User talk:Jalapeño

It is 03:21, on Thursday, 23 January 2025

Userpage (commons · meta)

Talk (Archives)

Gallery

WIP Projects

Contributions (Count)

Email

Barnstars (Userboxes)

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III.

Remember to put your signature after your message with 4 tildes (~~~~). Thank you. 🔥Jalapeño🔥

This section is pinned and will not be automatically archived.

Please use "New section"/"Add topic" instead of "Edit"/"Edit source" on this page, so you can read the page notice. I moved the page notice from the talk page to its special page because it looks tacky on the start of my talk page. So please, read it.

Thank you, 🔥Jalapeño🔥

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Lord Clyde-class ironclad on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jalapeño

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username 1ctinus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect 6 April 1992, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 2 § 6 April 1992.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1ctinus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-1ctinus📝🗨 00:05, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brian Lane (RAF officer) on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Talk:26 December 2024 Israeli attack on Yemen on a "Warfare" Good Article nomination. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Thompson (businessman) was already closed by a non-admin, subject to DRV and re-opened per WP:NACD. This was stated in the discussion by User:Extraordinary Writ, with the guidance that an admin should instead close the discussion.

Why did you think it appropriate to close that AfD as a non-admin? NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 21:19, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a section on the AfD talk page, but I don't think this one is worth fighting. It's probably going to DRV by the end of today anyway, and admins may overturn to no consensus at best. We'll see. guninvalid (talk) 21:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's separate really from the outcome of the AfD. If someone read the discussion, they would've read that the discussion had already been closed by a non-admin and re-opened with guidance an admin should instead close it.

So either, a) he didn't read the discussion prior to closing it, or b) wilfully ignored the guidance of uninvolved admin Extraordinary Writ and closed it again as a non-admin anyway. No reasoning was given for the close so I don't know whether it's a or b.

Either scenario is WP:DISRUPTIVE and requires explanation. NICHOLAS NEEDLEHAM (talk) 21:43, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert your close. That should not have been closed by a non-admin, and you'll save everyone a lot of time. SportingFlyer T·C 21:32, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm under no assumption whatsoever that the actual outcome would have been different (and I voted 'Keep'), but I nonetheless see this as a completely inappropriate overstep. Given there's strong circumstantial evidence that Jalapeño didn't even read through the discussion, this isn't the level of scrutiny I'd want to see at such an important AfD. It isn't a ballot; you actually have to read the things these people are saying, and I only trust an admin to do that for such a long discussion. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 22:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Hello, Jalapeño,

This was a divided AFD discussion that had already been through one Deletion review and was not suitable for a NAC. Please revert your closure and all associated actions that you took when closing this discussion. In general, for an editor with your lack of experience closing AFDs, you should only close ones that appear to be unanimous Keeps. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:26, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to write a similar message to Liz. Given this has already been to DRV for a non-admin close before, and is clearly a "controversial decision", I am going to revert your close per WP:NACD acting in my capacity as an "uninvolved administrator". I won't relist, and I hope it will sit there and be closed by an administrator in the coming day(s). Daniel (talk) 23:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you tagged Henri de Toulouse-Lautrec as maybe incorporating text from an LLM. Which parts look problematic? XOR'easter (talk) 19:32, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Came here to ask the same. Viriditas (talk) 21:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to remove the tag. This tool shows that the content was written 1-2 years before ChatGPT was released to the public. Viriditas (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 13 svibnja 1990 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 16 § 13 svibnja 1990 until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 00:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday! Hi Jalapeño! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy birthday! Enjoy this special day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 12:08, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edits to WHO changing the membership map to exclude the US. The executive order does not have international effect. It only starts US internal process. AncientWalrus (talk) 09:51, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the SVG change was fine. You didn't change membership, it just coincided with a vandalistic edit to the map on commons. Apologies for reverting that. I still wouldn't add a map under edit warring to the infobox when it's already in the article though. AncientWalrus (talk) 10:05, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thanks for the info. I've changed the SVG map to list the US as "in process of withdrawal". 🔥Jalapeño🔥 contribs 11:20, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a membership status the WHO has. The US is and remains a full member legally. Withdrawal process is entirely US-internal at this point with no international effect hence such an edit would be incorrect. AncientWalrus (talk) 02:30, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]