User talk:Srbernadette

Welcome to Wikipedia, Srbernadette! Thank you for your contributions. I am Jaaron95 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:01, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srbernadette. You have new messages at Help Desk's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 06:56, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 16:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:30, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The name of a newspaper or other publication should go in work=, not in publisher=. I am fixing the cites in Leeds Festival (classical music) right now. DES ^(talk) 02:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please review wp:ref more closely on how the formatting should go. In many cases it is simple typographic errors, such as this where the year had too may digits in it; or this where you didn't have the pipe | before the quote, and it was errantly after the term quote; or here where you spelled September incorrectly. Tiggerjay (talk) 02:39, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have made a few edits to both of the above pages and I hope you might look at them and tweak them please. ThanksSrbernadette (talk) 09:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You keep asking about how to write née (and you don't want the tooltip that née gives you). If you leave this message here on your user talk page you can just copy and paste the word from here to whichever article you're working on. Another option is that if you have a standard Windows keyboard you'll probably find than an "e acute" character can be produced by holding down the "Alt Gr" key (to the right of the spacebar) and hitting the "e" key. - David Biddulph (talk) 08:52, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Pippa Middleton shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 13:20, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can see that you've put a lot of work into adding the information about this man, but he's just not WP:NOTABLE and it's not appropriate to add so much information about him there. I have removed that paragraph. If you can create an article about him in his own right, then by all means mention him here and link to him. But this looks rather as if you are trying to shoehorn a biography of Kate's gt-gt-gt-uncle into the encyclopedia when there is nothing interesting about him to justify this. "Famous or infamous people", or "Notable people" or any such description should only include those who are considered "Notable" in Wikipedia's terms: there's a statement to this effect at WP:ALUMNI, in terms of "notable" alumni of colleges etc, and I think its spirit applies in a case like LGI. PamD 11:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Montsalvat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilson Hall. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Queen Máxima of the Netherlands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Statesman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srbernadette. You have new messages at Tiggerjay's talk page.
Message added 17:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tiggerjay (talk) 17:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Please see my talk page again Tiggerjay (talk) 03:55, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Please see my talk page again Tiggerjay (talk) 02:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have responses. Even though the headings are identical, the URL will take you to the other one that may be yours.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just to set you straight about this: There is only one heir to the throne: Prince Charles. Cheers. -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 11:15, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you want the word "née" placed in an article, you can just ask me on my talk page. I won't get angry, and I will use "née" not "née". Maproom (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Two suggestions. Highlight and copy (copy/paste) the section you are working on and then paste it into Microsoft Word or Notepad (or whatever) and print it out. I find it easier to read the printed page. Use a highlighter pen to mark the wiki mark-up text so you can see what needs to be corrected. Also, go to your User Page. To the right of your name, click on Preferences, then on Gadgets. Scroll down to Editing and click Syntax Highlighter, which colors the wiki syntax in the editing box. Makes it much easier to see in the edit box. Good luck!--Tribe of Tiger (talk) 20:57, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited White Lodge, Richmond Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George II. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you need help with referencing, please take a look at WP:REFB.--ukexpat (talk) 03:20, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One more time, with feeling: PLEASE READ THE PAGE LINKED ABOVE. It will help with your referencing questions.--ukexpat (talk) 17:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have rolled back your attempts at deletion nomination as they are improperly made. You need to follow the instructions at WP:AFD.--Whpq (talk) 00:48, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lupo (dog), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crest. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason why you are always asking really basic questions such as this one that you should be capable of fixing yourself? You've been editing for close to a year now. And you also often ask the same question where the only difference is the article. For instance, you've brought up the {{nee}} template a few times. Is there a reason for this? Dismas|^(talk) 19:56, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, it seems that you struggle with the technicalities of Wikipedia. For this reason, I wish to mention something to you. Two threads with similar content were recently opened at the Help Desk, one by "you" (Srbernadette) and the other by an "IP editor". It is fairly obvious that the IP editor is you when logged out. This is fine, per WP:LOGOUT, but you must be aware that your IP address has now been disclosed to whoever does enough digging.

The IP address is, very roughly speaking, the place where you internet connection is; this is personal information. From your IP, I could find (using free online tools which require little knowledge to use) that you live in Australia (actually, I could tell the city with a very good chance of being right, but I see no need to tell it - you probably know where you live, and you probably do not need others to know).

You may not care (in these day and age plenty of people expose the most intimate details of their lives on Facebook) but if you wish to have it removed, you can ask for it to be oversighted (that is, deleted and hidden from the page history so that it cannot be accessed by regular users). See Wikipedia:Revision_deletion#How_to_request_Revision_Deletion for how to request it.

Best regards, Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 17:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has used a number of different IP addresses. WP:REVDEL of all of them is unlikely to be practicable. --David Biddulph (talk) 18:40, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's wrong with the references?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:41, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your persistence in seeking to improve referencing, even in the face of "friendly fire". Maproom (talk) 07:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've been editing for over a year, surely by now you must have learnt to reference properly? We all make mistakes and errors, but competency is required to edit Wikipedia, and it seems like you aren't learning from mistakes. You (including IPs) have posted 4 times in the last 2 and a bit dates about simple reference errors at Family of Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge. The reference errors tell you exactly where the problem is most of the time, so please try and fix them yourself. Posting this on your IP page talkpages as well, for reference. Joseph2302 21:21, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of your persistent errors which doesn't get flagged up by the mediawiki software is that you don't (or won't) get it through your head (despite being told countless times) that the date belongs in the |date= parameter, not in the |publisher= parameter. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you've left a message on my talk page, without caring about giving a heading, or using the New section link or using even the link I have provided myself for leaving new messages. I find that odd, knowing that you leave properly structured messages on the Help Desk. Please don't spoil my talk page with errors that you leave behind in the wake of your messages. I suspect that's only because you either are careless, or don't care about following good form in these things where you feel it doesn't matter. Please first learn how to leave structured talk page messages before you request for help. Thanks for understanding and please don't take this message otherwise. Lourdes 09:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you need help with referencing, I will teach you a good way step by step. Let me know. --Jennica✿ ^{talk / contribs} 00:22, 18 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srbernadette. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Help desk, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 01:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I came to offer some advice but I see you are not new and have not benefitted much from any offered so far. So I will say very clearly don't dump quotations and bare url references just anywhere in articles as you did at North of England Council for Promoting the Higher Education of Women. Although the information is good and the source verifiable it makes work for other editors. I have converted the quotation to text, which is what you should do, and referenced it appropriately. If the reference is a good source, as this one obviously is, it is easy to verify it by clicking the link in the refs list and the quotation is not required. J3Mrs (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edit to Pippa Middleton. You have continued steadfastly to ignore, or deliberately violate, the reminders which you have received from countless editors on the fact that the "|publisher" parameter (if used) in a citation template is for the name of the publisher, and not for the date, which has its own parameter "|date", nor for such pointless text as "Copyright -". You have been reminded numerous times of Template:Cite web#Publisher and Template:Cite web#Date. If you are incapable of understanding plain English, would you please tell us which language you would wish editors to use in addressing you? --David Biddulph (talk) 08:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to what David has said and recent multiple threads at the help desk, I have just come across three edits in the last couple of hours or so, where anything but the name has been inserted in the 'publisher' parameter. You claim to understand English yet you continually put incorrect information in various fields, despite plenty of help given. Perhaps you could tell us what you think the word 'publisher' means? Also if you make a simple spelling error such as 'Octoner' or 'Novemeber' as you have done recently, please fix it yourself. Although willing to assist to some extent, the help desk should not be called upon to regularly correct such basic errors. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 11:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srbernadette. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lourdes (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Srbernadette, I hope you don't mind, but I saw the section at ANI and I'd like to make a suggestion in case it helps you.

There is no requirement to use citation templates in references. The referencing help material gives the impression one has to use them, but the people who wrote most of it are assuming everyone is willing to download a tool or otherwise comfortable with copying great chunks of complex syntax, and as you've discovered, if you are not using the tool but typing in the reference manually, the software produces alarming red error messages if you make the slightest mistake in typing (or even if you copy some date formats). What actually matters is that you provide the essential information: the URL for an online reference is the absolute minimum, otherwise (and in addition is desirable for an online reference), the website or publication, the title and the date. Other editors may grumble - especially if you're editing a much-trafficked and well developed page like Diana, Princess of Wales, because good practice dictates you follow whatever format the existing references use, and on such a page it's almost always some kind of templates - but someone will come along and fix it to match.

So I suggest you stop trying to use templates and concentrate on giving what information you can about the reference. As I say, I hope you don't mind, but many of us find them difficult. Yngvadottir (talk) 13:42, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Srbernadette. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited British Science Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward, Prince of Wales (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you have changed from editing through your user account and now intend to edit anonymously, please make a note of it at the top of this Talk page. Thanks--Quisqualis (talk) 23:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Meghan, Duchess of Sussex; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ~ GB fan 01:36, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Tataral (talk) 01:43, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for a violation of the 3 revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 01:48, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Potternewton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Freehold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lupton family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western Front (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Harriet Martineau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unitarian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do not change the character of Lady Merton to Baroness. That is simply false and original research. There is nothing in the primary source that refers to these characters as a Baron and Baroness. There are no secondary, reliable sources. The template has been challenged by admin to be verified. Such changes in the future could be seen as disruptive editing and could lead to further blocks. Thank you and happy editing.--Mark Miller (talk) 04:20, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Wikipedia: Help Desk while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:33, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Srbernadette, please can you explain your recent edit at Talk:St Anne's College, Oxford#Other. TSventon (talk) 07:37, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Family of Catherine, Princess of Wales, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stole.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rishi Sunak. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. If I understand correctly, you're trying to add "Defense" to the LGBT section to emphasize its importance, which is obviously not constructive. Firestar464 (talk) 04:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm DDMS123. An edit that you recently made to Catherine, Princess of Wales seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! DDMS123 (talk) 01:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Madame Roland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gary Goldsmith, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Circa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srbernadette! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Omid Scobie several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Omid Scobie, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. - LouisOrr27 (talk) 01:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Where is Kate?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The View.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. RudolfRed (talk) 05:45, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 11:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never meant to write that I would "Vandalise" the Omid Scobie account - I meant to say it (the Omid Scobie page) should NOT be vandalised. Please unblock me.

Thank you in advance Srbernadette (talk) 06:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blackfriars Settlement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page St Anne's College.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:45, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Srbernadette. Have you also been editing while logged out (i.e. editing using an IP address account instead logging in and using your registered account)? If you have, then that's OK (you don't need to confirm of deny it here); you should, however, take a look at WP:REALWORLD and WP:LOGGEDOUT for some general information on what it means to do so. Editing while logged out isn't forbidden as long as it's not being done to circumvent relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines; it is, however, actually less anonymous than editing from a registered account since an IP address can be used to find out (to some degree) where you're editing from. Editing while logged out can also be confusing to others trying to contact you because they may be leaving messages for you on the user talk page of the IP account instead here on this user talk page. So, if this account is also you (once again you fon't need to confirm of deny whether it is), you might want to take a look at that account's user talk page because there are messages posted there that were likely intended for you. If you've been using another IP account instead, you should also check the user talk page of that account for messages. You don't need to the respond to the messages on these other user talk pages if they're indeed for you, but you should at least read them because they are related to edits made by you when you used those particular accounts. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating multiple threads asking the exact same question at the Wikipedia Help Desk. I'm going to assume that you were logged out when you first asked WP:HD#Richard Dawson (1855–1923) on May 19, 2024. For some reason, you then seem to have logged in to this account a little over five and half hours later and started a new thread asking the very same question. The wording of both threads is identical, with the only difference being the signature of the person asking the question. There is absolutely no reason at all to create redundant discussion threads like you did, and I believe it's been something you've been advised not to do in the past by others.

For reference, everyone responding to questions at the Help Desk is a volunteer, which means there's no telling when somebody will respond to a question. Questions aren't answered in any particular order or by a particular person; they're basically answered when someone reads the question and thinks they can help. so, posting the exact same question multple times won't speed up the answering process, and you just need to be patient and wait until someone responds. Furthermore, if someone responds to your question and you're still in need of assistance, ask a follow up question in the same discussion thread; there's no need to start a new discussion thread in most cases. Starting multiple discussion thread about the same exact thing splits the discussion and can lead to redundant replies or just plain confusion; so, it's best to avoid doing so. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:07, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]