User talk:The Film Creator

Hi The Film Creator! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Rainy Day Friends, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Na-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Locomotive207 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hard Traveling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hard Traveling, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🌀Locomotive207-talk🌀 14:27, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotive207 I suggest you please read WP:NFO #1: “The film is widely distributed and has received full-length reviews by two or more nationally known critics.” In this case, the reviews are from The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, and both newspapers are considered reliable sources. I suggest you please reconsider accepting the article. The Film Creator (talk) 21:01, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Locomotive207 I also recommend you see WP:RSPSS because they list both The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times as reliable sources to use in Wikipedia. The Film Creator (talk) 21:20, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

A hyperlink to Google Books edition with all 275 pages is not a reference. How one can verify the facts after ready all 275 pages?. You will need to provide a link to the relevant page and indicate page no. in inline citation. See WP:GBOOKS.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hard Traveling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hard Traveling, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 08:47, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Insight (2021 film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Insight (2021 film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 23:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

When citing sources, NEVER credit someone with the "author" parameter. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia uses the "first" and "last" parameters. Following this format gives off a professional impression and also improves consistency throughout the site. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:47, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some Dude From North Carolina Thanks for the tip. I’ll keep that in mind in the future. The Film Creator (talk) 21:04, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vendetta (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vendetta (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 22:12, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Vendetta (upcoming film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Vanamonde (Talk) 20:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:04, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Breaking the Bank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:29, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:She Came to Me, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Flux Gourmet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:53, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Chestnut (film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Future film, fails WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be drafted or deleted until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 17:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Donaldd23 I have moved the article to draft space and requested the redirect for speedy deletion. The Film Creator (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Detained (upcoming film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable future film, appears to fail WP:NFF. Should be deleted or moved to draft until release

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again User:Donaldd23, I have moved the article to draftspace and requested the redirect for speedy deletion. The Film Creator (talk) 19:28, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article CURS R has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:46, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Donaldd23 Out of curiosity, are you one of those editors who doesn’t know how to move an article to draftspace without leaving a redirect? It's okay if you don't know how because I don't know how either (but it would be a lot easier to do that rather than proposing the article for deletion in my opinion). Anyways, I've moved the article to draftspace and requested the redirect for speedy deletion. The Film Creator (talk) 10:22, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your new article at this title. There are incoming redirects to that page that are not intended for the subject of your article. You can recover your work from the edit history and start a new article at Tim Hampton (producer) or another suitable disambiguator. I recommend using the WP:AFC process. MB 02:20, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is a Tim Hampton listed as producer in A Dry White Season and The NeverEnding Story III. If that is not a different producer by the same name, you can link those to your article also. MB 02:40, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mindcage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Holdovers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film fails WP:NFF as all sources are about casting and film starting production, but the production hasn't been proven to be notable. Should be deleted or moved to draft until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 21:53, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Joel P. West requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel P. West. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:49, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed a few of your articles, continue with the Good work! Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 09:22, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator

Thank you for creating Bitch Ass.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I'll Be Watching is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I'll Be Watching until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 08:26, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator

Thank you for creating Apache Junction (film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start> I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 19:35, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator

Thank you for creating Club Life (2015 film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator

Thank you for creating Club Life (1987 film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator

Thank you for creating The Drummer (2020 film).

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. I marked it as reviewed. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 16:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator

Thank you for creating My Fake Boyfriend.

User:Kudpung, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs a brief plot summary. I have added more categories - please check.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:18, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page Draft:1242: Gateway to the West has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jay (talk) 16:01, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on In Her Defense requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Her Defense. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ComplexRational (talk) 23:30, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Night Night (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:38, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator,

Thank you for creating An Innocent Kiss.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! Though, three of the refs are routine announcements that fail WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. The Dove Foundation is likely reliable (see WP:RS) and constitutes significant coverage, my WP:BEFORE search revealed few refs other than this one paragraph review which might be significant but could go either way. Addition info: I've read your previous comments on your user talk page, feel free to draftify this if you can't find many other refs, though if I missed any please add them here, many thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 05:56, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator,

Thank you for creating The Price We Pay (2022 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I've tagged notability. The Starburst article is RS that is probably WP:SIGCOV, while The Hollywood Reporter is WP:RS, this article is a routine announcement IMHO with a plot summary and quotes, there isn't critical commentary that counts as a review to pass WP:NFILM nor as significant coverage (to pass WP:GNG). This states that Source: Hollywood Reporter- an identical routine announcement per WP:GNG it counts IMHO as: It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works. My WP:BEFORE search found websites that probably fail WP:RS, including 1, 2, which is For Film Fans By Film Fans- this doesn't meet WP:RS sadly. Therefore, currently, I don't believe this passes the notability guidelines; however, it's recently released, and there could potentially be more reviews in the future. If I missed any refs, please reply to my comment or add them to the article talk page. Many thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 05:45, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Retirement Plan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:14, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Black Warrant (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:34, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mr. Blake At Your Service!, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Devil's Trap (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:56, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sight (2022 film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:58, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fear the Night (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Retirement Plan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:20, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dark Asset, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shelter in Solitude, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Senior (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:I'll Be Watching, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:04, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Hill (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manodrome, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Littlemouth, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Present (upcoming film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Coke Daniels requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coke Daniels. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

High Heat (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 06:03, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	Merry Christmas, The Film Creator
	Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice! As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia. May this Holiday Season bring you and yours nothing but joy, health and prosperity. Onel5969 TT me 20:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Miracle Club has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to DRAFT until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 02:05, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Helen's Dead has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NFF as production wasn't notable. Should be deleted or moved to DRAFT until release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As a heads up, I've moved an article you recently created to Daughter of the Bride (2023 film), because the 1997 Academy Award-winning short film that was marketed by this name (despite having a longer full name) seems to be the WP:PTOPIC. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 21:40, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Red-tailed hawk Understood. Thanks for moving the article. The Film Creator (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Panama (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27 § Panama (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 19:28, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect The Most Dangerous Game (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § The Most Dangerous Game (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 17:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Dig (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 28 § Dig (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:14, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Shock Value (film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:29, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/mark-rylance-led-inland-acquired-144517125.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Inland (2022 film) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:28, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Film Creator. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Cold Storage (upcoming film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G7: possibly useful page-move redirect. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:45, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, More Dogs Than Bones, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:02, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Inland (film) instead.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please compare and combine article and draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Inland (2022 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachel Hendrix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Hendrix until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 15:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Dead on Sight, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 14:01, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Film Creator!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:51, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you've recently created an unrealized projects page for director William Friedkin, based on a table that already appeared in the regular article. There are a few more directors that have tables like these and I wanted to request that you create pages for Joe Dante, Mark Romanek, Peter Bogdanovich, Brian De Palma, and Michael Mann, the last three of which the 'Unrealized projects' appear in their 'Filmography' pages. I also noticed that you've missed a couple projects of Friedkin's listed, including The Bunker Hill Boys, Sea Trial, his Howard Hughes biopic, TV shows based on Killer Joe and To Live and Die in L.A., and the description of Blood and Money as being a film project when in fact he developed it for television. All the main refs I initially included for those projects when I added the main table on his regular page, which was prior to when the article by IndieWire was published, which didn't include every project, because not every reference had a link. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 00:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZanderAlbatraz1145: I must say I'm truly flattered. This is the first time someone has requested me to create an article on a topic I happen to fascinated with. Unfortunately, I must decline your request and please let me explain why:

You see, I was able to create the "unrealized projects" articles on Friedkin and Martin Scorsese because I was able to find multiple reliable sources that mention their list of unrealized projects as the main topic. Per WP:LISTN: "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources, per the above guidelines; notable list topics are appropriate for a stand-alone list."

For example, in the case of Friedkin, I was able to find three reliable sources from IndieWire, MovieWeb and Collider and all three mention a list of Friedkin's unmade projects as a group or set and as the main topic.

Therefore, I would need multiple reliable sources that cover the list unrealized projects of the filmmakers you mentioned (e.g. Dante, De Palma) in order for the Wikipedia articles to pass WP:LISTN. If an "unrealized projects" article doesn't pass WP:LISTN, it will get redirected to the article of said filmmaker. That's why Michael Cimino's unrealized projects and Christopher Nolan's unrealized projects got redirected to Michael Cimino and Christopher Nolan respectively.

Like I said, I'm very flattered, but sadly I must decline unless you or me could provide those reliable sources. The Film Creator (talk) 10:12, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. Either way, thank you for your reply. But it's worth noting that most of the Unrealized projects tables are without a sourced comprehensive reference that covers all of the them. I never thought it had been a necessity since the majority just lists the reliable sources, either by way of book or article; J. J. Abrams, Darren Aronofsky, Michael Bay, Kathryn Bigelow, James Cameron, John Carpenter, Chris Columbus, Spike Lee, Shekhar Kapur, David Lynch, John McTiernan, George Miller, Sam Raimi... the list is endless. So while I understand your concern quite well, I don't see your point, as its been done before, and should not prevent more articles from being made. It's information, I believe, that should be shared with the public in a comprehensive way. I actually comprised the table of Friedkin's projects before the article had been published by IndieWire, MovieWeb and Collider. A comprehensive reference has only been made after the fact. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 12:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZanderAlbatraz1145: You’re welcome. If it helps, in the case of Michael Mann, I was able to find a reliable source from MovieWeb that covers a list of Mann’s unmade films. If there were more of these from different authors and other reliable sources, I would be more than happy to create the article. The Film Creator (talk) 14:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but that's precisely what I'm saying. For example, you created the page for Martin Scorsese, and had initially only included the projects that were compromised in those articles. Now, if you visit the page, dozens more have been added by myself or other editors. Does that mean they would be removed because they haven't been referenced elsewhere? Doesn't make sense to me. If you were to create one for Michael Mann, yes, use that MovieWeb source, but pick from the references that have already been found in the complete table on his Filmography. I also suggest doing some more research for the Orson Welles article you've recently created. He's had around 60 unmade films, no exaggeration. And you can find reliable sources for those, even by listening books as the source. I'd be happy to help you with that. I just don't see the point in creating an article specifically for a director's unmade or abandoned films if one is not going to at least TRY to list all of them. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 14:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZanderAlbatraz1145: I encourage that you continue adding more information on the Orson Welles article. Wikipedia is about collaboration so you’re more than welcome to add the omissions I failed to mention.

I understand what you mean by “Doesn't make sense to me.” What I’m trying to say is: as long as the article can pass WP:LISTN, it can be eligible for article status. The Film Creator (talk) 14:45, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In the words of Columbo, "just one more thing"; I've added a list of Welles' projects not listed on the articles' talk page. If there'd be a way to spread the word, or if you could add those yourself, and I'll contribute some as well. Call me lazy, but I don't feel like adding ALL of them. I already compromised them for you. Either way, thanks for your time. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 15:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. Thank you for your work on Broken Hill Blues. User:ARandomName123, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work on this film article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|ARandomName123}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 22:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. Thank you for your work on Walden (2023 film). User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

thanks for the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 23:44, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. Thank you for your work on Charlie Carrick. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 00:04, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, The Film Creator. Thank you for your work on The Good Half. User:Tails Wx, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hiya! I've reviewed this article. Looks in good shape; though don't forget to add a plot summary. Good work, and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tails Wx}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tails Wx 16:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interested?

Thought I'd pass along the link...

https://www.vulture.com/2012/01/the-lost-projects-of-harold-ramis.html

link... ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 22:43, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply] 

@ZanderAlbatraz1145: I’m also aware Bradford Evans, who wrote the Ramis article, also wrote similar articles on Judd Apatow, Adam McKay and Jonathan Dayton & Varleris Faris. The Film Creator (talk) 23:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, work your magic on all four! Or do you need to find more sources? ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 23:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZanderAbatraz1145: I could attempt to create those articles along with the Michael Mann article, provided that they would pass WP:LISTN. The Film Creator (talk) 23:45, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say pass on the Mann one if you do decide to. Despite the benefits of a singular page on the topic, its better to let people look toward the complete table on his filmography page should they want to know about his unmade films, rather than be misinformed by looking at an incomplete list.

ather than be misinformed by looking at an incomplete list, despite sing . ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 00:11, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ZanderAlbatraz11 I will reveal this: I plan on creating “unrealized projects” articles on Akira Kurosawa (1, 2, 3 & 4), the Coen brothers (1, 2 & 3) and Neil Blomkamp (1 & 2). I know for sure those future articles will pass LISTN. The Film Creator (talk) 00:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on one for Tobe Hooper as we speak. The majority of the articles of this subject were created without the inclusion of a comprehensive source, but still passed LISTN anyways. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 00:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Retribution (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 31 § Retribution (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 01:10, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jim Haynie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Jim Haynie requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Haynie. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Haynie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Haynie (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:30, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello The Film Creator, are you going to edit me and put the link to the movie? Running on Empty (1988 film 190.237.46.243 (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How's this page you mentioned to be working on coming along? This is the one I was most excited about, as there are not many of thrm for foreign directors. I also have found a couple of additional sources that mention some of Kurosawa's projects probably not listed in the sources you mentioned. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 04:06, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@ZanderAlbatraz1145: Sadly, I’ve had to pass on the unrealized projects article on Kurosawa because I couldn’t find a source relating to each of his unmade projects. :( The Film Creator (talk) 10:26, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well that's a shame. I had actually started to compile a couple, using the articles you mentioned, plus two others. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ZanderAlbatraz1145 I would like to ask you something. Do you know if the-solute.com is a reliable source? I ask because I am contemplating on using that as a source along with a link from Screen Rant in order to create an “unrealized projects” page on Steven Soderbergh. The Film Creator (talk) 22:31, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Film Creator: If you cross-reference all of the titles listed on the-solute.com, and all of it checks out, then it's reliable. Looks like it was compiled by Soderbergh fans. Similarly, the website LynchNet was the primary source used for his Unrealized projects page, and since then there have been several articles written based off information presented on that page, written from sources such as Screen Rant, MovieWeb and IndieWire.

But once again, I don't think that an unmade films article for Soderbergh is really necessary. Articles on filmmakers or artists infamous for unproduced works, or will be someday, is preferable. Soderbergh's on... what... film #30 now?? I don't think he's struggling to get movies made. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 22:51, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ZanderAlbatraz1145 Ah what the heck, I might as well create “unrealized projects” articles on Mann, Ramis, Apatow, McKay, Dayton & Faris and Soderbergh as well as on Oliver Stone, Antoine Fuqua and Terry Zwigoff The Film Creator (talk) 01:09, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@The Film Creator: I got the Stone one covered. ZanderAlbatraz1145 (talk) 13:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply