User talk:Simfish

Hi Simfish,

That would be me, but I'm actually more from AoWH than Town's Crier. I don't have Autism or Aspergers, but my brain has some interesting abnormal functions that were (a long time ago) briefly labelled (probably incorrectly) as ADD.

Good to see you contributing to the greatest repository of human knowledge ever written - Alphax 07:22, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Alphax! I see now. THough I sometimes cannot resist returning to AoKH. ;)

Simfish 00:59, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

_johnlee from OD here. Talk pages generally aren't used for blogs — they're a handy method of private messaging in the Wiki style. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• How to edit a page
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! BTW, you can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Here are some things you can do to get started:

You can help improve the articles listed below! This list updates frequently, so check back here for more tasks to try. (See Wikipedia:Maintenance or the Task Center for further information.)

Help counter systemic bias by creating new articles on important women.

Help improve popular pages, especially those of low quality.

Again, welcome. Johnleemk | Talk 08:52, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the message johnlee! Just to let you know; I was actually trying to find a free blog host where users could reply to my comments. I found none, save for Xanga which frankly gives little privacy from classmates (I don't want classmates to see my blog!). And Wikipedia is perfect. I'm ascetic so fancy backgrounds don't matter to me.Simfish 01:43, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Ah; screw the blog. I just viewed your contributions and seen the "ready to delete" contribution for a user who abused Wikispace. And I shouldn't be abusing it. ;) I really shouldn't. I apologize.01:47, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Don't worry. We're generally tolerant of such things, provided you make decent contributions to Wikipedia, whether in helping to run it or just edit articles. What pisses most people off is when users who don't help out at all come and make Wikipedia their own little homepage. Otherwise, a blog here would generally be tolerated. Johnleemk | Talk 18:04, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

I see.

24.16.83.131 21:36, 27 Aug 2004 (UTC)

You might be interested by this. Johnleemk | Talk 10:14, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Thanks johnlee! Very much! Finally a group that understands who I actually am! Simfish 23:37, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Hi Simfish,

That would be me, but I'm actually more from AoWH than Town's Crier. I don't have Autism or Aspergers, but my brain has some interesting abnormal functions that were (a long time ago) briefly labelled (probably incorrectly) as ADD.

Good to see you contributing to the greatest repository of human knowledge ever written - Alphax 07:22, Oct 1, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, Alphax! I see now. THough I sometimes cannot resist returning to AoKH. ;)

Simfish 00:59, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Hi!

I just want to comment on some matters of style..

First, Wikipedia uses Capitalization Sparingly. Article titles should only be capitalized if it consists of proper nouns. The same goes for section headings.

Secondly, always start section headings at ==Two levels==. Do not ==Use a colon:== at the end of headings.

Oh, and one more thing, please use the Preview button to view intermediate editing steps.

Thanks, — David Remahl 22:58, 2 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for the info, I am now putting them into account when creating any new articles. Simfish 00:59, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

---

Are you the person who trashed Guatemala [1] this morning? ie 152.157.79.253, who has certainly been contributing to your user page, and appears, according to my IP locator, to be from a school in Everett, Washington. --SqueakBox 18:44, Mar 23, 2005 (UTC)

No, I edit my page from my school without logging in. Simfish 02:04, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

So these Special:Contributions 152.157.79.253 are not yours then? Do they belong to someone else? Or are possibly some of them yours, and some belong to someone else? I appreciate school computers are shared. Anyway, given that this IP number is being used for vandalism I strongly advise you to sign in when you use that IP address. --SqueakBox 02:08, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

No, I only edited my own user page from that IP address. Alright - I'll try to log in when editing my page from school in the future. Simfish 03:10, 24 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Cheers, --SqueakBox 03:57, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

I replied to your message on my talk. Christopherlin 23:54, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if you noticed, but you put that hi on his userpage. Make sure you put communications on talk pages in the future. Some people don't like it. Happy editing! Mgm|^(talk) 01:07, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)

He said on his userpage that it was fine - and he wanted someone to put something there. So I made that comment. Simfish 01:10, 1 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hey, simfish; are you an RSI05ers? In that case, drop me a line - I'm Jason Chu, RSI03, and an RSI'05 first-week TA.

Even if you're not, that's cool, too; good job on starting the RSI entry. I appreciate it. 216.158.31.195 19:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

No, I'm still too young for RSI. I was considering applying next year if I did not get accepted to an early entrance program. Simfish 23:27, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Even if you get accepted to an early entrance program, you can still get into RSI. One of my fellow RSI03ers attended MIT in the class of 2007. jglc | t | c 16:24, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oh, the problem is... that I'm going to university next year (I was planning on applying to RSI that year) through the early entrance program, thereby disqualifying me from RSI. The person you're speaking about went to RSI the summer before college, I would believe. Simfish 02:03, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I couldn't help but notice your Random Notes for Self noone should look at. My recommendation is to create a sub user page like User:Simfish/Random notes and put your stuff there.

By the way, if that was you, adding the link, sorry, I reverted it. You should log in when editing your user page! Especially if you're on a school computer. ;-) Ambush Commander 21:30, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion - done. Sometimes I'm so excited to post something I forget to log on but that really isn't a great idea all of the time. Simfish 02:19, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Be bold and fix it. *grins* - UtherSRG (talk) 23:54, August 18, 2005 (UTC)

I noticed you are categorized as a Wikipedian by alignment. If you are in to userboxes, there are now infoboxes available using a standard template. See the alignment category page for details. This is a copied announcement, please reply on My Talk Page or in the category talk if you have any questions. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 18:52, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

We must Expand the SSP Article! --BorisFromStockdale 23:38, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AND I AM A SSP REJECTEE W00T Simfish 04:06, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hgmain logo-l.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bestiege23 18:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit summaries to Talking birds and Budgerigar appear to be uncivil. Please remain polite and professional in your edit summaries and comments. Thank you. --Ginkgo100^talk 00:50, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you make me proud :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.109.103.252 (talk) 19:54, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Tony Attwood. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Attwood. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:17, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I'm testing =)

InquilineKea (talk) 08:13, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coldmoleculedeborah.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 09:42, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on John Marzluff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lemlinspire (talk) 04:02, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tapio Schneider requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lemlinspire (talk) 04:06, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lee Kump has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 03:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that in section headings, such as Honors and awards or External links, one should not capitalize an initial letter merely because its in the heading. The first letter is capitalized (except in rare cases where there is some special reason not to do that) and subsequent initials are in lower case except when there is a special reason (such as a person's name) to use a capital. This is codified in WP:MOS. Michael Hardy (talk) 04:10, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lori Marino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackfish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Arlan Richardson, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.ouhsc.edu/roca/OurPeople/ArlanRichardson,PhD.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Judith Campisi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~HackedBotato ^{Chat with me ♽ Contribs} 14:44, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Simfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Rafael de Cabo, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Rafael de Cabo to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Rberchie (talk) 14:48, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Simfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, John M. Sedivy, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want John M. Sedivy to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Rberchie (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2015 (UTC) Hello the references you gave do not talk talk about him as a person but rather his works.--Rberchie (talk) 14:54, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

João Pedro de Magalhães

added a link pointing to George Church

Steven N. Austad

added a link pointing to Georgia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Parker Conrad for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ormr2014 (talk) 21:44, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Simfish. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dean Simonton, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Dean Simonton to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Rberchie (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Ormr2014. Simfish, thanks for creating Cosmo (parrot)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Apparently, Cosmo is a bit of a celebrity and has been discussed in the news, scholarly articles and scientific journals. Please add more content and cite some of these sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Ormr2014 (talk) 02:49, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Phil Jaber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Non-Dropframe _talk 05:00, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Phil Jaber, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Non-Dropframe _talk 05:01, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Maye Musk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 16:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Errol Musk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — JJMC89 (T·E·C) 16:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on SimplyInsured requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged SimplyInsured for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 22:13, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Heap Analytics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Heap Analytics for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 22:14, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jacked: The Outlaw Story of Grand Theft Auto

added links pointing to Grand Theft Auto and Jack Thompson

2,4,5-trihydroxyamphetamine

added a link pointing to MDA

Elon Musk: Tesla, SpaceX, and the Quest for a Fantastic Future

added a link pointing to Tesla

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

302M (Wolf)

added a link pointing to National Geographic

Snootz Math Trek

added a link pointing to Theatrix

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jun Wang (scientist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -=# Amos E Wolfe ^talk #=- 08:10, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lindy Li has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable unless elected

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 06:39, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norgay Montes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norgay Montes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Savonneux (talk) 00:29, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Newcastle 85+ Study, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newcastle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim "Pee Wee" Martin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim "Pee Wee" Martin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 05:16, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ján Gerthofer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Musa Talk  07:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gustav Francsi for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Musa Talk  07:25, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Ján Režňák, Simfish!

Wikipedia editor BeowulfBrower just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Add categories and consider finding more info at https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/J%C3%A1n_Re%C5%BE%C5%88%C3%A1k

To reply, leave a comment on BeowulfBrower's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi, I'm Jamesmcardle. Simfish, thanks for creating Fraility index!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This is a very worthwhile article, but is currently too short, with insufficient referencing.There are authoritative papers and research that may referenced in this article (e.g Age Ageing (2012) 41 (2): 142-147.doi: 10.1093/ageing/afr182)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. sinarau (talk) 08:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ján Režňák, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern Front. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've declined the speedy for both of those right now as I am not sure of the notability requirements. I have posted at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Ján Gerthofer and. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Human3015. Simfish, thanks for creating Gustav Francsi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Improve the article otherwise it will get nominated for Prod or WP:AFD. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Human3015^TALK  02:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Human3015. Simfish, thanks for creating Ján Gerthofer!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi, thanks for contributing to Wikipedia, but improve this article. You can translate it from here, another language Wikipedia. Otherwise article will get nominated for WP:AFD. I'm also marking this article as unreviewed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Human3015^TALK  02:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please add a source and category.Xx236 (talk) 06:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Video games usually require three in-depth reviews in order to pass the general notability guideline for their own standalone articles. (The vetted vg reliable sources custom Google search is a good place to start.) If you can't find three sources, the page will likely end up deleted down the road. – czar 14:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Amphipols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congeners. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reason to think notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no reason to think notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 01:25, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Dear Simfish, thank you for your creation of Frank Albanese. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 22:39, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Human Longevity, Inc has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of biogerontologists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Sinclair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bill Bowes (venture capitalist) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Parrotz1461 (talk) 04:03, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Helen Hobbs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Natsume96 (talk) 10:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 993-994 carbon-14 spike, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solar storm. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article J147 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears too short and irrelevant

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Le Sanglier des Ardennes (talk) 07:35, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Timeline of Tesla Motors page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Tesla Motors, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tesla. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article LBT-3627 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

inadequate sourcing to show importance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 20:36, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NE 130th Street (Link station) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 01:52, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of online food delivery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sprig. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just added some citations and extra info - hope that's OK. Blythwood (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dick Spady requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 02:32, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you recently created this article, but you sourced it to some sort of a personal website, which is by default not a reliable source. As it turns out, the claim it makes was actually entirely false. Please review WP:RS to avoid these kinds of mistakes in the future. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 17:34, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for your contributions. It seems you've been running into difficulty with some recent articles, stubs that on face value fail to adequately demonstrate notability. I believe much of this stems from your using in some cases only a single sentence for an article. While Wikipedia is a work in progress, time-consuming and effort-draining deletion attempts and discussions can be spared if article creators invest a bit more effort into clearly demonstrating notability right off the bat, i.e. instead of simply saying so and so is a person who did X, say clearly why he/she is famous or noteworthy (there is a difference between doing something and being known for doing something: focus on the latter). In other words, put some effort into it. Perhaps strive to write at least 5 sentences, and add at least five categories to each article you create, even stubs. Adding an appropriate stub tag and infobox would help articles develop faster as well. Without a good foundation (even if an incomplete stub) other editors may not always be able to improve your stubs before speedy deletion, which would be a shame if the subject is truly notable, and wastes everyone's time. All the best, --Animalparty! (talk) 20:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Case Against Education has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not to be published until 2017 -- not yet notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 21:16, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Age of Em has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Robert Bilott requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Bilott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Bilott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Inventology: How We Dream Up Things That Change the World for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 00:16, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Microsoft, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Department of Justice. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Richard P. Von Herzen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WHOI. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Archetype is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Archetype until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AdrianGamer (talk) 11:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Timeline of Intel

added links pointing to P6, Haswell and Nehalem

CrunchFund

added a link pointing to Patrick Gallagher

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Simfish,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Philodina acuticornis for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. NeedAGoodUsername (talk) 18:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Data Collective

added a link pointing to Uber

Initialized Capital

added a link pointing to Y Combinator

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Singularity Hypotheses: A Scientific and Philosophical Assessment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Simfish,

You have suddenly become very active on Wikipedia lately. Inquiring minds want to know why. Shouldn't you be overwhelmed with work for school stuff?

Also, why do you like to create stub articles but refuse to indicate that they are stubs using the category intended for such?

--FeralOink (talk) 10:28, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Yvette Fay Francis-McBarnette requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. RES2773 (talk) 00:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Instagram, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Quarles. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Timeline of Dropbox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mailbox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Trifluoroketamine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, no reliable source coverage or Google Scholar results

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning (talk) 22:09, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

148th Avenue

added links pointing to Bellevue and Redmond

8th Street (Bellevue)<