User talk:Ishtar456

Deutsch | Español | Français | Italiano | Lietuvių | 한국어 | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Suomi | Svenska | Türkçe | 简体中文 | The main embassy page

Getting Started First steps • FAQ Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting help Community Portal • Help desk • Village Pump Where to ask questions or make comments • Request administrator attention Wikipedia: The Missing Manual Place {{helpme}} on your talk page and a small message explaining the problem The Commmunity Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists		Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

ukexpat (talk) 21:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On July 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Steamtown, USA, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Well done! —Bruce1ee^talk 06:04, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 September 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Humphrey Atherton, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- Cirt (talk) 06:02, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ishtar. I'm going to remove the FAC for Steamtown, USA pending the OTRS stuff. As soon as you get that resolved, feel free to re-nominate the article for FAC, even if it hasn't been two weeks. Karanacs (talk) 14:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sfoskett's visit is becoming irregular, so there is still hope that he might come back. The crux of the issue is that we want to be reasonably sure (with evidence) that the uploader is the copyright owner; there have been cases of users who helped their friends upload images and later these friends said they did not agree to the licensing stated. Taking your own photographs and uploading them with the appropriate information is the quickest way to handle this issue. Jappalang (talk) 00:35, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ann Hibbins, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 31 October 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Margaret Jones (Puritan midwife), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article October the 31st (The Fall Guy episode), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of John Howland at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! cmadler (talk) 20:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Humphrey Atherton you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Humphrey Atherton for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Aaron north (T/C) 21:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, quick note to say I will be revisiting the GA review in the next day or so, just had a few other things to take care of lately... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You did excellent work on the Wenlock Christison article, and I was pleased to remove the tag on it. With the kind of work you did on this and other articles, I suggest that you consider requesting Wikipedia:Autopatrolled status. --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK review note: Thank you for your review of Template:Did you know nominations/Murder of Jacqueline Thomas. There are still some issues concerning this nomination that may need to be clarified; please respond on that page as soon as possible. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:42, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 February 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wenlock Christison, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the life of Wenlock Christison, who was condemned to death for being a Quaker while in Massachusetts Bay Colony by Governor John Endicott, was spared by King Charles II? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Wenlock Christison.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I started the article Chardon High School shooting and it is being vandalized constantly. One of the worst things is that editors were reporting in the article that someone has died before they actually did. When there was one fatality they reported 2 (by name) When there were 2 they reported 3 and now that there are 3 someone put in several places that there were 4 (by name). There is actually no indication that there will be a forth fatality so that last one was really uncalled for. I just had to make five manual edits to undo the damage that one editor did (and that was an experienced long time editor). It would really be helpful if the article could be semi-protected so that unregistered editors could not do what they have been doing. Good thing I am on vacation. Thank you for your help.--Ishtar456 (talk) 01:06, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Requests for page protection and mention the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons concerns, or use {{admin help}} here or the talk page. Dru of Id (talk) 02:14, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Ishtar456 (talk) 02:28, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime. :D Dru of Id (talk) 04:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help on Chardon High School shooting. I had some issues with some of you edits, however. First of all it is not appropriate terms such as Chardon Healing Fund to be in bold. It is appropriate for it to be linked in red, like it was, because it set it up to be a future wikilink. It is also appropriate for there to be external links to the churches where they event have been held since article on those churches are unlikely to ever be developed. I cannot automatically reverse these edits, because you did them while I was editing so I am an going to do them manually. That means I have to double my effort. I have put a lot into this article and I respectfully request that you use care with your edits. Thanks a lot.--Ishtar456 (talk) 23:20, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I must disagree. There is no reason to believe that such a fund will ever have its own article. It is specifically derived from the shooting and therefore it is significant within its context. This is why I have given it a minor status as it will not have major status such as a section and certainly not an article. As for the external links, you should reasonably assume that a person can use search engines and the text of the article to find community relations and current community information. Please realize what Wikipedia is, and what Wikipedia is not. As for your concerns about my edits being done while yours are being done, I suggest you make smaller time periods between edits to prevent this problem.--SidP (talk) 23:30, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re Chardon High School shooting: I found a source from fox8.com and will add it once I'm done here. Mapsax (talk) 02:35, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I found that article in a search, I also saw one to Cincinnati.com; taking that link, I saw that it was an AP article as included in the Cincinnati Enquirer. Usually those are republished newspaper articles, and sure enough, I found the original text in an article in the local paper. I will add that as the first source, since newspaper article access tends to be more stable than that to TV news reports online. I also kept the parentheses since the sentences seemed too disjunct without them. Mapsax (talk) 03:13, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your rationale for using "was" since you want to reflect the time during the search, which of course is in the past. However, it still seems to me that "is" is more appropriate; otherwise, it seems to me that with the current wording the article is trying to convey that for some reason the house was demolished after the search. I don't follow your "not newspaper" reasoning, since that would actually support my argument (newspapers report on specific events in the context of when they happened; encyclopedias, wiki or not, give a general synopsis of a particular subject). Is this addressed somewhere in the MOS? Mapsax (talk) 02:46, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

the entire article is in the past tense as it is expected to be there, well, forever. Newspapers, on the other hand are writing in and for the here and now so they can be written in the present tense. The problem is writing a current event as if it is in the past tense, but that it what has to be done (IMO). I will work on rewording it so that no verb-to-be has to be in the sentence, but for now "was" sounds better to me than "is". It is in agreement with the tone of the rest of the article.--Ishtar456 (talk) 03:02, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:49, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ishtar, it looks like the problem is the time zone that you're using (UTC-5?), so that an edit at 02:57 UTC on the 27th appears to you as an edit at 21:57 on the 26th. All timings for comparisons at DYK are done using UTC. To install DYKcheck, follow the instructions at User:Shubinator/DYKcheck. Cheers, Mikenorton (talk) 21:51, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It took me a while to remember :). Open the above link and click on the 'your skin.js' link and it should open a page for the skin that you're using. The just copy and paste in the line highlighted below that into that page and save it. The link should appear at the bottom of your toolbox list (that's on the left hand side of the page below the 'interaction' and 'navigation' boxes). Once it's there, you're in business. Good luck! Mikenorton (talk) 23:32, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	appreciation and improvement of a rescued article
	Thank you for your interest in an article with a history, your review with a sense for quality and improvement, and your approval. If you like, you can continue with the article reviewed, a fighter for Human rights. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:22, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, it made Main page history, pictured, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I know. That's great. --Ishtar456 (talk) 18:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Improved further, look at the top of my talk, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:25, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Passion: He was despised --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:37, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Now the author's gem is today's good story (hidden message: "open mind"), awesome Wikipedian of 4 April 2012 ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:17, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A year ago, you were the 47th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, you are an awesome Wikipedian! - I miss the photographer, again, and put "Letting go of the past" on top of my talk, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:33, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be making things exceptionally difficult. I suggest you look at it again.♦ Dr. Blofeld 23:21, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have altered the hook. I normally assume good faith but you seemed intent on it not being good enough for DYK.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:56, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Its your duty to see an article you review is properly assessed if the problems you identify have been addressed. Again I'm getting negative vibes from you, have I done something to offend you in the past? I'm disheartened with DYK as it is, so when I see reviewers trying to make life tough for DYK contributors I really have little patience with them. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:43, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1. no, you did not do anything to offend me...until now. I felt as if I explained the problems several times to you and I was getting no where. I finally X'd the nom when it seemed to me that you were not going to fix the problem. I certainly was not going to change my mind. I have had a recent review removed from prep. and it is not my intention to be that kind of reviewer. When you posted here yesterday, you did not even mention that you had changed the hook. All you had to do was say "I changed the hook, can you take another look at it". I certainly would have under those circumstances. It seemed reasonable to me for me to abandon the process when you come on to my user page and accused me of "making things exceptionally difficult"

2 I very recently suggested on the DYK discussion page that it should be a policy to that a reviewer finish a review once he/she starts it. I was told that that was unreasonable. So, I know I had no duty to continue that review, especially when you had been so contentious to me off the official discussion.

3. If you are disheartened by DYK, either become part of the solution to the problems that are bothering you or take a break from it. This experience with you has certainly disheartened me, especially the comments you made after your nom passed and you had what you wanted.

• Just as a side note: Your nom has been there only a couple of days. Mine has been there a week (just under yours) and no one has touched it. It would have been far better for me to have made a quick pass of your nom (as I have done in the past) which is what I expected when I started it. then maybe you would have seen mine and considered doing it. But once I realized that you were going to be stubborn about the problem I gave up. 'nuf said. Let's move on. --Ishtar456 (talk) 21:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your response and explanation. Thanks for that. I don't mind reviewers suggesting a way to improve the articles/hooks, maybe if you suggested removing the "main feature" part in the beginning we'd have quickly solved it. If you want any articles reviewed I'd be happy to do it. My point was that sometimes it feels like contributing to DYK is not worth it especially when it seemed as if you were happy to fail it and leave it at that. I saw that as negative. I said that when all of the new restriction were imposed starting with the review for review thing which whilst it reduces the backlog some of us at times, myself included, really don't feel like doing it. At times it feels like a chore rather than enjoying reviewing, at least tht's how I feel about it at times. At least with GA review I can choose to do so when I want and quite like reviewing good articles at times. Anyway no hard feelings.♦ Dr. Blofeld 22:37, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

—Bagumba (talk) 03:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've already taken a look at it. If you really want an article of mine to look at, there's a double nom for Nemoe Karma and I Wayan Gobiah that's been up for a week and a half. The nom for Teaserama may be easier though as all the sources are online and in English. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:47, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is time for me to go to work now, so I will look at your noms later, if you trust me (I am doubting myself a lot right now).--Ishtar456 (talk) 11:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• No need to worry about it; we all make mistakes. Just one review is fine, but even that isn't necessary if you don't feel up to it. I'm paraphrasing some of those quotes right now. Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:46, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I love what you have done, except for the last paragraph, Analysis section. He did not write it, he said it to a reporter. I think that that is one in particular that needs to stay. In the meantime, I took out the whole Social media section and reduced it to one paragraph as I really do not think that it is relavant to the legal case or the reflection upon what happened. I will start a discussion about this on the talk page, but I think that its importance has passed. Thanks again for your help. I am at work so I will look more carefully at the paraphrasing when I get home.--Ishtar456 (talk) 15:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• No problem. I did the paraphrasing by section, so undoing one should be fairly simple if you disagree. Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I did Teaserama, but I did not see the actual hook online, just some other excerps, so I accepted in GF. That review was almost too easy. I don't usually find the easy ones.--Ishtar456 (talk) 21:58, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I rephrased and added another reference as regards to DYK: Estelle Manville Bernadotte. --Bruzaholm (talk) 11:17, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} I am trying to add this image http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Invisible_Children_Official_Logo.jpg to Invisible Children, Inc, but for some reason it does not work. Thanks.--Ishtar456 (talk) 23:19, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorted with this edit. Let me know if anything is unclear. AJCham 23:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

By the way, when adding images to infoboxes it's useful to check the template page for usage guidance (in this case, Template:Infobox non-profit). Unfortunately our infoboxes are inconsistent when it comes to image parameters. Some only need the filename, others also require the File: prefix, and yet others (such as this one) require you to enter the full image markup. AJCham 23:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Special Barnstar
	Thanks for your help! Pwojdacz (talk) 01:56, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Invisible Children, Inc., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resolve (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chardon High School shooting, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a student witness to the Chardon High School shooting said her math teacher had a bulletproof vest in his classroom that he wore during the crisis? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chardon High School shooting.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:11, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

,

I nominated an article for FA review on Talk:Steamtown, USA, but I accidentally initiated the nomination twice. The 3rd nomination was done in error and I do not know how to correct it. Can someone please help?--Ishtar456 (talk) 15:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your work on it - I commented on the article's talk page, but I am fine with removing the section. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 16:35, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know where the rest came from - sorry. I am super busy IRL and cannot help much now. I see there are things in the lead which are not repeated in the article (like McDade) - it might be best to withdraw the nomination. If it has no comments yet, you could even have it deleted under {{db-g7}}. Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:39, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Current Events Barnstar
		For your dedication to keeping Chardon High School shooting up to date, neutral/free of speculation, and well sourced I hereby award you this barnstar. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comments that I've left for you here. Nyttend (talk) 22:36, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Steamtown, USA, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ohio Central Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Sandboxtwo. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Canadian Pacific Railway No. 1246. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Canadian Pacific Railway No. 1246 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Bmusician 01:08, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've userfied it, to User:Ishtar456/Sandbox2.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:16, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bmusician 03:43, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking at your interesting Age of Steam Roundhouse article up for Do You Know....March 17. Then I looked at Google Maps. I like to see things on Google Maps. Why can't I see this roundhouse on the map? Then it occurred to me this might be an elaborate hoax. You don't seem to have any citations other than the website itself. How about adding the coords to the article. --GroveGuy (talk) 16:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the interest in the article. It is pretty slim on citations. It is also a work in progress. It is not a hoax. You can check it out on their website. My interest in it stems from the fact that they own 4 locomotives that were in the possession of a tourist attraction that I used to visit when I was a kid. There are not many sources as it has not been open to the public yet. Besides their website, I have also cited the website of the architect and also a newspaper article about the latest locomotive they purchased in November, 2011. It is located on Smokey Lane, Sugarcreek, Ohio. I do not really know much about how to post coordinates. The fact that Jerry Joe Jacobson sold OCRR and kept all his vintage equipment is mentioned in many places, but no everyone is aware yet that he built this roundhouse. Take Care,--Ishtar456 (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On the website there is a page called "What We Are Doing" where it says this is a 34 acre farm 2 1/2 miles south of Sugarcreek. It is located on a road called Smokey Lane and located immediately adjacent to the Ohio Central Railroad main line track. I see all this on Google Maps. But I don't see any spurs from the railroad. Not on Bing maps either. You sent me a message about Morehead News. That makes me think this is not a hoax. Also you sent me a message saying the Google Map was dated 2006. Could you tell me how you know that? --GroveGuy (talk) 16:39, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added coords to your article. I see it on Mapquest. You don't need to send me a photo.--GroveGuy (talk) 17:21, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a Youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiyRhXpmv14 Must be nice to have a quarter of a billion dollars.--GroveGuy (talk) 17:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note that if you click on the coords and go to GoogleMaps - the map - you are also given a photo on the left of the roundhouse. Can you tell me how you know the GoogleMaps is dated 2006? --GroveGuy (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Age of Steam Roundhouse, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that to house his collection of vintage steam locomotives the former CEO of Ohio Central RR built the Age of Steam Roundhouse, the first full-sized, working roundhouse built in the U.S. since 1951? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Age of Steam Roundhouse.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 00:03, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the long-delayed re-review of the DYK nom for Madeline Rogero. Orlady (talk) 04:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Twice this morning I have tried to write a DYK nomination review and have conflicted with one you have just written. I was prompted to do some reviews by the fact that there is a large backlog of unreviewed nominations at present. Keep up the good work! (I wondered whether you were the same person as ishtar, an ODP editor at one time?) Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Took your advice re: lead-thanks again! We hope (talk) 01:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I left a reply on the page wondering if I could hold it to April 5th. I thought it was 5x expansion, but a bit short, and waited over 10 days for the review so I couldn't fix concerns. Thanks Secret ^account 03:23, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Margaret Bechstein Hays at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Prioryman (talk) 10:07, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can work on it somewhat, you want all the references formatted ?Nocturnal781 (talk) 02:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have finished adding the correct citation templates I believe. Nocturnal781 (talk) 03:56, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry about that but its Shelling of StepanakertNocturnal781 (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ishtar, I addressed concerns for the Ali al-Sulayhi and Jubbet ad-Dib nominations. I'll work on the issues relating to Hana Shalabi tomorrow. Thanks for reviewing the noms and for your patience. --Al Ameer son (talk) 02:26, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/Princess Irene of the Netherlands (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

To let you know, the ALT1 you created there successfully became promoted and then featured in the main page. Yes, I nominated the articles as part of DYK, but you deserve a lot of credit for a clean hook that got promoted. Also, credits goes to we hope for contributions to the article. Congratulations! George Ho (talk) 09:36, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ishtar,

I watched back on the Talk page of Ultracobalt. I found out that another guy (the nominator of this article) answered on his behalf on his talk page long time ago, but I have been awaiting an answer on the DYK template page. Moreover, I don't understand whether this guy is talking with me or with the creator (or maybe with you? :-)) In other words, big mess... :-( What can we do now? Anyway, I think that the place to talk about a DYK nomination should be the related DYK template page... Alex2006 (talk) 14:38, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking the same thing. That way every one who reviews it knows the full story.--Ishtar456 (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 March 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Illinois Central Railroad No. 790, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that retired steam locomotive Illinois Central 790 (pictured) was frequently put back into service during floods because any amount of water made the diesel-electric locomotives short out? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Illinois Central Railroad No. 790.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:44, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats to another good one! Reviewer of reviewers, could you cast an eye on my nomination for Schiersteiner Kantorei? It occured only last night to me that they celebrate 50 years and sing on Saturday, would be nice to have it appear then. Btw, something went wrong with the template I reviewed for it, Marion, Utah, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:01, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Sorry, I'm taking another break form reviewing. i got a nom pulled of the front page. When that happens I know I have to take a break. I am going to finish the one I started, but I am not taking on any new ones right now.--Ishtar456 (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• No problem for me. I hope it works out for you, I know what it means to be afraid of the Bozeman Carnegie Library effect, and see, I am not the only one, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:30, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Figure out: did you see where the link WP:Great Dismal Swamp goes? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:13, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• This victim of the swamp returned to editing, and the former has the Precious article for peer review ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:15, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is is referenced... --TIAYN (talk) 14:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.0.179 (talk) 20:33, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know that my post was bold so much as detailed and specific. I find that it helps in situations like that to spell things out as clearly as possible. After I made my "final" post, it dawned on me that the other party had displayed an excellent example of the problem and all I really needed to do was put that into focus. Perhaps that's what you were referring to as bold, the brief addendum, but it really wasn't. It's just the act of shining a light into darkness, it makes the darkness vanish. Marrante (talk) 20:35, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ishtar,

I was not able to be on Wikipedia for a bit. Both of the issues mentioned on the nomination are actually non-issues. The first sentence of the development section is wikilinked to the source of the quote, and the chief's name appears on the official website linked right underneath.

Could you help put this back up, as you said that there were no real issues.

Thank you, Aslbsl (talk) 13:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Wiki Award In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 23:04, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have provided a second opinion on the nomination and tried to satisfy one of the concerns you raised.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 16:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 15 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Margaret Bechstein Hays‎, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that RMS Titanic survivor Margaret Bechstein Hays not only saved her Pomeranian dog from the wreck, she also looked after the "Titanic Orphans" (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Margaret Bechstein Hays‎.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations to a titanic DYK! One of the victims rose from the swamp! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 00:12, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.12 (talk) 15:18, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Helen Jonas-Rosenzweig, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Helen Jonas-Rosenzweig, Holocaust survivor and one of the Schindlerjuden, appeared in a documentary with the daughter of Amon Goeth, her Nazi tormentor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Helen Jonas-Rosenzweig.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:07, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		Four Award
		Congratulations! You have been awarded the Four Award for your work from beginning to end on Steamtown, USA. TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:45, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have started the review of Charles Melville Hays and thought I would mention it here as it is a long time since you nominated it. Bob1960evens (talk) 11:02, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are two WP:RFCs at WP:FOUR. The first is to conflate issues so as to keep people from expressing meaningful opinions. The second, by me, is claimed to be less than neutral by proponents of the first. Please look at the second one, which I think is much better.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 06:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I replied to your comments there. Just dropping a note in case you miss it as you said you're not around much.

Storm in a teacup about some silly tagging and a badly thought out response to your help request with the retagging, in my opinion. The second user was probably just trying to help but didn't look properly...

Happy to remove the tags for you, but frankly, just do it yourself if you like. Either way works.

But comment there if you like...

Enjoyed the article, by the way, boys never grow out of trains, and I'm one of them. Cheers. Begoon ^talk 15:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well handled, sir. It's on my watchlist now, so don't feel you need to be worried or start being active again just to watch it like a hawk (though you can if you like, and it would be great if you did - editors like yourself coming back in sufficient numbers just might save the place from its descent into petty bureaucratic nonsense ). I despair sometimes at our introvert nature. If it's not all written for the readers, then what are we doing? See you around... Begoon ^talk 19:11, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Steamtown, U.S.A. for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Technical 13 (talk) 14:34, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Talk:Steamtown, U.S.A.". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Hasteur (talk) 14:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Union Pacific "Big Boy" No. 4012, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Thank you. Ch Th Jo (talk) 01:34, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a note to let the main editors of Steamtown, U.S.A. know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on January 16, 2014. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask Bencherlite (talk · contribs). You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 16, 2014. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

Steamtown, U.S.A. was a steam locomotive museum that ran steam excursions out of North Walpole, New Hampshire, and Bellows Falls, Vermont, from the 1960s to 1983. The museum was founded by millionaire seafood industrialist F. Nelson Blount and was operated by the Steamtown Foundation after his death in 1967. Due to Vermont's air quality regulations restricting steam excursions, declining visitor attendance, and track use disputes, some of the collection was relocated to Scranton, Pennsylvania, in the mid-1980s and the rest was sold. Steamtown, U.S.A. failed to attract the expected 200,000–400,000 visitors in Scranton and, facing bankruptcy, it sold more of the collection. In 1986, the U.S. House of Representatives approved funding to begin the process of making it a National Historic Site. Historical research was carried out by the National Park Service (NPS) on the remaining equipment. By 1995, Steamtown had been acquired and developed by the NPS as the Steamtown National Historic Site with a $66 million allocation. Several more pieces have been removed from the collection as a result of the government acquisition. Part of the Blount collection is still on display in Scranton. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precious again to see that on the Main page, where I enjoy The Lord bless you and keep you --Gerda Arendt (talk) 00:41, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015!!!

Hello Ishtar456, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2015. Happy editing, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:01, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} to all registered users whom have commented on his talk page. To prevent receiving future messages, please follow the opt-out instructions on User:Technical 13/Holiday list

Three years ago, you were the 47th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, repeated in br'erly style, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Eight years ago, you were recipient no. 47 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

David Carradine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]