French
Deutsch1940 United States presidential election in North Carolina
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All 13 North Carolina votes to the Electoral College | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in North Carolina |
|---|
 |
The 1940 United States presidential election in North Carolina took place on November 5, 1940, as part of the 1940 United States presidential election. North Carolina voters chose 13[2] representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
As a former Confederate state, North Carolina had a history of Jim Crow laws, disfranchisement of its African-American population and dominance of the Democratic Party in state politics. However, unlike the Deep South, the Republican Party had sufficient historic Unionist white support from the mountains and northwestern Piedmont to gain one-third of the statewide vote total in most general elections,[3] where turnout was higher than elsewhere in the former Confederacy due substantially to the state’s early abolition of the poll tax in 1920.[4] Like Virginia, Tennessee and Oklahoma, the relative strength of Republican opposition meant that North Carolina did not have statewide white primaries, although certain counties did use the white primary.[5] North Carolina was one of six states that swung more Democratic compared to 1936, alongside Delaware, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Maine.
In 1928, anti-Catholicism in the Outer Banks and growing middle-class urban Republicanism in Piedmont cities turned North Carolina to GOP nominee Herbert Hoover,[6] but this was sharply and severely reversed in the following decade beginning with Hoover’s failed nomination of John Johnston Parker to the Supreme Court.[7] With the South having the highest unemployment in the nation and blaming its fate upon the North and Wall Street,[8] exceptionally heavy support was given to Democratic nominee Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932 and 1936 everywhere except in a few rock-ribbed Republican mountain bastions.[6] Nevertheless, there was virtually no change to the state’s social structure during the New Deal,[9] and the conservative “Shelby Dynasty” was strong enough to prevent any populist challenge so much as developing.[10] After the 1936 Democratic landslide and Roosevelt’s failed “court-packing” plan, the state’s leading federal officeholders came to increasingly oppose Roosevelt’s policies.[9]
Although the state’s relatively numerous Republicans were highly active in support of nominees Wendell Willkie and Senate Minority Leader Charles L. McNary, early analysts said Roosevelt remained so popular with the state’s voters that there was no chance of the incumbent losing.[11] A poll in mid-October had Roosevelt carrying the state by a three-to-one margin after having given the incumbent 72 percent during the third week of September.[12]
Results
[edit]| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | Franklin D. Roosevelt (inc.) | 609,015 | 74.03% | |
| Republican | Wendell Willkie | 213,633 | 25.97% | |
| Total votes | 822,648 | 100% | ||
Results by county
[edit]| County | Franklin Delano Roosevelt Democratic | Wendell Lewis Willkie Republican | Margin | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | # | % | # | % | # | |
| Martin | 97.76% | 4,628 | 2.24% | 106 | 95.52% | 4,522 |
| Northampton | 97.33% | 3,826 | 2.67% | 105 | 94.66% | 3,721 |
| Bertie | 97.10% | 3,287 | 2.90% | 98 | 94.21% | 3,189 |
| Greene | 96.64% | 2,990 | 3.36% | 104 | 93.28% | 2,886 |
| Pitt | 96.46% | 10,067 | 3.54% | 369 | 92.93% | 9,698 |
| Hertford | 96.40% | 2,464 | 3.60% | 92 | 92.80% | 2,372 |
| Edgecombe | 95.97% | 7,516 | 4.03% | 316 | 91.93% | 7,200 |
| Halifax | 95.67% | 7,982 | 4.33% | 361 | 91.35% | 7,621 |
| Franklin | 95.42% | 4,724 | 4.58% | 227 | 90.83% | 4,497 |
| Granville | 94.85% | 3,924 | 5.15% | 213 | 89.70% | 3,711 |
| Chowan | 94.68% | 1,547 | 5.32% | 87 | 89.35% | 1,460 |
| Hoke | 94.21% | 1,904 | 5.79% | 117 | 88.42% | 1,787 |
| Currituck | 93.76% | 1,532 | 6.24% | 102 | 87.52% | 1,430 |
| Lenoir | 93.42% | 6,247 | 6.58% | 440 | 86.84% | 5,807 |
| Nash | 93.24% | 8,456 | 6.76% | 613 | 86.48% | 7,843 |
| Wilson | 93.13% | 7,912 | 6.87% | 584 | 86.25% | 7,328 |
| Gates | 92.78% | 1,388 | 7.22% | 108 | 85.56% | 1,280 |
| Anson | 92.46% | 4,552 | 7.54% | 371 | 84.93% | 4,181 |
| Scotland | 92.26% | 2,981 | 7.74% | 250 | 84.52% | 2,731 |
| Union | 91.89% | 7,179 | 8.11% | 634 | 83.77% | 6,545 |
| Vance | 91.80% | 4,252 | 8.20% | 380 | 83.59% | 3,872 |
| Warren | 91.55% | 2,676 | 8.45% | 247 | 83.10% | 2,429 |
| Robeson | 90.86% | 9,251 | 9.14% | 931 | 81.71% | 8,320 |
| Onslow | 89.79% | 2,383 | 10.21% | 271 | 79.58% | 2,112 |
| Richmond | 89.34% | 6,530 | 10.66% | 779 | 78.68% | 5,751 |
| Craven | 88.70% | 4,916 | 11.30% | 626 | 77.41% | 4,290 |
| Person | 88.23% | 3,239 | 11.77% | 432 | 76.46% | 2,807 |
| Pender | 88.06% | 2,249 | 11.94% | 305 | 76.12% | 1,944 |
| Camden | 87.76% | 961 | 12.24% | 134 | 75.53% | 827 |
| Lee | 87.48% | 3,682 | 12.52% | 527 | 74.96% | 3,155 |
| Wake | 87.16% | 18,083 | 12.84% | 2,665 | 74.31% | 15,418 |
| Caswell | 86.93% | 2,335 | 13.07% | 351 | 73.86% | 1,984 |
| Pasquotank | 86.75% | 3,314 | 13.25% | 506 | 73.51% | 2,808 |
| Columbus | 86.33% | 5,900 | 13.67% | 934 | 72.67% | 4,966 |
| Durham | 85.60% | 14,810 | 14.40% | 2,491 | 71.20% | 12,319 |
| Beaufort | 85.52% | 5,528 | 14.48% | 936 | 71.04% | 4,592 |
| Jones | 85.47% | 1,371 | 14.53% | 233 | 70.95% | 1,138 |
| Cumberland | 84.40% | 6,050 | 15.60% | 1,118 | 68.81% | 4,932 |
| Bladen | 84.34% | 2,925 | 15.66% | 543 | 68.69% | 2,382 |
| New Hanover | 84.03% | 8,600 | 15.97% | 1,635 | 68.05% | 6,965 |
| Perquimans | 83.76% | 1,176 | 16.24% | 228 | 67.52% | 948 |
| Washington | 82.65% | 1,724 | 17.35% | 362 | 65.29% | 1,362 |
| Cleveland | 82.59% | 9,346 | 17.41% | 1,970 | 65.18% | 7,376 |
| Rockingham | 82.51% | 11,315 | 17.49% | 2,398 | 65.03% | 8,917 |
| Cabarrus | 82.03% | 11,776 | 17.97% | 2,579 | 64.07% | 9,197 |
| Wayne | 81.41% | 7,222 | 18.59% | 1,649 | 62.82% | 5,573 |
| Duplin | 81.06% | 5,394 | 18.94% | 1,260 | 62.13% | 4,134 |
| Mecklenburg | 80.40% | 28,768 | 19.60% | 7,013 | 60.80% | 21,755 |
| Gaston | 80.08% | 17,262 | 19.92% | 4,294 | 60.16% | 12,968 |
| Hyde | 79.55% | 1,202 | 20.45% | 309 | 59.10% | 893 |
| Dare | 79.40% | 1,214 | 20.60% | 315 | 58.80% | 899 |
| Haywood | 78.55% | 8,631 | 21.45% | 2,357 | 57.10% | 6,274 |
| Alamance | 77.17% | 11,429 | 22.83% | 3,382 | 54.33% | 8,047 |
| Orange | 76.95% | 3,673 | 23.05% | 1,100 | 53.91% | 2,573 |
| Rowan | 76.24% | 13,023 | 23.76% | 4,059 | 52.48% | 8,964 |
| Forsyth | 74.36% | 20,664 | 25.64% | 7,125 | 48.72% | 13,539 |
| Harnett | 74.33% | 6,602 | 25.67% | 2,280 | 48.66% | 4,322 |
| Buncombe | 74.04% | 24,878 | 25.96% | 8,723 | 48.08% | 16,155 |
| Tyrrell | 73.31% | 1,140 | 26.69% | 415 | 46.62% | 725 |
| Guilford | 73.11% | 26,565 | 26.89% | 9,770 | 46.22% | 16,795 |
| Iredell | 73.00% | 10,328 | 27.00% | 3,820 | 46.00% | 6,508 |
| McDowell | 70.48% | 5,290 | 29.52% | 2,216 | 40.95% | 3,074 |
| Johnston | 70.41% | 9,976 | 29.59% | 4,192 | 40.82% | 5,784 |
| Chatham | 68.76% | 4,025 | 31.24% | 1,829 | 37.51% | 2,196 |
| Carteret | 68.53% | 3,896 | 31.47% | 1,789 | 37.06% | 2,107 |
| Surry | 67.98% | 8,871 | 32.02% | 4,178 | 35.96% | 4,693 |
| Rutherford | 67.84% | 8,869 | 32.16% | 4,204 | 35.68% | 4,665 |
| Caldwell | 67.82% | 6,334 | 32.18% | 3,005 | 35.65% | 3,329 |
| Catawba | 66.51% | 11,233 | 33.49% | 5,656 | 33.02% | 5,577 |
| Pamlico | 66.48% | 1,448 | 33.52% | 730 | 32.97% | 718 |
| Jackson | 65.44% | 4,563 | 34.56% | 2,410 | 30.88% | 2,153 |
| Brunswick | 64.10% | 2,717 | 35.90% | 1,522 | 28.19% | 1,195 |
| Henderson | 63.06% | 6,336 | 36.94% | 3,712 | 26.11% | 2,624 |
| Swain | 62.96% | 2,422 | 37.04% | 1,425 | 25.92% | 997 |
| Montgomery | 62.70% | 3,007 | 37.30% | 1,789 | 25.40% | 1,218 |
| Moore | 62.60% | 4,330 | 37.40% | 2,587 | 25.20% | 1,743 |
| Transylvania | 62.13% | 3,312 | 37.87% | 2,019 | 24.25% | 1,293 |
| Polk | 61.63% | 2,454 | 38.37% | 1,528 | 23.25% | 926 |
| Alleghany | 61.60% | 1,952 | 38.40% | 1,217 | 23.19% | 735 |
| Davidson | 61.37% | 11,084 | 38.63% | 6,978 | 22.73% | 4,106 |
| Lincoln | 61.26% | 4,901 | 38.74% | 3,099 | 22.53% | 1,802 |
| Stokes | 61.18% | 4,274 | 38.82% | 2,712 | 22.36% | 1,562 |
| Burke | 59.70% | 7,242 | 40.30% | 4,889 | 19.40% | 2,353 |
| Yancey | 58.10% | 3,489 | 41.90% | 2,516 | 16.20% | 973 |
| Stanly | 58.04% | 6,321 | 41.96% | 4,569 | 16.09% | 1,752 |
| Graham | 56.32% | 1,404 | 43.68% | 1,089 | 12.64% | 315 |
| Macon | 55.99% | 2,941 | 44.01% | 2,312 | 11.97% | 629 |
| Alexander | 55.27% | 2,739 | 44.73% | 2,217 | 10.53% | 522 |
| Randolph | 54.51% | 8,455 | 45.49% | 7,056 | 9.02% | 1,399 |
| Cherokee | 54.32% | 3,180 | 45.68% | 2,674 | 8.64% | 506 |
| Clay | 53.43% | 1,349 | 46.57% | 1,176 | 6.85% | 173 |
| Davie | 53.35% | 2,896 | 46.65% | 2,532 | 6.71% | 364 |
| Ashe | 53.04% | 4,716 | 46.96% | 4,175 | 6.08% | 541 |
| Watauga | 49.16% | 3,615 | 50.84% | 3,739 | -1.69% | -124 |
| Yadkin | 47.31% | 3,660 | 52.69% | 4,077 | -5.39% | -417 |
| Sampson | 46.96% | 5,107 | 53.04% | 5,769 | -6.09% | -662 |
| Wilkes | 46.36% | 7,299 | 53.64% | 8,446 | -7.28% | -1,147 |
| Madison | 40.72% | 3,171 | 59.28% | 4,617 | -18.57% | -1,446 |
| Mitchell | 30.59% | 1,450 | 69.41% | 3,290 | -38.82% | -1,840 |
| Avery | 28.85% | 1,194 | 71.15% | 2,944 | -42.29% | -1,750 |
Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic
[edit]Counties that flipped from Democratic to Republican
[edit]Analysis
[edit]Large portions of the interior of the United States – heavily populated by German Americans – opposed increasing "tension" with Nazi dictator Adolf Hitler and would switch support to Willkie.[14] North Carolina, however, was historically one of the least isolationist states, and its almost entirely English and Scotch-Irish descended electorate strongly favored as much aid to Britain’s World War II effort as possible.[15] Thus, North Carolina’s electorate did not merely resist the GOP shift in the heartland – in many Appalachian counties with normally substantial Republican support, FDR gained on what he had achieved in his 1932 and 1936 national landslides.[13]
North Carolina was thus won in a landslide by incumbent President Roosevelt and running mate Agriculture Secretary Henry A. Wallace, with 74.03 percent of the popular vote, against Willkie’s 25.97 percent.[16][17]
As of the 2020 presidential election[update], this is the last election in which Davie County and Randolph County voted for a Democratic presidential candidate.[18] This is also the best Democratic performance in the state since Andrew Jackson in 1832.[19]
References
[edit]- ^ "United States Presidential election of 1940 — Encyclopædia Britannica". Retrieved August 21, 2018.
- ^ "1940 Election for the Thirty-ninth Term (1941-45)". Retrieved August 21, 2018.
- ^ Phillips, Kevin P. (November 23, 2014). The Emerging Republican Majority. Princeton University Press. pp. 210, 242. ISBN 978-0-691-16324-6.
- ^ Key, Valdimer Orlando (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. Alfred A. Knopf. p. 502.
- ^ Klarman, Michael J. (2001). "The White Primary Rulings: A Case Study in the Consequences of Supreme Court Decision-Making". Florida State University Law Review. 29: 55–107.
- ^ a b Phillips. The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 212-215
- ^ Topping, Simon (2008). Lincoln's lost legacy: the Republican Party and the African American vote, 1928-1952. Gainesville, Florida: University Press of Florida. p. 22. ISBN 978-0813032283.
- ^ Ritchie, Donald A. (2007). Electing FDR: the New Deal campaign of 1932. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas. p. 143. ISBN 978-0700616879.
- ^ a b See Abrams, Douglas Carl (1992). Conservative constraints: North Carolina and the New Deal. Jackson, Mississippi: University Press of Mississippi. ISBN 9780878055593.
- ^ Christensen, Rob (2010). The paradox of Tar Heel politics: the personalities, elections, and events that shaped modern North Carolina. Chapel Hill, North Carolina: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 62–68. ISBN 9780807899632.
- ^ "Willkie Is Shown Favor in South: Strong Feeling for Him by Thinking Voters". The South Bend Tribune. September 1, 1940. pp. 1, 7.
- ^ "North Carolina Leaning to F.D.R. in Poll". Winston-Salem Journal and Sentinel. Winston-Salem, North Carolina. October 6, 1940. p. 19.
- ^ a b "NC US President Race, November 05, 1940". Our Campaigns.
- ^ Dunn, Susan (June 4, 2013). 1940: FDR, Willkie, Lindbergh, Hitler—The Election Amid the Storm. Yale University Press. p. 107. ISBN 978-0300190861.
- ^ See Menendez, Albert J. (2005). The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004. McFarland. p. 68. ISBN 0786422173.
- ^ "1940 Presidential General Election Results – North Carolina". Retrieved August 21, 2018.
- ^ "The American Presidency Project – Election of 1940". Retrieved August 21, 2018.
- ^ Sullivan, Robert David (June 29, 2016). "How the Red and Blue Map Evolved Over the Past Century". The National Catholic Review (America Magazine ed.).
- ^ "Presidential General Election Results Comparison – North Carolina".
