extremely silly in the first place. I may have my violation there, but I believe I should contribute it for the good of Wikipedia only. Maybe I was an ignorant, I admit. But that doesn't mean I violated it. Moreover, I think that I have searched and tried for some best infos. I am wrong, yes; but I also have my righteous reasons. In the next time, I'll be definitely more cautious. Okay? I don't want to be ridiculed, but there is a lot of good infos, and I want to see it being uploaded there, too. You just can't ban me only because of my copyright mishandling, since most of these "accusations" aimed only on small and less concerned infos. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 04:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZaDoraemonzu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have seen the copyright law and I do admit I did a number of wrong edits. However his condemnation on me is not realistic because it aimed only on small and less concerned infos, I believe that my edits do not harm but only to protect what Wikipedia has valued and I also provide good infos for Wikipedia as well. Nonetheless, I apologize for a number of the messes I have edited before and I hope I will not repeat the same things again, but I still wish to defend the true values of my editings in case it is violated. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 13:47, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Copyright is extremely serious because the presence of copyright-violating material on this website threatens the very existence of the project. I accept that you have good intentions, and fully believe that you can make positive contributions. But we need more than hoping that you won't repeat the same mistakes again. You need to make it very clear that you will never copy text to Wikiepdia from a copyrighted source again. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 05:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZaDoraemonzu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

After reviewing the copyright law, I admitted I did a number of wrong edits. Following the number of controversial materials I have wrongly added, I believe that my actions were wrong. I wish if I have been on the same issues again, I'll be more careful before getting approval for the edit. ZaDoraemonzu (talk) 08:32, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This request does not convince me you understand what copyright is. We aren't here to approve your edits; we need you to understand when copyrighted content can and cannot be used. You cannot be unblocked until you convince us you understand. I must decline your request. 331dot (talk) 16:45, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Template:Sweden national football team matches has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 04:03, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Racism in China requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA455923. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jalen Folf (talk) 22:12, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iran–Turkey proxy conflict is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iran–Turkey proxy conflict until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shawarsh (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Jamaican people of Greek descent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:53, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz talk to me | my contributions 15:18, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Iranian imperialism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States v Colombia (1994 FIFA World Cup), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:United States v Jamaica (2002 FIFA World Cup qualification), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Racism in China, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "United States v Jamaica".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:15, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:France–Spain football rivalry, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ZaDoraemonzu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "France–Spain football rivalry".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international goals scored by Mohamed Salah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international goals scored by Mohamed Salah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 04:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Chinese nationalism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ときさき くるみ ^{not because they are easy, but because they are hard} 15:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]