User talk:Hiddenstranger

Because the "Artist songs" categories were already filed in Category:New Wave songs. There's no need for a song to be in Category:New Wave songs and Category:Duran Duran songs, for example, if Category:Duran Duran songs is itself sitting in Category:New Wave songs. Bearcat (talk) 00:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dreamhouse (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dreamhouse (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 05:57, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modern Eon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Eon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —SW— ^express 14:31, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to the 3rd Philippine Wiki Conference (WikiCon) on May 26, 2012 9am-1pm at the co.lab.exchange in Pasig City. Please fill this form should you signify interest. --Exec8 (talk) 17:45, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

thanks a lot for polishing up dzmz :) Yummy hunny (talk) 01:11, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hiya, I saw that you removed the lyrics I put in Build Me Up, Buttercup. I don't care a whole lot either way, but I was confused by your note that they were "non-encyclopedic". If you meant that in a general sense as in "this looks unprofessional," I guess everyone's got a right to their opinion. If you meant that in a cultural way, as in "other Wikipedia song entries do not have lyrics, so this one shouldn't either," then I must look at what never was and ask "why not?" If you meant that literally, as in "this information does not belong in an encyclopedia entry about the song" then I don't understand your definition of encyclopedic. "Comprehensive in terms of information" is the one I'm going by, comprehensive meaning "complete." The lyrics are information that is not just important but intrinsic to the song. And yes, to anticipate an argument, so is the sheet music, sure. And an .mp3 file? Why the heck not! Of course, you couldn't get the rights to post those things... but that doesn't change the definition of "comprehensive". Genuinely curious, Grammargal Grammargal (talk) 01:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hiddenstranger,

Thanks for your answer -- the content policy was what I was looking for. One of the reasons I posted the lyrics is that there is a surprisingly sophisticated internal rhyme scheme instead of the standard ABAB pop structure. Which, I suppose, might make a good addition to the page -- so I'll do it that way. Thanks again! GG — Preceding unsigned comment added by Grammargal (talk • contribs) 15:38, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
As you probably know, the discussion regarding Category:Synth-pop new wave musical groups has been closed. I can say that my opinions about this category have changed and I support its existence on Wikipedia. Nevertheless, I still think that the category may be renamed with a more appropriate sounding name or the modern electropop bands may be seperated with an independent category. I just wanted to know your opinions on that as you've created the regarding category. I'd will be grateful if you would share your them. Thank you. Myxomatosis75 (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hiddenstranger. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of soft rock artists and songs.
Message added 12:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RadioFan (talk) 12:03, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hiddenstranger,

Thanks for your contributions about Voyage (band), my English is limited and your help is welcome. Thanks a lot. Cordially St-Denis (talk) 12:39, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are more than welcome to check out Eva Rydberg and Kvitt eller dubbelt as well. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 22:25, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	You are my inspiration... Eebs69 (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	You are my inspiration... Eebs69 (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	You are my inspiration... Eebs69 (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	You are my inspiration... Eebs69 (talk) 07:40, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	You are my inspiration.. don't speak just go with the flow.....call sick call me . Eebs69 (talk) 07:41, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I saw you removed my edits on Clark Datchler's page. I added links to Discogs in the singles sections and added two more singles to the lists. Did I do anything wrong? Was it the discogs links that are not ok for Wiki? In case I apologize. The two singles added are actually official. Thanks in advance --Cat italia (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I saw your notes: I added the singles back without links. Hope it's ok. Thanks for your help --Cat italia (talk) 13:09, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Would you care to review my FA nomination for the article Of Human Feelings? The article is about a jazz album by Ornette Coleman, and the criteria for FA articles is at WP:FACR. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 05:13, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am editing articles in need of editing on this WikiProject as part of a class assignment. I would love feedback, advice or any other tips of the trade involving Wikipedia. Thank you! --Dg0959a (talk) 01:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editathon Invitation  Celebrating Charlie Chaplin's film The Tramp at London's Cinema Museum, Kennington    This is a free event, one of a series of editathons which Wikimedia UK organises in conjunction with a variety of host organisations..    When? Saturday, 7 March 2014, 11am-4pm    Where? 2 Dugard Way (off Renfrew Road) London SE11 4TH.    Point of contact: Fabian Tompsett (fabian.tompsettwikimedia.org.uk) for Wikimedia UK. Further details and Registration: Education Program:Wikimedia UK/Cinema Museum 2015 (Spring 2015)

Meetup Invitation  Hi Hiddenstranger, You are cordially invited to an opportunity   to meet active Wikimedians in and around London face-to-face.    Description: Informal afternoon in a pub, children welcome.    When? Sunday, 8th March from 1 pm.    Where? Penderel's Oak, 283-288 High Holborn, London, WC1V 7HP.     Further details and check in: London 91 Hope to see you there, Fabian Tompsett (WMUK) (talk) 16:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Just wanted to thank you for clean up Herbie Crichlow page . However many of his works were deleted along with the clean up and we were wondering if you could possibly include them ?

Ferrarikid99 (talk) 00:51, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello, Hiddenstranger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hiddenstranger. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and happy new year. Thank you for creating the article about Runnin' Away (Sly and the Family Stone song).

I saw your hatnote changes at Runnin' Away and Running Away, and I wonder whether all the songs should have parenthetical identifiers in their titles and one of the "regular" titles, perhaps "Running Away", should be a disambiguation page. What do you think? Do you think one song is more of a primary topic than another? — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi User:Hiddenstranger, I sourced all the genres on Slide (Calvin Harris song) myself a while back, but knowing what I know now I'm not sure whether the song is being called these genres or the production of the song is. Since you make important edits to many music articles, can you please take a close look at the sources and let me know if you think they're worded in a way that makes it acceptable for them to be used as genres? Here [1], [2], [3], thanks.--Theo Mandela (talk) 04:15, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Black British DJs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Zawl 11:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hiddenstranger. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	appreciate your hard work and edits on wiki to improve articles. Paulhus15 (talk) 19:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hiddenstranger. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there I am a musician artist and I have already created my page in my sandbox. Someone replayed that I can not uploaded if I am "friend" with the article. Is it possible to create it for me ? Sorry for asking here but I can't find the way of how it's working after sandbox etc Thanks in advance Dnb174 (talk) 16:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Burning Flame (song).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

A bit more prose about the song would be nice, but it is adequately sourced as is.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 18:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping make the article for Champagne Dance better. Here is a virtual cookie to show my appreciation. Foxnpichu (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just a quick message to say thanks for your work here especially focusing on UK garage, hardcore, etc. Thanks for the tidy-ups on my edits too :) Altlondon (talk) 22:11, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No worries mate, thanks to you also. ~ Hiddenstranger (talk) 00:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your revival of Bobby Irwin. Hope it stands. I worked with him way back in Raw Sienna, along with Neil Brockbank, also regrettably no longer with us. Wwwhatsup (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Ah cool. :) Hiddenstranger (talk) 03:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Any chance you could leave a summary when making an edit? It's quite helpful to know what a change is about when it appears on a watchlist or recent changes. (I have no quibble with the edits themselves, that I have seen; thank you for your work). --kingboyk (talk) 01:22, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Rhythm and blues songs by nationality has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sly and Robbie songs has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Richhoncho (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my nomination of Category:Tourism by state or territory in Australia for speedy renaming Hugo999 (talk) 02:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hiddenstrange, I would like to recommend reverting the page you just edited back to the original page name/url Blak_Prophetz as the artist is namely Blak Prophetz and has sometimes referred to himself as Sure Shot but his name has always been Blak Prophetz previously and even now. This can be clearly seen via all of his releases. I think it is wrong for the page name to be called his personal name as that is not what his achievements was made from or by as the primary name should be the stage name and not the personal name for example Marvin Gaye was born Marvin Pentz Gay Jr and his page is not called the latter whereas Blak Prophetz page has been called Mark Duffus. I'm sure you can get where I'm coming from but please consider the latter for the musicians’ fans and musical known name in the music industry. Please revert the page URL and page name to Blak Prophetz for the respect of the musician’s achievements and brand. - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blak_Prophetz Thanks for your understandings. Avon Villa (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Avon Villa: I moved it back to "Sure Shot (rapper)" as the article is about himself as an individual; Blak Prophetz is the name of the group in which he's a member of. Though Duffus continues to use the name to this day, it was originally used as the group's name and searching for "Blak Prophetz" here on Wiki will redirect to the article anyhow, plus all Blak Prophetz releases credit him as Sure Shot e.g. "Produced and mixed by Sure Shot (Mark Duffus)" so "Sure Shot" is a known alias of his. If there was a separate article on the group, then of course that would use the name "Blak Prophetz". Hiddenstranger (talk) 22:22, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Hiddenstranger: Thank you for responding sir, just one further request which I believe is necessary. I can see that the URL is called Sure Shot (rapper). Sure Shot is a multi skilled musician, primarily a producer, rapper and drummer. I believe it would make better sense to have the inclusive term in the bracket to include that of (Producer/Rapper) Avon Villa (talk) 09:40, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Could you spare some time and review my nomination of this article? Here is the featured article criteria for guidance, in case you choose to do so. Thanks. isento (talk) 04:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hiddenstranger, thanks for your inputs. I'm quiet busy to prepare the expanding stuff within the german article, which I will bring in here, when it's done there. Because of several difficultites within this case (not only about the story, but also while it needs to get in the picture of the singer), I'm preparing the details first within the discussion site there, which is not possible for me, to do this also in english. --Jörg Lenau ^t@lk 19:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hiddenstranger, hope you're all good. I'm writing from a podcast production company in the UK and we're making a documentary series about Wikipedia and the people who work on it. I've just been looking at the history of the George Michael page to see who was updating it as news of his death came in and came across your name. I'd love to talk to you more to hear what it's like working on a page about a death in real time, especially on such a big figure - and especially on Christmas day! Would you be happy and available to talk to me sometime? Thanks Wearecrowd (talk) 10:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After taking another look at what is considered the minimal length of an album, I'm wondering if the first two releases by Recoil should be reclassified as albums rather than EPs since they run over 30 minutes. Shaneymike (talk) 02:14, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems the reason they were classed as EPs here is because they contain two and three tracks respectively. But due to the total length of each, and the definition of album, I say yes they can be reclassified as albums. Even on Discogs they are under the Albums section, although for 1 + 2, it's classified as a mini-album. Hiddenstranger (talk) 02:45, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When you have a moment, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at the article for Alice in Chains' Jar of Flies to see if that warrants being reclassified as an album rather than an EP since it clocks in (just barely) over the 30-minute mark. Although I'm not the first user to bring this up in it's talk page, I did start a new discussion this morning. As tempting as it is to take the bull by the horns, I know it's better to establish a consensus before making changes of this sort. Thank you for your time and kind consideration. Shaneymike (talk) 15:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes this would qualify as an album rather than an EP. Please make the change, thanks. Hiddenstranger (talk) 11:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for getting back to me. I started a discussion about doing that here. Shaneymike (talk) 10:00, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per discussion, agree to keep it as an EP. Hiddenstranger (talk) 16:45, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

this is poorly populated in many years. I will be working on it. Thanks for enhancing my edits, I like what you did on all so far haha Tillywilly17 (talk) 03:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Time Frequency songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:34, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female–female vocal duets has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you reversed my edit for the category debut EPs on Waysted (album), claiming that it was the band's first EP. I have been editing album articles for 12 years now and it is the first time that a band have multiple debuts. I understood since now that "debut" meant the first time a band released something on the market, a debut single or a debut album or a debut EP. Following your reasoning, there should be a category for debut demos, debut live albums, debut compilation albums, debut greatest hits, debut remix, and so on. How many times should a band debut? And is it in any way important for Wikipedia to categorize so many debuts? I can't follow the infinite debates behind the scenes about such topics and I'm ready to stand corrected, but I think that a band should have one debut for the single format and one for the long-playing format, being albums or EPs (although it was often debated if the EPs should be considered singles or mini-albums). I would like to be illuminated on the subject, thanks. Lewismaster (talk) 17:41, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes that is what the debut categories are for, to categorize bands and artist's first studio albums, EPs and singles. Debut live albums and remix albums were created before but were deleted after discussions (although Category:Debut mixtape albums hasn't yet been considered for deletion), so we can't have these types of specific debut album categories, which is no problem as long as we have the three main format types - albums, EPs and singles. An extended play is still not a full album or a proper single that's why such a term exists. Hiddenstranger (talk) 00:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you reverting me?--Potenza2021 (talk) 18:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot just unnecessarily add links to any word and please do not change song titles to italics. Italic titles are for albums, EPs, films, TV shows, video games, books, magazines etc. Hiddenstranger (talk) 18:54, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks.--Potenza2021 (talk) 19:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey mate, I was trying to create an infobox/section for Steps' "Love U More" song, though I forgot to create it as a "song" infobox rather than a "single" one. I wrote in the edit summary that it was still a work in progress, but you removed it... after only 4 minutes. Couldn't you have just converted it into a song infobox for me instead? Or at the very least, left the Steps section there so I could've kept adding to it? *sigh* AnimatedZebra (talk) 12:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, there shouldn't be a separate section for the Steps version even as a song, as it's not notable at all, see WP:NSONGS and WP:COVERSONG. Thanks. Hiddenstranger (talk) 13:30, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be willing to help a COI update/correct the Bronz (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) article? I am primarily wp:RCP and not really into music. See last section here. I'm not sure who to ask and I'd probably botch it! Much appreciated! Cheers Adakiko (talk) 09:30, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as we have a COI issue here, you did just right with your edits and reverts. I updated the article. Please give the user Bearcar the link to WP:COI to understand that COI editing is not allowed on Wikipedia. Please also see How to handle conflicts of interest if this user persists in COI editing. Hope that helps. Hiddenstranger (talk) 23:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating Bronz. uw-coi added. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. How can we contact so to create a simple new artist wiki page ? Or we can't do it via here ? Thanks in advance Dnb174 (talk) 10:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Hiddenstranger,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Same to you. Hiddenstranger (talk) 21:20, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:30, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:I like chopin.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Typo in the Mac Miller Wikipedia page, seems like something you’d like to fix Cheers 2607:FEA8:86DF:ADE0:454F:F93B:A313:CB85 (talk) 22:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Kx5 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 22 § Kx5 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 04:30, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Guvna and his friend going on a Korea trip if you wanna use it as reference to add more info to his page

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4cV3cNawe3s 47.189.13.184 (talk) 03:20, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Estonian Eurodance groups has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:26, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hiddenstranger!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you actually see this song on the AllMusic list? Because when I check the link, the only Cure song I see on the list is "Why Can't I Be You?" (which I'd also consider wrong, but that's a different argument). If you see it, I'm wondering if the AllMusic list is somehow different for different readers. CAVincent (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and I don't see "Why Can't I Be You?". Why is that? Seems to appear differently in different locations. Hiddenstranger (talk) 20:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Drug-related deaths in London has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 00:44, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sore Throat (punk/new wave band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sore Throat (punk/new wave band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:40, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Hiddenstranger. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! 141Pr {contribs} 19:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British rock music genres has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Solidest (talk) 07:56, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British hip hop genres has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Solidest (talk) 07:57, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me that doesn't smell like canvassing or sockpuppetry. Doctorhawkes (talk) 22:49, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is just an enquiry to see if a current page that has been redirected by you in the past could be placed back to its original URL. There's a current redirect on the from a page which was originally called Blak_Prophetz now redirecting to Sure Shot. I've just researched and found that the artist had several nick-names but his personal stage name had always been 'Blak Prophetz'. There was never a group per-say as that term was only suggested in various interviews with his friends and the assumptions by teh interviewer to be a collective or group but the actual song releases was from a single individual alone. I have seen several statements where he has made it clear that the term Sure Shot was referencing him but used like an adjective to describe him and his works in conjunction with product, sort like a slang term used in Hip Hop and not necessarily his stage name. I believe that the redirect would bring harm to his brand as his brand is Blak Prophetz and for wiki to not redirect the URL to the loosely used term Sure Shot that has often been affiliated with him. Please see his explanation of his name below on the links as it appears that the term on Wiki is causing him confusion.

I think it would be helpful for him and his brand to be in sync as Wiki is currently out of sync as Wiki has chosen one name over the other and selected and entire new URL to possibly confuse his brand. "Mark Duffus, also known as Sure Shot and Blak Prophetz, is a British rapper and producer from the West Midlands in England where he formed the group Blak Prophetz in the early 1980s." - I think it would read better as "Mark Duffus, also known as Blak Prophetz and sometimes refenced as Sure Shot, is a British rapper and producer from the West Midlands in England where he formed the group Blak Prophetz in the early 1980s." - and the URL reverted back to Blak_Prophetz.

My point is that keeping the uniform URL as 'Blak Prophetz' makes sense and not to override his entire career with a name that is a nickname or phrase.

https://www.blakprophetz.com/about - Definition of his name

https://www.facebook.com/blakprophetz/about_details

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=909855620509307&set=a.281949103299965

You thoughts appreciated, thanks Avon Villa (talk) 12:29, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

His bio on these links already cause the confusion by first saying "Blak Prophetz is NOT a band...He is ONE Global Hip Hop/Jazz Record Producer and creator of all music and songs that came out under that name." Then it goes on to say "He is of Jamaican descent and formed the band called Blak Prophetz in the early 1980s." So this already contradicts what was said in the opening sentence. If the bio on his official site and social media accounts claim "Blak Prophetz" is used as his solo alias, why does it also state that the name was a band (or group)? Or is Blak Prophetz his solo name and the name of his group? Hiddenstranger (talk) 01:00, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, Blak Prophetz is his solo name and movement that contained no members as such. he has collaborated with other musicians and termed the movemnet under his name which does look like a band yet is not. It was created by him and for him alone, collaborations does not call for his name to become a band. The personin question has no social accounts called 'Sure Shot' only of Blak Prophetz. All song releases are also by the latter and no other personnel - https://open.spotify.com/artist/7jl1GADl7ZItzySJohJB3I . The only error in his name is in Wikipedia from what I can see. In Hip Hop the term Sure Shot means right, brilliance, spot on and so forth. This term has been used loossley by him on several occassions to associate him withthe term and has somewhat become the confusion but I must clarify based on teh evidence I've seen his interviews where he has explicity stated that his name is Blak Prophetz with an addition sated that he's the Sure Shot meaning the best etc. All his productions by Blak Prophetz and all else by Blk Prophetz. Hope this helps to understand that the redirect is pointing to a term and not the official name of the artist. Blak Prophetz is his solo name and the not the name of his group because the group has never and does not exist as a group, he is Blak Prophetz, thanks Avon Villa (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Grind Time Now has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 10 § Grind Time Now until a consensus is reached. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British co-ed groups has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 11:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Hiddenstranger. I would like to invite you to join the discussion about "Label" or "distributor" at the album release history table. Leave your comment if you like. 183.171.120.49 (talk) 09:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hiddenstranger. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ARTMS (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hiddenstranger. Thank you for your work on Ray Morgan (singer). Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good start. IMO an edge case regarding wp:notability but I'm marking it as reviewed, primarily under SNG. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fox Stevenson albums indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:14, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect British Music Invasion has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 6 § British Music Invasion until a consensus is reached. Eurohunter (talk) 11:06, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hiddenstranger. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "ARTMS".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:10, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decapitalizing proper noun terms is baffling coming from an experienced editor such as yourself, considering I thought everybody was well aware anything beginning with "Euro-" and "Afro-" are well-established proper nouns. If you think "Afrobeat" and its derivations "Afrobeats", "Afro-pop" and so on should be decapitalized, please start a discussion on a related WikiProject or talk page. Also, please start leaving edit summaries. I don't know why less than half of your edits contain summaries, but all of them should, especially for contentious edits like the one I linked. Ss112 05:42, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]