French
DeutschUser talk:Mianvar1
| This is Mianvar1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 |
WikiProject Visual arts
[edit]Hi Mianvar1,
I saw your work on articles related to visual art and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch the WikiProject Visual arts talk page, which is a noticeboard for Wikipedia's fine arts coverage. It's a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to artists and fine arts. Take a look for yourself!
And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider adopting a cleanup category or participating in one of our current formal discussions.
Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Welcome to Wikipedia! Hope to see you around. czar 23:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi CZAR, Thanks for reaching out and for the links and references. I have checked them out, did a bit of editing and will look for other opportunities to contribute.–––– Mianvar1 15 February 2018
Replaceable fair use File:Arthur Lerner Self-portrait 2003.jpeg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Lerner Self-portrait 2003.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Thank you for your feedback and guidance. I have responded as you suggested, on the file description and talk pages. Best, Mianvar1 (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Just for reference, not being able to find an existing free image of a living person has not typically been considered an acceptable justification for non-free use because the long-established consensus is that the possibility of creating a new free equivalent exist as long as the person is alive. It might not be you or me who creates the free equivalent and it might not be done today or tomorrow, but it doesn’t have to be any of that. As long as the subject’s still living, the equivalent can be created by anyone at anytime, including the subject. There are certain exceptions to this, some are given in item #1 in WP:NFC#UUI, but the general consensus though as been not to allow such use for such a reason. The other argument you make is much more interesting and may require further discussion at WP:FFD or WT:NFC. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I should have left out the final aside—I see your point on that. In reality, my rationale was what you called the "more interesting argument." With that in mind, how should I proceed—leave the image as is? Mianvar1 (talk) 22:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- I posted something at WT:NFC#Non-free use of File:Arthur Lerner Self-portrait 2003.jpeg. My "feeling" is that the way you're trying to justify seems more appropriate for non-free use outside of the infobox, but others might feel differently. Anyway, an admin will review the tag and the contest and evaluate the arguments made in each; if they feel further discussion is warranted, they will decline the nomination and advise accordingly. If not, they may delete the file outright leaving open the possibility of a WP:REFUND at a later date.
- As for a free equivalent for the infobox, there are a couple things which could be tried. I agree that a free equivalent of this particular image is unlikely to be obtained, but "free equivalent" does not mean "free version of the exact same image". Asking at WP:RI and c:COM:RI occasionally works, but the process can be slow. Some people have had success with WP:PERMISSION, even directly contacting the subject of the article or their representatives, and obtaining a good free image of the person via that route. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:12, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I should have left out the final aside—I see your point on that. In reality, my rationale was what you called the "more interesting argument." With that in mind, how should I proceed—leave the image as is? Mianvar1 (talk) 22:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Just for reference, not being able to find an existing free image of a living person has not typically been considered an acceptable justification for non-free use because the long-established consensus is that the possibility of creating a new free equivalent exist as long as the person is alive. It might not be you or me who creates the free equivalent and it might not be done today or tomorrow, but it doesn’t have to be any of that. As long as the subject’s still living, the equivalent can be created by anyone at anytime, including the subject. There are certain exceptions to this, some are given in item #1 in WP:NFC#UUI, but the general consensus though as been not to allow such use for such a reason. The other argument you make is much more interesting and may require further discussion at WP:FFD or WT:NFC. — Marchjuly (talk) 22:39, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Don Baum image
[edit]The main infobox image is generally reserved for an image of the subject of the article, which in this case would be a photo of Baum. Non-free images of artwork are typically fine for main infoboxes when the article is a stand-alone article about the work in question, but they shouldn't really be used in the main infoboxes of articles about the artist. So, please try and figure if there's a way to incorporate this image into the body of the article that is in accordance with WP:NFCC#8. The best way to do this is by placing the image near any sourced critical commentary specifically about it or any sourced critical commentary discussing the particular style or technique it is supposed to illustrate. Simply adding non-free images of artwork to artist articles is likely to be considered WP:DECORATIVE, especially when involving multiple images, unless there is a clear contextual connection between sourced article content and image.
As for the infobox image, Baum is deceased which means it might be possible to use a non-free image of him for identification purposes in the main infobox per item 10 of WP:NFCI. As long as there is no reasonable expectation that a free equivalent can neither be found nor created per WP:NFCC#1, a non-free should be acceptable. While it's obvious that a new photo of someone who has died cannot be taken, it might be possible that a older existing photo which has been released under a free license or which can be converted to a free license can be found. How hard and extensively a search is needed is a bit subjective, but generally a little more effort than simply downloading the first photo you find on Google is expected. If you do search and are unable to find anything suitable, then you can upload a non-free as {{Non-free biog pic}} using {{Non-free use rationale biog}}.
If you have any questions about this, feel free to ask them below, at WT:NFC or WP:MCQ. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly: Thank you for your feedback. As you suggested, I moved the art image into the article's body (where it is discussed) and looked for an appropriate image of the subject. I was unable to find a clearly free image, so I selected one whose source was clear (the Smithsonian Archives), where educational use is encouraged, and from which I would use only a small detail (about 10% of the original), so as to make as minimal use of it as possible. Mianvar1 (talk) 15:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Rodney Carswell) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Rodney Carswell, Mianvar1!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Very well done article. Keep up the good work.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Onel5969 TT me 10:08, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed your article about the Jan Cicero Gallery and thought it was quite good. Have you considered nominating it for Did you know? ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 16:06, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- @ONUnicorn: Thank you for your assessment. No, I hadn't thought about that—isn't it a bit odd to nominate one's own pages?--Mianvar1 (talk) 17:08, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- It's not at all odd to nominate one's own pages - probably 90% or more of the pages nominated at DYK are nominated by the person who created them. If no one nominated their own pages there wouldn't be enough articles to fill the DYK section! ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 18:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
A cookie for you!
[edit] | Great article creation in James Pringle Cook! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 08:12, 9 November 2018 (UTC) |
A cheeseburger for you!
[edit] | Great article creation in Barbara Grad! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 11:20, 12 November 2018 (UTC) |
Some stroopwafels for you!
[edit] | Great article creation in Alison Ruttan! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 11:24, 12 November 2018 (UTC) |
A page you started (Laurie Hogin) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Laurie Hogin.
User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on Laurie Hogin.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 17:56, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Liz Young) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Liz Young.
User:FULBERT while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Well written and sourced article on this artist.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
FULBERT (talk) 13:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (William Nichols (artist)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating William Nichols (artist).
User:FULBERT while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Well-written, sourced, and tagged article.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
FULBERT (talk) 13:16, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Wow
[edit]Thank you for your spectacular additions to Ellen Carey!ThatMontrealIP (talk) 17:28, 9 July 2019 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit] | The Original Barnstar |
| For your great work expanding Ellen Carey from a tiny stub to a substantial article! ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:15, 11 July 2019 (UTC) |
Orphaned non-free image File:Ann Agee Boxing in the Kitchen detail 2005.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Ann Agee Boxing in the Kitchen detail 2005.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Images
[edit]Hi Mianvar1, Thanks so much for your advice on inserting images into articles! I’m going to go back and review the sizes of the images and then give your method a try. This is my first article, and it feels like I have invested as much time learning how to use Wikipedia as I have writing the article. Fortunately, when I have reached out for help, other Wikipedeans have been generous with their time and knowledge.
Thanks again! Dactyl123 (talk) 18:59, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169 Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Uploading a Wyeth image
[edit]Hi Mianvar1. I posed a question at the Help Desk an Image Correctly and was referred to you with high esteem and regards. I have created an article on Andrew Wyeth's Maidenhair and need to upload an image of the painting. My dilemma presently is the correct way to upload an image that obviously holds a copyright but is allowed to be displayed on other WP Wyeth painting pages. Might you be able to guide me through the process so that I could do this correctly? Thank you in advance. Maineartists (talk) 01:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you. I figured it out.Maineartists (talk) 18:32, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dorit Cypis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Asher.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 20 October 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Barbara Takenaga Gold + Red 2005.xcf
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Takenaga Gold + Red 2005.xcf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Sandeep Mukherjee
[edit]Hi Mianvar1—fantastic work on Sandeep Mukherjee! I think it'd be nice for it to appear on the main page through WP:DYK; would that be alright with you? For the blurb, we could potentially use something along the lines of "Did you know...that for his 2015 mural Mutual Entanglements, artist Sandeep Mukherjee instructed the gallery to install the 10 panels in whatever order and orientation they wanted?" Also open to any other blurb ideas you might have. Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} talk 21:18, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Sdkb: Hi Sdkb—Thank you for your encouragement. That would be fine with me and the blurb is good!--Best, Mianvar1 (talk) 22:17, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
- Awesome; I'll create the nomination page and put you as co-nom. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 22:32, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
DYK for Sandeep Mukherjee
[edit]
On 3 May 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sandeep Mukherjee, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that for his 2015 mural Mutual Entanglements, artist Sandeep Mukherjee instructed the gallery to install the 10 panels in whatever order and orientation they wanted? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sandeep Mukherjee. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sandeep Mukherjee), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]American art now
Thank you for quality articles about contemporary American artists, especially women, such as Sandeep MukherjeeFern Shaffer, Elizabeth Brown (musician), Susan Landauer and Heide Fasnacht, providing images of them and their works, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2588 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:44, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Richard Pousette-Dart House Suffern.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Richard Pousette-Dart House Suffern.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 22:23, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A barnstar for you!
[edit] | The Barnstar of Diligence |
| Astonishing! Robertgombos (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC) |
October 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:36, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for October 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dawn DeDeaux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Frank.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:30, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 2008, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlos Motta.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Michael Smith (performance artist), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Wegman, Joshua White and Mike Kelley.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jessica Stockholder, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Formalism.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Ellen Harvey The Nudist Museum 2012.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Ellen Harvey The Nudist Museum 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Amy Sillman Big Girl 2006.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Amy Sillman Big Girl 2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diana Cooper (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tony Smith.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Corinne Davis (Black) Heritage Search.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Lisa Corinne Davis (Black) Heritage Search.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
_Heritage_Search.jpeg){kind=link}
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
_Heritage_Search.jpeg){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free image File:Lisa Corinne Davis Doodle Verite 2007.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Lisa Corinne Davis Doodle Verite 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:53, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
| |
| One year! |
|---|
June events from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:21, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for August 12
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paul Winstanley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matthew Breen.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 12 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for September 21
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virginia Dwan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Ross.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)