User talk:SP-KP

This user may have left Wikipedia. SP-KP has not edited Wikipedia since 20 November 2015. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Archived messages can be found at:

• Archived messages from 2005
• Archived messages from 2006 (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct-Dec)
• Archived messages from 2007 (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct-Dec)
• Archived messages from 2008 (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct-Dec)
• Archived messages from 2009 (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct-Dec)
• Archived messages from 2010 (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct-Dec)
• Archived messages from 2011 (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct-Dec)
• Archived messages from 2012 (Jan-Mar) (Apr-Jun) (Jul-Sep) (Oct-Dec)
• Archived messages from 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Highnam Woods, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dogging (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Another editor has added a question on Talk:Ham Wall#"RSPB Ham Wall 'slime' baffles experts" - any ideas?— Rod ^talk 17:01, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you happen to know the Latin name for Bristol Rock-cress? There is a red link on River Avon (Bristol)#Conservation areas. Often I can fix these by searching for the latin name , but Rockcress has three genera and I don't know which one to go for.— Rod ^talk 21:07, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - hope you are feeling better?— Rod ^talk 12:22, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Backwoods (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article doesn't show notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. serioushat 17:59, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of disability-related terms with negative connotations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of disability-related terms with negative connotations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beerest355 Talk 19:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:16, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siberian Chiffchaff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Svensson, Lars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of heteropteran bugs recorded in Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Aquarius and Stenotus

Miris (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Miri people

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:09, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Canary Islands Blue Tits.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:54, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Restricted-range endemic bird species, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:19, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Heronries in Britain, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 10:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Birdlife International national partners, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:30, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Clements checklist cover.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SP-KP! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 14:48, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World (second edition - front cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Howard and Moore Complete Checklist of the Birds of the World (third edition - front cover).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've been doing some cleanup on articles which became FAs a long time ago and the cleanup list for WP Somerset. One issue which has been identified is on the Exmoor article. You kindly added a reference to Ballance, David K. and Gibbs, Brian D. (2003) The birds of Exmoor and the Quantocks (currently ref 90) back in 2008. I have since added the isbn but I don't have acess to a copy of the book and it has been noticed that no page number is given. Do you still have the book and would you be able to check the page number for this?— Rod ^talk 18:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info. I will miss your expertise on wp.— Rod ^talk 18:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red kite feeding in Wales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red kite feeding in Wales until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mountain^cirque 12:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SP-KP. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Reinwardtipicus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —swpb^T 18:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Red kite feeding in Wales is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red kite feeding in Wales (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mountain^cirque 15:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SSSIs Cambridgeshire geological has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SSSIs Dorset geological has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:37, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SSSIs Hampshire geological has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of United Kingdom bird clubs and ornithological societies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication as to how this article satisfies WP:SAL. The vast majority of the entries are red links which seem to have little chance of ever becoming viable stand-alone articles. Removing them with leave only a few entries, whose Wikipedia notability also appears questionable at best. Primary purpose of the article seems to have been to create a online directory of these organizations which is not really what Wikipedia is about.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on African Bird Club, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 12:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:United Kingdom premierships has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Backwoods Camp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Backwoods Camp (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:56, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Country Trust requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mean as custard (talk) 08:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the elfin woods warbler article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 11 August 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 11, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 09:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

biodiversity in Britain

Thank you for quality articles about British and Irish biodiversity, not only wildlife such as the Elfin woods warbler but also related culture, people, organizations, for the many articles you are "happy with", - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1706 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of SSSIs in Radnor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Firstly this article hasn't got a list of anything and isn't a list of SSSIs in Radnorshire, but a general description of SSSIs. Secondly, there isn't a place called Radnor, while Radnorshire merged with two other counties to form Powys. We already have an actual list article of actual SSSI's called List of SSSIs in Powys.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sionk (talk) 22:31, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I PRODed Endemic birds of western and central Africa. Eostrix (talk) 13:56, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Julias caesar. Since you had some involvement with the Julias caesar redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 09:56, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sites of Special Scientific Interest notified in 1961 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:49, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/lists of unusual things/personal names, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/lists of unusual things/personal names and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/lists of unusual things/personal names during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Curlews has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Three years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:40, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Hereford and Worcester requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:20, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Humberside requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ruth Lea has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Very little biographical coverage in RSes; CBE might suggest some notability, but even that needs the material, which appears not to exist. WP:BEFORE doesn't show any either - mostly content by the subject, but vanishingly little about the subject, which would meet any of the four prongs of WP:JOURNALIST/WP:ECONOMIST. Does independent, third-party, biographical coverage of the subject in reliable sources exist?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David Gerard (talk) 13:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruth Lea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Lea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. David Gerard (talk) 20:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Higher-level bird taxa restricted to the Malagasy region has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 13:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Higher-level bird taxa restricted to the Oriental region has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor ^(talk) 12:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British premierships has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:51, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lill pin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not really seeing significant usage in sources outside of circular sources, even as an entomologist. Even more common minutens wouldn't get their own article. Doubtful on anything to merge elsewhere either.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KoA (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a street term in South Africa that refers to formal pants. Lubabalo Ntshona (talk) 22:40, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cranes of Great Britain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cranes of Great Britain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AryKun (talk) 15:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SSSIs Wilts biological has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. बिनोद थारू (talk) 04:07, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Money-rich, time-poor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money-rich, time-poor (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mooonswimmer 20:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article County flowers of the United Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

appears to be a promotion for Plantlife. Has a single primary source as reference.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British premierships has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 17:23, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Nevis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:51, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]