2008 Massachusetts Question 2

Question 2

Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative
Results
Choice Votes % Yes 1,949,704 65.25% No 1,038,523 34.75% Valid votes 2,988,227 100.00% Invalid or blank votes 0 0.00% Total votes 2,988,227 100.00%
County results Municipality results Precinct results Yes   80–90%   70–80%   60–70%   50–60% No   60–70%   50–60% Other   No votes

Elections in Massachusetts
General 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022
Federal government U.S. President 1788–89 1792 1796 1800 1804 1808 1812 1816 1820 1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 Dem 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 Dem 2004 Dem GOP 2008 Dem GOP 2012 2016 Dem GOP 2020 Dem GOP 2024 Dem GOP U.S. Senate Class 1: 1788 1790 1796 (S) 1796 1798 1800 (S) 1803 1808 (S) 1810 (S) 1811 1813 (S) 1815 1815 (S) 1816 (S) 1818 (S) 1820 1820 (S) 1822 1826 1827 1829 (S) 1833 1839 February 1841 (S) 1845 1851 1851 (S) 1857 1863 1869 1874 (S) 1875 1881 1887 1893 1899 1905 1911 1916 1922 1928 1934 1940 1946 1952 1958 1962 (S) 1964 1970 1976 1982 1988 1994 2000 2006 2010 (S) 2012 2018 2024 Class 2: 1788 1793 1796 1800 (S) 1803 (S) 1805 1810 1811 (S) 1816 1822 (S) 1826 (S) 1828 1835 January 1841 (S) 1841 1845 (S) 1847 1853 1855 (S) 1859 1865 1871 1873 (S) 1877 1883 1889 1895 1901 1905 (S) 1907 1913 1918 1924 1930 1936 1942 1944 (S) 1948 1954 1960 1966 1972 1978 1984 1990 1996 2002 2008 2013 (S) 2014 2020 U.S. House 1788/1789 1790/1792 1792/1793 1794/1795 1796/1797 1798/1799 1800/1801 1802/1803 1804 1806 1808 1810/1811 1812/1813 1814/1815 3rd 1816/1817 1818/1819 1820/1821 1822/1823 1824/1825 1826/1827 1828 1830/1832 1833/1834 1834/1835 1836 1838/1839 1840/1841 1842/1844 1844/1846 1846 1848/1850 1850/1851 1852 1854 1856 1858 1860 1862 1864 1866 1868 1870 1872 1874 1876 1878 1880 1882 1884 1886 1888 1890 1892 1894 1896 1898 1900 1902 1904 1906 1908 1910 1912 1914 1916 1918 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1991 (1st) 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2001 (9th) 2002 2004 2006 2007 (5th) 2008 2010 2012 2013 (5th) 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
State government Governor 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 Apr. 1831 Nov. 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 State Senate 1787 1824 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 State House 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2020 2022 2024 Governor's Council 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 2024 Ballot measures 1980: Proposition 2½ 2002: English Language Education in Public Schools 2006: 2008 Greyhound Protection Sensible Marijuana Policy State Income Tax Repeal 2010: No Sales Tax for Alcohol Sales Tax Relief Comprehensive Permits and Regional Planning 2012: Right to Repair Death with Dignity Medical Marijuana 2014: Automatic Gas Tax Increase Repeal Expansion of Bottle Deposits Casino Repeal Paid Sick Days 2016: Expand Slot Machine Gaming Charter School Expansion Farm Animal Confinement Legalization, Regulation and Taxation of Marijuana 2018: Gender Identity Anti-Discrimination 2020: pending
Boston Mayor 1822 1823 1824 Apr 1825 Dec 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844–45 Dec 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853–54 Dec 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1897 1899 1901 1903 1905 1907 1910 1914 1917 1921 1925 1929 1933 1937 1941 1945 1949 1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1993 1997 2001 2005 2009 2013 2017 2021 2025 City council 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023
Springfield Mayor 1953 1955 1957 1959 1961 1963 1965 1967 1969 1971 1973 (S) 1973 1975 1977 1979 1983 1981 1985 1987 1989 (S) 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2015 2019 2023
Worcester Mayor 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017 2019 2021 2023
Massachusetts portal
v t e

The Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative, also known as Massachusetts Ballot Question 2, was an initiated state statute that replaced prior criminal penalties with new civil penalties on adults possessing an ounce or less of marijuana. The initiative appeared on the November 4, 2008, ballot in Massachusetts.

The measure was passed on Nov 4.^[1] and became public law on January 2, 2009

Question 2:

• Replaced criminal penalties with a US$100 fine of which the proceeds go to the city where the offense takes place.
• Eliminated the collection of Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) reports for minor marijuana related infractions.
• Maintained then-current penalties for selling, growing, and trafficking marijuana, as well as the prohibition against driving under the influence of marijuana.
• The law requires additional penalties for minors such as Parental notification, compulsory drug awareness program, and 10 hours community service that was not required under prior law. It also requires a larger US$1,000 fine and possible delinquency proceedings for those under 17 if they do not complete the requirements of the law.

The law represents a break with prior law in Massachusetts, where people charged with marijuana possession faced criminal penalties of up to six months in jail and a US$500 fine, as well as a CORI report being filed.

On Tuesday, September 10, 2008, a city councillor in Worcester called for a vote on a measure to express the opposition by the city of Worcester to the initiative. The city council rejected and voted down the measure by a 10-1 vote, with the only vote for the measure coming from the councillor that requested the vote.^[2]

The Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy is the leading proponent of the initiative.^[3]

• National Association of Social Workers—Massachusetts Chapter
• Greater Boston Civil Rights Coalition
• Criminal Justice Policy Coalition
• American Civil Liberties Union — National
• Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
• American Civil Liberties Union — Massachusetts chapter
• National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws
• Massachusetts Cannabis Reform Coalition, Inc. (aka "MassCann")
• Univ. of Massachusetts, Amherst Cannabis Reform Coalition (not part of prev. listed group, "MassCann")
• Union of Minority Neighborhoods
• The Boston Worker's Alliance
• Marijuana Policy Project
• Brookline Police Department^[4]

• Paul T. Breeden - President/CEO Boston Live Magazine/Boston Live Charity Fund Inc.
• Ronald Ansin, ACLU, philanthropist
• Charles H. Baron, Esq., Boston College School of Law
• Jack Cole, Law Enforcement Against Prohibition
• Michael D. Cutler, Esq.
• Richard Elliott Doblin, PhD, MAPS
• Sergeant Howard Donohue, a 33-year veteran of the Boston Police Department
• Lester Grinspoon, M.D., associate professor emeritus of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School
• John H. Halpern, M.D., assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School
• Massachusetts state Sen. Patricia Jehlen (D-Second Middlesex), chair of the Joint Committee on Elder Affairs and Vice-Chair of the Joint Committee on State Administration and Regulatory Oversight
• Wendy Kaminer, Esq., ACLU, author, journalist
• Woody Kaplan, ACLU, philanthropist
• Thomas R. Kiley, Esq., Cosgrove, Eisenberg & Kiley
• Karen Klein, Brandeis University, Unitarian Universalists for Drug Policy Reform
• Lanny Kutakoff, Partakers, Inc.
• Dr. Robert Meenan, dean of the Boston University School of Public Health
• Lieutenant Thomas Nolan, a 30-year veteran of the Boston Police Department who now teaches criminology at Boston University
• Massachusetts state Rep. Frank Smizik (D-Fifteenth Norfolk), chair of the Joint Committee on Environment, Natural Resources and Agriculture
• Carl Valvo, Esq., Cosgrove, Eisenberg & Kiley
• Ernest "Tony" Windsor, Esq., Massachusetts Law Reform Institute
• George Soros - Hedge Fund Manager
• Massachusetts State Rep. Jim O'Day (D-fourteenth Worcester)^[5]

• Rev. Jean Alexander, Auburndale
• Rabbi Alan Alpert, Leominster
• Rev. Molly Baskette, Somerville
• Father Richard Beaulieu, Winchester
• Rev. Jim Bronwell, Barre
• Rev. Suzanne Brunnquell, Pittsfield
• Rev. Sarah Buteux, Amherst
• Rev. Dr. Jan Carlsson-Bull, Cohasset
• Rev. Thomas Carlton, Ludlow
• Rev. Stephen Cook
• Father Richard Crowley, Middleboro
• Rev. C. Edward Deyton, Andover
• Father Thomas Dilorenzo, Winthrop
• Rev. Jonathan Drury, Andover
• Rev. Leigh Dry, Hopkinton
• Rev. Kathrene Duhon, Great Barrington
• Rev. Lisa Durkee Abbott, West Brookfield
• Rev. Dr. Dorothy May Emerson, Billerica
• Rev. Marc Fredette, Waltham
• Rev. Tamarack Garlow, Ashley Falls
• Rev. John Gibbons, Bedford
• Rev. Jamie Green, West Groton
• Rev. Edward Hardy, Abington
• Rev. William Hobbs, Athol
• Rev. Dr. Anne Ierardi, Yarmouthport
• Ms. Marion Jansen, Great Barrington
• Rev. David Johnson, Plymouth
• Rev. Bill Leggett, Milford
• Father John Lis, Williamsburg
• Rev. Jeffrey Long-Middleton, Acton
• Rev. Ian Lynch, Brimfield
• Rev. Art McDonald, Essex
• Rabbi Richard Messing, North Easton
• Rev. Stephen Philbrick, Cummington
• Rev. Susie Phoenix, Lee
• Rev. Katherine Reis, Rockport
• Rev. Edmund Robinson, Chatham
• Rev. Ken Sawyer, Wayland
• Rev. Dr. Victor Scalise, Somerville
• Rev. Warren Scamman, Windsor
• Rev. Richard Schlak, Foxboro
• Rev. Stephen Shick, Hudson
• Rev. Judith Smith-Valley, Brewster
• Rev. Paul Sprecher, Hingham
• Rev. C. William Steelman, Nantucket
• Rev. Rachel Tedesco, Taunton
• Rev. Jonathan Tetherly, Chicopee
• Rev. Patricia Tummino, Middleboro
• Rabbi Andrew Vogel, Brookline
• Rev. Vicki Woods, Worcester
• Rev. Dr. Judith Wright, Boylston

• The Daily Free Press
• The Bay state Banner
• The Harvard Crimson
• The Newton TAB
• The Milford Daily News
• The Springfield Republican
• The Metrowest Daily News
• The Daily News Tribune
• The Brookline TAB
• The Fall River Herald News
• The Danvers Herald
• MIT Tech

A Suffolk University / WHDH Channel 7 poll has shown that 72 percent of Greater Boston residents are in favor of replacing criminal penalties with civil fines for carrying an ounce or less of marijuana. "The public may be signaling that pursuing small-time marijuana users is a waste of taxpayer resources," said David Paleologos, director of the Political Research Bureau at Suffolk University. "This issue suggests there is a libertarian streak in the thinking of the Massachusetts voter." The poll was conducted with 400 residents between July 31 and August 3, 2008.^[6]

A FastTrack poll by WBZ TV /Survey USA on September 17 showed that 69% of all Massachusetts voters would favor either decriminalization or legalization. It was broken down to 30% want it remain a crime, 31% want it changed to a civil fine and 38% would like it to be legalized completely. The poll had a margin of error of 4.5%.^[7]

Supporting arguments advanced by the proponents include:^[8]

• It would save Massachusetts US$130 million per year, according to a 2002 report by Harvard economist Jeffrey Miron.
• Instances of minor marijuana possession would no longer affect if people can obtain jobs, housing, and student loans.
• Currently there are about 2.8 million CORI records on file for a population of 6 million.
• Small convictions have been shown to have little or no impact on drug use.

The National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse (also known as the Shafer Commission) was created by Public Law 91-513 in 1972 to study marijuana abuse in the United States. It published its findings in a report called Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding and recommended that the president should decriminalize possession of marijuana in amounts that constituted "simple possession".^[9]

So far 30 non-binding public policy questions calling for civil fines for possession of marijuana rather than criminal penalties have passed in legislative districts throughout Massachusetts since 2000. These questions were passed with an average of 62% of the vote in favor. No Public policy question related to replacing criminal penalties with civil fines has ever failed in the state of Massachusetts.^[10]

The Joint Mental Health and Substance Abuse Committee of the Massachusetts General Court voted 6-1 in favor of a bill that would have made possession of less than an ounce of marijuana punishable by a civil fine.^[11]

Billionaire George Soros made an initial contribution of $400,000. The committee has also received $750,000 cash as well as about $320,000 in donated time and services from the Marijuana Policy Project, an organization created to reform marijuana laws in the United States. According to campaign finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the committee has raised approximately $1,250,000 to help pass the measure with $40,060.90 remaining.^[12]

The Coalition for Safe Streets, a committee organized to oppose Question 2, launched a statewide campaign Sept. 5 to defeat the measure. Jonathan W. Blodgett, the Essex County District Attorney serves as the Coalition's treasurer and chairman.

Michael O'Keefe, the president of the Massachusetts District Attorneys Association, is opposed to the initiative. He believes that the measure will lead to an increase in minors using the drug by sending the wrong message to them.

The O'Keefe Committee is one of ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts that have contributed to the Coalition.^[13]

William Breault, chairman of the Main South Alliance for Public Safety in Worcester, also plans to oppose this initiative.

According to Campaign Finance reports, as of November 1, 2008, the ten committees representing district attorneys in Massachusetts have contributed approximately $2,275 each to the Coalition along with a donation of $2,500 from the Worcester County Deputy Sheriffs Association as well as a few other donors for a total of approx $60,000, after expenditures they have $0 to fight the initiative and $2,601.92 in outstanding liabilities.^[14]

On September 17, 2008, the Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy filed complaints with the Office of Campaign and Political Finance and the Attorney General's office against the Massachusetts District Attorney Association, the 11 state district attorneys and O'Neill and Associates, a Boston public relations firm. Violations of the campaign finance law could result in up to 1 year in jail and a $1,000 fine.^[15][16]

Also, Middlesex District Attorney Gerry Leone has stated that in the event the majority of voters in the State of Massachusetts were to pass the initiative, he will attempt to override the vote and defeat it in an appellate process.^[17]

• Under Massachusetts law, it is illegal to solicit, receive, or spend funds to support or oppose a ballot initiative without first forming a political committee. CSMP alleges that the district attorneys solicited, received, and spent donations before they were legally allowed to, attempting to conceal their campaign activity for as long as they could.
• CSMP further alleges that the district attorneys used public funds to post and house a statement urging voters to reject the decriminalization initiative on its Web site, a violation of Massachusetts election law, which prohibits public officials from using public resources to advocate for or against a ballot initiative. The statement on the state run Massachusetts District Attorneys Association website says that if the question is approved, "any person may carry and use marijuana at any time," which is untrue.

The support group collected over 105,000 signatures, far exceeding the requirement of 66,593 valid signatures. Since Massachusetts is an indirect initiative state, this meant that the Massachusetts State Legislature had to take up the proposed measure. Since the legislature declined to act on it by early May, the supporters then had until June 18, 2008, to collect another 11,099 signatures to ensure that the initiative is placed on the November 2008 statewide ballot, a goal at which they succeeded.^[18][19][20]

Sensible Marijuana Policy Initiative^[21][22]

Choice	Votes	%
Yes	1,949,704	65.25
No	1,038,523	34.75
Valid votes	2,988,227	96.30
Invalid or blank votes	114,768	3.70
Total votes	3,102,995	100.00
Registered voters/turnout	4,220,488	73.52

As per Massachusetts law, the initiative became public law on January 2, 2009, 30 days from the date it was presented to the Governor's Council and certified.

• Massachusetts 2008 ballot measures
• Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act of 2008

• Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy
• Sensible Marijuana Policy Ballot Language
• Attorney General's Opinion 07-09
• Campaign finance registration statement of support committee
• Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy Radio spot
• Committee for Sensible Marijuana Policy Television spots