User talk:Msalmon

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. Please click here to leave me a new message.

Welcome!

Hello, Msalmon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for joining our community. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. First thing: be bold! Editors are always happy to correct or revert mistakes and discuss changes with which they disagree. Here are some links you might find useful:

• The tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article

And for more detailed information:

• Help pages - the instruction manual, contains everything you could possibly want to know
• The five pillars of Wikipedia - our principles, or how to get on with other editors
• Manual of Style - how to format articles, where to place pictures, and other stylistic matters.

You can also check out the community portal, which has lots of ideas on how you can help Wikipedia.

All of this information can be daunting, but if you have a question and can't find the answer, you can always ask me on my talk page or go to Wikipedia:Where to ask a question. One last thing: please sign your name when leaving messages for others on article and user talk pages using (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. I hope you enjoy editing!   --Sam Blanning (formerly Malthusian) (talk) 22:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Happy editing! Waterlooroadfan107 (talk) 21:08, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know she's not at Judges' houses? Bootcamp for the overs isn't until tomorrow. –anemoneprojectors– 21:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Because she was sent home --MSalmon (talk) 21:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, I'm watching on +1 and saw online that tonight was just the girls. But I'm now watching the overs, so she obviously didn't get through. –anemoneprojectors– 21:29, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was the Girls and part of the Over 25s that was on tonight --MSalmon (talk) 21:31, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I was slightly misled by what I read. Not to worry :-) –anemoneprojectors– 21:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thats ok --MSalmon (talk) 21:36, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

how do you know there are no live show? huh? i got proof okay.

XFactor123 (talk) 09:16, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Look at Fox's schedule, doesn't say anything about live shows --MSalmon (talk) 09:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been an afternoon of mad levels of vandalism - drives you mad doesn't it ;) An admin will hopfully turn up soon and start banning the backlog and give us a break. KylieTastic (talk) 15:38, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know, and I am not sitting here reverting everything when I have better things to do with my time --MSalmon (talk) 15:40, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Motherfuckere are gonna die

Hello, Msalmon. You have new messages at Livelikemusic's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 14:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strictly Come Dancing (series 11), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dancing in the Dark (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just thought you'd want to know that one of your IP fans posted a comment to Talk:Timeline of Google Street View posing as you (made it look like a typical signature), which Sinebot then signed because he/she didn't put the four tildes. Don't worry, I reverted the edits. Paris1127 (talk) 16:42, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, didn't see it because I was at work --MSalmon (talk) 18:04, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask how do we leave comment when we edit? Like how you leave comment when you edited my post? ~XFactor123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by XFactor123 (talk • contribs) 12:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just type it in the box below where it says Edit Summary --MSalmon (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh Thank You very Much :) Please update the 'U.S Rating', they are all messed up! ~XFactor123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by XFactor123 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know what they are sorry, and remember to sign your posts by using the pen icon or type ~~~~ --MSalmon (talk) 13:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Can we chat personally? --XFactor123 (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)XFactor123[reply]

Why? --MSalmon (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

nvm. :) --XFactor123 (talk) 03:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)XFactor123[reply]

You mean type ~~~~ ;-) –anemoneprojectors– 16:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes --MSalmon (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you a girl or a boy? --XFactor123 (talk) 13:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)XFactor123[reply]

Why are you interested? --MSalmon (talk) 13:16, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Msalmon, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Herald talk with me 13:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked. Leaky Caldron 17:16, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank god for that --MSalmon (talk) 17:17, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You said that "it was Crissy and Mark in the bottom two on 18 not Crissy and Willie" but the table shows Willie was 5th in the vote, not Mark. Does this mean that the figures quoted in the table are wrong (the reference is dead so I can't check) or that the two people Ant and Dec said "it could be you" to, weren't the two that were actually in the bottom two? If so, the key is wrong. Just wanted to clarify as it doesn't add up. –anemoneprojectors– 21:36, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The table that I have changed it to now is correct (I have the figures in an Excel spreadsheet) --MSalmon (talk) 22:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't answer my question. Does it mean that Mark wasn't in the bottom two of the vote that week, but was he called out as "it might be you"? Because if it does, the key is wrong. –anemoneprojectors– 11:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He was in the bottom two as indicated in the "bottom two" row on the table --MSalmon (talk) 11:36, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The term "bottom two" implies that he received the lowest votes. The table shows someone else received the lowest votes. I changed the note in the key, because he didn't receive the second lowest number of votes. Why do we (on Wikipedia) call it the bottom two, when it's not always the official bottom two? Do we know why they sometimes call out someone else? –anemoneprojectors– 16:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can change the key but nothing else --MSalmon (talk) 16:11, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Same as Crissy in the second vote, and others possibly in that year and definitely in other years. What's being called the bottom two on Wikipedia isn't always the people with the fewest votes, so it's not the bottom two. It should be renamed, shouldn't it? –anemoneprojectors– 16:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To what though? --MSalmon (talk) 16:13, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just spotted that series 13 has an "NB", explaining it. I don't know if it's on all of them because I haven't checked. The Daily Mirror called it the bottom two so as at least one reliable source call it then we don't need to change it - I had assumed Wikipedians decided. Though I don't recall anyone on the programme saying that the "bottom two" doesn't reflect the votes, and people probably assume that it always does and it could easily affect the votes. I might complain to Ofcom ;-) –anemoneprojectors– 16:23, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that's fine then --MSalmon (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Added a note to series 11, the first year where the "bottom two" didn't always follow the vote. Series 12 and 13 already have these notes. That's that sorted then! –anemoneprojectors– 16:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool, will add the camp saviour vote on the "reults and elimination" table later tonight. --MSalmon (talk) 17:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed the spat you're having with 2.30.20.205 over number of nominations. Have to say I think he's right and you're wrong. To say that Casey and Lee have zero nominations implies that it was possible for them to be nominated but did not receive any when, in fact, they were not eligible for nominations so n/a would, to me, seem to be correct.--The Totter 02:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

So what that Casey and Lee were not eligible to be nominated, it is explained in the notes, and anyway they are returning to the house tonight (10 January) so they are eligible to be nominated --MSalmon (talk) 14:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No – returning to the house yes but they're not eligible to be nominated for eviction tonight, which was the point of your spat.--The Totter 15:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Why did you revert it then change it back to zero? --MSalmon (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Surely not having the chance to receive any nominations means that stating it as none applicable shows that they couldn't have got any. Whilst 0 suggests that they haven't received any at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.20.205 (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are missing the point here, they were still housemates when they were living in the Bolt Hole even though could not be nominated, but now they are back in the house it can be left as 0 --MSalmon (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But they still have not gone through a nominations process, meaning that they haven't got 0, because they didn't receive no nominations. They were in the Bolt Hole, making them not eligible to be nominated. Therefore it should be N/A. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.20.205 (talk) 08:03, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They will go through it tomorrow --MSalmon (talk) 11:12, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

But they haven't gone through it yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.30.20.205 (talk) 14:50, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No but they will tomorrow, anyway the page is semi-protected now so you won't be able to edit it unless you create an account--MSalmon (talk) 14:54, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, have added Day 11's doings but in doing so managed to bugger up the formatting. Could you be a dear and fix it please? Thanks.--The Totter 01:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Seems fine to me --MSalmon (talk) 10:21, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'm fine with your edits. But I made some changes in the The Voice UK (series 1), I hope you don't change those.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 13:20, 28 January 2014 (UTC) No, they are ok with me --MSalmon (talk) 13:21, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dancing on Ice (series 5), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Michael Ball and Songbird (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Dancing with the Stars (U.S. TV series) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 01:16, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you've contributed to The_Great_British_Sewing_Bee_(series_2); why not contribute to The Great British Sewing Bee Wiki? Jesse Groppi (talk) 15:40, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to the summary table, I the following proposal at Talk:The_X_Factor_(UK_TV_series)#Small_text_proposal_to_alter_table. to improve readability per WP:ACCESS, what do you think? → Lil-℧niquԐ 1 - { Talk } - 01:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Draw It!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Julian Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Big Brother 15 (UK), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya, I added the 1st/2nd/3rd but was reverted by one editor so I assumed my other addition was also incorrect. →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It was fine before you reverted it --MSalmon (talk) 21:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well since I was confused I reverted both of my additions! →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 21:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thats ok the

• "Top 3 (lost judges' vote)" means they came third. "Top 3 (won judges' vote)" means they came second. What's so hard to understand. And my mother taught me that you only swear when you're losing. 78.147.146.4 (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wait until the results of the public vote to be released, like every single year --MSalmon (talk) 18:59, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya Msalmon,
Just a friendly note - Please don't edit war,
Either discuss the issue with the editor or If you think it's necessary report them :)
Cheers, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 19:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice UK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Royal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tumble (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louis Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MSalmon, How are you? Just to let you know that there is an unregistered user on the loose who is getting rid of a lot of stats and other sources, mainly on ITV programs, (saying that ITV press is not a valid source, even though people have been using it here for a long while). As you can see on the edit history for the Jump, he will just revert your edits for the reasons described. (WP:NOTSTATS and no source for the episode results.) So I would suggest watching out for his reverts on this programme and who knows, he soon may delete statistics on any other pages similar to this citing the same reasons. It's starting to get annoying, so be on the look out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/81.154.188.16 173.179.185.186 (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)samusek2[reply]

...has been blocked for 48 hours. He not only vandalized Big Brother but this is his idea of humor. ```Buster Seven Talk 21:14, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie indeed goes for deadlock in Week 1 and she should named as Bottom three in Week 1. Chloe indeed goes for deadlock in Week 2 and been voted off so she should named 13th. Chloe indeed goes for deadlock in Week 3 and been voted off so he should named 12th.

What has that got to do with me? --MSalmon (talk) 16:54, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Jump (series 2), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jackass. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice UK (series 4), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marvin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, sorry about that (deleting the table) I didn't realise you were waiting until a certain time, I was going by the current released ratings, okay sorry I'll leave it to you! However It would be good if you left the first part of the article which I changed because it previously said 'Emma willis will return to the series' but I changed it to 'returned' obviously because it's launched now and she's returned....

It's only the official ratings that we add in --MSalmon (talk) 15:56, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The bit about Emma was already changed --MSalmon (talk) 16:03, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

I noticed you reasonably undid my edits when I added the celebrity versions to the series details and understandibly they were deleted as the celebrity version has its own page. Just to ask, is it ok if I undo it for now as in my opinion, I don't think Big Brother & Celebrity Big Brother should be seperate articles. It's the same show more or less, and I wouldn't really consider it a spin-off. I'm aiming to merge the Celebrity article into the main one. It's all Big Brother UK at the end of the day. ;) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simkinsjohn1 (talk • contribs) 20:55, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coast (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian McMillan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a link to the episode on the talk page. I don't know what RachelRice is talking about, neither Davina or Big Brother referred to it as nominations. ThisIsDanny (talk) 22:51, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I kept saying but she didn't listen to me --MSalmon (talk) 18:03, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

She's now requesting we change the nominations table for Big Brother 15 on the talk page. Tell me it's not just me who thinks her idea is ridiculous. ThisIsDanny (talk) 16:52, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the The Voice UK (series 5) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Msalmon. This is TVShowsEditor. I put Day 6 in the nomination table because the first eviction is taking place in the 1st of September. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TVShowsEditer (talk • contribs) 22:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Put the day they nominate in not the eviction day. --MSalmon (talk) 22:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"please don't abbreviate"? Why the heck not?? (1) TV isn't really an abbreviation, it's another word/spelling. (2) If you say that for TV, why wouldn't you say the same for R&B? (3) There's nothing wrong with it - especially on a article about a U.S. show, and especially in the Notability column where it should be kept as short as possible. --Musdan77 (talk) 04:35, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well it can't be changed because the page has been fully protected now --MSalmon (talk) 09:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Anything can be changed if you make an edit request for an admin to do so. –anemoneprojectors– 13:52, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I just felt the need to clarify that. But if this is the reason for the protection, then probably not. –anemoneprojectors– 13:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 15) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I know you are trying to reach a consensus, but you have now violated the 3 revert rule. I won't report you however (because I'm nice), but please don't do it again on any other article. I have seen many people being blocked for 3RR violations and i really don't want to see you being blocked for this. Thank you for your co-operation Class455fan1 (talk to me) 23:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I did reply but no one has replied to mine yet --MSalmon (talk) 23:28, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I will do, but i go on a 5 day WikiBreak tomorrow because of exams Class455fan1 (talk to me) 23:38, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haymarket bus station, Leicester, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 00:30, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article was sent to an AFD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 4 HouseGuests (Canada), where the consensus was that it should redirect to the season's article. If you have information to add, it should go there. If you disagree with the decision at AFD, you can discuss it at the season article's talk page, or you can go to WP:DRV. Please do not revert the redirect without discussing the matter first. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 20:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is no discussion on the articles talk page, it was just me saying the article needed updating. --MSalmon (talk) 20:22, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, the discussion was all at the Articles for Deletion debate that I linked above. If you like, you can make a draft article with updates that you'd want to add, and then propose that the redirect be turned into that draft - but, for now, the consensus is that there is not enough sourced information for a separate article on the houseguests themselves. If you have information to add about them, feel free to add it to the season article itself. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 20:32, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article because the past three seasons have one. --MSalmon (talk) 20:46, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Voice UK, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jolan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:05, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Haymarket bus station, Leicester, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The others are classed as having housemate status on the official website. Click onto one of the photos and it says housemate status: Housemate

They SHOULD be in the info box because it's likely there are going to be lots of changes . Like previous series with the halfway house in Bb8 and BB10 when Benazir didn't receive full housemate status. Andybigbro2 (talk) 19:20, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Leaky Caldron 15:05, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Leaky Caldron 15:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was not the one who started all of this so don't blame me, I was just following all previous series --MSalmon (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Strictly Come Dancing (series 14), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Ball. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Someone has changed the CBB 10 EYE ALERT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:8AA4:5600:2988:CB60:4C8D:4E66 (talk) 12:20, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Done MSalmon (talk) 21:43, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your attitude towards my adding of a controversy to Britain's Got Talent (series 11)[[1]] comes across as a personal butt hurt, and your condensing words over my simple typo was uncalled for. Can you please be more polite and take things a bit less personally? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:3A2B:3B00:15B7:C6F7:5B16:CF8D (talk) 22:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was only correcting a small error that was it MSalmon (talk) 22:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted it at first without any reason, and with a simple "huh?". Then you edited my mistake with the comment, "if you are going to include it at least get his name right". That is not "only correcting a small error". It's clear you're personally butt-hurt over the edit and acted condescending towards me because of it. Stop it, please. This is not the first time you've done this over reality shows.--2A02:C7F:3A2B:3B00:15B7:C6F7:5B16:CF8D (talk) 22:46, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the nominations table, by the evicted column the grey space is missing Lauren's World (talk) 22:00, 17 June 2017 (UTC) File:Lauren Lauren.jpg[reply]

You could have fixed it yourself but it is done MSalmon (talk) 22:09, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Msalmon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of Big Brother 4 HouseGuests (Canada) for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

~Kvng (talk) 13:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The reason we need it to have the extra column is because it is unclear if Alex or Jillian was nominated before Megan left. Additionally if you look at Big Brother 11 (U.S.), when Chima was expelled, we agreed to add the extra column because she was a nominee. We plan on doing the same with Megan. Please stop changing it because we already had a consensus.

Musicalorange6 (talk) 17:54, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Big Brother 11 was a completely different season to this one so you can't compare it. Also, Chima's expulsion resulted in a new HoH while this one is still the same. MSalmon (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You asked about Bbb23 (talk · contribs)'s edits here. This is because the user who made those changes, Aldergate20 (talk · contribs), is one of the most abusive block-evaders we have here. This is ZestyLemonz (talk · contribs). That user knows they aren't permitted to edit Wikipedia until their account is unblocked, and is known for introducing false information to pages. As such, we revert everything from them on sight. You are welcome to reintroduce the change, but you must take responsibility for verifying all parts of the change. Be careful. Often, the information is entirely correct but occasionally, there are some subtle instances of vandalism. For example, days are switched around, information is cited but the citation doesn't quite match up, that sort of thing. --Yamla (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was watching the show and all the information is correct. I just didn't have time to update it MSalmon (talk) 13:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

At what point does it say (other than the warning you added) that there can't be years for which host hosted which version plus there is good reason for those years to be there (as pointed out by the anonymous user who undid your edit) as people may get confused and think they both hosted together plus check other wikipedia pages for other game shows (e.g: The US version of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire) and that wikipedia page tells you how many years each host has hosted for so whats the reason you removed the years?

Pepper Gaming (talk) 23:22, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Infobox_television#Parameters in the Parameters section where it says presenters MSalmon (talk) 11:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Msalmon: Well thats Stupid the template saying years or seasons should not be included but is there a reason why they shouldn't be included (even if there has been more than presenter) Pepper Gaming (talk) 11:34, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I did not make the rules MSalmon (talk) 12:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Msalmon: Not the answer I was looking for I didn't say Do you make the rules I asked is there a reason why it says on the template don't add the years Pepper Gaming (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know why there is a reason sorry, maybe ask on the talk page over there MSalmon (talk) 14:41, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Msalmon: I'll try over there thanks anyway though Pepper Gaming (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I will kindly ask you to stop vandalizing the X Factor series 15 Wikipedia page. If you have done your research you will find that X Factor finishes on SATURDAY 1ST DECEMBER 2018. This has also been confirmed by the broadcaster aka ITV. --Slindsell15 (talk) 16:13, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop vandalizing Wikipedia. Radio times is not valid. You should look into Wikipedia's rules on editing. --Slindsell15 (talk) 18:59, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why have you reverted my edit which is an improvement to the 'Presenters' and 'Judges' section? I clearly wrote on my original edit that it is designed to help people differentiate between who is a current judge/presenter and who is historic. Please tell me why you think this differentiation is unnecessary and not an improvement. I will revert it back to the split otherwise and start a discussion on the Talk page. Please do not engage in an edit war (as I see you have done from your previous history/warnings) but discuss productively on the talk page. Thanks Fortnum (talk) 20:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to discuss it on the talk page then go ahead MSalmon (talk) 22:30, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (UK series 18), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The page has gone weird again! Annamargarita0 (talk) 16:57, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Big Brother sidebar/CAN has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alucard 16_{❯❯❯ chat?} 21:12, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello sorry I haven't been able to split the articles yet, I've just been really busy. I will get round to it though, possibly tomorrow, if not on Sunday. I've already been looking for some sources etc for it. ThisIsDanny (talk) 20:03, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is some stuff with wide reaching implications which you might be interested in. [2] Leaky caldron (talk) 18:45, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever are runners-up do it as the highest score near top of the table & lowest near the bottom, it makes it easier. --Annamargarita0 (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother Canada houseguests (season 2) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother Canada houseguests (season 1) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother Canada houseguests (season 3) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother Canada houseguests (season 1) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 02:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother 15 (American season) houseguests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 1 (American season) houseguests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Big Brother 16 (American season) houseguests is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Big Brother 1 (American season) houseguests until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ajf773 (talk) 09:04, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British series 23), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Please do not restore unsourced edits again per WP:BURDEN. – Meena • 15:37, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you revert this edit also please [3]

Sharon was not a housemate and should not be in the housemate list. 2A00:23EE:10F8:29C1:9C31:AFAA:99A1:F297 (talk) 02:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't need to as it's already done MSalmon (talk) 09:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Im talking about the nominations table, not the housemate list. That still needs reverting please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23EE:1370:3897:8478:3168:9856:ECFC (talk) 12:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's already done MSalmon (talk) 12:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The nominations table is done, but Sharon is still listed on the housemates table list and needs removing please. We have never included “non housemates” on this table for Big Brother. She has a separate section 2A00:23EE:2170:2B7C:EC83:BA86:169D:3FEB (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To make this really simple, I’m just asking you to revert to your previous revision here [4] as your version was the last safe version before the vandal edits.2A00:23EE:2170:2B7C:EC83:BA86:169D:3FEB (talk) 01:02, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is fine as it is along as we mention she is a Celebrity Lodger MSalmon (talk) 09:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just want to drop you a thanks for raising the removal of these charts on the users talk page. We went through this last year with them and consensus was that the charts remained but they took it upon themselves to remove them from the current article in spite of that consensus Davethorp (talk) 16:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really care if they are included or not I only asked the question why this years was removed and not other series. That's all. MSalmon (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya! Just letting you know that on Big Brother (British series 21), all the information has been removed including your hard work and all the surnames because of a sockpuppet. You are allowed to restore it though as long as they’ve been reintroduced by someone else. The same thing happened to User:Nathandelrey 90.192.76.192 (talk) 23:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't touch the page after the launch show so it is not really my issue to be honest but I will keep checking though. MSalmon (talk) 08:10, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your removal simply because rumours should not be included on Wikipedia until, as you said, confirmed by ITV. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 19:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On Big Brother (British TV series) series 21, I remember you saying Marcello's surname was different on other sites, [5] and it has been changed now, also his surname was mentioned by Khaled the other night. Could you change this please 2A00:23EE:1648:7A46:5C96:E83C:132A:2F29 (talk) 19:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]